en.wikipedia.org

User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 10 - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 5

←

→

Hey there, I saw you accepted this edit to the pending changes protected Dave Grohl article. This is by no means a vandalistic addition, so accepting it was by no means the wrong thing to do. However, this article, particularly the equipment section, is terribly lacking in sources. These type of edits are very common in articles about musicians, people see or think the musician uses this guitar or that effect pedal, they add it to the article, which in turn acts as sort of a promotion for that product (which obviously we don't want)... eventually the equipment section grows into this huge monstrosity of original research. For this reason I feel it's best if we prevent any further additions of unsourced material, and I have made a good-faith revert of the aforementioned edit. Thanks! — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah thanks for the explanation. I will be more careful when approving or denying edits on high visibility music-related articles in the future. Jinkinson (talk) 20:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello I noticed that you had added a category to my article Marc Y. Chenevert. I have been targeted by another editor that first didnt like how the copyright on my photos of the article was verified. I addressed that and they have been corrected and then he added a do not move banner to them for a watermark. Once that was all corrected he has now moved on to my article and has decided that I have some connection with the subject and when I addressed that he then added a number or tags and decided that if there were no discussion on the subject that that he would nominate the article for deletion. I think this would be a terrible loss as the subject person is very notable. Would you mind to join in on this discussion and see what you think about the issues that he LGA has brought up? Thanks so much. Mmb777e (talk) 12:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The article Vera Byers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Daffydavid (talk) 23:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Garfield may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Universal City, California USA (United States of America). It's Box Office Budget 50,000,000 (estimated. It's running time is 80 minutes. It's sequel, ''[[Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties]]''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, you made an edit here [1] but it seems to be a sentence fragment. It reads

bloggers such as David Gorski and Phil Plait, the latter of whom called Adams' commentary "obnoxious and loathsome."

IRWolfie- (talk) 09:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I have fixed it. Jinkinson (talk) 03:55, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of H. Hugh Fudenberg at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)