localization of an (infinity,1)-category in nLab
Context
(∞,1)(\infty,1)-Category theory
Background
Basic concepts
-
equivalences in/of (∞,1)(\infty,1)-categories
Universal constructions
Local presentation
Theorems
Extra stuff, structure, properties
Models
Contents
Idea
As for localization of ordinary categories, there are slightly different notions of what a localization of an (∞,1)-category is.
One definition is in terms of simplicial localizations or quasicategory of fractions; another is in terms of reflective (∞,1)-subcategories:
A localization in the first sense is a functor L:C→DL:C \to D of ∞\infty-categories that is initial among the functors inverting a prescribed set of morphisms of CC.
A localization , in the second sense, of an (∞,1)-category CC is a functor L:C→C 0L : C \to C_0 to an (∞,1)(\infty,1)-subcategory C 0↪CC_0 \hookrightarrow C such that with cc any object there is a morphism connecting it to its localization
c→L(c) c \to L(c)
in a suitable way. This “suitable way” just says that ff is left adjoint to the fully faithful inclusion functor.
Since localizations are entirely determined by which morphisms in CC are sent to equivalences in C 0C_0, they can be thought of as sending CC to the result of “inverting” all these morphisms, a process familiar from forming the homotopy category of a homotopical category.
Definitions
As explained in Idea, there are two common definitions that are referred to as localizations of ∞\infty-categories.
The following definition appears in kerodon, tag01MP.
Definition
Let CC be an ∞\infty-category and WW a set of morphisms of CC. A functor L:C→DL:C\to D is said to exhibit DD as a (Dwyer–Kan) localization of CC with respect to WW if for each ∞\infty-category EE, the functor
Fun(D,E)→Fun(C,E)\operatorname{Fun}(D,E)\to \operatorname{Fun}(C,E)
is fully faithful and its essential image consists of those functors C→EC\to E that carry each morphism of WW into equivalences of EE.
The following second definition appears in HTT, def. 5.2.7.2:
Reflective localizations are a special case of Dwyer–Kan localizations. This is kerodon, tag04JL.
Examples
-
Localizations of (∞,1)(\infty,1)-categories are modeled by the notion of left Bousfield localization of model categories.
One precise statement is: localizations of (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves C=PSh (∞,1)(K)C = PSh_{(\infty,1)}(K) are presented by the left Bousfield localizations of the global projective model structure on simplicial presheaves on the simplicial category incarnation of KK.
-
∞-stackification (or (∞,1)-sheafification) is the localization of an (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves to the (∞,1)(\infty,1)-subcategory of (∞,1)-sheaves.
References
Reflective localization is the topic of
- Jacob Lurie, §5.2.7 & §5.5.4 of: Higher Topos Theory (2009)
- Jacob Lurie, Kerodon,[Reflective Localizations, tag:02FY]
Dwyer–Kan localization (also called simplicial localizations or quasicategory of fractions) are treated in
- Jacob Lurie, Kerodon,[Localization, tag:01M4]
- Markus Land, Section 2.4 of Introduction to Infinity-Categories, Compact Textbooks in Mathematics,Birkh"auser/Springer, Cham, (2021) [doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61524-6]
- Jacob Lurie, pp. 485 of: Higher Algebra (2017)
With an eye towards modal homotopy type theory:
- Marco Vergura, Localization Theory in an Infinity Topos, 2019 (pdf, ir.lib.uwo.ca:etd/6257)
Via a calculus of fractions for quasi-categories:
- Daniel Carranza, Chris Kapulkin, Zachery Lindsey, Calculus of Fractions for Quasicategories [arXiv:2306.02218]
Last revised on October 28, 2024 at 00:31:53. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.