Analysis of mechanized tunneling parameters to determine the overcutting characteristics | Konyukhov | Mining Science and Technology (Russia)

1. Potapova E.V. Typology of metro structures for the tasks of geotechnical risk classification. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2021;6(1):52-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2021-1-52-60

2. Mangushev R.A., Sapin D.A., Kirillov V. M. Effect of finite element type on ultimate subsidence of neighboring building foundations in numerical modeling of shoring of excavation. In: Soil Mechanics in Geotechnics and Foundation Engineering: Proceedings of the International Research-to-Practice Conference. Novocherkassk. 2018. P. 708–718 (In Russ.)

3. Kulikova E. Yu. Methodical principles for improving the ecological and technological reliability of urban underground structures. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2020;(6–1):176–185. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2020-61-0-176-185

4. Nikiforova N. S., Konnov A.V. Predicting deformations of the surrounding buildings foundations with regard to protective measures. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 2020;(6):7–12. (In Russ.)

5. Gong Zh., Li Y., Liu M., Tang C. A case study for large excavation constructed by open cutting with under mining method in Xuzhou, China. In: World Tunnel Digital Congress and Exhibition (WTC) 2020 and the 46th General Assembly. 11–17 September 2020. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2020. Pp. 721–724.

6. Hewitt P., Suthagaran V. Dealing with the challenges of ground response on deep urban excavations adjacent to underground transport infrastructure in Australia. In: World Tunnel Digital Congress and Exhibition (WTC) 2020 and the 46th General Assembly. 11–17 September 2020. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2020. Pp. 801–806.

7. Konyukhov D. S., Polyankin A. G., Kazachenko S.A. An analysis of the factors which influence geotechnical calculations and monitoring data agreement. In: Proceedings of International Tunneling Symposium in Turkey. Challenges of Tunneling. Istanbul, Turkey. 2017. Pp. 51–63.

8. Ustinov D.V. Impact of the enclosing massif model selection over the results of subway tunnels excavation modelling. Geotechnics. 2018;(5–6):34–50. (In Russ.)

9. Lee Ch.-J., Wu B.-R., Chiou Sh.-Y. Soil Movements Around a Tunnel in Soft Soils. In: Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China (A). China. 1999;23(2):235-247.

10. Bourget A. P. F., Chiriotti E., Patrinieri E. Evolution of risk management during an underground project’s life cycle. In: Peila D., Viggiani G., Celestino T. (eds.). Tunnels and Underground Cities: Engineering and Innovation meet Archaeology, Architecture and Art. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2019. Pp. 4375–4385. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429424441-463

11. Mangushev R.A., Nikiforova N. S. Process subsidence of buildings and structures in the underground construction affected zone. Мoscow: ASV Publishing House; 2017. 168 p. (In Russ.)

12. Discussion sessions. Session 2: Bored tunnels: Construction. In: Bakker K. J., Bezuijen A., Broere W., Kwast E.A. (eds.) Proc. of the 5th International symposium “Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground”. Netherlands, 2005. Pp. 945–950.

13. Tupikov M. M. Peculiarities of straining soil mass and structures during construction of shallow utility tunnels in urban conditions. [Ph.D. thesis in Engineering Science]. Мoscow: MGUPS Publishing House; 2011. 24 p. (In Russ.)

14. Mahdi S., Gastebled O., Khodr S. Back analysis of ground settlements induced by TBM excavation for the north extension of Paris metro, line 12. In: Peila D., Viggiani G., Celestino T. (eds.). Tunnels and Underground Cities: Engineering and Innovation meet Archaeology, Architecture and Art. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2019. Pp. 2606–2615. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031635-6

15. Mahdi S., Gastebled O., Ningre H., Senechal M. Grand Paris Express, Line 15 East – predictive damage analysis combining continuous settlement trough modelling, risk management, automated vulnerability checks and visualization in GIS. In: Peila D., Viggiani G., Celestino T. (eds.). Tunnels and Underground Cities: Engineering and Innovation meet Archaeology, Architecture and Art. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2019. Pp. 5855–5864. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031871-9

16. El Houari N., Allal M. A., Abou Bekr N. Numerical simulation of the mechanical response of the tunnels in the saturated soils by Plaxis. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering. 2011;5(1):9–31. URL: https://jjce.just.edu.jo/issues/show_paper.php?pid=171

17. Voznesensky A. S., Kidima-Mbombi L. K. Formation of synthetic structures and textures of rocks when simulating in COMSOL Multiphysics. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2021;6(2):65–72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2021-2-65-72

18. Ter-Martirosian A. Z., Kivliuk V. P., Isaev I. O., Shishkina V.V. Determination of the actual excess excavation ratio (section “Kosino” – “Yugo-Vostochnaya”). Construction and Geotechnics. 2021;12(2):5–14. https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9826/2021.2.01