Performance difference 32bit/64bit userland
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Performance difference 32bit/64bit userland
- From: Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:21:42 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1486487895@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
Hi there, while preparing other tests I created two installations on two hosts with identical hardware (LPARs on IBM POWER): - powerpc (64 bit kernel, 32 bit userland) - ppc64 (64 bit kernel, 64 bit userland) Both are up-to-date sid with systemd held to 232-10 (#852811). Now the surprise: Using the 32 bit userland, CPU bound operations like gzip or xz are significantly faster (5 to 10 percent). Comparing to x86 where i386 is 10 to 15 percent slower than amd64. Also running debootstrap showed a similar pattern. All tests were repeated a few times to rule out any caching or similar effects. This is not quite satisfying. Anyone an explanation for this? Christoph
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Performance difference 32bit/64bit userland
- From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: Performance difference 32bit/64bit userland
- From: Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola@libero.it>
- Re: Performance difference 32bit/64bit userland
- Prev by Date: Re: Firefox 51.0.1-1 on Debian Sid/experimental PowerPC (PPC32): Segmentation fault
- Next by Date: Re: A few questions about stretch ( testing ) on a PowerMac G5
- Previous by thread: Re: yaboot problem? OS won't load after install on a Power Mac G5
- Next by thread: Re: Performance difference 32bit/64bit userland
- Index(es):