zeta function (changes) in nLab

Showing changes from revision #25 to #26: Added | Removed | Changed

Contents

Idea

The concept of zeta function originates in number theory, but to get an idea of what they “really are” it is helpful to proceed anachronistically:

ζ\zeta-functions are meromorphic functions s↦ζ(s)s \mapsto \zeta(s) on the complex plane , which behave like likeanalytic continuations of traces of powers

s↦Tr(1H) s s \mapsto Tr \left(\frac{1}{H}\right)^s

of suitable elliptic differential operators HH (in physics these are regularized traces of Feynman propagators leading to expressions for vacuum amplitudes), which means that for sufficiently nice such HH these are analytic continuations in ss of sums of the form

s↦∑λλ −s, s \mapsto \underset{\lambda}{\sum} \lambda^{-s} \,,

where the summation is over the eigenvalues λ\lambda of HH.

Indeed, such zeta functions of elliptic differential operators constitutes one class of examples of zeta functions. Of particular interest is the case where HH is a Laplace operator of a hyperbolic manifold and in particular on a hyperbolic Riemann surface, for that case one obtains the zeta function of a Riemann surface, in particular the Selberg zeta function.

In modern language one also speaks of L-functions. Where a zeta function of some space is like the Feynman propagator of the canonical Laplace operator of that space, an L-function is defined from an extra “twisting” information such as that of a flat bundle/local system of coefficients on the space (and is hence like the Feynman propagator of the corresponding twisted/coupled Laplace operator). The major properties satisfied by anything that qualifies as a zeta function or L-functions are: these are meromorphic functions s↦L(s)s \mapsto L(s) on the complex plane such that

1. for ℜ(s)>1\Re(s) \gt 1 they have a converging series expansion of the above form, and/or a multiplicative series expression, the Euler product;

2. such that analytic continuation of the series expression exists to a meromorphic function L(−)L(-) on the complex plane;

3. and such that the result satisfies a functional equation which says that the product L^\hat L of LL with some correcion functions satisfies L^(1−s)=L^(s)\hat L(1-s) = \hat L(s).

Proceeding from the above class of examples in complex analytic geometry one may wonder if there are analogs also in arithmetic geometry. Indeed, by the function field analogy there are. All the way down “on Spec(Z)” the analog of the Selberg zeta function is the Riemann zeta function, which historically is the first of all zeta functions, defined by analytic continuation of the series

s↦∑n=1∞n −s. s \mapsto \underoverset{n = 1}{\infty}{\sum} n^{-s} \,.

The Riemann hypothesis conjectures a characterization of the roots of this zeta function and is regarded as one of the outstanding problems in mathematics. It has evident analogs for all other zeta functions (for some of which it has been proven).

More generally, over arithmetic curves which are spectra of rings of integers of more general number fields, the Riemann zeta function has generalization to the Artin L-functions defined intrinsically in terms of characteristic polynomials of Galois representations. When the Galois representation is 1-dimensional, then the Artin L-function may be expressed (by “Artin reciprocity”) in terms of “more arithmetic” data by Dirichlet L-functions and Hecke L-functions. When the Galois representation is higher dimensional, then the Langlands correspondence conjecture asserts that the Artin L-function may be expressed “arithmetically” as the automorphic L-function of an automorphic form.

Similarly on arithmetic curves given by function fields there is the Goss zeta function and in higher dimensional arithmetic geometry the Weil zeta function, famous from the Weil conjectures. The

When interpreting the Frobenius morphisms that appear in the Artin L-functions geometrically as flows (as discussed at Borger’s arithmetic geometry – Motivation) then this induces an evident analog of zeta function of a dynamical system. This in turn has strong analogies with Alexander polynomials in knot theory (see at arithmetic topology).

context/function field analogy	theta function θ\theta	zeta function ζ\zeta (= Mellin transform of θ(0,−)\theta(0,-))	L-function L zL_{\mathbf{z}} (= Mellin transform of θ(z,−)\theta(\mathbf{z},-))	eta function η\eta	special values of L-functions
physics/2d CFT	partition function θ(z,τ)=Tr(exp(−τ⋅(D z) 2))\theta(\mathbf{z},\mathbf{\tau}) = Tr(\exp(-\mathbf{\tau} \cdot (D_\mathbf{z})^2)) as function of complex structure τ\mathbf{\tau} of worldsheet Σ\Sigma (hence polarization of phase space) and background gauge field/source z\mathbf{z}	analytically continued trace of Feynman propagator ζ(s)=Tr reg(1(D 0) 2) s=∫ 0 ∞τ s−1θ(0,τ)dτ\zeta(s) = Tr_{reg}\left(\frac{1}{(D_{0})^2}\right)^s = \int_{0}^\infty \tau^{s-1} \,\theta(0,\tau)\, d\tau	analytically continued trace of Feynman propagator in background gauge field z\mathbf{z}: L z(s)≔Tr reg(1(D z) 2) s=∫ 0 ∞τ s−1θ(z,τ)dτL_{\mathbf{z}}(s) \coloneqq Tr_{reg}\left(\frac{1}{(D_{\mathbf{z}})^2}\right)^s = \int_{0}^\infty \tau^{s-1} \,\theta(\mathbf{z},\tau)\, d\tau	analytically continued trace of Dirac propagator in background gauge field z\mathbf{z} η z(s)=Tr reg(sgn(D z)|D z|) s\eta_{\mathbf{z}}(s) = Tr_{reg} \left(\frac{sgn(D_{\mathbf{z}})}{ { \vert D_{\mathbf{z}} } \vert }\right)^s	regularized 1-loop vacuum amplitude pvL z(1)=Tr reg(1(D z) 2)pv\, L_{\mathbf{z}}(1) = Tr_{reg}\left(\frac{1}{(D_{\mathbf{z}})^2}\right) / regularized fermionic 1-loop vacuum amplitude pvη z(1)=Tr reg(D z(D z) 2)pv\, \eta_{\mathbf{z}}(1)= Tr_{reg} \left( \frac{D_{\mathbf{z}}}{(D_{\mathbf{z}})^2} \right) / vacuum energy −12L z ′(0)=Z H=12lndet reg(D z 2)-\frac{1}{2}L_{\mathbf{z}}^\prime(0) = Z_H = \frac{1}{2}\ln\;det_{reg}(D_{\mathbf{z}}^2)
Riemannian geometry (analysis)		zeta function of an elliptic differential operator	zeta function of an elliptic differential operator	eta function of a self-adjoint operator	functional determinant, analytic torsion
complex analytic geometry	section θ(z,τ)\theta(\mathbf{z},\mathbf{\tau}) of line bundle over Jacobian variety J(Σ τ)J(\Sigma_{\mathbf{\tau}}) in terms of covering coordinates z\mathbf{z} on ℂ g→J(Σ τ)\mathbb{C}^g \to J(\Sigma_{\mathbf{\tau}})	zeta function of a Riemann surface	Selberg zeta function		Dedekind eta function
arithmetic geometry for a function field		Goss zeta function (for arithmetic curves) and Weil zeta function (in higher dimensional arithmetic geometry)
arithmetic geometry for a number field	Hecke theta function, automorphic form	Dedekind zeta function (being the Artin L-function L zL_{\mathbf{z}} for z=0\mathbf{z} = 0 the trivial Galois representation)	Artin L-function L zL_{\mathbf{z}} of a Galois representation z\mathbf{z}, expressible “in coordinates” (by Artin reciprocity) as a finite-order Hecke L-function (for 1-dimensional representations) and generally (via Langlands correspondence) by an automorphic L-function (for higher dimensional reps)		class number ⋅\cdot regulator
arithmetic geometry for ℚ\mathbb{Q}	Jacobi theta function (z=0\mathbf{z} = 0)/ Dirichlet theta function (z=χ\mathbf{z} = \chi a Dirichlet character)	Riemann zeta function (being the Dirichlet L-function L zL_{\mathbf{z}} for Dirichlet character z=0\mathbf{z} = 0)	Artin L-function of a Galois representation z\mathbf{z} , expressible “in coordinates” (via Artin reciprocity) as a Dirichlet L-function (for 1-dimensional Galois representations) and generally (via Langlands correspondence) as an automorphic L-function

Properties

Function field analogy

One way to understand the plethora of different zeta functions is to see them as the incarnation of the same general concept in different flavors of geometry. This is expressed at least in parts by the

function field analogy

	number fields (“function fields of curves over F1”)	function fields of curves over finite fields 𝔽 q\mathbb{F}_q (arithmetic curves)	Riemann surfaces/complex curves
affine and projective line
	ℤ\mathbb{Z} (integers)	𝔽 q[z]\mathbb{F}_q[z] (polynomials, polynomial algebra on affine line 𝔸 𝔽 q 1\mathbb{A}^1_{\mathbb{F}_q})	𝒪 ℂ\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{C}} (holomorphic functions on complex plane)
	ℚ\mathbb{Q} (rational numbers)	𝔽 q(z)\mathbb{F}_q(z) (rational fractions/rational function on affine line 𝔸 𝔽 q 1\mathbb{A}^1_{\mathbb{F}_q})	meromorphic functions on complex plane
	pp (prime number/non-archimedean place)	x∈𝔽 px \in \mathbb{F}_p, where z−x∈𝔽 q[z]z - x \in \mathbb{F}_q[z] is the irreducible monic polynomial of degree one	x∈ℂx \in \mathbb{C}, where z−x∈𝒪 ℂz - x \in \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{C}} is the function which subtracts the complex number xx from the variable zz
	∞\infty (place at infinity)		∞\infty
	Spec(ℤ)Spec(\mathbb{Z}) (Spec(Z))	𝔸 𝔽 q 1\mathbb{A}^1_{\mathbb{F}_q} (affine line)	complex plane
	Spec(ℤ)∪place ∞Spec(\mathbb{Z}) \cup place_{\infty}	ℙ 𝔽 q\mathbb{P}_{\mathbb{F}_q} (projective line)	Riemann sphere
	∂ p≔(−) p−(−)p\partial_p \coloneqq \frac{(-)^p - (-)}{p} (Fermat quotient)	∂∂z\frac{\partial}{\partial z} (coordinate derivation)	“
	genus of the rational numbers = 0		genus of the Riemann sphere = 0
formal neighbourhoods
	ℤ/(p nℤ)\mathbb{Z}/(p^n \mathbb{Z}) (prime power local ring)	𝔽 q[z]/((z−x) n𝔽 q[z])\mathbb{F}_q [z]/((z-x)^n \mathbb{F}_q [z]) (nn-th order univariate local Artinian $\mathbb{F}_q$-algebra)	ℂ[z]/((z−x) nℂ[z])\mathbb{C}[z]/((z-x)^n \mathbb{C}[z]) (nn-th order univariate Weil $\mathbb{C}$-algebra)
	ℤ p\mathbb{Z}_p (p-adic integers)	𝔽 q[[z−x]]\mathbb{F}_q[ [ z -x ] ] (power series around xx)	ℂ[[z−x]]\mathbb{C}[ [z-x] ] (holomorphic functions on formal disk around xx)
	Spf(ℤ p)×Spec(ℤ)XSpf(\mathbb{Z}_p)\underset{Spec(\mathbb{Z})}{\times} X (“pp-arithmetic jet space” of XX at pp)		formal disks in XX
	ℚ p\mathbb{Q}_p (p-adic numbers)	𝔽 q((z−x))\mathbb{F}_q((z-x)) (Laurent series around xx)	ℂ((z−x))\mathbb{C}((z-x)) (holomorphic functions on punctured formal disk around xx)
	𝔸 ℚ=∏ ′pplaceℚ p\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}} = \underset{p\; place}{\prod^\prime}\mathbb{Q}_p (ring of adeles)	𝔸 𝔽 q((t))\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{F}_q((t))} ( adeles of function field )	∏ ′x∈ℂℂ((z−x))\underset{x \in \mathbb{C}}{\prod^\prime} \mathbb{C}((z-x)) (restricted product of holomorphic functions on all punctured formal disks, finitely of which do not extend to the unpunctured disks)
	𝕀 ℚ=GL 1(𝔸 ℚ)\mathbb{I}_{\mathbb{Q}} = GL_1(\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{Q}}) (group of ideles)	𝕀 𝔽 q((t))\mathbb{I}_{\mathbb{F}_q((t))} ( ideles of function field )	∏ ′x∈ℂGL 1(ℂ((z−x)))\underset{x \in \mathbb{C}}{\prod^\prime} GL_1(\mathbb{C}((z-x)))
theta functions
	Jacobi theta function
zeta functions
	Riemann zeta function	Goss zeta function
branched covering curves
	KK a number field (ℚ↪K\mathbb{Q} \hookrightarrow K a possibly ramified finite dimensional field extension)	KK a function field of an algebraic curve Σ\Sigma over 𝔽 p\mathbb{F}_p	K ΣK_\Sigma (sheaf of rational functions on complex curve Σ\Sigma)
	𝒪 K\mathcal{O}_K (ring of integers)		𝒪 Σ\mathcal{O}_{\Sigma} (structure sheaf)
	Spec an(𝒪 K)→Spec(ℤ)Spec_{an}(\mathcal{O}_K) \to Spec(\mathbb{Z}) (spectrum with archimedean places)	Σ\Sigma (arithmetic curve)	Σ→ℂP 1\Sigma \to \mathbb{C}P^1 (complex curve being branched cover of Riemann sphere)
	(−) p−Φ(−)p\frac{(-)^p - \Phi(-)}{p} (lift of Frobenius morphism/Lambda-ring structure)	∂∂z\frac{\partial}{\partial z}	“
	genus of a number field	genus of an algebraic curve	genus of a surface
formal neighbourhoods
	vv prime ideal in ring of integers 𝒪 K\mathcal{O}_K	x∈Σx \in \Sigma	x∈Σx \in \Sigma
	K vK_v (formal completion at vv)		ℂ((z x))\mathbb{C}((z_x)) (function algebra on punctured formal disk around xx)
	𝒪 K v\mathcal{O}_{K_v} (ring of integers of formal completion)		ℂ[[z x]]\mathbb{C}[ [ z_x ] ] (function algebra on formal disk around xx)
	𝔸 K\mathbb{A}_K (ring of adeles)		∏ x∈Σ ′ℂ((z x))\prod^\prime_{x\in \Sigma} \mathbb{C}((z_x)) (restricted product of function rings on all punctured formal disks around all points in Σ\Sigma)
	𝒪\mathcal{O}		∏ x∈Σℂ[[z x]]\prod_{x\in \Sigma} \mathbb{C}[ [z_x] ] (function ring on all formal disks around all points in Σ\Sigma)
	𝕀 K=GL 1(𝔸 K)\mathbb{I}_K = GL_1(\mathbb{A}_K) (group of ideles)		∏ x∈Σ ′GL 1(ℂ((z x)))\prod^\prime_{x\in \Sigma} GL_1(\mathbb{C}((z_x)))
Galois theory
	Galois group	“	π 1(Σ)\pi_1(\Sigma) fundamental group
	Galois representation	“	flat connection (“local system”) on Σ\Sigma
class field theory
	class field theory	“	geometric class field theory
	Hilbert reciprocity law	Artin reciprocity law	Weil reciprocity law
	GL 1(K)\GL 1(𝔸 K)GL_1(K)\backslash GL_1(\mathbb{A}_K) (idele class group)	“
	GL 1(K)\GL 1(𝔸 K)/GL 1(𝒪)GL_1(K)\backslash GL_1(\mathbb{A}_K)/GL_1(\mathcal{O})	“	Bun GL 1(Σ)Bun_{GL_1}(\Sigma) (moduli stack of line bundles, by Weil uniformization theorem)
non-abelian class field theory and automorphy
	number field Langlands correspondence	function field Langlands correspondence	geometric Langlands correspondence
	GL n(K)\GL n(𝔸 K)//GL n(𝒪)GL_n(K) \backslash GL_n(\mathbb{A}_K)//GL_n(\mathcal{O}) (constant sheaves on this stack form unramified automorphic representations)	“	Bun GL n(ℂ)(Σ)Bun_{GL_n(\mathbb{C})}(\Sigma) (moduli stack of bundles on the curve Σ\Sigma, by Weil uniformization theorem)
	Tamagawa-Weil for number fields	Tamagawa-Weil for function fields
theta functions
	Hecke theta function		functional determinant line bundle of Dirac operator/chiral Laplace operator on Σ\Sigma
zeta functions
	Dedekind zeta function	Weil zeta function	zeta function of a Riemann surface/of the Laplace operator on Σ\Sigma
higher dimensional spaces
zeta functions	Hasse-Weil zeta function

• multiple zeta values, motivic multiple zeta values, motivic integration, motive

• Weil conjecture

• Riemann hypothesis

• there are attempts to understand the Riemann zeta function as the spectrum of a Hamiltonian of a quantum mechanical system. See at Riemann hypothesis and physics.

• Beilinson regulator

• zeta function of a Riemann surface

References

General

A useful survey of the zoo of zeta functions is in

• Jeffrey Lagarias, Number theory zeta functions and Dynamical zeta functions (pdf)

Further general review includes

• E. Kowalski, first part of Automorphic forms, L-functions and number theory (March 12–16) Three Introductory lectures (pdf)

• Alain Connes, Matilde Marcolli, chapter II of Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives

Discussion in the more general context of higher dimensional arithmetic geometry is in

• Ivan Fesenko, Adelic approch to the zeta function of arithmetic schemes in dimension two, Moscow Math. J. 8 (2008), 273–317 (pdf)

In algebraic geometry

• Yuri Manin, Lectures on zeta functions and motives (according to Deninger and Kurokawa), Astérisque 228:4 (1995) 121–163, and preprint MPIM1992-50 pdf

• Nobushige Kurokawa, Zeta functions over F 1F_1, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 81:10 (2005) 180-184 euclid

• Bruno Kahn, Fonctions zêta et LL de variétés et de motifs, arXiv:1512.09250.

Categorical approaches

• M. Larsen, V. A. Lunts, Motivic measures and stable birational geometry, Mosc. Math. J. 3, 1 (2003) 85–95; Rationality criteria for motivic zeta functions, Compos. Math. 140:6 (2004) 1537–1560

• Vladimir Guletskii, Zeta functions in triangulated categories, Mathematical Notes 87, 3 (2010) 369–381, math/0605040

• M. Kontsevich, Notes on motives in finite characteristics, math.AG/0702206

• John Baez, Zeta functions?

• Sergey Galkin?, Evgeny Shinder?, On a zeta-function of a dg-category, arXiv:1506.05831.