electric-magnetic duality (Rev #10, changes) in nLab
Showing changes from revision #9 to #10: Added | Removed | Changed
Context
Physics
physics, mathematical physics, philosophy of physics
Surveys, textbooks and lecture notes
theory (physics), model (physics)
experiment, measurement, computable physics
-
-
-
Axiomatizations
-
Tools
-
Structural phenomena
-
Types of quantum field thories
-
Differential cohomology
Ingredients
Connections on bundles
Higher abelian differential cohomology
Higher nonabelian differential cohomology
Fiber integration
Application to gauge theory
Duality
-
abstract duality: opposite category,
-
concrete duality: dual object, dualizable object, fully dualizable object, dualizing object
Examples
-
between higher geometry/higher algebra
-
Langlands duality, geometric Langlands duality, quantum geometric Langlands duality
In QFT and String theory
Langlands correspondence
Contents
Idea
Electric-magnetic duality is a lift of Hodge duality from de Rham cohomology to ordinary differential cohomology.
Description
Consider a circle n-bundle with connection ∇\nabla on a space XX. Its higher parallel transport is the action functional for the sigma-model of (n−1)(n-1)-dimensional objects ((n−1)(n-1)-branes) propagating in XX.
For n=1n = 1 this is the coupling of the electromagnetic field to particles. For n=2n = 2 this is the coupling of the Kalb-Ramond field to strings.
The curvature F ∇∈Ω n+1(X)F_\nabla \in \Omega^{n+1}(X) is a closed (n+1)(n+1)-form. The condition that its image ⋆F ∇\star F_\nabla under the Hodge star operator is itself closed
d dR⋆F ∇=0 d_{dR} \star F_\nabla = 0
is the Euler-Lagrange equation for the standard (abelian Yang-Mills theory-action functional on the space of circle n-bundle with connection.
If this is the case, it makes sense to ask if ⋆F ∇\star F_\nabla itself is the curvature (d−(n+1))(d-(n+1))-form of a circle (d−(n+1)−1)(d-(n+1)-1)-bundle with connection ∇˜\tilde \nabla, where d=dimXd = dim X is the dimension of XX.
If such ∇˜\tilde \nabla exists, its higher parallel transport is the gauge interaction action functional for (d−n−3)(d-n-3)-dimensional objects propagating on XX.
In the special case of ordinary electromagnetism with n=1n=1 and d=4d = 4 we have that electrically charged 0-dimensional particles couple to ∇\nabla and magnetically charged (4−(1+1)−2)=0(4-(1+1)-2) = 0-dimensional particles couple to ∇˜\tilde \nabla.
In analogy to this case one calls generally the d−n−3d-n-3-dimensional objects coupling to ∇˜\tilde \nabla the magnetic duals of the (n−1)(n-1)-dimensional objects coupling to ∇\nabla.
Generalizations
For d=4d= 4 EM-duality is the special abelian case of S-duality for Yang-Mills theory. Witten and Kapustin argued that this is governed by the geometric Langlands correspondence.
Examples
-
In N=2 D=4 super Yang-Mills theory electric-magnetic duality is studied as Seiberg-Witten theory.
-
In heterotic string theory one considers 1-dimensional objects in d=10d=10-dimensional spaces electrically charged (under the Kalb-Ramond field). Their magnetic duals are 5-dimensional objects (fivebranes), studied in dual heterotic string theory.
duality in physics, duality in string theory
References
An It exposition was of originally the noticed relation in togeometric Langlands duality is given in
- P. Goddard, J. Nuyts, and David Olive, Gauge Theories And Magnetic Charge, Nucl. Phys. B125 (1977) 1-28.
that where electric charge in Yang-Mills theory takes values in the weight lattice of the gauge group, then magnetic charge takes values in the lattice of what is now called the Langlands dual group.
This led to the electric/magnetic duality conjecture formulation in
- Claus Montonen, David Olive, Magnetic Monopoles As Gauge Particles? Phys. Lett. B72 (1977) 117-120.
According to (Kapustin-Witten 06, pages 3-4) the observaton that the Montonen-Olive dual charge group coincides with the Langlands dual group is due to
- Michael Atiyah, private communication to Edward Witten, 1977
See also the references at S-duality.
The insight that the Montonen-Olive duality works more naturally in super Yang-Mills theory is due to
- David Olive, Edward Witten, Supersymmetry Algebras That Include Topological Charges, Phys. Lett. B78 (1978) 97-101.
and that it works particularly for N=4 D=4 super Yang-Mills theory is due to
- H. Osborn, Topological Charges For N=4N = 4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories And Monopoles Of Spin 1, Phys. Lett. B83 (1979) 321-326.
The observation that the ℤ 2\mathbb{Z}_2 electric/magnetic duality extends to an SL(2,ℤ)SL(2,\mathbb{Z})-action in this case is due to
-
John Cardy, E. Rabinovici, Phase Structure Of Zp Models In The Presence Of A Theta Parameter, Nucl. Phys. B205 (1982) 1-16;
-
John Cardy, Duality And The Theta Parameter In Abelian Lattice Models, Nucl. Phys. B205 (1982) 17-26.
-
A. Shapere and Frank Wilczek, Selfdual Models With Theta Terms, Nucl. Phys. B320 (1989) 669-695.
The understanding of this SL(2,ℤ)SL(2,\mathbb{Z})-symmetry as a remnant conformal transformation on a 6-dimensional principal 2-bundle-theory – the 6d (2,0)-superconformal QFT – compactified on a torus is described in
-
Edward Witten, pages 4-5 of Some Comments On String Dynamics, Proceedings of String95 (arXiv:hepth/9507121)
-
Edward Witten, On S-Duality in Abelian Gauge Theory (arXiv:hep-th/9505186)
-
Edward Witten, Conformal Field Theory In Four And Six Dimensions (arXiv:0712.0157) An exposition of the relation to geometric Langlands duality is given in
The relation of S-duality to geometric Langlands duality was understood in
- Anton Kapustin, Edward Witten, Electric-Magnetic Duality And The Geometric Langlands Program , Communications in number theory and physics, Volume 1, Number 1, 1–236 (2007) (arXiv:hep-th/0604151)
Exposition of this is in
- Edward Frenkel, What Do Fermat’s Last Theorem and Electro-magnetic Duality Have in Common? KITP talk 2011 (web)
Revision on July 1, 2014 at 05:00:27 by Urs Schreiber See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.