spherical object (changes) in nLab
Showing changes from revision #8 to #9: Added | Removed | Changed
Context
Homotopy theory
homotopy theory, (∞,1)-category theory, homotopy type theory
flavors: stable, equivariant, rational, p-adic, proper, geometric, cohesive, directed…
models: topological, simplicial, localic, …
see also algebraic topology
Introductions
Definitions
Paths and cylinders
Homotopy groups
Basic facts
Theorems
Contents
Idea
Spherical objects in a general pointed model category play the role of the spheres in TopTop.
Spherical objects
Let 𝒞\mathcal{C} be a pointed model category.
Examples
Examples
-
The spheres form the obvious examples of spherical objects in the category TopTop, but the rational spheres give other examples.
-
In the category of path connected pointed spaces with action of a discrete group, Gr.Top 0 *Gr.Top^*_0 and space of form S G n=⋁ GS nS^n_G= \bigvee_G S^n is a spherical object.(see Baues, 1991, ref. below, p.273).
-
Any rational sphere is a sphere object (in a suitable category for rational homotopy theory).
-
Let TT be a contractible locally finite 1-dimensional simplicial complex, with T 0T^0 its 0-skeleton. Let ϵ:E′T 0\epsilon : E'T^0 be a finite-to-one function. By S ϵ nS^n_\epsilon we mean the space obtained by attaching an nn-sphere to the vertices of TT with at vertex vv, the spheres attached to vv being indexed by ϵ −1(v)\epsilon^{-1}(v). This space S ϵ nS^n_\epsilon is a spherical object in the proper category, Proper ∞ TProper_\infinity^T, of TT-based spaces. (In this context TT is acting as the analogue of the base point. It gives a base tree within the spaces. This is explored a bit more in proper homotopy theory.)
For instance, take T=ℝ ≥0T = \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}, made up of an infinite number of closed unit intervals (end-to-end), then S ϵ nS^n_\epsilon will be the infinite string of spheres considered in the entry on the Brown-Grossmann homotopy groups? if we take ϵ\epsilon to be the identity function on T 0T^0.
Definition
By a family of spherical objects for 𝒞\mathcal{C} is meant a collection of spherical objects in 𝒞\mathcal{C} closed under suspension.
The theory, theoryΠ 𝒜\Pi_\mathcal{A}
Let 𝒜\mathcal{A} be such a family of spherical objects. Let Π 𝒜\Pi_\mathcal{A} denote the full subcategory of Ho(𝒞)Ho(\mathcal{C}), whose objects are the finite coproducts of objects from 𝒜\mathcal{A}.
Example
For 𝒜={S n} n=1 ∞\mathcal{A} = \{S^n\}^\infty_{n=1} in TopTop, Π 𝒜=Π\Pi_\mathcal{A} = \Pi, the theory of Pi-algebras.
Of course, Π 𝒜\Pi_\mathcal{A} is a finite product theory in the sense of algebraic theories, and the corresponding models/algebras/modules are called:
Π 𝒜\Pi_\mathcal{A}-algebras
We thus have that these are the product preserving functors Λ:Π 𝒜 op→Set *\Lambda : \Pi_\mathcal{A}^{op}\to Set_*. Morphisms of Π 𝒜\Pi_\mathcal{A}-algebras are simply the natural transformations. This gives a category Π 𝒜−Alg\Pi_\mathcal{A}-Alg.
Properties
- Such a Π 𝒜\Pi_\mathcal{A}-algebra, Λ\Lambda, is determined by its values Λ(A)∈Set *\Lambda(A)\in Set_* for AA in 𝒜\mathcal{A}, together with, for every ξ::A→⨆ i∈IA i \xi \xi\colon : A \to \bigsqcup_{i\in I}A_i in Π 𝒜\Pi_\mathcal{A}, a map
ξ *::∏Λ(A i)→Λ(A). \xi^* \xi^*\colon : \prod \Lambda(A_i)\to \Lambda(A).
- The object AA being a (homotopy) cogroup, Λ(A)\Lambda(A) is a group (but beware the ξ *\xi^* need not be group homomorphisms).
Example
If XX is in 𝒞\mathcal{C}, define π 𝒜(X):=[−,X] Ho(𝒞):Π 𝒜 op→Set *\pi_\mathcal{A}(X):= [-,X]_{Ho(\mathcal{C})} : \Pi_{\mathcal{A}}^{op}\to Set_*. This is the homotopy Π 𝒜\Pi_{\mathcal{A}}-algebra of XX. As with Π\Pi-algebras, there is a realisablity problem, i.e., given Λ\Lambda, find a XX and an isomorphism, π 𝒜(X)≅Λ\pi_\mathcal{A}(X)\cong \Lambda. The realisability problem is discussed in Baues-Blanc (2010) (see below).
References
Spherical objects are considered in
- Hans-Joachim Baues and David Blanc, Comparing cohomology obstructions, (2010), Arxiv (to appear JPAA).
Examples are given in earlier work by Baues and by Blanc.
The group action case is in
- Hans-Joachim Baues, Combinatorial Homotopy and 4-Dimensional Complexes, de Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics 2, Walter de Gruyter, (1991).
The example from proper homotopy theory is discussed in
- H.-J. Baues and Antonio Quintero, Infinite Homotopy Theory, K-monographs in mathematics, Volume 6, Kluwer, 2001.
Last revised on August 18, 2011 at 00:23:06. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.