link.springer.com

Pudendal nerve recovery after a non-instrumented vaginal delivery - International Urogynecology Journal

  • ️Christiansen, J.
  • ️Fri Mar 01 1996

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate pudendal nerve function after a non-instrumented vaginal delivery. Seventeen primiparae women who had had a non-instrumented vaginal delivery were examined 3–5 days and 3 months after delivery. At both assessments pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was measured. The mean PNTML was found to decrease significantly from 2.64 ms in the first few days after delivery to 1.95 ms 3 months after delivery (P=0.00009). PNTML decreased in all but one of the 17 women during the observation period. Immediately after delivery 9 women (53%) had a pathological high PNTML value, which was normalized 3 months later in all but 1. It was concluded that pudendal nerve function is often impaired immediately after a non-instrumented vaginal delivery, but recovers in most women over a 3-month period.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN. Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:22–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tetzschner T, Sørensen M, Jønsson L, Lose G, Christiansen J. Delivery and pudendal nerve function. Submitted for publication

  3. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Setchel M. Risk factors in childbirth causing damage to pelvic floor innervation.Int J Colorectal Dis 1986:1:20–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith ARB, Warrel DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth. a neurophysiological study.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:770–779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Snooks SJ, Setchel M, Swash M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of pelvis floor sphincter musculature in childbrith.Lancet 1984;ii:546–550

    Google Scholar 

  6. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, Henry MM. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up.Br J Surg 1990;77:1358–1360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tetzschner T, Sørensen M, Rasmussen OR, Lose G, Christiansen J. Pudendal nerve damage increases the risk of fecal incontinence in women with anal sphincter rupture after childbirth.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995;74:434–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers J, Henry MM, Misiewics JJ. Disposable pudendal nerve stimulator: evaluation of the standard instrument and the new device.Gut 1988;29:1132–1133

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tetzschner T, Sørensen M, Rasmussen OR, Lose G, Christiansen J. Reliability of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Submitted for publication.

  10. Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Griffin JW, Philip L, Poduslo JF. Peripheral neuropathy. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1992:613–627

    Google Scholar 

  11. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, Henry MM. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor:Br J Surg 1990;77:1358–1360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith ARB, Warrell DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:770–779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, DK 2600, Glostrup, Denmark

    T. Tetzschner &  G. Lose (Consultant Gynecologist)

  2. Department of Surgery D, Glostrup County Hospital, University of Copenhagen, DK 2600, Glostrup, Denmark

    M. Sørensen

  3. Department of Surgery D, Herlev County Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

    J. Christiansen

Authors

  1. T. Tetzschner

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Sørensen

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Lose

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Christiansen

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Editorial Comment: This study evaluates pudendal nerve function following a non-instrumented vaginal delivery and its relation to urinary and fecal incontinence. It has been established by other investigators that vaginal delivery leads to a prolongation of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) [1,2]. Beyond reconfirming this fact, Tetzschner et al. find that PNTML returns toward normal values approximately 3 months postpartum. Clinically, this translates into the need to question patients regarding urinary or fecal incontinence in the postpartum period, and to consider further evaluation and treatment if the patient remains symptomatic 3 months following delivery.

About this article

Cite this article

Tetzschner, T., Sørensen, M., Lose, G. et al. Pudendal nerve recovery after a non-instrumented vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J 7, 102–104 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902382

Download citation

  • Issue Date: March 1996

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902382

Keywords