empty subset (changes) in nLab
Showing changes from revision #2 to #3: Added | Removed | Changed
Given a set AA, the empty subset of AA, denoted ∅ A\empty_A, is the subset of AA defined by the property that, for every element xx of AA, it is false that xx belongs to ∅ A\empty_A.
Context
Foundations
The basis of it all
Set theory
- fundamentals of set theory
- material set theory
- presentations of set theory
- structuralism in set theory
- class-set theory
- constructive set theory
- algebraic set theory
Foundational axioms
-
basic constructions:
-
strong axioms
-
further
Removing axioms
Mathematics
-
-
- geometry (general list), topology (general list)
- general topology
- differential topology
- differential geometry
- algebraic geometry
- noncommutative algebraic geometry
- noncommutative geometry (general flavour)
- higher geometry
The underlying set (or shadow) of any empty subset is the empty set. That is, if we interpret ∅ A\empty_A as an injective function S↪AS \hookrightarrow A, then the source SS of this function is the empty set.
Contents
In the usual framework of material set theory, every empty subset is identical to the empty set. For this reason, it is common to write simply ∅\empty instead of ∅ A\empty_A. Even from a structural perspective, this is an abuse of language that is unlikely to cause any confusion. Given a set AA, the empty subset of AA, denoted ∅ A\empty_A, is the subset of AA defined by the property that, for every element xx of AA, it is false that xx belongs to ∅ A\empty_A. The underlying set (or shadow) of any empty subset is the empty set. That is, if we interpret ∅ A\empty_A as an injective function S↪AS \hookrightarrow A, then the source SS of this function is the empty set. In the usual framework of material set theory, every empty subset is identical to the empty set. For this reason, it is common to write simply ∅\empty instead of ∅ A\empty_A. Even from a structural perspective, this is an abuse of language that is unlikely to cause any confusion. In the context of topology, we often speak of the empty subspace. In point-set topology, this is indeed an empty subset of the set of points, but in point-free topology, a space is not necessarily the empty space just because it has no points, and the empty subspace is similarly subtle.Idea
Last revised on October 4, 2019 at 08:58:27. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.