delooping (changes) in nLab
Showing changes from revision #39 to #40: Added | Removed | Changed
Context
(∞,1)(\infty,1)-Category theory
Background
Basic concepts
-
equivalences in/of (∞,1)(\infty,1)-categories
Universal constructions
Local presentation
Theorems
Extra stuff, structure, properties
Models
Stable homotopy theory
Ingredients
Contents
Contents
Idea
The delooping of an object AA is, if it exists, a uniquely pointed object BA\mathbf{B} A such that AA is the loop space object of BA\mathbf{B} A:
A≃Ω(BA) A \simeq \Omega(\mathbf{B} A)
In particular, if A=GA = G is a group then its delooping
-
in the context Top is the classifying space ℬG\mathcal{B}G
-
in the context ∞-Grpd is the one-object groupoid BG\mathbf{B}G.
Under the homotopy hypothesis these two objects are identified: the geometric realization of the groupoid BG\mathbf{B}G is the classifying space ℬG\mathcal{B}G:
|BG|≃ℬG. |\mathbf{B}G| \simeq \mathcal{B}G \,.
Definition
Loop space objects are defined in any (∞,1)-category C\mathbf{C} with homotopy pullbacks: for XX any pointed object of C\mathbf{C} with point *→X{*} \to X, its loop space object is the homotopy pullback ΩX\Omega X of this point along itself:
ΩX → * ↓ ↓ * → X. \array{ \Omega X &\to& {*} \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ {*} &\to& X } \,.
Conversely, if AA is given and a homotopy pullback diagram
A → * ↓ ↓ * → BA \array{ A &\to& {*} \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ {*} &\to& \mathbf{B}A }
exists, with the point *→BA{*} \to \mathbf{B} A being essentially unique, by the above AA has been realized as the loop space object of BA\mathbf{B} A
A=ΩBA A = \Omega \mathbf{B} A
and we say that BA\mathbf{B} A is the delooping of AA.
See the section delooping at groupoid object in an (∞,1)-category for more.
If C\mathbf{C} is even a stable (∞,1)-category then all deloopings exist and are then also denoted ΣA\Sigma A and called the suspension of AA.
Characterization of deloopable objects
In section 6.1.3 of
a definition of groupoid object in an (infinity,1)-category C\mathbf{C} is given as a homotopy simplicial object, i.e. a (infinity,1)-functor
C:Δ op→C C : \Delta^{op} \to \mathbf{C}
⋯C 2⇉→C 1⇉C 0 \cdots C_2 \stackrel{\to}\rightrightarrows C_1 \rightrightarrows C_0
satisfying certain conditions (prop. 6.1.2.6) which are such that if C 0=*C_0 = {*} is the point we have an internal group in a homotopical sense, given by an object C 1C_1 equipped with a coherently associative multiplication operation C 1×C 1→C 1C_1 \times C_1 \to C_1 generalizing that of Stasheff H-space from the (∞,1)(\infty,1)-category Top to arbitrary (∞,1)(\infty,1)-categories.
Lurie calls the groupoid object CC an effective groupoid object in an (infinity,1)-category precisely if it arises as the delooping, in the above sense, of some object BC\mathbf{B}C.
One of the characterizing properties of an (infinity,1)-topos is that every groupoid object in it is effective.
This is the analog of Stasheff’s classical result about H-spaces.
See the remark at the very end of section 6.1.2 in HTT.
Examples
Topological loop spaces
For C=C = Top the (infinity,1)-category of topological spaces, a space is deloopable if it is an A-infinity-space and hence homotopy equivalent to a loop space.
Delooping of a group to a groupoid
Let GG be a group regarded as a discrete groupoid in the (∞,1)-topos ∞Grpd of ∞-groupoids.
Then BG\mathbf{B} G exists and is, up to equivalence, the groupoid
-
with a single object •\bullet,
-
with Hom BG(•,•)=GHom_{\mathbf{B} G}(\bullet, \bullet) = G, or equivalently Aut BG(•)=GAut_{\mathbf{B}G}(\bullet) = G,
-
and with composition of morphisms in BG\mathbf{B} G being given by the product operation in the group.
More informally but more suggestively we may write
BG={•→g•|g∈G} \mathbf{B} G = \{ \bullet \stackrel{g}{\to} \bullet | g \in G\}
or
BG={•⟲g|g∈G} \mathbf{B}G = \{ \bullet \righttoleftarrow g \;|\; g \in G \}
to emphasize that there is really only a single object.
Notice how the homotopy pullback works in this simple case:
the universal 2-cell η\eta
G → * ↓ ⇓ η ↓ * → BG \array{ G &\to& {*} \\ \downarrow &\Downarrow^{\eta}& \downarrow \\ {*} &\to& \mathbf{B}G }
filling this 2-limit diagram is the natural transformation from the constant functor
G→*→BG G \to {*} \to \mathbf{B}G
to itself, whose component map
η:Obj(G)→Mor(BG) \eta : Obj(G) \to Mor(\mathbf{B}G)
is just the identity map, using that Obj(G)=GObj(G) = G and Mor(BG)=GMor(\mathbf{B}G) = G.
Deloopings of higher categorical structures
There is also a notion of delooping which takes a pointed (n,k+1)(n, k+1)-category CC to a pointed (n+1,k)(n+1, k)-category BC\mathbf{B} C in which BC\mathbf{B} C has a single 00-cell •\bullet, and where hom(•,•)=C\hom(\bullet, \bullet) = C. This is a tautological construction if one accepts the delooping hypothesis, which views a (n,k+1)(n, k+1)-category CC as a special type of (n+k+1)(n+k+1)-category, namely a pointed kk-connected (n+k+1)(n+k+1)-category: by viewing such as a fortiori a pointed (k−1)(k-1)-connected (n+k+1)(n+k+1)-category, we get the delooping BC\mathbf{B} C.
This is just a generalization of the fact that a monoid MM gives rise to a one-object category (which we are denoting BM\mathbf{B} M). For an important example: a monoidal category MM has an associated delooping bicategory BM\mathbf{B} M, where
-
BM\mathbf{B} M has a single 00-cell •\bullet,
-
the 11-cells •→•\bullet \to \bullet of BM\mathbf{B} M are named by objects of MM, and the composite of •→a•→b•\bullet \stackrel{a}{\to} \bullet \stackrel{b}{\to} \bullet is •→a⊗b•\bullet \stackrel{a \otimes b}{\to} \bullet (using the monoidal product ⊗\otimes of MM),
-
the 22-cells of BM\mathbf{B} M are similarly named by morphisms of MM; the vertical composition of 22-cells in BM\mathbf{B} M is given by composition of morphisms of MM, and the horizontal composition of 22-cells in BM\mathbf{B} M is given by taking the monoidal product of the morphisms that name them in MM.
Along similar lines, the delooping of a braided monoidal category produces a monoidal bicategory, and delooping of that is a tricategory or (weak) 33-category. See delooping hypothesis for more.
-
loop space object, free loop space object,
-
delooping
-
References
Discussion in homotopy type theory:
-
Ulrik Buchholtz, J. Daniel Christensen, Jarl G. Taxerås Flaten, Egbert Rijke, Central H-spaces and banded types [[arXiv:2301.02636](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02636)]
-
David Wärn, Eilenberg-MacLane spaces and stabilisation in homotopy type theory [[arXiv:2301.03685](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03685)]
Last revised on September 19, 2023 at 05:52:43. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.