nature.altmetric.com

Report for: Correction: Corrigendum: IGFBP-4 is an inhibitor of canonical Wnt signalling required for cardiogenesis

  • ️@altmetric
Title

Correction: Corrigendum: IGFBP-4 is an inhibitor of canonical Wnt signalling required for cardiogenesis

Published in

Nature, February 2014

DOI 10.1038/nature13003
Authors

Weidong Zhu, Ichiro Shiojima, Yuzuru Ito, Zhi Li, Hiroyuki Ikeda, Masashi Yoshida, Atsuhiko T. Naito, Jun-ichiro Nishi, Hiroo Ueno, Akihiro Umezawa, Tohru Minamino, Toshio Nagai, Akira Kikuchi, Makoto Asashima, Issei Komuro

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 46 34%
United States 7 5%
United Kingdom 2 1%
China 2 1%
Unknown 80 58%

Demographic breakdown

Type Count As %
Members of the public 131 96%
Scientists 6 4%
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.

All research outputs

#466,013

of 26,868,050 outputs

Outputs from Nature

#21,691

of 102,036 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#4,410

of 333,110 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Nature

#296

of 923 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 26,868,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 102,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 923 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.