Sullivan model in nLab
Context
Rational homotopy theory
and
rational homotopy theory (equivariant, stable, parametrized, equivariant & stable, parametrized & stable)
dg-Algebra
Rational spaces
PL de Rham complex
Sullivan models
Contents
Idea
A Sullivan model of a rational space XX is a particularly well-behaved commutative dg-algebra quasi-isomorphic to the dg-algebra of Sullivan forms on XX. These Sullivan algebras are precisely the cofibrant objects in the standard model structure on dg-algebras.
Sullivan models are a central tool in rational homotopy theory.
Definition
Sullivan models are particularly well-behaved differential graded-commutative algebras that are equivalent to the dg-algebras of piecewise polynomial differential forms on topological spaces. Conversely, every rational space can be obtained from a dg-algebra and the minimal Sullivan algebras provide convenient representatives that correspond bijectively to rational homotopy types under this correspondence.
Abstractly, (relative) Sullivan models are the (relative) cell complexes in the standard model structure on dg-algebras.
We now describe this in detail. First some notation and preliminaries:
Definition
-
A graded vector space VV is of finite type if in each degree it is finite dimensional. In this case we write V *V^* for its degreewise dual.
-
A Grassmann algebra is of finite type if it is the Grassmann algebra ∧ •V *\wedge^\bullet V^* on a graded vector space of finite type
(the dualization here is just convention, that will help make some of the following constructions come out nicely).
-
A CW-complex is of finite type if it is built out of finitely many cells in each degree.
For VV a ℕ\mathbb{N}-graded vector space write ∧ •V\wedge^\bullet V for the Grassmann algebra over it. Equipped with the trivial differential d=0d = 0 this is a semifree dgc-algebra (∧ •V,d=0)(\wedge^\bullet V, d=0).
With kk our ground field we write (k,0)(k,0) for the corresponding dg-algebra, the tensor unit for the standard monoidal structure on dgAlgdgAlg. This is the Grassmann algebra on the 0-vector space (k,0)=(∧ •0,0)(k,0) = (\wedge^\bullet 0, 0).
Definition
(Sullivan algebras)
A relatived Sullivan algebra is a homomorphism of differential graded-commutative algebras that is an inclusion of the form
(A,d)↪(A⊗ k∧ •V,d′) (A,d) \hookrightarrow (A \otimes_k \wedge^\bullet V, d')
for (A,d)(A,d) any dgc-algebra and for VV some graded vector space, such that
-
there is a well ordered set JJ indexing a linear basis {v α∈V|α∈J}\{v_\alpha \in V| \alpha \in J\} of VV;
-
writing V <β≔span(v α|α<β)V_{\lt \beta} \coloneqq span(v_\alpha | \alpha \lt \beta) then for all basis elements v βv_\beta we have that
d′v β∈A⊗∧ •V <β. d' v_\beta \in A \otimes \wedge^\bullet V_{\lt \beta} \,.
This is called a minimal relative Sullivan algebra if in addition the condition
(α<β)⇒(degv α≤degv β) (\alpha \lt \beta) \Rightarrow (deg v_\alpha \leq deg v_\beta)
holds. For a Sullivan algebra (k,0)→(∧ •V,d)(k,0) \to (\wedge^\bullet V, d) relative to the tensor unit we call the semifree dgc-algebra (∧ •V,d)(\wedge^\bullet V,d) simply a Sullivan algebra, and we call it a minimal Sullivan algebra if (k,0)→(∧ •V,d)(k,0) \to (\wedge^\bullet V, d) is a minimal relative Sullivan algebra.
(e.g. Hess 06, def. 1.10, remark 1.11)
See also the section Sullivan algebras at model structure on dg-algebras.
Properties
As cofibrations
Proposition
Minimal Sullivan models are unique up to isomorphism.
e.g Hess 06, prop 1.18.
Rationalization
Theorem
Consider the derived adjunction
Ho(Top)≃Ho(sSet)⊥⟶ℝΩ poly •⟵𝕃K polyHo((dgcAlg ℚ,≥0) op) Ho(Top) \simeq Ho(sSet) \underoverset {\underset{\mathbb{R} \Omega^\bullet_{poly}}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{\mathbb{L} K_{poly} }{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} Ho( (dgcAlg_{\mathbb{Q}, \geq 0})^{op} )
induced from the of the PL de Rham complex-Quillen adjunction
(dgcAlg ℚ,≥0proj) op⊥⟶K poly⟵Ω poly •sSet Quillen (dgcAlg_{\mathbb{Q}, \geq 0}_{proj})^{op} \underoverset {\underset{K_{poly}}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{\Omega^\bullet_{poly}}{\longleftarrow}} {\bot} sSet_{Quillen}
(this theorem).
Then: On the full subcategory Ho(Top ℚ,≥1 fin)Ho(Top_{\mathbb{Q}, \geq 1}^{fin}) of nilpotent rational topological spaces of finite type this adjunction restricts to an equivalence of categories
Ho(Top ℚ,>1 fin)≃⟶ℝΩ poly •⟵𝕃K polyHo((dgcAlg ℚ,>1 fin) op). Ho(Top_{\mathbb{Q}, \gt 1}^{fin}) \underoverset {\underset{\mathbb{R} \Omega^\bullet_{poly}}{\longrightarrow}} {\overset{\mathbb{L} K_{poly} }{\longleftarrow}} {\simeq} Ho( (dgcAlg_{\mathbb{Q}, \gt 1}^{fin})^{op} ) \,.
In particular the derived adjunction unit
X⟶K poly(Ω pwpoly •(X)) X \longrightarrow K_{poly}(\Omega^\bullet_{pwpoly}(X))
exhibits the rationalization of XX.
This is the fundamental theorem of dgc-algebraic rational homotopy theory, see there for more.
It follows that the cochain cohomology of the cochain complex of piecewise polynomial differential forms on any topological, hence equivalently that of any of its Sullivan models, coincides with its ordinary cohomology with coefficients in the rational numbers:
Theorem
Let (∧ •V *,d V)(\wedge^\bullet V^*, d_V) be a minimal Sullivan model of a simply connected rational topological space XX. Then there is an isomorphism
π •(X)≃V \pi_\bullet(X) \simeq V
between the homotopy groups of XX and the generators of the minimal Sullivan model.
e.g. Hess 06, theorem 1.24.
Relation to nilpotent L ∞L_\infty-algebras
Under the formal duality between L ∞ L_\infty -algebras and their Chevalley-Eilenberg dgc-algebras, the connected Sullivan models correspond bijectively to connective nilpotent L ∞ L_\infty -algebras (Berglund 2015, Thm. 2.3).
Relation to Whitehead products
See at the co-binary Sullivan differential is the dual Whitehead product.
Examples
References
Original articles:
-
Dennis Sullivan, Differential forms and the topology of manifolds, in Proc. International Conf.: Manifolds Tokyo (1973), Univ. Tokyo Press (1975) 37-49 [pdf, pdf]
-
Alan J. Deschner, Sullivan’s theory of minimal models, MSc thesis, Univ. British Columbia (1976) [doi:10.14288/1.0080132, pdf]
-
Dennis Sullivan, Infinitesimal computations in topology, Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 47 (1977), p. 269-331 (numdam:PMIHES_1977__47__269_0)
-
Aldridge Bousfield, Victor Gugenheim, On PL deRham theory and rational homotopy type, Memoirs of the AMS, vol. 179 (1976) (ams:memo-8-179)
-
Phillip Griffiths, John Morgan, Rational Homotopy Theory and Differential Forms, Progress in Mathematics Volume 16, Birkhauser (2013) (doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8468-4)
Review and application:
-
Steve Halperin, Lectures on minimal models, Mem. Soc. Math. Franc. no 9/10 (1983) (doi:10.24033/msmf.294)
-
Yves Félix, Stephen Halperin, Jean-Claude Thomas, Chapter II of: Rational Homotopy Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 205, Springer-Verlag, 2000 (doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0105-9)
-
Kathryn Hess, around def 1.10 of Rational homotopy theory: a brief introduction (arXiv:math.AT/0604626)
-
Luc Menichi, Rational homotopy – Sullivan models, in: Free Loop Spaces in Geometry and Topology, IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys., EMS (2015) [arXiv:1308.6685, doi:10.4171/153]
-
Yves Félix, Steve Halperin, Rational homotopy theory via Sullivan models: a survey, Notices of the International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians Volume 5 (2017) Number 2 (arXiv:1708.05245, doi:10.4310/ICCM.2017.v5.n2.a3)
Dual interpretation as nilpotent L ∞ L_\infty -algebras:
- Alexander Berglund, Def. 2.1 in: Rational homotopy theory of mapping spaces via Lie theory for L ∞L_\infty algebras, Homology, Homotopy and Applications, Volume 17 (2015) Number 2 (arXiv:1110.6145, doi:10.4310/HHA.2015.v17.n2.a16)
Last revised on June 21, 2023 at 16:40:38. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.