link.springer.com

On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates - Climate Dynamics

  • ️Bony, Sandrine
  • ️Sat Mar 23 2013

References

  • Andrews T, Forster P (2008) CO2 forcing induces semi-direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations. Geophys Res Lett 35:L04,802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews T, Gregory J, Webb M, Taylor K (2012) Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models. Geophys Res Lett 39(9):L09,712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius S (1896) On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 41(251):237–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block K, Mauritsen T (2013) Forcing and feedback in the MPI-ESM-LR coupled model under abruptly quadrupled CO2. J Adv Model Earth Syst (submitted)

  • Boer G, Yu B (2003) Climate sensitivity and climate state. Clim Dyn 21(2):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bony S, Dufresne J (2005) Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models. Geophys Res Lett 23:L20,806

    Google Scholar 

  • Bony S, Dufresne JL, Treut HL, Morcrette JJ, Senior C (2004) On dynamic and thermodynamic components of cloud changes. Clim Dyn 22:71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bony S, Colman R, Kattsov V, Allan R, Bretherton C, Dufresne J, Hall A, Hallegatte S, Holland M, Ingram W, et al (2006) How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J Clim 19(15):3445–3482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bony S, Stevens B, Held I, Mitchell J, Dufresne JL, Emanuel K, Friedlingstein P, Griffies S, Senior C (2013a) Carbon dioxide and climate: perspectives on a scientific assessment. In: Hurrel J, Asran G (eds) Climate science for serving society: research, modelling and prediction priorities. Springer, Monograph

  • Bony S, Bellon G, Klocke D, Sherwood S, Fermepin S, Denvil S (2013b) Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation. Nat Geosci (in press)

  • Cess R, Potter G, Blanchet J, Boer G, Del Genio A, Deque M, Dymnikov V, Galin V, Gates W, Ghan S, et al (1990) Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models. J Geophys Res 95(16):601,216

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney JG, et al (1979) Carbon dioxide and climate: a scientific assessment : report of an ad hoc study group on carbon dioxide and climate, woods hole, Massachusetts, July 23–27, 1979 to the climate research board, assembly of mathematical and physical sciences, National Research Council. National Academy of Sciences: available from Climate Research Board, http://books.google.com/books?id=cj0rAAAAYAAJ

  • Colman R, McAvaney B (2011) On tropospheric adjustment to forcing and climate feedbacks. Clim Dyn 36(9):1649–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denman K, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A, Ciais P, Cox P, Dickinson R, Hauglustaine D, Heinze C, Holland E, Jacob D, et al (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Solomon S, D Qin, M Manning, Z Chen, M Marquis, KB Averyt, MTignor and HL Miller (eds)]

  • Dufresne JL, Bony S (2008) An assessment of the primary sources of spread of global warming estimates from coupled atmosphere-ocean models. J Clim 21:5135–5144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey D, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe D, Myhre G, et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Solomon, S, D Qin, M Manning, Z Chen, M Marquis, KB Averyt, MTignor and HL Miller (eds)]

  • Gregory J, Webb M (2008) Tropospheric adjustment induces a cloud component in CO2 forcing. J Clim 21:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JM, Ingram WJ, Palmer MA, Jones GS, Thorpe PASRB, Lowe JA, Johns TC, Williams KD (2004) A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 31:L03,205

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R, Nazarenko L, Lacis A, Schmidt G, Russell G, Aleinov I, Bauer M, Bauer S, et al (2005) Efficacy of climate forcings. J Geophys Res 110(D18):D18,104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held I, Soden B (2000) Water vapor feedback and global warming 1. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25(1):441–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held IM, Shell KM (2012) Using relative humidity as a state variable in climate feedback analysis. J Clim 25(8):2578–2582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonko A, Shell K, Sanderson B, Danabasoglu G (2012) Climate feedbacks in CCSM3 under changing CO2 forcing. Part I: adapting the linear radiative kernel technique to feedback calculations for a broad range of forcings. J Clim 25(15):5260–5272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutti R, Hegerl G (2008) The equilibrium sensitivity of the earth’s temperature to radiation changes. Nat Geosci 1(11):735–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauritsen T, Graversen RG, Klocke D, Langen PL, Bjorn S, Tomassini L (2013) Climate feedback efficiency and synergy. Clim Dyn (submitted)

  • Randall D, Wood R, Bony S, Colman R, Fichefet T, Fyfe J, Kattsov V, Pitman A, Shukla J, Srinivasan J, et al (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. Clim Change 323

  • Shell KM, Kiehl JT, Shields CA (2008) Using the radiative kernel technique to calculate climate feedbacks in NCAR’s community atmospheric model. J Clim 21:2269–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soden B, Held I (2006) An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. J Clim 19(14):3354–3360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soden B, Held I, Colman R, Shell K, Kiehl J, Shields C (2008) Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J Clim 21(14):3504–3520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soden BJ, Broccoli AJ, Hemler RS (2004) On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback. J Clim 19:3661–3665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485–498. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb M, Senior C, Sexton D, Ingram W, Williams K, Ringer M, McAvaney B, Colman R, Soden B, Gudgel R, et al (2006) On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles. Clim Dyn 27(1):17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherald RT, Manabe S (1988) Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 45:1397–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, et al. (2012) CGILS: first results from an international project to understand the physical mechanisms of low cloud feedbacks in general circulation models. Bull Am Meteorol Soc (submitted)

Download references