2-site (changes) in nLab
Showing changes from revision #8 to #9: Added | Removed | Changed
This entry is about the notion of site in 2-category theory. For the notion “bisite” of a 1-categorical site equipped with two coverages see instead separated presheaf.
Context
(∞,2)(\infty,2)-Topos theory
Truncations
2-Category theory
Definitions
Transfors between 2-categories
Morphisms in 2-categories
Structures in 2-categories
Limits in 2-categories
Structures on 2-categories
Contents
Idea
The notion of 2-site is the generalization of the notion of site to the higher category theory of 2-categories (bicategories).
Over a 2-site one has a 2-topos of 2-sheaves.
Definition
A coverage on a 2-category CC consists of, for each object U∈CU\in C, a collection of families (f i:U i→U) i(f_i: U_i\to U)_i of morphisms with codomain UU, called covering families, such that
- If (f i:U i→U) i(f_i:U_i\to U)_i is a covering family and g:V→Ug:V\to U is a morphism, then there exists a covering family (h j:V j→V) j(h_j:V_j\to V)_j such that each composite gh jg h_j factors through some f if_i, up to isomorphism.
This is the 2-categorical analogue of the 1-categorical notion of coverage introduced in the Elephant.
A 2-category equipped with a coverage is called a 2-site.
Examples
-
If CC is a regular 2-category, then the collection of all singleton families (f:V→U)(f:V\to U), where ff is eso, forms a coverage called the regular coverage.
-
Likewise, if CC is a coherent 2-category, the collection of all finite jointly-eso families forms a coverage called the coherent coverage.
-
On CatCat, the canonical coverage consists of all families that are jointly essentially surjective on objects.
Saturation conditions
A pre-Grothendieck coverage on a 2-category is a coverage satisfying the following additional conditions:
-
If f:V→Uf:V\to U is an equivalence, then the one-element family (f:V→U)(f:V\to U) is a covering family.
-
If (f i:U i→U) i∈I(f_i:U_i\to U)_{i\in I} is a covering family and for each ii, so is (h ij:U ij→U i) j∈J i(h_{i j}:U_{i j} \to U_i)_{j\in J_i}, then (f ih ij:U ij→U) i∈I,j∈U i(f_i h_{i j}:U_{i j}\to U)_{i\in I, j\in U_i} is also a covering family.
This is the 2-categorical version of a Grothendieck pretopology (minus the common condition of having actual pullbacks).
Now, a sieve on an object U∈CU\in C is defined to be a functor R:C op→CatR:C^{op}\to Cat with a transformation R→C(−,U)R\to C(-,U) which is objectwise fully faithful (equivalently, it is a fully faithful morphism in [C op,Cat][C^{op},Cat]). Equivalently, it may be defined as a subcategory of the slice 2-category C/UC/U which is closed under precomposition with all morphisms of CC.
Every family (f i:U i→U) i(f_i\colon U_i\to U)_i generates a sieve by defining R(V)R(V) to be the full subcategory of C(V,U)C(V,U) on those g:V→Ug:V\to U such that g≅f ihg \cong f_i h for some ii and some h:V→U ih:V\to U_i. The following observation is due to StreetCBS.
Lemma
A 2-presheaf X:C op→CatX:C^{op}\to Cat is a 2-sheaf for a covering family (f i:U i→U) i(f_i:U_i\to U)_i if and only if
X(U)≃[C op,Cat](C(−,U),X)→[C op,Cat](R,X)X(U) \simeq[C^{op},Cat](C(-,U),X) \to [C^{op},Cat](R,X)
is an equivalence, where RR is the sieve on UU generated by (f i:U i→U) i(f_i:U_i\to U)_i.
Therefore, just as in the 1-categorical case, it is natural to restrict attention to covering sieves. We define a Grothendieck coverage on a 2-category CC to consist of, for each object UU, a collection of sieves on UU called covering sieves, such that
-
If RR is a covering sieve on UU and g:V→Ug:V\to U is any morphism, then g *(R)g^*(R) is a covering sieve on VV.
-
For each UU the sieve M UM_U consisting of all morphisms into UU (the sieve generated by the singleton family (1 U)(1_U)) is a covering sieve.
-
If RR is a covering sieve on UU and SS is an arbitrary sieve on UU such that for each f:V→Uf:V\to U in RR, f *(S)f^*(S) is a covering sieve on VV, then SS is also a covering sieve on UU.
Here if RR is a sieve on UU and g:V→Ug:V\to U is a morphism, g *(R)g^*(R) denotes the sieve on VV consisting of all morphisms hh into VV such that ghg h factors, up to isomorphism, through some morphism in RR.
As in the 1-categorical case, one can then show that every coverage generates a unique Grothendieck coverage having the same 2-sheaves.
Properties
-
The 2-category of 2-sheaves on a 2-site is a Grothendieck 2-topos.
-
If CC is a 1-category regarded as a 2-category with only identity 2-morphisms, then a coverage (pretopology, topology) on CC reduces to the usual notion of coverage, Grothendieck pretopology, or Grothendieck topology.
References
Strict 2-sites were considered in
- Ross Street, Two-dimensional sheaf theory J. Pure Appl. Algebra 23 (1982), no. 3, 251-270, MR83d:18014, doi
Bicategorical 2-sites in
- Ross Street, Characterization of Bicategories of Stacks, MR84d:18006, p. 282-291 in: Category theory (Gummersbach 1981) Springer LNM 962, 1982
See also StreetCBS.
More discussion is in
Last revised on July 31, 2018 at 08:55:32. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.