The nature of explanation in sexology and the riddle of triolism - Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment
- ️Wernik, Uri
- ️Thu Mar 01 1990
Abstract
Triolism is an uncommon sexual variety. Through its examination, the nature of explanation itself in Sexology is clarified and much is learned about sexuality in general. The prevalent explanations based on voyeurism, exhibitionism, latent homosexuality, and the Oedipal complex, are rejected as pseudo-scientific "one factor" theories, nonhumanistic, and anti-therapeutic. Content analysis was performed on letters written by triolists. This analysis supplied information on the couples involved, the nature and development of their sexual practices, and the effects on the couples' relationship. Based on this analysis, an alternative explanatory model is presented. It consists of an interplay of three groups of factors: Sexuality in the framework of marriage, the role of visuality in human sexuality, and coping with inhibitions in sexual functioning. Thus, triolism can be conceived as a result of a problem solving process in which a person finds a creative combined solution to these and other concerns.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, G.W. (1958).The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Bieber, I. et al. (1962).Homosexuality: A psychoanalytic study of male homosexuals. New York: Basic Books.
Ellis, H. (1936).Studies in the psychology of sex. (Vol. II.) New York: Random House.
Frank, J.D. (1973).Persuasion and healing. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Haley, J. (1963).Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune & Statton.
Holsti, O.R. (1969).Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Massachussetts: Addison-Wesley Publication Co.
Kinsey, A.C., Pomeroy, W.B., Martin, C.E. (1948).Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
Krafft-Ebing, R. von. (1931).Psychopathia sexualis. trans. F.J. Rebman. Chicago: Login Bros.
McDonald, G.W. (1980). Family power.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 841–54.
Mann, T. (1968).Doctor Faustus. Trans. H.T. Lower-Porter. London: Penguin Books.
Masters, W.H. & Johnson, V.E. (1970).Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.
McCary, J.L. (1978).Human sexuality. 3rd Ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Money, J. (1984). Testimony before a hearing of the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Justice, Washington, D.C., October, 1984.
Nagel, E. (1961).The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanations. New York: Hartcourt, Brace, & World.
Singer, I. (1974).The goals of human sexuality. New York: Shocken Books.
Torey E.F. (1973).The mind game, witchdoctors, and psychiatrists. New York: Bantam.
Tripp, C.A. (1975).The homosexual matrix. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.
Zilbergeld, B. (1978).Male sexuality. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Misgav Ladach Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
Uri Wernik PsyD
Authors
- Uri Wernik PsyD
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wernik, U. The nature of explanation in sexology and the riddle of triolism. Annals of Sex Research 3, 5–20 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849719
Issue Date: March 1990
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849719