tensor product of commutative monoids in nLab
Context
Algebra
Algebraic theories
Algebras and modules
Higher algebras
-
symmetric monoidal (∞,1)-category of spectra
Model category presentations
Geometry on formal duals of algebras
Theorems
Monoidal categories
With braiding
With duals for objects
-
category with duals (list of them)
-
dualizable object (what they have)
-
ribbon category, a.k.a. tortile category
With duals for morphisms
-
monoidal dagger-category?
With traces
Closed structure
Special sorts of products
Semisimplicity
Morphisms
Internal monoids
Examples
Theorems
In higher category theory
Monoid theory
monoid theory in algebra:
Contents
Idea
For AA and BB two commutative monoids, their tensor product A⊗BA \otimes B is a new commutative monoid such that a monoid homomorphism A⊗B→CA \otimes B \to C is equivalently a bilinear map out of AA and BB.
Definition
Equivalently this means explicitly:
Definition
For A,BA, B two commutative monoids, their tensor product of commutative monoids is the commutative monoid A⊗BA \otimes B which is the quotient of the free commutative monoid on the product of their underlying sets A×BA \times B by the relations
-
(a 1,b)+(a 2,b)∼(a 1+a 2,b)(a_1,b)+(a_2,b)\sim (a_1+a_2,b)
-
(a,b 1)+(a,b 2)∼(a,b 1+b 2)(a,b_1)+(a,b_2)\sim (a,b_1+b_2)
-
(0,b)∼0(0,b)\sim 0
-
(a,0)∼0(a,0)\sim 0
for all a,a 1,a 2∈Aa, a_1, a_2 \in A and b,b 1,b 2∈Bb, b_1, b_2 \in B.
The following relates the tensor product to bilinear functions. It is a definition or a proposition dependening on whether one takes the notion of bilinear function to be defined before or after that of tensor product of commutative monoids.
Definition/Proposition
A function of underlying sets f:A×B→Cf : A \times B \to C is a bilinear function precisely if it factors by the morphism of through a monoid homomorphism ϕ:A⊗B→C\phi : A \otimes B \to C out of the tensor product:
f:A×B→⊗A⊗B→ϕC. f : A \times B \stackrel{\otimes}{\to} A \otimes B \stackrel{\phi}{\to} C \,.
Properties
Symmetric monoidal category structure
Proposition
Equipped with the tensor product ⊗\otimes of def. and the exchange map σ A,B:A⊗B→B⊗A\sigma_{A, B}: A\otimes B \to B \otimes A generated by σ A,B(a,b)=(b,a)\sigma_{A, B}(a, b) = (b, a), CMon becomes a symmetric monoidal category.
The unit object in (CMon,⊗)(CMon, \otimes) is the additive monoid of natural numbers ℕ\mathbb{N}.
Proof
To see that ℕ\mathbb{N} is the unit object, consider for any commutative monoid AA the map
A⊗ℕ→A A \otimes \mathbb{N} \to A
which sends for n∈ℕn \in \mathbb{N}
(a,n)↦n⋅a≔a+a+⋯+a⏟ nsummands. (a, n) \mapsto n \cdot a \coloneqq \underbrace{a + a + \cdots + a}_{n\;summands} \,.
Due to the quotient relation defining the tensor product, the element on the left is also equal to
(a,n)=(a,1+1⋯+1⏟ nsummands)=(a,1)+(a,1)+⋯+(a,1)⏟ nsummands. (a, n) = (a, \underbrace{1 + 1 \cdots + 1}_{n\; summands}) = \underbrace{ (a,1) + (a,1) + \cdots + (a,1) }_{n\; summands} \,.
This shows that A⊗ℕ→AA \otimes \mathbb{N} \to A is in fact an isomorphism.
Showing that σ A,B\sigma_{A, B} is natural in A,BA, B is trivial, so σ\sigma is a braiding. σ 2\sigma^2 is identity, so it gives CMon a symmetric monoidal structure.
Proposition
The tensor product of commutative monoids distributes over the biproduct of commutative monoids
A⊗⊕ s∈SB s≃⊕ s∈S(A⊗B s). A \otimes \oplus_{s \in S} B_s \simeq \oplus_{s \in S} ( A \otimes B_s ) \,.
Monoids
Proof
Let (A,⋅)(A, \cdot) be a monoid in (CMon,⊗)(CMon, \otimes). The fact that the multiplication
⋅:A⊗A→A \cdot : A \otimes A \to A
is bilinear means by the above that for all a 1,a 2,b∈Aa_1, a_2, b \in A we have
(a 1+a 2)⋅b=a 1⋅b+a 2⋅b (a_1 + a_2) \cdot b = a_1 \cdot b + a_2 \cdot b
b⋅(a 1+a 2)=b⋅a 1+b⋅a 2. b \cdot (a_1 + a_2) = b \cdot a_1 + b \cdot a_2 \,.
0⋅b=0. 0 \cdot b = 0 \,.
b⋅0=0. b \cdot 0 = 0 \,.
This is precisely the distributivity law and absorption law? of the rig.
In (∞,1)(\infty,1)-category theory
The assignment 𝒞↦CMon(𝒞)\mathcal{C} \mapsto \mathrm{CMon}(\mathcal{C}) satisfies base change for presentable (∞,1)-categories, i.e.
𝒞⊗CMon(𝒮)≃CMon(𝒮). \mathcal{C} \otimes \mathrm{CMon}(\mathcal{S}) \simeq \mathrm{CMon}(\mathcal{S}).
In particular, CMon(S)\mathrm{CMon}(S) is a mode; this implies that for 𝒞\mathcal{C} a presentably symmetric monoidal(∞,1)-category, CMon(𝒞)\mathrm{CMon}(\mathcal{C}) possesses a unique symmetric monoidal structure subject to the condition that the free functor
𝒞→CMon(𝒞) \mathcal{C} \rightarrow \mathrm{CMon}(\mathcal{C})
is symmetric monoidal. This is due to Gepner-Groth-Nikolaus
References
- David Gepner, Moritz Groth, Thomas Nikolaus, Universality of multiplicative infinite loop space machines, (2013) (arXiv:1305.4550)
Last revised on April 19, 2024 at 20:19:52. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.