holographic principle in nLab

Contents

Contents

Idea

In quantum field theory what has come to be known as the holographic principle is the fact that the correlators/partition functions of some quantum field theories of dimension nn may be identified with states of a TQFT of dimension n+1n + 1.

Some details

Notice that for Σ\Sigma an (n+1)(n+1)-dimensional manifold with nn-dimensional boundary ∂Σ\partial \Sigma, regarded as a cobordism Σ:∅→∂Σ\Sigma : \emptyset \to \partial \Sigma, an (n+1)(n+1)-dimensional TQFT assigns a morphism

Z(Σ):1→Z(∂Σ), Z(\Sigma) : 1 \to Z(\partial \Sigma) \,,

hence an element of the space Z(∂Σ)Z(\partial \Sigma). Under holography, this element is identified with the partition function of an nn-dimensional QFT evaluated on the manifold (without boundary) ∂Σ\partial \Sigma.

The idea that some systems in physics are governed by other systems “localized at a boundary” in this kind of way was originally suggested by the behaviour of black holes in general relativity: their black hole entropy is proportional to their “surface”, as reflected by the generalized second law of thermodynamics. This made Gerard 't Hooft suggest a general principle, called the holographic principle, which however remained somewhat vague (t’Hooft 93, Susskind 94).

Later, two more precise classes of correspondences were identified, that are regarded now as precise examples of the general idea of the holographic principle:

1. Systems of Chern-Simons theory and higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory can be shown explicitly to have spaces of states that are canonically identified with correlator spaces of CFTs (conformal blocks) and self-dual higher gauge theory on their boundary.

   (The relation of traditional 3d Chern-Simons theory to the 2d WZW model originates in (Witten 89) and hence precedes the proposal of (t’Hooft 93, Susskind 94), but this relation was not recognized from this perspective earlier.)

2. Systems of quantum gravity in various dimensions as given by string theory on asymptotically anti de Sitter spacetimes have been checked not in total but in a multitude of special aspects in special cases to be dual to supersymmetric CFTs on their asymptotic boundary – this is called AdS/CFT correspondence.

Below at Examples we list some systems for which something along these lines is known.

More details

We discuss in a bit more detail the central idea of holography, roughly for the case of Chern-Simons type theories and making some simplifications, but giving a precise statement.

The general idea is that fields ϕ\phi in the bulk theory are identified with source fields in the correlation functions of the boundary theory.

The archetypical example is the relation between the correlators of the WZW model on a Lie group GG with the space of quantum states of 3d GG-Chern-Simons theory, as reviewed for instance on page 30 of (Gawędzki 99):

a correlator for the WZW model with source field AA has to satisfy a conformal transformation property called a Ward identity. The space of all suitable functionals satisfying these identities is the space of conformal blocks. That space is equivalently identified with the space of wave functions of Chern-Simons theory depending on the fields AA, hence the quantum states of the CS theory.

More generally, consider some nn-dimensional FQFT Z BZ_B and assume that the spaces of states that it assigns to any (n−1)(n-1)-dimensional manifold XX are of finite dimension (over some ground field ℂ\mathbb{C}):

dimZ B(X)<∞. dim Z_B(X) \lt \infty \,.

Then for Σ:∂ inΣ→∂ outΣ\Sigma : \partial_{in}{\Sigma} \to \partial_{out}{\Sigma} any cobordism of dimension nn, the correlator

Z B(Σ):Z B(∂ inΣ)→Z B(∂ outΣ) Z_B(\Sigma) : Z_B(\partial_{in} \Sigma) \to Z_B(\partial_{out} \Sigma)

that Z BZ_B assigns may naturally be identified, under the closed monoidal structure of Vect, as an element

Z B(Σ)¯ ∈Z B(∂ inΣ) *⊗Z B(∂ outΣ) ≃Z B(∂Σ). \begin{aligned} \overline{Z_B(\Sigma)} & \in Z_B(\partial_{in} \Sigma)^{*} \otimes Z_B(\partial_{out} \Sigma) \\ & \simeq Z_B(\partial \Sigma) \end{aligned} \,.

Stated differently: the vector space Z B(∂Σ)Z_B(\partial \Sigma) is the space of all “potential correlators” of Z BZ_B and Z B(Σ)¯\overline{Z_B(\Sigma)} is the particular one chosen by the given model.

If Z BZ_B is really a CFT one calls a subspace Bl B(Σ)⊂Z(∂Σ)Bl_B(\Sigma) \subset Z(\partial\Sigma) of elements that respect conformal invariance in a certain way the space of conformal blocks and calls the assignment Σ↦Bl B(Σ)\Sigma \mapsto Bl_B(\Sigma) the modular functor of the model.

Notice that by looking at all “potential correlators” this way we are suddenly assigning vector spaces in codimension 0 (on Σ\Sigma), even though the axioms of an FQFT a priori only mention vector spaces (of states) assigned in codimension 1. Given all these spaces of “conformal blocks”, the (re)construction of Z BZ_B consists of choosing inside each Bl B(Σ)Bl_B(\Sigma) the actual correlator Z B(Σ)¯\overline{Z_B(\Sigma)} (this way of looking at TQFTs BB is actually the way in which Atiyah originally formuated the axioms of FQFT).

But since we are dealing now with vector spaces assigned to nn-dimensional Σ\Sigma, we can ask the following question:

is there an (n+1)(n+1)-dimensional extended TQFT AA such that

1. there is an isomorphism

   Z A(Σ)≃Z B(∂Σ)=Bl B(Σ) Z_A(\Sigma) \simeq Z_B(\partial \Sigma) = Bl_B(\Sigma)

2. such that whenever Σ^\hat \Sigma cobounds Σ\Sigma the linear map

Z A:ℂ=Z A(Σ^)→Z A(Σ^)Z A(∂Σ^)≃Bl B(Σ) Z_A : \mathbb{C} = Z_A(\hat \Sigma) \stackrel{Z_A(\hat \Sigma)}{\to} Z_A(\partial \hat \Sigma) \simeq Bl_B(\Sigma)

sends 1∈ℂ1 \in \mathbb{C} to Z B(Σ)¯\overline{Z_B(\Sigma)}.

If so, we say that AA is a holographic dual to BB.

Notice that Z A(Σ)Z_A(\Sigma) is the space of states of AA over Σ\Sigma, while Bl B(Σ)Bl_B(\Sigma) is the space of possible correlators of BB over Σ\Sigma. Under holography, the states of AA are identified with the correlators of BB.

Examples

Poisson holography

One of the key statements of the holographic principle is that fields of a bulk field theory correspond to sources in its boundary field theory.

One set-up where this can be made a formal theorem is for 2d Chern-Simons theory which is a non-perturbative Poisson sigma-model. This theorem is discussed at

• off-shell Poisson bracket – boundary field theory interpretation.

• motivic quantization – Poisson holography.

Holography of higher Chern-Simons/CFT-type

See also AdS3-CFT2 and CS-WZW correspondence.

RT-3d TQFT / rational 2d CFT

The class of examples of “Chern-Simons-type holography” we mention now has fairly completely and rigorously been understood. It is in turn a special and comparatively simple (but far from trivial) case of the historically earliest class of examples: ordinary Chern-Simons theory dual to a 2d WZW model below.

For more see at AdS3-CFT2 and CS-WZW correspondence.

Given any modular tensor category CC the Reshetikhin-Turaev construction produces a 3-dimensional TQFT Z CZ_C. Its space of states over a 2-dimensional surface can be identified (after some work) with a space of conformal blocks for a WZW-model-liked 2d2d CFT. The FRS formalism provides a way to show that the states of Z CZ_C provides correlators that solve the sewing constraints.

Ordinary Chern-Simons theory / WZW-model

For a given Lie group GG, ordinary 3-dimensional GG-Chern-Simons theory for a group GG is holographically dual to the 2-dimensional WZW-model describing the string propagating on GG.

Here is a list with aspects of this correspondence:

1. At the level of action functionals the relation is directly seen by observing that on a 3-d manifold with boundary the Chern-Simons theory action is not gauge invariant, but has a boundary term depending on the gauge transformation. Since the gauge transformation is a function on the 2d boundary with values in GG, this boundary term is like an action functional for a sigma-model with target space GG, and indeed it is that (subject to some fine-tuning) of the GG-WZW model.

   A random source reviewing this is for instance (Arcioni-Blau-Loughlin, p. 6).

2. More abstractly, at least for simply connected compact GG, the action functionals are also related by transgression of moduli stacks as discussed at infinity-Chern-Simons theory. The action functional of GG-Chern-Simons theory is induced by the morphism

   c conn:BG conn→B 3U(1) conn \mathbf{c}_{conn} : \mathbf{B}G_{conn} \to \mathbf{B}^3 U(1)_{conn}

   from the smooth moduli stack of GG-bundles with connection to the smooth moduli 3-stack of circle 3-bundles with connection (discussed in detail at differential string structure ) in that for Σ 3\Sigma_3 a compact 3d-dimensional surface the Chern-Simons action is the composite

   exp(iS CS(−)):[Σ 3,BG conn]→[Σ 3,c conn][Σ 3,B 3U(1) conn]→exp(2πi∫ Σ 3(−))U(1), \exp(i S_{CS}(-)) : [\Sigma_3, \mathbf{B} G_{conn}] \stackrel{[\Sigma_3, \mathbf{c}_{conn}]}{\to} [\Sigma_3, \mathbf{B}^3 U(1)_{conn}] \stackrel{\exp(2 \pi i \int_{\Sigma_3}(-))}{\to} U(1) \,,

   where the last morphism is given by fiber integration in ordinary differential cohomology.

   Topological term in the WZW-model (the B-field background gauge field) is similarly the term appearing in codimension 2. This is discussed at Chern-Simons theory – Geometric quantization – In higher codimension.

3. At the level of matching space of states of CS-theory with the partition function of the WZW model this is a computation obtained from the geometric quantization of the CS-action, originally due to (Witten). A review is in (Gawedzki, section 5).

4. If one accepts that the quantization of the GG-Chern-Simons action functional yields the TQFT given by the Reshetikhin-Turaev construction applied to the modular tensor category of GG-loop group representations, then a detailed construction of the correspondence CS-TQFT/WZW-CFT is what the FFRS-formalism achieves. See there for more details.

   More comments on the holographic interpretation of this formalism are in (Kapustin-Saulina, Fuchs-Schweigert-Valentino).

Poisson σ\sigma-model / quantum mechanics

Ordinary quantum mechanics induced by quantization of a Poisson manifold – which may be regarded as a 1-dimensional QFT – is holographically dual to the 2-dimensional Poisson sigma-model (implicitly observed by (Kontsevich) made explicit by (CattaneoFelder).

(Notice the Poisson sigma-model is the (n=2)(n = 2)-case of the AKSZ sigma-model which is indeed an example of a infinity-Chern-Simons theory, as discussed there.)

A-model / quantum mechanics

Similarly the A-model on certain D-branes gives a holographic description of ordinary quantum mechanics. (Witten).

See

• quantization via the A-model

Notice that the A-model arises from the Poisson sigma-model, as discussed there.

Higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory / Self-dual higher gauge theory

Idea and examples

Generally, higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory in dimension 4k+34k+3 (for k∈ℕk \in \mathbb{N}) is holographically related to self-dual higher gauge theory in dimension 4k+24k+2 (at least in the abelian case).

• (k=0)(k=0): ordinary 3-dimensional Chern-Simons theory is related to a string sigma-model on its boundary;

• (k=1)(k=1): 7-dimensional Chern-Simons theory is related to a fivebrane model on its boundary;

• (k=2)(k=2): 11-dimensional Chern-Simons theory is related to a parts of a type II string theory on its boundary (or that of the space-filling 9-brane, if one wishes) (BelovMoore).

Some details

We indicate why higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory is – if holographically related to anything – holographically related to self-dual higher gauge theory.

The phase space of higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory in dimension 4k+34k+3 on Σ×ℝ\Sigma \times \mathbb{R} can be identified with the space of flat 2k+12k+1-forms on Σ\Sigma. The presymplectic form on this space is given by the pairing

(δB 1,δB 2)↦∫ ΣδB 1∧δB 2. (\delta B_1, \delta B_2) \mapsto \int_\Sigma \delta B_1 \wedge \delta B_2 \,.

The geometric quantization of the theory requires that we choose a polarization of the complexification of this space (split the space of forms into “coordinates” and their “canonical momenta”).

One way to achieve this is to choose a conformal structure on Σ\Sigma. The corresponding Hodge star operator

⋆:Ω 2k+1(Σ)→Ω 2k+1(Σ) \star : \Omega^{2k+1}(\Sigma) \to \Omega^{2k+1}(\Sigma)

provides the polarization by splitting into self-dual and anti-self-dual forms:

notice that (by the formulas at Hodge star operator) we have on mid-dimensional forms

⋆⋆B=(−1) (2k+1)(4k+3)B=−B. \star \star B = (-1)^{(2k+1)(4k+3)} B = - B \,.

Therefore it provides a complex structure on Ω 2k+1(Σ)⊗ℂ\Omega^{2k+1}(\Sigma) \otimes \mathbb{C}.

We see that the symplectic structure on the space of forms can equivalently be rewritten as

∫ XB 1∧B 2 =−∫ XB 1∧⋆⋆B 2. \begin{aligned} \int_X B_1 \wedge B_2 & = - \int_X B_1 \wedge \star \star B_2 \end{aligned} \,.

Here on the right now the Hodge inner product of B 1B_1 with ⋆B 2\star B_2 appears, which is invariant under applying the Hodge star to both arguments.

We then decompose Ω 2k+1(Σ)\Omega^{2k+1}(\Sigma) into the ±i\pm i-eigenspaces of ⋆\star: say B∈Ω 2k+1(Σ)B \in \Omega^{2k+1}(\Sigma) is imaginary self-dual if

⋆B=iB \star B = i B

and imaginary anti-self-dual if

⋆B=−iB. \star B = - i B \,.

Then for imaginary self-dual B 1B_1 and B 2B_2 we find that the symplectic pairing is

(B 1,B 2) =−i∫ XB 1∧⋆B 2 =−i∫ X(⋆B 1)∧⋆(⋆B 2) =+i∫ XB 1∧⋆B 2. \begin{aligned} (B_1, B_2) &= -i \int_X B_1 \wedge \star B_2 \\ & = -i \int_X (\star B_1) \wedge \star (\star B_2) \\ & = +i \int_X B_1 \wedge \star B_2 \end{aligned} \,.

Therefore indeed the symplectic pairing vanishes on the self-dual and on the anti-selfdual forms. Evidently these provide a decomposition into Lagrangian subspaces.

Therefore a state of higher Chern-Simons theory on Σ\Sigma may locally be thought of as a function of the self-dual forms on Σ\Sigma. Under holography this is (therefore) identified with the correlator of a self-dual higher gauge theory on Σ\Sigma.

Holography of AdS gravity/CFT-type

Type II on AdS 5×S 5AdS_5 \times S^5 and d=4d = 4 super Yang-Mills

Conjecturally, type II string theory on a anti-de Sitter space background is holographically dual to super Yang-Mills theory on the asymptotic boundary.

See AdS/CFT correspondence.

M-theory on AdS 7×S 4AdS_7 \times S^4 and 6d (2,0)(2,0)-SCFT on M5 branes

M-theory on AdS 7×S 4AdS_7 \times S^4 is supposed to have as holographic boundary the 6d (2,0)-superconformal QFT. See there for references.

M-theory on AdS 4×S 7/ℤ kAdS_4 \times S^7/\mathbb{Z}_k and Chern-Simons on M2 branes

See ABJM theory.

• holographic entanglement entropy

• holographic principle of higher category theory

• firewall problem

References

General

The idea of the holographic principle in quantum gravity originates with:

• Gerard 't Hooft, Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity, talk at Conference on Highlights of Particle and Condensed Matter Physics (SALAMFEST) (1993) [gr-qc/9310026, spire:36137]

• Leonard Susskind, The World as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377-6396 [hep-th/9409089, doi:10.1063/1.531249]

Early suggestion of holography in the form of QCD flux tubes being described by strings in a higher dimensional spacetime (later discussed as AdS-QCD duality):

• Alexander Polyakov, String Theory and Quark Confinement, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 68 (1998) 1-8 [arXiv:hep-th/9711002, doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(98)00135-2]

• Alexander Polyakov, The wall of the cave, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14 (1999) 645-658 [arXiv:hep-th/9809057, doi:10.1142/S0217751X99000324]

Review:

• R. Bousso, The holographic principle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002) 825-874 [MR2003m:83048, doi, arXiv:hep-th/0203101]

See also

• Oxford Holography Group, Background material for holography

AdS/CFT

See the references at AdS/CFT correspondence.

Chern-Simons / CFT

On the level of action functionals

The identification of the space of quantum states of 3d GG-Chern-Simons theory with the space of conformal blocks of the WZW model on GG is due to

• Edward Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (3) (1989) 351-399. [euclid:cmp/1104178138, MR0990772]

A review of the standard holographic relation between 3d GG-Chern-Simons theory and the WZW model on GG is for instance around p. 30 of

• Krzysztof Gawędzki, Conformal field theory: a case study (arXiv:hep-th/9904145)

Discussion of how gauge transformations of the action functional of Chern-Simons theory reproduce overe boundaries the action functional of the WZW model are for instance on p. 6 of

• Giovanni Arcioni, Matthias Blau, Martin O’Loughlin, On the boundary dynamics of Chern-Simons gravity (arXiv:0210089)

(And many other references. )

Matching of spaces of states to conformal blocks

The observation that the space of states in the geometric quantization of 3d Chern-Simons theory matches with the partition function of the WZW model is originally due to

• Edward WittenQuantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (3) (1989) 351–399. MR0990772 (project EUCLID)

A review is in section 5 of

• Krzysztof Gawedzki, Conformal field theory: a case study (arXiv:hep-th/9904145)

Reshetikhin-Turaev 3d TQFT and rational 2d CFT

Using the hypothesized relation between GG-Chern-Simons TQFT to that given by the Reshetikhin-Turaev construction applied to the modular tensor category of GG-loop group representations, a detailed discussion of the relation CS/WZW in given by the FFRS formalism. See there for more details

One article that contains a survey of much of the story is

• Jens Fjelstad, Jürgen Fuchs, Ingo Runkel, Christoph Schweigert, Uniqueness of open/closed rational CFT with given algebra of open states (arXiv:hep-th/0612306) .

The isomorphism between the RT-theory modular functor and the CFT conformal blocks is also discussed in

• Jørgen Andersen, Kenji Ueno, Construction of the Reshetikhin-Turaev TQFT from conformal field theory (arXiv:1110.5027)

Amplification of how the FRS formalism is inevitable once one adopts holography and QFT with defects is in

• Anton Kapustin, Natalia Saulina, Surface operators in 3d TFT and 2d Rational CFT in Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber (eds.) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Field and Perturbative String Theory AMS, 2011

More along these lines is in

• Jürgen Fuchs, Christoph Schweigert, Alessandro Valentino, Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d TFT (arXiv:1203.4568)

Self-dual higher gauge fields and higher abelian Chern-Simons

The idea of describing self-dual higher gauge theory by abelian Chern-Simons theory in one dimension higher originates in

• Edward Witten, Five-brane effective action in M-Theory, J. Geom. Phys. 22 (1997), no. 2, 103–133, hep-th/9610234

• Edward Witten, Duality relations among topological effects in string theory, J. High Energy Phys. 2000, no. 5, Paper 31, 31 pp. arXiv:hep-th/9912086, doi

More discussion of the general principle is in

• Dmitriy Belov, Greg Moore, Holographic action for the self-dual field, arXiv:hep-th/0605038

A quick exposition of the basic idea is in

• Jacques Distler, Actions for self-dual gauge fields (blog)

The application of this to the description of type II string theory in 10-dimensions to 11-dimensional Chern-Simons theory is in the followup

• Dmitriy Belov, Greg Moore, Type II Actions from 11-Dimensional Chern-Simons Theories (arXiv)

Poisson σ\sigma-model/A-model and quantum mechanics

• Maxim Kontsevich, …

• Alberto Cattaneo, Giovanni Felder, …

• Edward Witten, …

3d Chern-Simons theory / 2d CFT

3-dimensional Chern-Simons theory in the context of holography is discussed for instance in

• Victor O. Rivelles, Holographic Principle and AdS/CFT Correspondence (arXiv)

Chern-Simons/CFT in AdS/CFT

In

• Edward Witten, AdS/CFT Correspondence And Topological Field Theory JHEP 9812:012,1998 (arXiv:hep-th/9812012)

it is argued that in the AdS/CFT correspondence it is in fact just the Chern-Simon terms inside the corresponding supergravity theories whose states control the conformal blocks of the dual CFT. So the CS/CFT correspondence is a part (a crucial part) of the AdS/CFT correspondence, at least for AdS 5/CFT 4AdS_5/CFT_4 and AdS 7/CFT 6AdS_7/CFT_6.

Black hole / CFT correspondence

For Kerr black holes:

• Monica Guica, Thomas Hartman, Wei Song, Andrew Strominger, The Kerr/CFT Correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 124008 [arXiv:0809.4266, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.124008]

• Alejandra Castro, Alexander Maloney, Andrew Strominger, Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the Kerr Black Hole (arXiv:1004.0996)

General abstract formulation

An identification of boundary conditions and defects as natural transformations between higher dimensional FQFTs is discussed in

• Chris Schommer-Pries, Topological defects and classifying local topological field theories in low dimension (pdf)

See holographic principle of higher category theory for more on this.

Further discussion of formalization in extended TQFT is in

• Dan Freed, 4-3-2 8-7-6, talk at ASPECTS of Topology Dec 2012