patents.google.com

US20040160227A1 - Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable - Google Patents

  • ️Thu Aug 19 2004

US20040160227A1 - Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable - Google Patents

Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040160227A1
US20040160227A1 US10/778,288 US77828804A US2004160227A1 US 20040160227 A1 US20040160227 A1 US 20040160227A1 US 77828804 A US77828804 A US 77828804A US 2004160227 A1 US2004160227 A1 US 2004160227A1 Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
probe
cable
status
urd
contact
Prior art date
2003-02-18
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/778,288
Inventor
Gregory Piesinger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
2003-02-18
Filing date
2004-02-11
Publication date
2004-08-19
2004-02-11 Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
2004-02-11 Priority to US10/778,288 priority Critical patent/US20040160227A1/en
2004-08-19 Publication of US20040160227A1 publication Critical patent/US20040160227A1/en
2005-03-29 Priority to US11/092,071 priority patent/US7154281B2/en
Status Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R19/00Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof
    • G01R19/145Indicating the presence of current or voltage
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/08Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks
    • G01R31/081Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors
    • G01R31/086Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors in power transmission or distribution networks, i.e. with interconnected conductors
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/50Testing of electric apparatus, lines, cables or components for short-circuits, continuity, leakage current or incorrect line connections
    • G01R31/58Testing of lines, cables or conductors
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/50Testing of electric apparatus, lines, cables or components for short-circuits, continuity, leakage current or incorrect line connections
    • G01R31/52Testing for short-circuits, leakage current or ground faults

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of electric power distribution networks. More specifically, the present invention relates to determining the status of underground residential distribution power cables.
  • Electric power distribution networks are used by the electric utilities to deliver electricity from generating plants to customers. Although the actual distribution voltages will vary from utility to utility, in a typical network, three-phase power at high voltage (345,000 volts phase-to-phase) is delivered to multiple transmission substations at which transformers step this high voltage down to a lower three-phase voltage (69,000 volts phase-to-phase). This 69,000-volt three-phase power then feeds multiple distribution substations whose transformers further step down the voltage to the distribution voltage (12,470 volts phase-to-phase) and separate the power into three single-phase feeder cables. Typically, these feeder cables operate at 7,200 volts phase-to-ground. Each of these feeder cables branch into multiple circuits to power a plurality of local pole-mounted or pad-mounted transformers which step the voltage down to a final voltage of 120/240 volts for delivery to commercial and residential customers.
  • the final 7,200-volt distribution network utilizes underground (i.e., buried) cables. These cables are typically known as underground residential distribution (URD) cables. Typical URD cables are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.
  • a central conductor 22 is surrounded by an inner semiconductor sheath 24 .
  • Inner semiconductor sheath 24 serves to relieve electrical stress by spreading out and making the electrical field more uniform.
  • Insulator 26 has significant high-voltage insulating properties to minimize the overall size of URD cable 20 .
  • insulator 26 is formed of a polymeric material, such as polyethylene.
  • outer sheath 28 Surrounding insulator 26 is an outer semiconductor sheath 28 . Like inner sheath 24 , outer sheath 28 serves to relieve electrical stress by making the electrical field more uniform. Making the electrical field more uniform protects insulator 26 , which would otherwise be more likely to break down.
  • Outer semiconductor sheath 28 is surrounded by a shield formed of a plurality of neutral conductors 30 .
  • Neutral conductors 30 together serve as a return line for central conductor 22 .
  • neutral conductors 30 carry current resulting from any imbalance among the three phases.
  • neutral conductors 30 form a barrier to protect URD cable 20 from casual penetration (as with a blunt shovel).
  • neutral conductors 30 serve to provide a short electrical path and thereby offer some protection to a worker wielding the penetrating object.
  • Semiconductor layers 24 and 28 prevent high stress electrical field lines from forming under each neutral conductor 30 . But as a side effect, semiconductor layers 24 and 28 also impede detection of the electrical field from outside of layer 28 .
  • URD cable 20 may be an unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ (FIG. 1).
  • unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ neutral conductors 30 form the outermost layer of the cable. Neutral conductors 30 are therefore in contact with the Earth when unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is buried.
  • URD cable 20 may also be a jacketed URD cable 20 ′′.
  • neutral conductors 30 are surrounded by and embedded within an insulating jacket 32 . Whether URD cable 20 is jacketed or unjacketed, neutral conductors 30 need not be grounded, but usually are grounded at the ends.
  • URD cable 20 is cut and an extension cable is spliced in to supply power to the new customer's transformer. This poses certain problems.
  • URD cables 20 there are often multiple URD cables 20 in a given trench, conduit, or raceway. Typically, one of these URD cables 20 is de-activated prior to splicing. A problem exists in determining which of these multiple URD cables 20 is de-energized (i.e., “dead”).
  • Clamp-on ammeters are occasionally used in an attempt to determine if a URD cable 20 is dead. Since each URD cable 20 carries its own return, the ammeter is used to measure differential current. But a reading of zero current may result from two very different conditions. Either the cable is in-fact a dead cable, or the cable is live but nearly perfectly balanced. Since one of the goals of electrical distribution is to achieve perfect balance, the value of the test becomes more meaningless as this goal is more closely achieved. Consequently, many live cables are misdiagnosed as being dead.
  • Another related problem is that, in a given dig, extraneous unmapped URD cables 20 may be present. These extraneous URD cables 20 may or may not be energized, and will often confuse ammeter measurements to the point where it is impossible to determine which of the URD cables 20 is the de-energized URD cable 20 to be cut and spliced.
  • a URD cable 20 When a URD cable 20 is to be cut and spliced, it is first spiked. That is, a “spike”is driven through the selected URD cable 20 to short neutral conductors 30 to center conductor 22 . If the spiked URD cable 20 is live, then spiking will create a short circuit and trip the appropriate circuit breakers. This assures that the worker will not cut into a live URD cable 20 .
  • the spiking of a live URD cable 20 is undesirable for several reasons.
  • Spiking a live URD cable 20 therefore, is dangerous, costly, and time consuming.
  • a false-live result may cause the worker to backtrack and double-check the removal of power from the desired URD cable 20 , may cause additional and unnecessary excavation, and may cause further labor and paperwork. This may result in a waste of time and resources. But a false-dead result, on the other hand, may lead to misidentification of the specific URD cable 20 to be cut and spliced. This is the worst possible scenario, in that the worker would then spike a live URD cable 20 , believing it to be dead. As previously mentioned, spiking a live URD cable 20 is dangerous, costly, and time-consuming.
  • Apparatuses intended to determine status almost invariably test to determine if a URD cable 20 is live. No active test is performed to determine if URD cable 20 is dead. The presumption is, of course, that if URD cable 20 is not live, it is dead. This is a dangerous presumption.
  • URD cable 20 may test not-live if it is dead, or if it is live and the test fails for whatever reason, including worker error. This form of test therefore exhibits a high incidence of false-dead results. This is the worst possible scenario, in that the worker would then spike a live URD cable 20 , believing it to be dead.
  • URD cable 20 Another problem with many apparatuses for determining the status of URD cables 20 is that they are cumbersome to use. Often, an apparatus (or a portion of the apparatus) must be clamped to the URD cable 20 under test. This requires the worker to get down into a trench or otherwise obtain direct access to and manipulate URD cable 20 .
  • the URD cables 20 may carry high voltage (typically 7,200 volts), any procedure requiring direct manipulation of the cable is inherently dangerous. A faulty or misidentified cable may expose the worker to high voltage, and potentially precipitate injury or death. Additionally, all procedures requiring direct manipulation of the cable are cumbersome, costly, and time-consuming. This is especially true for a jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ being tested with an apparatus intended for an unjacketed URD cable 20 ′′. When a portion of the insulating jacket 32 has been cut away and that URD cable 20 is determined to not be the URD cable 20 to be cut and spliced, then that URD cable 20 must then be repaired to protect it from corrosion and other factors that would otherwise shorten its useful lifetime. This repair is itself cumbersome, costly, and time-consuming.
  • an apparatus for determining the status of a URD cable in an electric power network operating at a line frequency includes a rigid probe with a common contact configured to contact a neutral conductor of the URD cable, and an input contact insulated from the common contact and configured to contact an outer semiconductor sheath of the URD cable.
  • the apparatus also includes an instrumentation unit rigidly coupled to the probe, a cable analysis circuit housed within the instrumentation unit and electrically coupled to the common and input contacts, and a status display unit electrically coupled to the cable analysis circuit.
  • an apparatus for determining the status of a URD cable in an electric power network includes a probe configured to establish an electrical connection with the URD cable, wherein the electrical connection consists of a common contact of the probe in contact with a neutral conductor of the URD cable, and an input contact of the probe in contact with an outer semiconductor sheath of the URD cable.
  • the apparatus also includes a cable analysis circuit coupled to the probe. This circuit simultaneously determines if the electrical connection is a valid connection while determining the status of the URD cable.
  • a status display unit is coupled to the cable analysis circuit and configured to indicate the status of the URD cable when the electrical connection is a valid connection.
  • FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a typical prior-art unjacketed underground residential distribution (URD) cable
  • FIG. 2 shows a cross-sectional view of a typical prior-art jacketed URD cable
  • FIG. 3 shows a side view of a power-cable status determination apparatus in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 shows a cross-sectional side view of a portion of the apparatus of FIG. 3 for use with an unjacketed URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 5 shows an end view of the apparatus portion of FIG. 4 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 6 shows a cross-sectional side view of a melt unit for the apparatus of FIGS. 3 and 4 for use with a jacketed URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 7 shows an end view of the melt unit of FIG. 6 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 8 shows a schematic view of the electrical characteristics of a URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 9 shows a schematic view of an equivalent circuit of a URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 shows a flow chart of a method for determining the status of a URD cable using the apparatus of FIG. 3 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 11 shows a cross-sectional side view of the apparatus of FIGS. 3 and 4 in contact with an unjacketed URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 12 shows a cross-sectional side view of the apparatus of FIGS. 3, 4, and 5 in contact with a jacketed URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 13 shows a schematic block diagram of a cable analysis circuit for the apparatus of FIG. 3 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 14 shows a plan view of a status display panel for the apparatus of FIG. 3 depicting no electrical connection in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 15 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 depicting a “short” or low-resistance electrical connection in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 16 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 depicting an “open” or high-resistance electrical connection in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 17 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 depicting a “dead” or de-energized URD cable status in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 18 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 depicting an “unknown” or indeterminate URD cable status in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 19 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 displaying a “live” or energized URD cable status in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 show cross-sectional views of typical underground residential distribution (URD) cables 20 , with FIG. 1 showing an unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ and FIG. 2 a jacketed URD cable 20 ′′.
  • FIG. 3 shows a side view of an apparatus 100 that determines the status of a URD cable 20 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a cross-sectional side view and FIG. 5 an end view of a portion of apparatus 100 for use with unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows a side view and FIG. 7 an end view of a melt unit 102 for apparatus 100 for use with jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the following discussion refers to FIGS. 1 through 7.
  • Status determination apparatus 100 is a probing device configured to engage URD cable 20 and determine the status thereof.
  • Apparatus 100 is a rigid structure made up of a probe 104 to which is coupled an instrumentation unit 106 , to which is coupled an insulated shank 108 , to which is coupled a hotstick adapter 110 .
  • apparatus 100 allows the worker to couple apparatus 100 to a hotstick and use the apparatus as an extension of the hotstick to contact URD cable 20 from a distance. This allows the user to determine the status of URD cable 20 without necessitating direct manipulation of URD cable 20 by the worker. This significantly increases ease of use and overall safety.
  • Hotstick adapter 110 is a standardized hotstick adapter 110 used in the industry to couple to a hotstick (not shown), which is an insulated extension pole.
  • a hotstick allows apparatus 100 to be used at a distance from the worker, as in the bottom of a deep trench. This allows the worker to determine the status of a URD cable 20 safely and conveniently from outside the trench.
  • Insulated shank 108 has an adapter end 112 and an instrumentation end 114 opposing adapter end 112 .
  • Hotstick adapter 110 is rigidly coupled to adapter end 112 of insulated shank 108 .
  • the hotstick is coupled to hotstick adapter 110 , and insulated shank 108 serves as an extension of the hotstick.
  • insulated shank 108 serves as a short hotstick to provide ease of use while maintaining safety for the worker.
  • Instrumentation unit 106 has a probe side 116 and a display side 118 opposing probe side 116 .
  • Instrumentation end 114 of insulated adapter 108 is rigidly coupled to display side 118 of instrumentation unit 106 .
  • Probe 104 has an active end 120 and an instrumentation end 122 in opposition to active end 120 .
  • Instrumentation end 122 is rigidly coupled to probe side 116 of instrumentation unit 106 .
  • probe 104 , instrumentation unit 106 , insulated shank 108 , and hotstick adapter 110 form a rigid structure for apparatus 100 .
  • Probe 104 is made up of melt unit 102 and a probe body 124 .
  • melt unit 102 is detachably and rigidly coupled to probe body 124 by female and male threads 126 and 128 , respectively. This allows melt unit 102 to be removed from probe body 124 when probe 104 is to be used with unjacketed URD cable 20 ′, and allows melt unit 102 to be coupled to probe body 124 when probe 104 is to be used with jacketed URD cable 20 ′′.
  • melt unit 102 When melt unit 102 is removed from probe body 124 , melt unit 102 is typically still hot. An effective way of removing melt unit 102 without risk of injury is to slip a pocket-like hot pad (not shown) over melt unit 102 . The hot pad may then be used to unscrew and remove melt unit 102 from probe body 124 . Melt unit 102 may then be stored within the hot pad until cool.
  • a typical pocket-like hot pad for this use is the type universally sold for use over the handle of a cast-iron skillet. Any similar pocket-type hot pad will also work.
  • melt unit 102 be detachable from probe body 124 .
  • apparatus 100 may be produced for use with unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ only.
  • probe 104 would lack melt unit 102 completely.
  • apparatus 100 may be produced for use with jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ only.
  • probe 104 might have melt unit 102 fixedly and rigidly coupled to probe body 124 . The differences in the internal construction of probe 104 (discussed hereinafter) to effect these alternative embodiments would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art and are not discussed herein.
  • melt unit 102 is desirably omitted and probe 104 is made up solely of probe-body 124 .
  • Probe body 124 is made up of a cylindrical outer shell 130 and a central input conductor 132 .
  • Cylindrical outer shell 130 is electrically conductive, but desirably somewhat resistive to thermal conduction.
  • a typical material for outer shell 130 is stainless steel.
  • An insulator 134 separates shell 130 and input conductor 132 .
  • outer shell 130 , insulator 134 , and input conductor 132 are all coaxial.
  • probe body 124 rejects extraneous noise during determination of the status of URD cable 20 (discussed in greater detail hereinafter).
  • probe body 124 By being coaxial, probe body 124 more easily establishes an electrical connection with URD cable 20 than apparatuses having multiple non-coaxial probes (discussed in more detail hereinafter).
  • Input conductor 132 is made up of a conductive spring 138 , a movable conductor portion 140 , and an input contact 142 .
  • a fixed conductor portion 136 is fixedly coupled within insulator 134 .
  • Movable conductor portion 140 is movably coupled within insulator 134 .
  • Conductive spring 138 electrically couples fixed and movable conductor portions 136 and 140 .
  • Input contact 142 is coupled to movable conductor portion 140 .
  • movable conductor 140 is a solid rod that extends entirely through probe body 124 .
  • a flexible wire connects movable conductor 140 to an electrical circuit, and spring 138 is located inside instrument housing 106 . Spring 138 then pushes against conductor portion 140 but is substantially electrically isolated from the electronic signal conveyed by conductor portion 140 . Both embodiments allow input contact 142 to be spring loaded, but this is not a requirement of the present invention.
  • input contact 142 may be detachably coupled to movable conductor portion 140 . This allows input contact 142 to be changed if worn or damaged, but is not a requirement of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that input contact 142 may also be integral to movable conductor portion 140 without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
  • Outer shell 130 of probe body 124 incorporates a circular common contact 144 and male threads 128 .
  • Male threads 128 allow probe body 124 to couple to melt unit 102 as required.
  • Probe body 124 has an instrumentation end 146 and an active end 148 .
  • melt unit 102 is desirably omitted.
  • Probe-body instrumentation end 146 then serves as probe instrumentation end 122
  • probe-body active end 148 serves as probe active end 120 .
  • Probe-body input and common contacts 142 and 144 then serve as probe input and common contacts 150 and 152 , respectively, and are located at probe active end 120 .
  • Probe body 124 has a length 154 of not more than 32.0 cm, and desirably has a length 154 of approximately 16.5 cm.
  • apparatus 100 is typically attached to a hotstick (not shown) and placed into contact with a URD cable 20 located in the bottom of a trench while the worker remains safely outside the trench.
  • probe 104 desirably consists of probe body 124 , with instrumentation unit 106 coupled to the instrumentation end 122 of probe 104 . It is desirable, therefore, that probe body 124 be long enough to allow the worker to see active end 120 of probe 104 around instrumentation unit 106 as probe 104 makes contact with URD cable 20 .
  • probe body 124 the longer probe body 124 is, the more susceptible apparatus 100 is to electrical noise (discussed hereinafter).
  • a compromise is desirably reached between these two opposing requirements.
  • a maximum length 154 of 32.0 cm, and a desirable length 154 of approximately 16.5 cm, for probe body 124 successfully effects that compromise in the preferred embodiment.
  • probe body 124 has a diameter 156 of not more than 6.0 cm. This provides a distance 158 between input and common contacts 150 and 152 of not more than 3.0 cm. Desirably, probe body has a diameter 156 of approximately 1.6 cm, providing a nominal distance 158 between contacts 150 and 152 of 0.8 cm.
  • This two-point contact scheme allows probe 104 to successfully establish electrical contact with URD cable 20 while apparatus 100 is off-center and non-perpendicular to URD cable 20 , i.e., while the worker holds the hotstick with apparatus 100 attached at any of a wide variety of angles and contacts URD cable 20 at any of a wide variety of on- and off-axis locations. This is in marked contrast to two-probe apparatuses that require a specific orientation to URD cable 20 to effect contact.
  • probe-body 124 may be produced with dimensions other than those given herein without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
  • melt unit 102 is coupled to probe body 124 , and probe 104 is made up of probe-body 124 and melt unit 102 .
  • Melt unit 102 is made up of a thermal reservoir 160 , a thermal insulator 162 , and a coupling component 164 .
  • Coupling component 164 contains female threads 126 and serves to couple melt unit 102 to probe-body 124 .
  • Thermal reservoir 160 is made up of a thermally massive, thermally and electrically conductive cylindrical outer shell 166 and a thermally and electrically conductive central input conductor 168 .
  • Outer shell 166 serves as the primary thermal component of thermal reservoir 160 .
  • outer shell is desirably fabricated of a thermally retentive material, such as aluminum or aluminum alloys.
  • a thermally conductive electrical insulator 170 separates shell 166 and input conductor 168 . Since outer shell 166 serves as the primary thermal component of thermal reservoir 160 , insulator 170 is preferably small in cross section in order to maximize the mass of outer shell 166 . Outer shell 166 , insulator 170 , and input conductor 168 are all mutually coaxial.
  • Input conductor 168 is made up of a fixed conductor portion 172 and an input contact 174 .
  • input contact 174 is detachably coupled to fixed conductor portion 172 . This allows input contact 174 to be changed if a cable 20 ′′ with unusually large or small diameter neutral conductors 30 is encountered of if input contact 174 becomes worn or damaged. But this is not a requirement of the present invention.
  • input contact 174 may be integral to fixed conductor portion 172 without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
  • melt unit 102 has an active end 178 and a body end 180 .
  • Outer shell 166 of melt unit 102 incorporates a circular common contact 176 configured as a ring or lip at active end 178 .
  • the ring or lip projects outward only for a distance that is slightly greater than the distance between the outside surface of neutral conductors 30 and the outside of jacket 32 of cable 20 ′′, e.g., about 3.8 mm.
  • melt unit 102 When melt unit 102 is used to establish electrical contact with jacketed URD cable 20 ′′, body end 180 is coupled to active end 148 of probe body 124 . Probe-body instrumentation end 146 then serves as probe instrumentation end 122 , and melt-unit active end 178 then serves as probe active end 120 . Melt-unit input and common contacts 174 and 176 then serve as probe input and common contacts 150 and 152 , respectively, and are located at probe active end 120 . Input contact 174 desirably projects beyond common contact 176 by a distance roughly equal to or slightly greater than the diameter of a neutral conductor 30 , e.g., about 2.5 mm.
  • thermal reservoir 160 is heated by applying heat from an external heat source 181 (FIG. 10).
  • External heat source 181 is a source of heat external to apparatus 100 . This allows apparatus 100 to be self-contained without having to provide sufficient power to heat melt unit 102 .
  • Typical external heat sources 181 may be a torch or a heating unit powered by line or vehicular current.
  • Thermal reservoir 160 is desirably heated to a temperature suitable for melting insulating jacket 32 of jacketed URD cable 20 ′′. This temperature is desirably around 200-250° C.
  • a thermometer 183 (FIG. 6) may be used to measure an inside temperature of thermal reservoir 160 .
  • a thermometer connector 182 is provided in thermal reservoir 160 . Thermometer connector 182 , in its simplest form, need only be a hole into the end of thermal reservoir 160 into which the sensing end of thermometer 183 is inserted during heating.
  • Thermal reservoir 160 desirably has sufficient mass to maintain a temperature suitable to melt insulating jacket 32 a plurality of times. In the preferred embodiment, thermal reservoir has sufficient mass to maintain a melting temperature for at least five normal status determinations.
  • Thermal insulator 162 provides a barrier between thermal reservoir 160 and coupling component 164 . This impedes the heat from thermal reservoir from traveling up probe 104 .
  • thermal insulator 162 is configured of a non-thermally conducting material, such as polytetrafluorethylene (a.k.a. Teflon®) or lava rock.
  • probe body 124 and thermal reservoir 160 Electrical continuity between probe body 124 and thermal reservoir 160 is provided through fixed conductor portion 172 and a conductive coupler 184 .
  • Melt-unit input contact 174 is electrically coupled to probe-body input contact 142 through fixed conductor portion 172 .
  • Melt-unit common contact 176 is electrically coupled to probe-body common contact 144 through thermal-reservoir outer shell 166 , conductive couplers 184 , and coupling component 164 .
  • conductive couplers 184 are screws or pins. This is not a requirement of the present invention, however, and other means of electrical coupling may be effected without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 8 and 9 show schematic views of the electrical characteristics of URD cable 20 and an equivalent circuit of URD cable 20 , respectively, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The following discussion refers to FIGS. 8 and 9.
  • URD cable 20 has a central conductor 22 .
  • central conductor 22 carries current at a high voltage E L (typically 7,200 volts). This current is coupled through a cable capacitance C to outer semiconductor sheath 28 . A portion of this current therefore passes through a cable resistance R to form a line signal S L .
  • Line signal S L has a line-signal amplitude that is normally either very small, on the order of a few millivolts (when URD cable 20 is live) or nearly zero (when URD cable 20 is dead). Naturally, line signal S L is at line frequency (normally 50-60 Hz). Line signal S L forms across cable resistance R. Line signal S L is therefore present at input contact 150 .
  • FIG. 10 shows a flow chart of a method 300 for determining the status of URD cable 20 using apparatus 100 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 11 and 12 show cross-sectional side views of apparatus 100 in contact with unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ (FIG. 11) and jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ (FIG. 12) in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 13 shows a schematic block diagram of a cable analysis circuit 186 for apparatus 100 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 14 through 19 show a plan view of a status display unit 188 for apparatus 100 depicting no electrical connection (FIG.
  • FIGS. 14 14
  • a “short” or low-resistance electrical connection (FIG. 15)
  • an “open” or high-resistance electrical connection (FIG. 16)
  • a “dead” or de-energized cable status (FIG. 17)
  • an “unknown” or indeterminate cable status (FIG. 18)
  • a “live” or energized cable status (FIG. 19) in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the following discussion refers to FIGS. 3 and 10 through 13 .
  • a task 302 determines, typically through observation by a worker, if URD cable 20 to be tested is unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ (FIG. 11) or jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ (FIG. 12).
  • an optional task 306 ′ cleans unjacketed URD cable 20 ′.
  • task 306 ′ cleans unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ through the use of a hotstick with a cleaning device attached (not shown). In this manner, the worker stays safely away from unjacketed URD cable 20 ′.
  • Task 306 ′ is considered optional because it may be skipped, particularly on the first attempt at determining cable status. A worker may decide to skip task 306 ′ if an observation of cable 20 ′ reveals neutral conductors that do not appear to be particularly corroded. But if cable status cannot be successfully determined on the first attempt, then subsequent iterations may include task 306 ′.
  • a task 308 ′ then positions active end 120 of probe 104 over a desired contact location on unjacketed URD cable 20 ′.
  • a task 310 ′ connects probe 104 to unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ by causing input contact 150 to contact outer semiconductor sheath 28 and common contact 152 to contact at least one of neutral conductors 30 .
  • the tip of probe-body input contact 142 (serving as probe input contact 150 ) is substantially flat or blunt to provide a significant amount of contact area and to minimize damage to outer semiconductor sheath 28 .
  • a task 314 ′ determines if probe 104 has successfully established an electrical connection with unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ in task 310 ′. That is, task 314 ′ determines that input contact 150 contacts either outer semiconductor sheath 28 or one of neutral conductors 30 at the same time common contact 152 contacts one of neutral conductors 30 . The establishment of the electrical connection is evidenced by the illumination of an “on” indicator 198 (FIGS. 13 and 15 through 19 ).
  • input contact 150 may on occasion contact one of neutral conductors 30 . This constitutes a “short” electrical connection, and is discussed in detail hereinafter.
  • input contact 150 may on occasion not effect a good contact with outer semiconductor sheath 28 . This constitutes an “open” electrical connection, and is discussed in detail hereinafter.
  • Apparatus 100 incorporates cable analysis circuit 186 (FIG. 13) housed within instrumentation unit 106 (FIG. 3) and electrically coupled to input and common contacts 150 and 152 .
  • Cable analysis circuit 186 includes a power supply 190 configured to automatically provide power to the remainder of cable analysis circuit 186 when task 310 ′ establishes the electrical connection between probe 104 and URD cable 20 .
  • Power supply 190 contains a battery 192 , a contact detector 194 coupled between battery 192 and input contact 150 , and a gated regulator 196 .
  • URD cable 20 has cable resistance R between the point on outer semiconductor sheath 28 where input contact 150 makes contact and the neutral conductor 30 where common contact 152 makes contact. Therefore, when a electrical connection has been made, there is a complete circuit through battery 192 , contact detector 194 , input contact 150 , cable resistance R, common contact 152 , and back to battery 192 . When this complete circuit occurs, current flows though contact detector 194 , and a signal is sent to gated regulator 196 . Gated regulator 196 then turns on and supplies regulated power to the remainder of cable analysis circuit 186 .
  • battery 192 is preferably tested prior to the use of apparatus 100 to prevent errors.
  • the auto-on feature allows battery 192 to be tested by simply shorting input and common contacts 150 and 152 together with a coin, a key, a tool, or any other handy piece of metal. A good battery 192 will result in a “short” indication (FIG. 15) of status display unit 188 (discussed in detail hereinafter).
  • task 314 ′ determines that probe 104 has not established the electrical connection, i.e., “on” indicator 198 is not lit, then the process flow passes back to task 308 ′, and probe 104 is repositioned at a different contact location on unjacketed URD cable 20 ′. Tasks 308 ′, 310 ′, and 314 ′ are repeated.
  • task 314 ′ determines that probe 104 has established the electrical connection. i.e., “on” indicator 198 is lit, then a task 316 ′ then determines if the electrical connection is a “short” connection.
  • Connection determination circuit 200 is a form of dynamic ohmmeter configured to compare cable resistance R against predetermined resistance thresholds.
  • a signal injector 202 injects a trace signal S T into input contact 150 .
  • Trace signal S T is divided between an output resistance (not shown) of signal injector 202 and cable resistance R. Trace signal S T therefore has a trace-signal amplitude that is a function of the value of cable resistance R.
  • Signal injector 202 produces trace signal S T at a frequency different from the line frequency (usually 50 or 60 Hz) of the electric distribution system of which URD cable 20 is a part. This frequency is typically higher, and is nominally 32 kHz in the preferred embodiment. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the use of other frequencies for trace signal S T does not depart from the spirit of the present invention.
  • Trace signal S T is amplified by a preamplifier 204 and passes to the inputs of a first filter 206 configured to pass trace signal S T and a second filter 208 configured to block trace signal S T .
  • the pass filter 206 is a high-pass filter configured to pass signals at the trace frequency (32 kHz) and block signals at the line frequency (50-60 Hz)
  • the block filter 208 is a low-pass filter configured to block signals at the trace frequency and pass signals at the line frequency.
  • Trace signal S T therefore passes through high-pass filter 206 .
  • Trace signal S T is then applied to a pair of threshold detectors.
  • a lower-threshold detector 210 determines if the trace-signal amplitude is less than a predetermined lower trace threshold. That is, since the trace-signal amplitude is a function of the cable resistance R, lower threshold detector 210 determines if cable resistance R is less than a predetermined lower resistance threshold. In the preferred embodiment, this predetermined lower resistance threshold is greater than 75 ⁇ , and preferably approximately 100 ⁇ .
  • a cable resistance R of less than the lower resistance threshold results in a “short” connection, and a “short” indicator 212 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 15) is activated.
  • Such a condition indicates that input contact 150 is contacting either one of neutral conductors 30 or is contacting a local shorted area of outer semiconductor sheath 28 .
  • task 316 ′ determines that the electrical connection is a “short” connection, i.e., the “short” indicator 212 is lit.
  • the process flow passes back to task 308 ′ and apparatus 100 is repositioned at a different contact location on unjacketed URD cable 20 ′.
  • Tasks 308 ′, 310 ′, 314 ′, and 316 ′ are repeated.
  • task 316 ′ determines that the electrical connection is not a “short” connection, i.e., “short” indicator 212 is not lit, then a task 318 ′ determines if the electrical connection is an “open” connection.
  • a higher-threshold detector 214 determines if the trace-signal amplitude is greater than a predetermined higher trace threshold. That is, if cable resistance R is greater than a predetermined higher resistance threshold. In the preferred embodiment, this predetermined higher resistance threshold is less than 50 k ⁇ , and preferably approximately 30 k ⁇ .
  • a cable resistance R of greater than the higher resistance threshold results in an “open” indicator 216 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 16) being activated.
  • Such a condition may indicate that input contact 150 is making a poor contact with outer semiconductor sheath 28 , or is contacting a local contaminated area of outer semiconductor sheath 28 , or that common contact 152 is making a poor contact with neutral conductors 30 .
  • task 318 ′ determines that the electrical connection is an “open” connection, i.e., the “open” indicator 216 is lit.
  • the process flow passes back to task 306 ′, unjacketed URD cable is cleaned or re-cleaned, and apparatus 100 is optionally repositioned at a different contact location on unjacketed URD cable 20 ′.
  • Tasks 308 ′, 310 ′, 314 ′, 316 ′, and 318 ′ are repeated.
  • task 318 ′ determines that the electrical connection is not an “open” connection, i.e., “open” indicator 216 is not lit, then the electrical connection is a “good” connection, i.e., is a valid connection.
  • the electrical connection can be a valid connection only when the electrical connection is neither a “short” nor an “open” connection, i.e., when neither “short” indicator 212 nor “open” indicator 216 is lit.
  • a logic gate 218 causes an optional “good” indicator 220 of status display unit 188 (FIG. 13) being activated.
  • An output of logic gate 218 is used to provide condition information elsewhere in cable analysis circuit 186 .
  • Cable analysis circuit 186 incorporates a status determination circuit 222 .
  • Status determination circuit 222 is a form of a gated comparator configured to compare line signal S L against predetermined signal thresholds.
  • Line signal S L is amplified by preamplifier 204 and passes to the inputs of first filter 206 configured to block line signal S L and second filter 208 configured to pass line signal S L .
  • the block filter 206 is a high-pass filter configured to block signals at the line frequency and pass signals at the trace frequency
  • the pass filter 208 is a low-pass filter configured to block signals at the trace frequency and pass signals at the line frequency.
  • Line signal S L therefore passes through the low-pass filter 208 .
  • Line signal S L is then applied to a pair of gated threshold detectors.
  • the gate of each of these gated threshold detectors is coupled to logic gate 218 of connection determination circuit 200 . This means that each of the gated threshold detectors can produce an output only if connection determination circuit 200 determines that the electrical connection between probe 104 and URD cable 20 is a valid electrical connection, i.e., is a “good” connect wherein either optional “good” indicator 220 is lit and/or both “short” indicator 212 and “open” indicator 216 are not lit.
  • connection determination circuit 200 is simultaneously determining that the electrical connection between probe 104 and URD cable 20 is a valid electrical connection. This logic severely limits the potential for either a false-dead or a false-live status indication.
  • task 318 ′ determines that the electrical connection is not an “open” connection, i.e., “open” indicator 216 is not lit, then a task 320 ′ determines if the status of unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is “dead” or de-energized.
  • a gated lower-threshold detector 224 determines if the line-signal amplitude is less than a predetermined lower signal threshold. A line-signal amplitude less than the lower signal threshold results in a “dead” indicator 226 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 17) being activated. Such a condition indicates that URD cable 20 is dead, i.e., de-energized.
  • a positive dead test where a de-energized URD cable 20 is positively determined to be dead, is superior to a negative live test, where a de-energized URD cable 20 is determined to be not live.
  • a positive dead test eliminates many possible false-dead indications (where a live URD cable 20 is falsely reported to be dead), whereas a negative live test does not.
  • a false-dead status is the worst of all possible indications and creates the potential for injury or death should the worker spike or cut a live URD cable 20 .
  • task 320 ′ determines that the status of unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is “dead” or de-energized, then flow routes to a terminal task 322 wherein unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is indicated to be dead, i.e. “dead” indicator 226 is lit (FIGS. 13 and 17).
  • task 320 ′ determines that the status of unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is not “dead” or de-energized, i.e., “dead” indicator is not lit, then a task 324 ′ determines if the status of unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is “live” or energized.
  • a gated higher-threshold detector 228 determines if the line-signal amplitude is greater than a predetermined higher signal threshold. A line-signal amplitude greater than the higher signal threshold results in a “live” indicator 230 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 19) being activated. Such a condition indicates that URD cable 20 is live, i.e., energized.
  • task 324 ′ determines that the status of unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is “live” or energized, then an optional task 326 ′ determines, usually by observation, if unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is clamped.
  • a dead unjacketed URD cable will pick up enough electrical noise, perhaps in the form of stray ground currents flowing in neutral conductors 30 , to produce a false-live or unknown status indication. This can occur when neutral conductors 30 loosely contact outer semiconductor sheath 28 , or when sufficient corrosion of neutral conductors 30 has set in so as to cause a poor contact between neutral conductors 30 and outer semiconductor sheath 28 at the contact location. This condition may be improved by clamping neutral conductors 30 to outer semiconductor sheath 28 to break through the corrosion and otherwise short any stray ground currents to semiconductor sheath 28 .
  • the preferred method of clamping is to use one or two hotsticks with one or two “hotstick clamps” affixed to the ends of hotsticks. In this manner, the worker stays safely away from unjacketed URD cable 20 ′.
  • one clamp is used, it is desirably positioned as close to the probing area as possible. More preferably, two clamps are used, and the two clamps are positioned roughly 30 cm apart, on opposing sides of the probing area. The clamps shunt or short circuit any stray current flow down the outside of semiconductor sheath 28 around the area being probed. Thus, any voltage measured in the probed area between the clamps originates from current flow at the center conductor 22 , via capacitance “C” (FIGS. 8 - 9 ), to semiconductor sheath 28 , and then to neutral conductors 30 . But if the cable is live, the clamps do not interfere with the measurement.
  • task 326 ′ determines that unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is not clamped or that it may be inadequately clamped, then in a task 328 ′ unjacketed URD cable is clamped or re-clamped as discussed above. Flow then passes to task 308 ′, where probe 104 is repositioned at a contact location on unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ proximate the clamp or clamps. Tasks 308 ′, 310 ′ 314 ′, 316 ′ 318 , 320 , 324 ′, and 326 ′ are repeated.
  • task 326 ′ determines that unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is adequately clamped and indicating a live condition, then process flow routes to a terminal task 330 , wherein unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is simply indicated as being live, i.e. “live” indicator 230 is lit (FIGS. 13 and 19).
  • task 324 ′ determines that the status of unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is not “live” or energized, i.e., “live” indicator 230 is not lit, then in a task 332 ′ the status of unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ cannot be determined, i.e., is “unknown” or indeterminate.
  • a logic gate 232 results in an “unknown” indicator 234 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 18) being activated.
  • Such a condition indicates that the status of URD cable 20 is indeterminate. In this case, the process flow passes back to tasks 326 ′ and 328 ′ where unjacketed URD cable 20 ′ is clamped or re-clamped as discussed above.
  • Tasks 308 ′, 310 ′ 314 ′, 316 ′ 318 ′, 320 ′, 324 ′, and 326 ′ are then repeated. Presumably, a worker will repeat the above-discussed tasks as needed until a clear indication of either a “dead” or “live” cable is obtained.
  • a task 306 ′′ heats melt unit 102 to the desired temperature by applying heat from external heat source 181 .
  • a task 308 ′′ positions active end 120 of probe 104 over a desired contact location on jacketed URD cable 20 ′′.
  • a task 310 ′′ connects probe 104 to jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ by causing input and common contacts 150 and 152 to melt through insulating jacket 32 of jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ so that input contact 150 contacts outer semiconductor sheath 28 and common contact 152 contacts at least one of neutral conductors 30 .
  • the tip of melt-unit input contact 174 (serving as probe input contact 150 ) is a blunt point, but sharper than probe-body input contact 142 , to allow melting through jacket 32 and a partial melt into the outermost portion of outer semiconductor sheath 28 .
  • Probe 104 is pressed against jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ until the lip or rim of common contact 176 contacts one or two neutral conductors 30 .
  • input contact 174 Due to the projection of input contact 174 a predetermined distance beyond contact 176 , input contact 174 will only slightly penetrate into semiconductor sheath 28 when contact 176 abuts neutral conductors 30 . With contact 176 projecting around 2.5 mm beyond common contact 174 , sufficient, but not excessive, penetration into semiconductor sheath 28 results when cable 20 ′′ has 10-14 gage neutral conductors 30 . When larger or smaller diameter neutral conductors 30 are encountered, then input contact 174 is replaced by a longer or shorter input contact 174 , as needed.
  • a task 312 ′′ determines, typically through observation, if task 310 ′′ successfully melted melt unit 102 into insulating jacket 32 , i.e., if melt unit 102 was hot enough.
  • task 312 ′′ determines that melt unit 102 was not hot enough (i.e., there was a bad melt) If task 312 ′′ determines that melt unit 102 was not hot enough (i.e., there was a bad melt), then the process flow passes back to task 306 ′′ and melt unit 102 is reheated. Tasks 306 ′′, 308 ′′, 310 ′′, and 312 ′′ are repeated.
  • a task 314 ′′ determines if probe 104 has successfully established an electrical connection with jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ in task 310 ′′ as discussed hereinbefore for task 314 ′.
  • task 314 ′′ determines that probe 104 has not established the electrical connection, i.e., “on” indicator 198 is not lit, then the process flow passes back to task 308 ′′ and probe 104 is repositioned at a different contact location on jacketed URD cable 20 ′′. Tasks 308 ′′, 310 ′′, 312 ′′, and 314 ′′ are repeated.
  • task 314 ′′ determines that probe 104 has established the electrical connection. i.e., “on” indicator 198 is lit, then a task 316 ′′ determines if the electrical connection is a “short” connection as discussed hereinbefore in connection with task 316 ′.
  • task 316 ′′ determines that the electrical connection is a “short” connection, i.e., the “short” indicator 212 is lit, then the process flow passes back to task 308 ′ and apparatus 100 is repositioned at a different contact location on jacketed URD cable 20 ′′. Tasks 308 ′′, 310 ′′, 312 ′′, 314 ′′, and 316 ′′ are repeated.
  • task 316 ′′ determines that the electrical connection is not a “short” connection, i.e., “short” indicator 212 is not lit, then a task 318 ′′ determines if the electrical connection is an “open” connection as discussed hereinbefore in connection with task 318 ′.
  • task 318 ′′ determines that the electrical connection is an “open” connection, i.e., the “open” indicator 216 is lit, then the process flow passes back to task 308 ′′ and apparatus 100 is repositioned to a different contact location on jacketed URD cable 20 ′′. Tasks 308 ′′, 310 ′′, 312 ′′, 314 ′′, 316 ′′, and 318 ′′ are repeated.
  • a task 320 ′′ determines if the status of jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ is “dead” or de-energized as discussed hereinbefore in connection with task 320 ′.
  • task 320 ′′ determines that the status of jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ is “dead”, then flow routes to terminal task 322 wherein jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ is indicated to be dead, i.e. “dead” indicator 226 is lit.
  • a task 324 ′′ determines if the status of jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ is “live” or energized as discussed hereinbefore in connection with task 324 ′.
  • task 324 ′′ determines that the status of jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ is “live” or energized, then flow routes to a terminal task 330 wherein jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ is indicated to be live, i.e. “live” indicator 230 is lit.
  • task 324 ′′ determines that the status of jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ is not “live” or energized, i.e., “live” indicator 230 is not lit, then in a task 332 ′′ the status of jacketed URD cable 20 ′′ cannot be determined, i.e., is “unknown” or indeterminate as discussed hereinbefore. In this case, the process flow passes back to task 308 ′′ and apparatus 100 is repositioned to another contact location on jacketed URD cable 20 ′′. Tasks 308 ′′, 310 ′′, 312 ′′, 314 ′′, 316 ′′, 318 ′′, 320 ′′, and 324 ′′ are repeated.
  • Terminal tasks 322 and 330 represent the end or termination of a successful status determination effort.
  • apparatus 100 is carefully structured to minimized the possibility of either a false-dead or a false-live status indication, there is always a chance that such an error might occur.
  • the presence of such an error, especially a false-dead indication may pose a hazard and incur a risk of injury or death.
  • terminal tasks 322 and 330 should be followed by a task 334 wherein the entire status determination method 300 is repeated with apparatus 100 positioned at a different contact location on URD cable 20 . After a plurality of such status determination procedures, the assurance that URD cable 20 is truly dead or live approaches certainty.
  • the ease with which apparatus 100 may be used to perform status determination method 300 encourages repeated performances of method 300 .
  • Status display unit 188 contains a plurality of indicators 236 coupled to display side 118 of instrumentation unit 106 .
  • indicators 236 include “on” indicator 198 to indicate an electrical connection is established between probe 104 and URD cable 20 , “short” indicator 212 to indicate that the electrical connection is a “short” connection and not a valid connection, “open” indicator 216 to indicate that the electrical connection is an “open” connection and not a valid connection, “dead” indicator 226 to indicate that URD cable 20 is de-energized when the electrical connection is a valid connection, “live” indicator 230 to indicate that URD cable 20 is energized when the electrical connection is a valid connection, and “unknown” indicator 234 to indicate that the status of URD cable 20 cannot be determined.
  • “good” indicator may be used in conjunction with or in lieu of “short” and “open” indicators 212 and 216 to indicate that the electrical connection is a valid connection.
  • Indicators 236 are placed on display side 118 of instrumentation unit 106 so as to be in the worker's line of sight while the worker is establishing contact with and determining the status of URD cable 20 .
  • indicators 236 are visual indicators, preferably light-emitting diodes.
  • indicators 236 are patterned in two rows or lines.
  • a first line of indicators 236 contains “short” indicator 212 , “on” indicator 198 , and “open” indicator 216 , i.e., those indicators 236 associated with condition determination circuit 200 .
  • a second line of indicators 236 contains “dead” indicator 226 , “unknown” indicator 234 , and “live” indicator 230 .
  • “dead” indicator 226 is of a first color, preferably green
  • “live” indicator is of a second color different from the first color, preferably red
  • the remaining indicators 236 are of a third color different from either the first or second colors, preferably yellow.
  • “short” indicator 212 , “open” indicator 216 , and “unknown” indicator 234 are oriented relative to “on” indicator 198 so that again instantaneous and distinct interpretation by the worker is possible.
  • the present invention teaches an apparatus 100 for determining the status of an underground residential distribution (URD) cable 20 .
  • Apparatus 100 actively determines status for both a live and a dead URD cable 20 .
  • Apparatus 100 determines status for both unjacketed and jacketed URD cables 20 ′ and 20 ′′.
  • Apparatus displays results viewable and instantly interpretable at a distance.
  • Apparatus determines a quality of connection to URD cable 20 while determining the status thereof.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electric Cable Installation (AREA)

Abstract

An apparatus (100) and method (300) for determining the status of a electric cable (20) is provided. The apparatus (100) rigidly includes a probe (104) having coaxial contacts (150, 152) and including a melt unit (102) configured to melt an insulating jacket (32) of the cable (20), an instrumentation unit (106) coupled to the probe (104) and housing a cable analysis circuit (186), a status display unit (188) coupled to the instrumentation unit (106), an insulated shank (108) coupled to the instrumentation unit (106), and a hotstick adapter (110) coupled to the insulated shank (108). The cable analysis circuit (186) includes a connection determination circuit (200) configured to determine if an electrical connection between the probe (104) and the cable (20) is a valid connection, and a status determination circuit (222) configured to determine the status of the cable (20) while the electrical connection is a valid connection. The status display unit (188) includes a plurality of visual indicators (236) configured to impart connection condition and cable status to the user.

Description

    RELATED INVENTION
  • The present invention claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to “Apparatus and Method for Determining if an Underground Cable Is Energized and for Identifying Its Phase,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/448,161 filed 18 Feb. 2003, which is incorporated by reference herein.

  • The present invention also claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to “Apparatus and Method for Probing Jacketed Underground Distribution Cable,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/519,319 filed 12 Nov. 2003, which is incorporated by reference herein.

  • TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to the field of electric power distribution networks. More specifically, the present invention relates to determining the status of underground residential distribution power cables.

  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Electric power distribution networks are used by the electric utilities to deliver electricity from generating plants to customers. Although the actual distribution voltages will vary from utility to utility, in a typical network, three-phase power at high voltage (345,000 volts phase-to-phase) is delivered to multiple transmission substations at which transformers step this high voltage down to a lower three-phase voltage (69,000 volts phase-to-phase). This 69,000-volt three-phase power then feeds multiple distribution substations whose transformers further step down the voltage to the distribution voltage (12,470 volts phase-to-phase) and separate the power into three single-phase feeder cables. Typically, these feeder cables operate at 7,200 volts phase-to-ground. Each of these feeder cables branch into multiple circuits to power a plurality of local pole-mounted or pad-mounted transformers which step the voltage down to a final voltage of 120/240 volts for delivery to commercial and residential customers.

  • In many cases, the final 7,200-volt distribution network utilizes underground (i.e., buried) cables. These cables are typically known as underground residential distribution (URD) cables. Typical URD cables are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.

  • In a

    typical URD cable

    20, a

    central conductor

    22 is surrounded by an

    inner semiconductor sheath

    24.

    Inner semiconductor sheath

    24 serves to relieve electrical stress by spreading out and making the electrical field more uniform.

  • Inner semiconductor sheath

    24 is surrounded by an

    insulator

    26.

    Insulator

    26 has significant high-voltage insulating properties to minimize the overall size of

    URD cable

    20. Typically,

    insulator

    26 is formed of a polymeric material, such as polyethylene.

  • Surrounding

    insulator

    26 is an

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28. Like

    inner sheath

    24,

    outer sheath

    28 serves to relieve electrical stress by making the electrical field more uniform. Making the electrical field more uniform protects

    insulator

    26, which would otherwise be more likely to break down.

  • Outer semiconductor sheath

    28 is surrounded by a shield formed of a plurality of

    neutral conductors

    30.

    Neutral conductors

    30 together serve as a return line for

    central conductor

    22. In a typical three-phase system,

    neutral conductors

    30 carry current resulting from any imbalance among the three phases. In a mechanical sense,

    neutral conductors

    30 form a barrier to protect

    URD cable

    20 from casual penetration (as with a blunt shovel). In the event of a catastrophic penetration through

    neutral conductors

    30 and into or through

    central conductor

    22,

    neutral conductors

    30 serve to provide a short electrical path and thereby offer some protection to a worker wielding the penetrating object.

  • Semiconductor layers

    24 and 28 prevent high stress electrical field lines from forming under each

    neutral conductor

    30. But as a side effect,

    semiconductor layers

    24 and 28 also impede detection of the electrical field from outside of

    layer

    28.

  • URD cable

    20 may be an

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ (FIG. 1). In

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′,

    neutral conductors

    30 form the outermost layer of the cable.

    Neutral conductors

    30 are therefore in contact with the Earth when

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is buried.

  • URD cable

    20 may also be a jacketed

    URD cable

    20″. In jacketed

    URD cable

    20″,

    neutral conductors

    30 are surrounded by and embedded within an

    insulating jacket

    32. Whether

    URD cable

    20 is jacketed or unjacketed,

    neutral conductors

    30 need not be grounded, but usually are grounded at the ends.

  • As new customers are added,

    URD cable

    20 is cut and an extension cable is spliced in to supply power to the new customer's transformer. This poses certain problems.

  • One problem is that there are often

    multiple URD cables

    20 in a given trench, conduit, or raceway. Typically, one of these

    URD cables

    20 is de-activated prior to splicing. A problem exists in determining which of these

    multiple URD cables

    20 is de-energized (i.e., “dead”).

  • Clamp-on ammeters are occasionally used in an attempt to determine if a

    URD cable

    20 is dead. Since each

    URD cable

    20 carries its own return, the ammeter is used to measure differential current. But a reading of zero current may result from two very different conditions. Either the cable is in-fact a dead cable, or the cable is live but nearly perfectly balanced. Since one of the goals of electrical distribution is to achieve perfect balance, the value of the test becomes more meaningless as this goal is more closely achieved. Consequently, many live cables are misdiagnosed as being dead.

  • Another related problem is that, in a given dig, extraneous

    unmapped URD cables

    20 may be present. These

    extraneous URD cables

    20 may or may not be energized, and will often confuse ammeter measurements to the point where it is impossible to determine which of the

    URD cables

    20 is the de-energized

    URD cable

    20 to be cut and spliced.

  • When a

    URD cable

    20 is to be cut and spliced, it is first spiked. That is, a “spike”is driven through the selected

    URD cable

    20 to short

    neutral conductors

    30 to

    center conductor

    22. If the

    spiked URD cable

    20 is live, then spiking will create a short circuit and trip the appropriate circuit breakers. This assures that the worker will not cut into a

    live URD cable

    20.

  • The spiking of a

    live URD cable

    20 is undesirable for several reasons. First, spiking a

    live URD cable

    20 poses a risk to the worker, albeit a risk significantly less than the cutting of a

    live URD cable

    20. Second, tripping the circuit breaker causes an unnecessary power outage to all customers served by that

    URD cable

    20. Third, unnecessarily spiking a

    URD cable

    20 necessitates a repair of that

    URD cable

    20. Spiking a

    live URD cable

    20, therefore, is dangerous, costly, and time consuming.

  • Various apparatus have been developed to identify the status, live or dead, of

    URD cables

    20. All of these apparatuses suffer from one or more deficiencies. When attempting to use such apparatuses to identify the status of a given

    URD cable

    20, there are four primary conditions:

  • True-dead—identifying a given

    URD cable

    20 as dead when it is in fact dead;

  • False-dead—identifying a given

    URD cable

    20 as dead when it is in fact live;

  • True-live—identifying a given

    URD cable

    20 as live when it is in fact live; and

  • False-live—identifying a given

    URD cable

    20 as live when it is in fact dead.

  • A false-live result may cause the worker to backtrack and double-check the removal of power from the desired

    URD cable

    20, may cause additional and unnecessary excavation, and may cause further labor and paperwork. This may result in a waste of time and resources. But a false-dead result, on the other hand, may lead to misidentification of the

    specific URD cable

    20 to be cut and spliced. This is the worst possible scenario, in that the worker would then spike a

    live URD cable

    20, believing it to be dead. As previously mentioned, spiking a

    live URD cable

    20 is dangerous, costly, and time-consuming.

  • The only good status results are then a true-live and a true-false. Only such results will properly identify the

    specific URD cable

    20 to be spiked, cut, and spliced, thereby safely, inexpensively, and efficiently allowing the work to proceed.

  • Apparatuses intended to determine status almost invariably test to determine if a

    URD cable

    20 is live. No active test is performed to determine if

    URD cable

    20 is dead. The presumption is, of course, that if

    URD cable

    20 is not live, it is dead. This is a dangerous presumption.

  • If such an apparatus determines a

    URD cable

    20 is live, it is often correct. That is, such an apparatus produces a reasonably reliable true-live result, with few false-live results. On the other hand, such an apparatus does not positively determine if

    URD cable

    20 is dead. The apparatus can therefore only determine if

    URD cable

    20 is “not-live”.

    URD cable

    20 may test not-live if it is dead, or if it is live and the test fails for whatever reason, including worker error. This form of test therefore exhibits a high incidence of false-dead results. This is the worst possible scenario, in that the worker would then spike a

    live URD cable

    20, believing it to be dead.

  • Another problem with many apparatuses for determining the status of

    URD cables

    20 is that they are cumbersome to use. Often, an apparatus (or a portion of the apparatus) must be clamped to the

    URD cable

    20 under test. This requires the worker to get down into a trench or otherwise obtain direct access to and manipulate

    URD cable

    20.

  • Many such apparatuses are usable only with

    unjacketed URD cables

    20′.

    Unjacketed URD cables

    20 suffer from corrosion and other factors that shorten their useful lifetimes. For this reason, the cable of choice for newer installations is almost invariably jacketed

    URD cable

    20″. In order to use an apparatus designed for

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ with a

    jacketed URD cable

    20″, a portion of the insulating

    jacket

    32 must be cut away, drilled, or otherwise penetrated. This, too, requires that the worker obtains direct access to and manipulates

    URD cable

    20.

  • Because the

    URD cables

    20 may carry high voltage (typically 7,200 volts), any procedure requiring direct manipulation of the cable is inherently dangerous. A faulty or misidentified cable may expose the worker to high voltage, and potentially precipitate injury or death. Additionally, all procedures requiring direct manipulation of the cable are cumbersome, costly, and time-consuming. This is especially true for a

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ being tested with an apparatus intended for an

    unjacketed URD cable

    20″. When a portion of the insulating

    jacket

    32 has been cut away and that

    URD cable

    20 is determined to not be the

    URD cable

    20 to be cut and spliced, then that

    URD cable

    20 must then be repaired to protect it from corrosion and other factors that would otherwise shorten its useful lifetime. This repair is itself cumbersome, costly, and time-consuming.

  • Cumbersome and time-consuming procedures often inspire workers to shortcut the testing procedure. This may lead to injury or death, as well as expensive and time-consuming error.

  • Even those apparatuses which do not require the worker to enter the trench often require the worker to insert the apparatus into the trench to make a measurement, then remove the apparatus from the trench to obtain the results. Such apparatuses are often difficult to maneuver from a distance. For example, one such apparatus has two probes more than 3 cm apart, and is configured to be attached to a hotstick. In order to establish a proper connection, the apparatus must be positioned so that the two probes are oriented longitudinally with the

    URD cable

    20 and the hotstick and apparatus are perpendicular to the URD cable. This requires careful manipulation on the part of the worker. Such careful manipulation is awkward and cumbersome to perform in the field, and inspires the worker to shortcut the testing procedure by making a minimum number of tests (often a single test, especially where a desired result is obtained) where a plurality of tests is required for positive results.

  • Many apparatuses for determining the status of a

    URD cable

    20 do so by detecting the presence of an electric field in or around a

    live URD cable

    20. This field is very weak, on the order of a few millivolts at best. Since the URD cables carry high voltages at respectable currents, the environment in which the tests are performed is generally electrically noisy. The combination of low signal strength and a noisy environment creates a tendency for such apparatuses to indicate false-live statuses. This is especially true of those apparatuses having lengthy and or unshielded input lines. Of course, an apparatus may be designed to obtain fewer false-live readings at the expense of more false-dead readings. But this would only lead to a less usable apparatus. Since the false-dead condition is even worse than the false-live condition.

  • Many apparatuses have a first portion contacting the

    URD cable

    20 under test and a second portion indicating the test results, where the first portion is naturally in the trench or raceway with the

    URD cable

    20 and the second portion is with the operator. Alternatively, many apparatuses derive power from a generator or work vehicle. In both cases, there is a cable or line extending from the URD cable to a person or object outside of the trench or raceway. This poses a significant hazard in that a

    defective URD cable

    20, or a penetration of an otherwise

    good URD cable

    20, may cause the high voltage to be conducted over the line to a point outside the trench or raceway. Once high voltage is out of the trench or raceway, there is a danger that an individual may come into contact with the high voltage and suffer injury or death as a result. In addition, this high voltage may find a path through equipment which may subsequently become damaged or destroyed.

  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Accordingly, it is an advantage of the present invention that an apparatus is provided for determining the status of an underground residential distribution (URD) cable.

  • It is another advantage of the present invention that an apparatus is provided that actively tests a URD cable for both a live and a dead status.

  • It is another advantage of the present invention that an apparatus is provided that determines the status of a URD cable while the worker is safely at a distance from the URD cable.

  • It is another advantage of the present invention that an apparatus is provided that displays results viewable at a distance.

  • It is another advantage of the present invention that an apparatus is provided that determines a quality of connection to a URD cable while determining the status thereof.

  • It is another advantage of the present invention that an apparatus is provided that determines the status of a URD cable in an easy and straightforward manner.

  • The above and other advantages of the present invention are carried out in one form by an apparatus for determining the status of a URD cable in an electric power network operating at a line frequency. The apparatus includes a rigid probe with a common contact configured to contact a neutral conductor of the URD cable, and an input contact insulated from the common contact and configured to contact an outer semiconductor sheath of the URD cable. The apparatus also includes an instrumentation unit rigidly coupled to the probe, a cable analysis circuit housed within the instrumentation unit and electrically coupled to the common and input contacts, and a status display unit electrically coupled to the cable analysis circuit.

  • The above and other advantages of the present invention are carried out in another form by an apparatus for determining the status of a URD cable in an electric power network. The apparatus includes a probe configured to establish an electrical connection with the URD cable, wherein the electrical connection consists of a common contact of the probe in contact with a neutral conductor of the URD cable, and an input contact of the probe in contact with an outer semiconductor sheath of the URD cable. The apparatus also includes a cable analysis circuit coupled to the probe. This circuit simultaneously determines if the electrical connection is a valid connection while determining the status of the URD cable. A status display unit is coupled to the cable analysis circuit and configured to indicate the status of the URD cable when the electrical connection is a valid connection.

  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the Figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to similar items throughout the Figures, and:

  • FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a typical prior-art unjacketed underground residential distribution (URD) cable;

  • FIG. 2 shows a cross-sectional view of a typical prior-art jacketed URD cable;

  • FIG. 3 shows a side view of a power-cable status determination apparatus in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 4 shows a cross-sectional side view of a portion of the apparatus of FIG. 3 for use with an unjacketed URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 5 shows an end view of the apparatus portion of FIG. 4 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 6 shows a cross-sectional side view of a melt unit for the apparatus of FIGS. 3 and 4 for use with a jacketed URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 7 shows an end view of the melt unit of FIG. 6 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 8 shows a schematic view of the electrical characteristics of a URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 9 shows a schematic view of an equivalent circuit of a URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 10 shows a flow chart of a method for determining the status of a URD cable using the apparatus of FIG. 3 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 11 shows a cross-sectional side view of the apparatus of FIGS. 3 and 4 in contact with an unjacketed URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 12 shows a cross-sectional side view of the apparatus of FIGS. 3, 4, and 5 in contact with a jacketed URD cable in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 13 shows a schematic block diagram of a cable analysis circuit for the apparatus of FIG. 3 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 14 shows a plan view of a status display panel for the apparatus of FIG. 3 depicting no electrical connection in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 15 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 depicting a “short” or low-resistance electrical connection in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 16 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 depicting an “open” or high-resistance electrical connection in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 17 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 depicting a “dead” or de-energized URD cable status in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

  • FIG. 18 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 depicting an “unknown” or indeterminate URD cable status in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and

  • FIG. 19 shows a plan view of the status display panel of FIG. 14 displaying a “live” or energized URD cable status in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 show cross-sectional views of typical underground residential distribution (URD)

    cables

    20, with FIG. 1 showing an

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ and FIG. 2 a

    jacketed URD cable

    20″. FIG. 3 shows a side view of an

    apparatus

    100 that determines the status of a

    URD cable

    20 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 shows a cross-sectional side view and FIG. 5 an end view of a portion of

    apparatus

    100 for use with

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 6 shows a side view and FIG. 7 an end view of a

    melt unit

    102 for

    apparatus

    100 for use with

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The following discussion refers to FIGS. 1 through 7.

  • Status determination apparatus

    100 is a probing device configured to engage

    URD cable

    20 and determine the status thereof.

    Apparatus

    100 is a rigid structure made up of a

    probe

    104 to which is coupled an

    instrumentation unit

    106, to which is coupled an

    insulated shank

    108, to which is coupled a

    hotstick adapter

    110. By being rigid,

    apparatus

    100 allows the worker to couple

    apparatus

    100 to a hotstick and use the apparatus as an extension of the hotstick to contact

    URD cable

    20 from a distance. This allows the user to determine the status of

    URD cable

    20 without necessitating direct manipulation of

    URD cable

    20 by the worker. This significantly increases ease of use and overall safety.

  • Hotstick adapter

    110 is a

    standardized hotstick adapter

    110 used in the industry to couple to a hotstick (not shown), which is an insulated extension pole. The use of a hotstick allows

    apparatus

    100 to be used at a distance from the worker, as in the bottom of a deep trench. This allows the worker to determine the status of a

    URD cable

    20 safely and conveniently from outside the trench.

  • Insulated shank

    108 has an

    adapter end

    112 and an

    instrumentation end

    114 opposing

    adapter end

    112.

    Hotstick adapter

    110 is rigidly coupled to adapter end 112 of

    insulated shank

    108. When

    apparatus

    100 is used with a hotstick, the hotstick is coupled to

    hotstick adapter

    110, and

    insulated shank

    108 serves as an extension of the hotstick. When

    apparatus

    100 is used without a hotstick (as when

    URD cable

    20 is at the surface or in a raceway), then insulated

    shank

    108 serves as a short hotstick to provide ease of use while maintaining safety for the worker.

  • Instrumentation unit

    106 has a

    probe side

    116 and a

    display side

    118 opposing

    probe side

    116.

    Instrumentation end

    114 of

    insulated adapter

    108 is rigidly coupled to

    display side

    118 of

    instrumentation unit

    106.

  • Probe

    104 has an

    active end

    120 and an

    instrumentation end

    122 in opposition to

    active end

    120.

    Instrumentation end

    122 is rigidly coupled to probe

    side

    116 of

    instrumentation unit

    106. Together,

    probe

    104,

    instrumentation unit

    106,

    insulated shank

    108, and

    hotstick adapter

    110 form a rigid structure for

    apparatus

    100.

  • The methodologies used to couple

    probe

    104 to

    instrumentation unit

    106,

    instrumentation unit

    106 to

    insulated shank

    108, and

    insulated shank

    108 to

    hotstick adapter

    110 are commonplace in the industry and well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. These methodologies are therefore not discussed herein.

  • Probe

    104 is made up of

    melt unit

    102 and a

    probe body

    124. In the preferred embodiment,

    melt unit

    102 is detachably and rigidly coupled to probe

    body

    124 by female and

    male threads

    126 and 128, respectively. This allows

    melt unit

    102 to be removed from

    probe body

    124 when

    probe

    104 is to be used with

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′, and allows

    melt unit

    102 to be coupled to probe

    body

    124 when

    probe

    104 is to be used with

    jacketed URD cable

    20″.

  • When

    melt unit

    102 is removed from

    probe body

    124,

    melt unit

    102 is typically still hot. An effective way of removing

    melt unit

    102 without risk of injury is to slip a pocket-like hot pad (not shown) over

    melt unit

    102. The hot pad may then be used to unscrew and remove

    melt unit

    102 from

    probe body

    124.

    Melt unit

    102 may then be stored within the hot pad until cool. A typical pocket-like hot pad for this use is the type universally sold for use over the handle of a cast-iron skillet. Any similar pocket-type hot pad will also work.

  • Those skilled in the art will appreciate that it is not a requirement of the present invention that melt

    unit

    102 be detachable from

    probe body

    124. In an alternative embodiment,

    apparatus

    100 may be produced for use with

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ only. In this embodiment,

    probe

    104 would lack

    melt unit

    102 completely. In another alternative embodiment,

    apparatus

    100 may be produced for use with

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ only. In this embodiment,

    probe

    104 might have

    melt unit

    102 fixedly and rigidly coupled to probe

    body

    124. The differences in the internal construction of probe 104 (discussed hereinafter) to effect these alternative embodiments would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art and are not discussed herein.

  • When

    apparatus

    100 is used with

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′,

    melt unit

    102 is desirably omitted and probe 104 is made up solely of probe-

    body

    124. Probe

    body

    124 is made up of a cylindrical

    outer shell

    130 and a

    central input conductor

    132. Cylindrical

    outer shell

    130 is electrically conductive, but desirably somewhat resistive to thermal conduction. A typical material for

    outer shell

    130 is stainless steel.

  • An

    insulator

    134 separates shell 130 and

    input conductor

    132. Desirably,

    outer shell

    130,

    insulator

    134, and

    input conductor

    132 are all coaxial. By being coaxial,

    probe body

    124 rejects extraneous noise during determination of the status of URD cable 20 (discussed in greater detail hereinafter). By being coaxial,

    probe body

    124 more easily establishes an electrical connection with

    URD cable

    20 than apparatuses having multiple non-coaxial probes (discussed in more detail hereinafter).

  • Input conductor

    132 is made up of a

    conductive spring

    138, a

    movable conductor portion

    140, and an

    input contact

    142. In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 4, a fixed

    conductor portion

    136 is fixedly coupled within

    insulator

    134.

    Movable conductor portion

    140 is movably coupled within

    insulator

    134.

    Conductive spring

    138 electrically couples fixed and

    movable conductor portions

    136 and 140.

    Input contact

    142 is coupled to

    movable conductor portion

    140. In another embodiment (not shown),

    movable conductor

    140 is a solid rod that extends entirely through

    probe body

    124. A flexible wire connects

    movable conductor

    140 to an electrical circuit, and

    spring

    138 is located inside

    instrument housing

    106.

    Spring

    138 then pushes against

    conductor portion

    140 but is substantially electrically isolated from the electronic signal conveyed by

    conductor portion

    140. Both embodiments allow

    input contact

    142 to be spring loaded, but this is not a requirement of the present invention.

  • In one alternate embodiment,

    input contact

    142 may be detachably coupled to

    movable conductor portion

    140. This allows

    input contact

    142 to be changed if worn or damaged, but is not a requirement of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that

    input contact

    142 may also be integral to

    movable conductor portion

    140 without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

  • Outer shell

    130 of

    probe body

    124 incorporates a circular

    common contact

    144 and

    male threads

    128.

    Male threads

    128 allow

    probe body

    124 to couple to melt

    unit

    102 as required.

  • Probe body

    124 has an

    instrumentation end

    146 and an

    active end

    148. When

    apparatus

    100 is used to determine the status of

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′, then melt

    unit

    102 is desirably omitted. Probe-

    body instrumentation end

    146 then serves as

    probe instrumentation end

    122, and probe-body

    active end

    148 serves as probe

    active end

    120. Probe-body input and

    common contacts

    142 and 144 then serve as probe input and

    common contacts

    150 and 152, respectively, and are located at probe

    active end

    120.

  • Probe body

    124 has a

    length

    154 of not more than 32.0 cm, and desirably has a

    length

    154 of approximately 16.5 cm. In use,

    apparatus

    100 is typically attached to a hotstick (not shown) and placed into contact with a

    URD cable

    20 located in the bottom of a trench while the worker remains safely outside the trench. For use with

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′,

    probe

    104 desirably consists of

    probe body

    124, with

    instrumentation unit

    106 coupled to the

    instrumentation end

    122 of

    probe

    104. It is desirable, therefore, that

    probe body

    124 be long enough to allow the worker to see

    active end

    120 of

    probe

    104 around

    instrumentation unit

    106 as

    probe

    104 makes contact with

    URD cable

    20. Conversely, the

    longer probe body

    124 is, the more

    susceptible apparatus

    100 is to electrical noise (discussed hereinafter). A compromise is desirably reached between these two opposing requirements. A

    maximum length

    154 of 32.0 cm, and a

    desirable length

    154 of approximately 16.5 cm, for

    probe body

    124 successfully effects that compromise in the preferred embodiment.

  • Additionally,

    probe body

    124 has a

    diameter

    156 of not more than 6.0 cm. This provides a

    distance

    158 between input and

    common contacts

    150 and 152 of not more than 3.0 cm. Desirably, probe body has a

    diameter

    156 of approximately 1.6 cm, providing a

    nominal distance

    158 between

    contacts

    150 and 152 of 0.8 cm. By having a

    single probe

    104 with two

    contacts

    150 and 152 separated by less than 3.0 cm, an electrical connection between

    probe

    104 and

    URD cable

    20 is greatly facilitated over multi-probe apparatuses having a greater distance between contacts.

  • By having input contact 150 within and coaxial with

    common contact

    152, a significant increase in the ease of establishing an electrical contact between

    probe

    104 and

    URD cable

    20 is realized.

    Apparatus

    100 need only establish an electrical contact between

    common contact

    152 and any single

    neutral conductor

    30 of

    URD cable

    20, and need only establish an electrical contact between

    input contact

    150 and any point on

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28 of

    URD cable

    20.

    Common contact

    152 is configured as a ring or lip at the active end of

    probe

    104, and

    input contact

    150 is configured as a pin coaxial with

    common contact

    152. This two-point contact scheme allows

    probe

    104 to successfully establish electrical contact with

    URD cable

    20 while

    apparatus

    100 is off-center and non-perpendicular to

    URD cable

    20, i.e., while the worker holds the hotstick with

    apparatus

    100 attached at any of a wide variety of angles and

    contacts URD cable

    20 at any of a wide variety of on- and off-axis locations. This is in marked contrast to two-probe apparatuses that require a specific orientation to

    URD cable

    20 to effect contact.

  • In addition, by having

    contacts

    150 and 152 separated by less than 3.0 cm, a significant reduction in electrical noise (discussed hereinafter) may be realized by

    apparatus

    100. This is especially true because, for

    probe body

    124,

    input conductor

    132 is coaxial with and shielded by

    outer shell

    130.

  • Those skilled in the art will appreciate that probe-

    body

    124 may be produced with dimensions other than those given herein without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

  • When

    apparatus

    100 is to be used with

    jacketed URD cable

    20″, then melt

    unit

    102 is coupled to probe

    body

    124, and probe 104 is made up of probe-

    body

    124 and melt

    unit

    102.

    Melt unit

    102 is made up of a

    thermal reservoir

    160, a

    thermal insulator

    162, and a

    coupling component

    164.

    Coupling component

    164 contains

    female threads

    126 and serves to couple

    melt unit

    102 to probe-

    body

    124.

  • Thermal reservoir

    160 is made up of a thermally massive, thermally and electrically conductive cylindrical

    outer shell

    166 and a thermally and electrically conductive

    central input conductor

    168.

    Outer shell

    166 serves as the primary thermal component of

    thermal reservoir

    160. For this reason, outer shell is desirably fabricated of a thermally retentive material, such as aluminum or aluminum alloys.

  • A thermally conductive

    electrical insulator

    170 separates shell 166 and

    input conductor

    168. Since

    outer shell

    166 serves as the primary thermal component of

    thermal reservoir

    160,

    insulator

    170 is preferably small in cross section in order to maximize the mass of

    outer shell

    166.

    Outer shell

    166,

    insulator

    170, and

    input conductor

    168 are all mutually coaxial.

  • Input conductor

    168 is made up of a fixed

    conductor portion

    172 and an

    input contact

    174. In the preferred embodiment,

    input contact

    174 is detachably coupled to fixed

    conductor portion

    172. This allows

    input contact

    174 to be changed if a

    cable

    20″ with unusually large or small diameter

    neutral conductors

    30 is encountered of if

    input contact

    174 becomes worn or damaged. But this is not a requirement of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that

    input contact

    174 may be integral to fixed

    conductor portion

    172 without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

  • Melt unit

    102 has an

    active end

    178 and a

    body end

    180.

    Outer shell

    166 of

    melt unit

    102 incorporates a circular

    common contact

    176 configured as a ring or lip at

    active end

    178. The ring or lip projects outward only for a distance that is slightly greater than the distance between the outside surface of

    neutral conductors

    30 and the outside of

    jacket

    32 of

    cable

    20″, e.g., about 3.8 mm.

  • When

    melt unit

    102 is used to establish electrical contact with

    jacketed URD cable

    20″,

    body end

    180 is coupled to

    active end

    148 of

    probe body

    124. Probe-

    body instrumentation end

    146 then serves as

    probe instrumentation end

    122, and melt-unit

    active end

    178 then serves as probe

    active end

    120. Melt-unit input and

    common contacts

    174 and 176 then serve as probe input and

    common contacts

    150 and 152, respectively, and are located at probe

    active end

    120.

    Input contact

    174 desirably projects beyond

    common contact

    176 by a distance roughly equal to or slightly greater than the diameter of a

    neutral conductor

    30, e.g., about 2.5 mm.

  • When preparing

    melt unit

    102 to melt insulating

    jacket

    32 of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″,

    thermal reservoir

    160 is heated by applying heat from an external heat source 181 (FIG. 10).

    External heat source

    181 is a source of heat external to

    apparatus

    100. This allows

    apparatus

    100 to be self-contained without having to provide sufficient power to heat

    melt unit

    102. Typical

    external heat sources

    181 may be a torch or a heating unit powered by line or vehicular current.

  • Thermal reservoir

    160 is desirably heated to a temperature suitable for melting insulating

    jacket

    32 of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″. This temperature is desirably around 200-250° C. To prevent overheating of

    thermal reservoir

    160, a thermometer 183 (FIG. 6) may be used to measure an inside temperature of

    thermal reservoir

    160. To facilitate this, a

    thermometer connector

    182 is provided in

    thermal reservoir

    160.

    Thermometer connector

    182, in its simplest form, need only be a hole into the end of

    thermal reservoir

    160 into which the sensing end of

    thermometer

    183 is inserted during heating.

  • Thermal reservoir

    160 desirably has sufficient mass to maintain a temperature suitable to melt insulating jacket 32 a plurality of times. In the preferred embodiment, thermal reservoir has sufficient mass to maintain a melting temperature for at least five normal status determinations.

  • Thermal insulator

    162 provides a barrier between

    thermal reservoir

    160 and

    coupling component

    164. This impedes the heat from thermal reservoir from traveling up

    probe

    104. Desirably,

    thermal insulator

    162 is configured of a non-thermally conducting material, such as polytetrafluorethylene (a.k.a. Teflon®) or lava rock.

  • Electrical continuity between

    probe body

    124 and

    thermal reservoir

    160 is provided through fixed

    conductor portion

    172 and a

    conductive coupler

    184. Melt-

    unit input contact

    174 is electrically coupled to probe-

    body input contact

    142 through fixed

    conductor portion

    172. Melt-unit

    common contact

    176 is electrically coupled to probe-body

    common contact

    144 through thermal-reservoir

    outer shell

    166,

    conductive couplers

    184, and

    coupling component

    164.

  • In the preferred embodiment,

    conductive couplers

    184 are screws or pins. This is not a requirement of the present invention, however, and other means of electrical coupling may be effected without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

  • Mechanical connectivity between

    thermal reservoir

    160,

    thermal insulator

    162, and

    coupling component

    164 is desirably established though the use of

    conductive couplers

    184 in the form of small-diameter, stainless steel screws. Thus,

    couplers

    184 provide mechanical and electrical coupling. In addition, since

    couplers

    184 are small in diameter and made from stainless steel they also serve as thermal insulators. But the use of pins, adhesives (not shown) or other components or methodologies to couple

    thermal reservoir

    160,

    thermal insulator

    162, and

    coupling component

    164 to form

    melt unit

    102 does not depart from the spirit of the present invention.

  • FIGS. 8 and 9 show schematic views of the electrical characteristics of

    URD cable

    20 and an equivalent circuit of

    URD cable

    20, respectively, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The following discussion refers to FIGS. 8 and 9.

  • URD cable

    20 has a

    central conductor

    22. When

    URD cable

    20 is live,

    central conductor

    22 carries current at a high voltage EL (typically 7,200 volts). This current is coupled through a cable capacitance C to

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28. A portion of this current therefore passes through a cable resistance R to form a line signal SL. Line signal SL has a line-signal amplitude that is normally either very small, on the order of a few millivolts (when

    URD cable

    20 is live) or nearly zero (when

    URD cable

    20 is dead). Naturally, line signal SL is at line frequency (normally 50-60 Hz). Line signal SL forms across cable resistance R. Line signal SL is therefore present at

    input contact

    150.

  • FIG. 10 shows a flow chart of a

    method

    300 for determining the status of

    URD cable

    20 using

    apparatus

    100 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. FIGS. 11 and 12 show cross-sectional side views of

    apparatus

    100 in contact with

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ (FIG. 11) and

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ (FIG. 12) in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 13 shows a schematic block diagram of a

    cable analysis circuit

    186 for

    apparatus

    100 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. FIGS. 14 through 19 show a plan view of a

    status display unit

    188 for

    apparatus

    100 depicting no electrical connection (FIG. 14), a “short” or low-resistance electrical connection (FIG. 15), an “open” or high-resistance electrical connection (FIG. 16), a “dead” or de-energized cable status (FIG. 17), an “unknown” or indeterminate cable status (FIG. 18), and a “live” or energized cable status (FIG. 19) in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The following discussion refers to FIGS. 3 and 10 through 13.

  • Initially, a task 302 (FIG. 10) determines, typically through observation by a worker, if

    URD cable

    20 to be tested is

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ (FIG. 11) or jacketed

    URD cable

    20″ (FIG. 12).

  • If

    task

    302 determines

    URD cable

    20 is

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′, then, if

    melt unit

    102 is attached to probe

    body

    124, a

    task

    304′ detaches melt

    unit

    102 from

    probe body

    124.

  • Next, an

    optional task

    306′ cleans unjacketed

    URD cable

    20′. Desirably,

    task

    306′ cleans unjacketed

    URD cable

    20′ through the use of a hotstick with a cleaning device attached (not shown). In this manner, the worker stays safely away from

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′.

    Task

    306′ is considered optional because it may be skipped, particularly on the first attempt at determining cable status. A worker may decide to skip

    task

    306′ if an observation of

    cable

    20′ reveals neutral conductors that do not appear to be particularly corroded. But if cable status cannot be successfully determined on the first attempt, then subsequent iterations may include

    task

    306′.

  • A

    task

    308′ then positions

    active end

    120 of

    probe

    104 over a desired contact location on

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′.

  • A

    task

    310′ connects

    probe

    104 to

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ by causing

    input contact

    150 to contact

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28 and

    common contact

    152 to contact at least one of

    neutral conductors

    30. The tip of probe-body input contact 142 (serving as probe input contact 150) is substantially flat or blunt to provide a significant amount of contact area and to minimize damage to

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28.

  • A

    task

    314′ then determines if

    probe

    104 has successfully established an electrical connection with

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ in

    task

    310′. That is,

    task

    314′ determines that

    input contact

    150 contacts either

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28 or one of

    neutral conductors

    30 at the same time

    common contact

    152 contacts one of

    neutral conductors

    30. The establishment of the electrical connection is evidenced by the illumination of an “on” indicator 198 (FIGS. 13 and 15 through 19).

  • It will be appreciated that

    input contact

    150 may on occasion contact one of

    neutral conductors

    30. This constitutes a “short” electrical connection, and is discussed in detail hereinafter.

  • Similarly, it will be appreciated that

    input contact

    150 may on occasion not effect a good contact with

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28. This constitutes an “open” electrical connection, and is discussed in detail hereinafter.

  • Apparatus

    100 incorporates cable analysis circuit 186 (FIG. 13) housed within instrumentation unit 106 (FIG. 3) and electrically coupled to input and

    common contacts

    150 and 152.

    Cable analysis circuit

    186 includes a

    power supply

    190 configured to automatically provide power to the remainder of

    cable analysis circuit

    186 when

    task

    310′ establishes the electrical connection between

    probe

    104 and

    URD cable

    20.

  • Power supply

    190 contains a

    battery

    192, a

    contact detector

    194 coupled between

    battery

    192 and

    input contact

    150, and a

    gated regulator

    196.

    URD cable

    20 has cable resistance R between the point on

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28 where

    input contact

    150 makes contact and the

    neutral conductor

    30 where

    common contact

    152 makes contact. Therefore, when a electrical connection has been made, there is a complete circuit through

    battery

    192,

    contact detector

    194,

    input contact

    150, cable resistance R,

    common contact

    152, and back to

    battery

    192. When this complete circuit occurs, current flows though

    contact detector

    194, and a signal is sent to

    gated regulator

    196.

    Gated regulator

    196 then turns on and supplies regulated power to the remainder of

    cable analysis circuit

    186. This results in an “on”

    indicator

    198 of

    status display unit

    188 being activated (FIGS. 13 and 15 through 19). This auto-on feature simplifies and thereby encourages the use of

    apparatus

    100, and also prevents accidentally leaving

    apparatus

    100 turned on and unnecessarily draining

    battery

    192.

  • In addition,

    battery

    192 is preferably tested prior to the use of

    apparatus

    100 to prevent errors. The auto-on feature allows

    battery

    192 to be tested by simply shorting input and

    common contacts

    150 and 152 together with a coin, a key, a tool, or any other handy piece of metal. A

    good battery

    192 will result in a “short” indication (FIG. 15) of status display unit 188 (discussed in detail hereinafter).

  • Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other methods of turning on

    apparatus

    100 may be incorporated. The use of any such method, including but not limited to a simple switch, does not depart from the spirit of the present invention.

  • If

    task

    314′ (FIG. 10) determines that

    probe

    104 has not established the electrical connection, i.e., “on”

    indicator

    198 is not lit, then the process flow passes back to

    task

    308′, and probe 104 is repositioned at a different contact location on

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′.

    Tasks

    308′, 310′, and 314′ are repeated.

  • If

    task

    314′ determines that

    probe

    104 has established the electrical connection. i.e., “on”

    indicator

    198 is lit, then a

    task

    316′ then determines if the electrical connection is a “short” connection.

  • Cable analysis circuit

    186 incorporates a connection determination circuit 200 (FIG. 13).

    Connection determination circuit

    200 is a form of dynamic ohmmeter configured to compare cable resistance R against predetermined resistance thresholds. A

    signal injector

    202 injects a trace signal ST into

    input contact

    150. Trace signal ST is divided between an output resistance (not shown) of

    signal injector

    202 and cable resistance R. Trace signal ST therefore has a trace-signal amplitude that is a function of the value of cable resistance R.

  • Signal injector

    202 produces trace signal ST at a frequency different from the line frequency (usually 50 or 60 Hz) of the electric distribution system of which

    URD cable

    20 is a part. This frequency is typically higher, and is nominally 32 kHz in the preferred embodiment. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the use of other frequencies for trace signal ST does not depart from the spirit of the present invention.

  • Trace signal S T is amplified by a

    preamplifier

    204 and passes to the inputs of a

    first filter

    206 configured to pass trace signal ST and a

    second filter

    208 configured to block trace signal ST. In the preferred embodiment the

    pass filter

    206 is a high-pass filter configured to pass signals at the trace frequency (32 kHz) and block signals at the line frequency (50-60 Hz), and the

    block filter

    208 is a low-pass filter configured to block signals at the trace frequency and pass signals at the line frequency. Trace signal ST therefore passes through high-

    pass filter

    206.

  • Trace signal S T is then applied to a pair of threshold detectors. A lower-

    threshold detector

    210 determines if the trace-signal amplitude is less than a predetermined lower trace threshold. That is, since the trace-signal amplitude is a function of the cable resistance R,

    lower threshold detector

    210 determines if cable resistance R is less than a predetermined lower resistance threshold. In the preferred embodiment, this predetermined lower resistance threshold is greater than 75 Ω, and preferably approximately 100 Ω.

  • A cable resistance R of less than the lower resistance threshold results in a “short” connection, and a “short”

    indicator

    212 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 15) is activated. Such a condition indicates that

    input contact

    150 is contacting either one of

    neutral conductors

    30 or is contacting a local shorted area of

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28.

  • In either case,

    task

    316′ (FIG. 10) determines that the electrical connection is a “short” connection, i.e., the “short”

    indicator

    212 is lit. The process flow passes back to

    task

    308′ and

    apparatus

    100 is repositioned at a different contact location on

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′.

    Tasks

    308′, 310′, 314′, and 316′ are repeated.

  • If

    task

    316′ determines that the electrical connection is not a “short” connection, i.e., “short”

    indicator

    212 is not lit, then a

    task

    318′ determines if the electrical connection is an “open” connection.

  • A higher-threshold detector 214 (FIG. 13) determines if the trace-signal amplitude is greater than a predetermined higher trace threshold. That is, if cable resistance R is greater than a predetermined higher resistance threshold. In the preferred embodiment, this predetermined higher resistance threshold is less than 50 kΩ, and preferably approximately 30 kΩ.

  • A cable resistance R of greater than the higher resistance threshold results in an “open”

    indicator

    216 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 16) being activated. Such a condition may indicate that

    input contact

    150 is making a poor contact with

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28, or is contacting a local contaminated area of

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28, or that

    common contact

    152 is making a poor contact with

    neutral conductors

    30.

  • In any of these situations,

    task

    318′ (FIG. 10) determines that the electrical connection is an “open” connection, i.e., the “open”

    indicator

    216 is lit. The process flow passes back to

    task

    306′, unjacketed URD cable is cleaned or re-cleaned, and

    apparatus

    100 is optionally repositioned at a different contact location on

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′.

    Tasks

    308′, 310′, 314′, 316′, and 318′ are repeated.

  • If

    task

    318′ determines that the electrical connection is not an “open” connection, i.e., “open”

    indicator

    216 is not lit, then the electrical connection is a “good” connection, i.e., is a valid connection. The electrical connection can be a valid connection only when the electrical connection is neither a “short” nor an “open” connection, i.e., when neither “short”

    indicator

    212 nor “open”

    indicator

    216 is lit. This occurs when lower-

    threshold detector

    210 determines the trace-signal amplitude is greater than the lower trace threshold and higher-

    threshold detector

    214 determines the trace-signal amplitude is less than the higher trace threshold, i.e., cable resistance R is greater than the lower resistance threshold and less than the higher resistance threshold. In this condition a

    logic gate

    218 causes an optional “good”

    indicator

    220 of status display unit 188 (FIG. 13) being activated.

  • An output of

    logic gate

    218 is used to provide condition information elsewhere in

    cable analysis circuit

    186.

  • Cable analysis circuit

    186 incorporates a

    status determination circuit

    222.

    Status determination circuit

    222 is a form of a gated comparator configured to compare line signal SL against predetermined signal thresholds. Line signal SL is amplified by

    preamplifier

    204 and passes to the inputs of

    first filter

    206 configured to block line signal SL and

    second filter

    208 configured to pass line signal SL. In the preferred embodiment the

    block filter

    206 is a high-pass filter configured to block signals at the line frequency and pass signals at the trace frequency, and the

    pass filter

    208 is a low-pass filter configured to block signals at the trace frequency and pass signals at the line frequency. Line signal SL therefore passes through the low-

    pass filter

    208.

  • Line signal S L is then applied to a pair of gated threshold detectors. The gate of each of these gated threshold detectors is coupled to

    logic gate

    218 of

    connection determination circuit

    200. This means that each of the gated threshold detectors can produce an output only if

    connection determination circuit

    200 determines that the electrical connection between

    probe

    104 and

    URD cable

    20 is a valid electrical connection, i.e., is a “good” connect wherein either optional “good”

    indicator

    220 is lit and/or both “short”

    indicator

    212 and “open”

    indicator

    216 are not lit.

  • No determination of the status of

    URD cable

    20 is made unless

    connection determination circuit

    200 is simultaneously determining that the electrical connection between

    probe

    104 and

    URD cable

    20 is a valid electrical connection. This logic severely limits the potential for either a false-dead or a false-live status indication.

  • If

    task

    318′ (FIG. 10) determines that the electrical connection is not an “open” connection, i.e., “open”

    indicator

    216 is not lit, then a

    task

    320′ determines if the status of

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is “dead” or de-energized.

  • A gated lower-

    threshold detector

    224 determines if the line-signal amplitude is less than a predetermined lower signal threshold. A line-signal amplitude less than the lower signal threshold results in a “dead”

    indicator

    226 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 17) being activated. Such a condition indicates that

    URD cable

    20 is dead, i.e., de-energized.

  • This constitutes a positive test for a “dead” status for

    URD cable

    20. Such a positive dead test, where a

    de-energized URD cable

    20 is positively determined to be dead, is superior to a negative live test, where a

    de-energized URD cable

    20 is determined to be not live. A positive dead test eliminates many possible false-dead indications (where a

    live URD cable

    20 is falsely reported to be dead), whereas a negative live test does not. A false-dead status is the worst of all possible indications and creates the potential for injury or death should the worker spike or cut a

    live URD cable

    20.

  • If

    task

    320′ (FIG. 10) determines that the status of

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is “dead” or de-energized, then flow routes to a

    terminal task

    322 wherein

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is indicated to be dead, i.e. “dead”

    indicator

    226 is lit (FIGS. 13 and 17).

  • If

    task

    320′ determines that the status of

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is not “dead” or de-energized, i.e., “dead” indicator is not lit, then a

    task

    324′ determines if the status of

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is “live” or energized.

  • A gated higher-threshold detector 228 (FIG. 13) determines if the line-signal amplitude is greater than a predetermined higher signal threshold. A line-signal amplitude greater than the higher signal threshold results in a “live”

    indicator

    230 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 19) being activated. Such a condition indicates that

    URD cable

    20 is live, i.e., energized.

  • This constitutes a positive test for a “live” status for

    URD cable

    20. A positive live test, where an

    energized URD cable

    20 is positively determined to be live, eliminates many possible false-live indications (where a

    dead URD cable

    20 is falsely reported to be live).

  • If

    task

    324′ (FIG. 10) determines that the status of

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is “live” or energized, then an

    optional task

    326′ determines, usually by observation, if

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is clamped.

  • Under certain conditions, a dead unjacketed URD cable will pick up enough electrical noise, perhaps in the form of stray ground currents flowing in

    neutral conductors

    30, to produce a false-live or unknown status indication. This can occur when

    neutral conductors

    30 loosely contact

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28, or when sufficient corrosion of

    neutral conductors

    30 has set in so as to cause a poor contact between

    neutral conductors

    30 and

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28 at the contact location. This condition may be improved by clamping

    neutral conductors

    30 to

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28 to break through the corrosion and otherwise short any stray ground currents to

    semiconductor sheath

    28.

  • The preferred method of clamping is to use one or two hotsticks with one or two “hotstick clamps” affixed to the ends of hotsticks. In this manner, the worker stays safely away from

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′. If one clamp is used, it is desirably positioned as close to the probing area as possible. More preferably, two clamps are used, and the two clamps are positioned roughly 30 cm apart, on opposing sides of the probing area. The clamps shunt or short circuit any stray current flow down the outside of

    semiconductor sheath

    28 around the area being probed. Thus, any voltage measured in the probed area between the clamps originates from current flow at the

    center conductor

    22, via capacitance “C” (FIGS. 8-9), to

    semiconductor sheath

    28, and then to

    neutral conductors

    30. But if the cable is live, the clamps do not interfere with the measurement.

  • If

    task

    326′ determines that

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is not clamped or that it may be inadequately clamped, then in a

    task

    328′ unjacketed URD cable is clamped or re-clamped as discussed above. Flow then passes to

    task

    308′, where

    probe

    104 is repositioned at a contact location on

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ proximate the clamp or clamps.

    Tasks

    308′, 310314′, 316318, 320, 324′, and 326′ are repeated.

  • If

    task

    326′ determines that

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is adequately clamped and indicating a live condition, then process flow routes to a

    terminal task

    330, wherein

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is simply indicated as being live, i.e. “live”

    indicator

    230 is lit (FIGS. 13 and 19).

  • If

    task

    324′ determines that the status of

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is not “live” or energized, i.e., “live”

    indicator

    230 is not lit, then in a

    task

    332′ the status of

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ cannot be determined, i.e., is “unknown” or indeterminate.

  • When gated lower-

    threshold detector

    224 determines the line-signal amplitude is greater than the lower signal threshold and gated higher-

    threshold detector

    228 determines the line-signal amplitude is less than the higher signal threshold, then a

    logic gate

    232 results in an “unknown”

    indicator

    234 of status display unit 188 (FIGS. 13 and 18) being activated. Such a condition indicates that the status of

    URD cable

    20 is indeterminate. In this case, the process flow passes back to

    tasks

    326′ and 328′ where

    unjacketed URD cable

    20′ is clamped or re-clamped as discussed above.

    Tasks

    308′, 310314′, 316318′, 320′, 324′, and 326′ are then repeated. Presumably, a worker will repeat the above-discussed tasks as needed until a clear indication of either a “dead” or “live” cable is obtained.

  • If

    task

    302 determines

    URD cable

    20 is jacketed

    URD cable

    20″, then, if

    melt unit

    102 is not attached to probe

    body

    124, a

    task

    304″ attaches

    melt unit

    102 to probe

    body

    124.

  • A

    task

    306″ heats melt

    unit

    102 to the desired temperature by applying heat from

    external heat source

    181.

  • A

    task

    308″ positions

    active end

    120 of

    probe

    104 over a desired contact location on

    jacketed URD cable

    20″.

  • A

    task

    310″ connects

    probe

    104 to

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ by causing input and

    common contacts

    150 and 152 to melt through insulating

    jacket

    32 of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ so that

    input contact

    150 contacts

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28 and

    common contact

    152 contacts at least one of

    neutral conductors

    30. The tip of melt-unit input contact 174 (serving as probe input contact 150) is a blunt point, but sharper than probe-

    body input contact

    142, to allow melting through

    jacket

    32 and a partial melt into the outermost portion of

    outer semiconductor sheath

    28.

    Probe

    104 is pressed against

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ until the lip or rim of

    common contact

    176 contacts one or two

    neutral conductors

    30. Due to the projection of input contact 174 a predetermined distance beyond

    contact

    176,

    input contact

    174 will only slightly penetrate into

    semiconductor sheath

    28 when

    contact

    176 abuts

    neutral conductors

    30. With

    contact

    176 projecting around 2.5 mm beyond

    common contact

    174, sufficient, but not excessive, penetration into

    semiconductor sheath

    28 results when

    cable

    20″ has 10-14 gage

    neutral conductors

    30. When larger or smaller diameter

    neutral conductors

    30 are encountered, then input

    contact

    174 is replaced by a longer or

    shorter input contact

    174, as needed.

  • A

    task

    312″ determines, typically through observation, if

    task

    310″ successfully melted

    melt unit

    102 into insulating

    jacket

    32, i.e., if

    melt unit

    102 was hot enough.

  • If

    task

    312″ determines that

    melt unit

    102 was not hot enough (i.e., there was a bad melt), then the process flow passes back to

    task

    306″ and

    melt unit

    102 is reheated.

    Tasks

    306″, 308″, 310″, and 312″ are repeated.

  • A

    task

    314″ then determines if

    probe

    104 has successfully established an electrical connection with

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ in

    task

    310″ as discussed hereinbefore for

    task

    314′.

  • If

    task

    314″ determines that

    probe

    104 has not established the electrical connection, i.e., “on”

    indicator

    198 is not lit, then the process flow passes back to

    task

    308″ and probe 104 is repositioned at a different contact location on

    jacketed URD cable

    20″.

    Tasks

    308″, 310″, 312″, and 314″ are repeated.

  • If

    task

    314″ determines that

    probe

    104 has established the electrical connection. i.e., “on”

    indicator

    198 is lit, then a

    task

    316″ determines if the electrical connection is a “short” connection as discussed hereinbefore in connection with

    task

    316′.

  • If

    task

    316″ determines that the electrical connection is a “short” connection, i.e., the “short”

    indicator

    212 is lit, then the process flow passes back to

    task

    308′ and

    apparatus

    100 is repositioned at a different contact location on

    jacketed URD cable

    20″.

    Tasks

    308″, 310″, 312″, 314″, and 316″ are repeated.

  • If

    task

    316″ determines that the electrical connection is not a “short” connection, i.e., “short”

    indicator

    212 is not lit, then a

    task

    318″ determines if the electrical connection is an “open” connection as discussed hereinbefore in connection with

    task

    318′.

  • If

    task

    318″ determines that the electrical connection is an “open” connection, i.e., the “open”

    indicator

    216 is lit, then the process flow passes back to

    task

    308″ and

    apparatus

    100 is repositioned to a different contact location on

    jacketed URD cable

    20″.

    Tasks

    308″, 310″, 312″, 314″, 316″, and 318″ are repeated.

  • If

    task

    318″ determines that the electrical connection is a “good” or valid connection, then a

    task

    320″ determines if the status of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ is “dead” or de-energized as discussed hereinbefore in connection with

    task

    320′.

  • If

    task

    320″ determines that the status of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ is “dead”, then flow routes to

    terminal task

    322 wherein

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ is indicated to be dead, i.e. “dead”

    indicator

    226 is lit.

  • If

    task

    320″ determines that the status of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ is not “dead” or de-energized, i.e., “dead” indicator is not lit, then a

    task

    324″ determines if the status of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ is “live” or energized as discussed hereinbefore in connection with

    task

    324′.

  • If

    task

    324″ (FIG. 10) determines that the status of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ is “live” or energized, then flow routes to a

    terminal task

    330 wherein

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ is indicated to be live, i.e. “live”

    indicator

    230 is lit.

  • If

    task

    324″ determines that the status of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ is not “live” or energized, i.e., “live”

    indicator

    230 is not lit, then in a

    task

    332″ the status of

    jacketed URD cable

    20″ cannot be determined, i.e., is “unknown” or indeterminate as discussed hereinbefore. In this case, the process flow passes back to

    task

    308″ and

    apparatus

    100 is repositioned to another contact location on

    jacketed URD cable

    20″.

    Tasks

    308″, 310″, 312″, 314″, 316″, 318″, 320″, and 324″ are repeated.

  • Terminal tasks

    322 and 330, for “dead” and “live” statuses respectively, represent the end or termination of a successful status determination effort. However, even though

    apparatus

    100 is carefully structured to minimized the possibility of either a false-dead or a false-live status indication, there is always a chance that such an error might occur. The presence of such an error, especially a false-dead indication, may pose a hazard and incur a risk of injury or death. To further reduce any chance of injury or death,

    terminal tasks

    322 and 330 should be followed by a

    task

    334 wherein the entire

    status determination method

    300 is repeated with

    apparatus

    100 positioned at a different contact location on

    URD cable

    20. After a plurality of such status determination procedures, the assurance that

    URD cable

    20 is truly dead or live approaches certainty. The ease with which

    apparatus

    100 may be used to perform

    status determination method

    300 encourages repeated performances of

    method

    300.

  • The following discussion refers to FIGS. 3 and 13 through 19.

  • Status display unit

    188 contains a plurality of indicators 236 coupled to

    display side

    118 of

    instrumentation unit

    106.

  • By using a plurality of indicators 236, sufficient information is imparted to the worker to make an informed and safe decision regarding the status of

    URD cable

    20. In the preferred embodiment, indicators 236 include “on”

    indicator

    198 to indicate an electrical connection is established between

    probe

    104 and

    URD cable

    20, “short”

    indicator

    212 to indicate that the electrical connection is a “short” connection and not a valid connection, “open”

    indicator

    216 to indicate that the electrical connection is an “open” connection and not a valid connection, “dead”

    indicator

    226 to indicate that

    URD cable

    20 is de-energized when the electrical connection is a valid connection, “live”

    indicator

    230 to indicate that

    URD cable

    20 is energized when the electrical connection is a valid connection, and “unknown”

    indicator

    234 to indicate that the status of

    URD cable

    20 cannot be determined. In an alternative embodiment, “good” indicator may be used in conjunction with or in lieu of “short” and “open”

    indicators

    212 and 216 to indicate that the electrical connection is a valid connection.

  • Indicators 236 are placed on

    display side

    118 of

    instrumentation unit

    106 so as to be in the worker's line of sight while the worker is establishing contact with and determining the status of

    URD cable

    20. In the preferred embodiment, indicators 236 are visual indicators, preferably light-emitting diodes.

  • In the preferred embodiment, indicators 236 are patterned in two rows or lines. A first line of indicators 236 contains “short”

    indicator

    212, “on”

    indicator

    198, and “open”

    indicator

    216, i.e., those indicators 236 associated with

    condition determination circuit

    200. A second line of indicators 236 contains “dead”

    indicator

    226, “unknown”

    indicator

    234, and “live”

    indicator

    230.

  • In the preferred embodiment, “dead”

    indicator

    226 is of a first color, preferably green, “live” indicator is of a second color different from the first color, preferably red, and the remaining indicators 236 are of a third color different from either the first or second colors, preferably yellow. By using this color scheme, instantaneous and distinct interpretation of the indicated status of

    URD cable

    20 by the worker is possible.

  • In addition, “short”

    indicator

    212, “open”

    indicator

    216, and “unknown”

    indicator

    234 are oriented relative to “on”

    indicator

    198 so that again instantaneous and distinct interpretation by the worker is possible.

  • In summary, the present invention teaches an

    apparatus

    100 for determining the status of an underground residential distribution (URD)

    cable

    20.

    Apparatus

    100 actively determines status for both a live and a

    dead URD cable

    20.

    Apparatus

    100 determines status for both unjacketed and

    jacketed URD cables

    20′ and 20″. Apparatus displays results viewable and instantly interpretable at a distance. Apparatus determines a quality of connection to

    URD cable

    20 while determining the status thereof.

  • Although the preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described in detail, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention or from the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (73)

What is claimed is:

1. An apparatus for determining the status of an underground residential distribution (URD) cable in an electric power network operating at a line frequency, said apparatus comprising:

a rigid probe comprising:

a common contact configured to contact a neutral conductor of said URD cable; and

an input contact insulated from said common contact and configured to contact an outer semiconductor sheath of said URD cable;

an instrumentation unit rigidly coupled to said probe;

a cable analysis circuit housed within said instrumentation unit and electrically coupled to said common and input contacts; and

a status display unit electrically coupled to said cable analysis circuit.

2. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

wherein said input contact is substantially coaxial with said common contact.

3. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

wherein said cable analysis circuit comprises:

a connection determination circuit configured to determine if an electrical connection between said probe and said URD cable is a valid connection; and

a status determination circuit configured to determine said status of said URD cable while said connection determination circuit simultaneously determines if said electrical connection is said valid connection.

4. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

wherein said probe additionally comprises a melt unit configured to melt an insulating jacket of said URD cable when said URD cable is a jacketed URD cable.

5. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

wherein:

said rigid probe has an active end and an instrumentation end in opposition to said active end, wherein said input contact and common contacts are proximate said active end;

said instrumentation unit has a probe side and a display side in opposition to said probe side, wherein said probe side is coupled to said probe proximate said instrumentation end; and

said status display unit is coupled to said display side.

6. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

wherein said status display unit comprises:

a first indicator configured to indicate a condition of an electrical connection between said probe and said URD cable; and

a second indicator configured to indicate said status of said URD cable.

7. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

wherein said common and input contacts are separated by a inter-contact distance of less than or equal to 3 cm.

8. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

wherein said probe has a probe body having a probe body length of less than or equal to 32 cm.

9. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

wherein said cable analysis circuit comprises a power supply comprising:

a battery;

a contact detector coupled to said probe and configured to detect when said probe has effected an electrical connection with said URD cable; and

a gated regulator coupled to said battery and said contact detector and configured to automatically provide power to a remaining portion of said cable analysis circuit in response to said contact detector.

10. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

wherein said cable analysis circuit comprises:

a connection determination circuit configured to determine if an electrical connection between said probe and said URD cable is a valid connection; and

a status determination circuit configured to determine said status of said URD cable.

11. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 10

wherein said connection determination circuit determines if a resistance between said input contact and said common contact is greater than a lower resistance threshold and less than a higher resistance threshold.

12. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 11

wherein:

said lower resistance threshold is greater than 75 Ω; and

said higher resistance threshold is less than 50 kΩ.

13. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 10

wherein said status determination circuit determines if a line signal derived from said URD cable has a line-signal amplitude of either less than a lower signal threshold or greater than a higher signal threshold.

14. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 13

wherein said status display unit comprises:

a first indicator configured to indicate when said status determination circuit determines said line-signal amplitude is less than said lower signal threshold; and

a second indicator configured to indicate when said status determination circuit determines said line-signal amplitude is greater than said higher signal threshold.

15. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 1

additionally comprising:

an insulated shank coupled to one of said probe and said instrumentation unit; and

a hotstick adapter coupled to said insulated shank.

16. An apparatus for determining the status of an underground residential distribution (URD) cable in an electric power network, said apparatus comprising:

a probe configured to establish an electrical connection with said URD cable, wherein said electrical connection comprises:

a common contact of said probe in contact with a neutral conductor of said URD cable; and

an input contact of said probe in contact with an outer semiconductor sheath of said URD cable;

a cable analysis circuit coupled to said probe, configured to simultaneously determine if said electrical connection is a valid connection and said status of said URD cable when said electrical connection is said valid connection; and

a status display unit coupled to said cable analysis circuit and configured to indicate said status of said URD cable when said electrical connection is said valid connection.

17. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 16

wherein said probe is a rigid coaxial probe comprising:

a conductive shell of which said common contact is a portion; and

an input conductor within said conductive shell and of which said input contact is a portion.

18. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 16

wherein said probe is a rigid probe comprising:

a probe body having an active end and an instrumentation end in opposition to said active end; and

a melt unit coupled to said active end and configured to melt an insulating jacket of said URD cable when said URD cable is a jacketed URD cable.

19. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 16

wherein said status display unit comprises:

a first indicator configured to indicate when said electrical connection is said valid connection; and

a second indicator configured to indicate said status of said URD cable.

20. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 16

wherein said cable analysis circuit comprises:

a connection determination circuit configured to determine when said electrical connection is said valid connection; and

a status determination circuit configured to determine said status of said URD cable when said electrical connection is said valid connection.

21. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 20

wherein said connection determination circuit determines if a resistance between said input contact and said common contact is one of less than a lower resistance threshold and greater than a higher resistance threshold.

22. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 21

wherein:

said lower resistance threshold is greater than 75 Ω; and

said higher resistance threshold is less than 50 kΩ.

23. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 20

wherein said connection determination circuit comprises:

a signal injector coupled to said input contact, configured to generate a trace signal, and configured to inject said trace signal into said input contact such that a trace-signal amplitude of said trace signal is a proportionate to said resistance;

a lower-threshold detector coupled to said input contact and configured to detect when said trace-signal amplitude is less than a lower trace threshold; and

a higher-threshold detector coupled to said input contact and configured to detect when said trace-signal amplitude is greater than a higher trace threshold.

24. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 23

wherein:

said line signal has a line frequency; and

said trace signal has a trace frequency different from said line frequency.

25. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 20

wherein said status determination circuit determines if a line signal derived from said URD cable has a line-signal amplitude of either less than a lower signal threshold or greater than a higher signal threshold.

26. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 25

wherein said status display unit comprises:

a first indicator coupled to said status determination circuit and configured to indicate when said line-signal amplitude is less than said lower signal threshold; and

a second indicator coupled to said status determination circuit and configured to indicate when said line-signal amplitude is greater than said higher signal threshold.

27. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 26

wherein said status display unit comprises a third indicator coupled to said status determination circuit and configured to indicate when said line-signal amplitude is greater than said lower signal threshold and less than said higher signal threshold.

28. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 26

wherein said status determination circuit is configured to inhibit indication by said first and second indicators when said line-signal amplitude is greater than said lower signal threshold and less than said higher signal threshold.

29. An apparatus for determining the status of a jacketed underground residential distribution (URD) cable in an electric power network, said apparatus comprising:

a probe comprising a melt unit configured to melt through an insulating jacket of said jacketed URD cable, said melt unit comprising:

a common contact configured to contact a neutral conductor of said jacketed URD cable when said melt unit has melted through said insulating jacket; and

an input contact insulated from said common contact and configured to contact an outer semiconductor sheath of said jacketed URD cable when said melt unit has melted through said insulating jacket;

an instrumentation unit coupled to said probe; and

a status display unit coupled to said instrumentation unit.

30. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 29

wherein:

said probe is a rigid probe having an active end and an instrumentation end in opposition to said active end;

said instrumentation unit has a probe side and a display side in opposition to said probe side, wherein said probe side is coupled to said probe proximate said instrumentation end; and

said status display unit is coupled to said display side.

31. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 29

wherein said melt unit comprises:

a substantially cylindrical outer shell of which said common contact is a portion; and

a substantially coaxial input conductor within said outer shell and of which said input contact is a portion.

32. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 29

wherein:

said common contact is a first melt-unit common contact;

said input contact is a first melt-unit input contact;

said probe additionally comprises a probe body comprising:

a second probe-body common contact configured to be electrically coupled to said first common contact; and

a second probe-body input contact insulated from said second common contact and configured to be electrically coupled to said first input contact; and

said melt unit is detachably coupled to said probe body.

33. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 32

wherein said first input contact is sharper than said second input contact.

34. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 29

wherein said melt unit is configured to be heated by an application of heat from an external heat source.

35. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 29

wherein:

said probe additionally comprises a probe body coupled to said melt unit; and

said melt unit comprises:

a thermal reservoir; and

a thermal insulator coupled between said thermal reservoir and said probe body.

36. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 35

wherein said thermal reservoir comprises a thermometer connector configured to accept a thermometer.

37. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 35

wherein said thermal reservoir is configured to retain sufficient heat to melt through said insulating jacket a plurality of times.

38. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 35

wherein:

said common contact is a first common contact;

said input contact is a first input contact; and

said probe body comprises:

a second common contact configured to be electrically coupled to said first common contact through said thermal reservoir; and

a second input contact insulated from said second common contact and configured to be electrically coupled to said first input contact through said thermal reservoir.

39. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 35

wherein said thermal reservoir comprises:

a thermally massive outer shell, wherein said common contact is a portion of said outer shell;

a thermally conductive electrical insulator within said outer shell; and

a thermally conductive input conductor within said thermally conductive electrical insulator, wherein said input contact is a portion of said input conductor.

40. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 35

wherein:

said common contact is thermally coupled to said thermal reservoir and is configured to melt through said insulating jacket to effect contact with said neutral conductor; and

said input contact is thermally coupled to said thermal reservoir and is configured to melt through said insulating jacket to effect contact with said outer semiconductor sheath.

41. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 29

wherein:

said input contact extends a first predetermined distance beyond said common contact; and

said input contact is detachably coupled to said melt unit so that said input contact can be replaced by another input contact that projects a second predetermined distance beyond said common contact.

42. An apparatus for determining the status of an underground residential distribution (URD) cable in an electric power network, said apparatus comprising:

a rigid probe having an active end and an instrumentation end in opposition to said active end, wherein said active end is configured to effect an electrical connection with said URD cable;

an instrumentation unit having a probe side and a display side in opposition to said probe side, wherein said probe side is rigidly coupled to said probe proximate said instrumentation end;

a status display unit coupled to said instrumentation unit upon said display side.

43. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 42

wherein:

said apparatus additionally comprises a power supply configured to automatically provide power to said apparatus when said probe effects said electrical connection; and

said status display unit comprises an indicator configured to indicate when said power supply is providing said power.

44. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 42

wherein said status display unit comprises a plurality of visual indicators.

45. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 44

wherein said visual indicators are light-emitting diodes.

46. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 42

wherein said status display unit comprises an indicator configured to indicate when a resistance across said probe is greater than a lower resistance threshold and less than a higher resistance threshold.

47. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 42

wherein said status display unit comprises:

a first indicator configured to indicate when a resistance across said probe and through said URD cable is less than a lower resistance threshold; and

a second indicator configured to indicate when said resistance is greater than a higher resistance threshold.

48. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 47

wherein said status display unit comprises a third indicator configured to indicate when said apparatus is energized.

49. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 42

wherein said status display unit comprises a first indicator configured to indicate when a line-signal amplitude of a line signal derived from said URD cable is less than a lower signal threshold.

50. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 49

wherein said status display unit additionally comprises a second indicator configured to indicate when said line-signal amplitude is greater than a higher signal threshold.

51. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 50

wherein:

said first indicator is of a first color; and

said second indicator is of a second color different from said first color.

52. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 50

wherein said status display unit additionally comprises a third indicator configured to indicate when said line-signal amplitude is greater than said lower signal threshold and less than said higher signal threshold.

53. An apparatus as claimed in

claim 42

wherein said status display unit comprises an indicator configured to indicate when a line-signal amplitude of a line signal derived from said URD cable is less than a lower signal threshold while simultaneously verifying a resistance across said probe and through said URD cable is greater than a lower resistance threshold and less than a higher resistance threshold.

54. A method for determining the status of an underground residential distribution (URD) cable in an electric power network, said method comprising:

connecting a probe to said URD cable so as to establish an electrical connection;

verifying that said electrical connection established in said connecting activity is a valid connection; and

establishing said status of said URD cable when said verifying activity simultaneously verifies said electrical connection is a valid connection.

55. A method as claimed in

claim 54

wherein said connecting activity comprises:

contacting one of an outer semiconductor sheath and a neutral conductor of said URD cable with an input contact of said probe; and

contacting said neutral conductor of said URD cable with a common contact of said probe.

56. A method as claimed in

claim 54

wherein said verifying activity comprises determining said electrical connection is said valid connection when a resistance between said input contact and said common contact is greater than a lower resistance threshold and less than a higher resistance threshold.

57. A method as claimed in

claim 56

additionally comprising repeating said connecting and verifying activities at a different contact location on said URD cable when said verifying activity fails to verify said electrical connection is a valid connection.

58. A method as claimed in

claim 54

additionally comprising indicating when a resistance between said input contact and said common contact is greater than a lower resistance threshold and less than a higher resistance threshold.

59. A method as claimed in

claim 54

additionally comprising indicating when a resistance between said input contact and said common contact is one of less than a lower resistance threshold and greater than a higher resistance threshold.

60. A method as claimed in

claim 54

wherein said establishing activity comprises determining said status is a de-energized status when a line signal derived from said URD cable has a line-signal amplitude less than a lower signal threshold.

61. A method as claimed in

claim 60

wherein said establishing activity additionally comprises determining said status is an energized status when said line-signal amplitude is greater than a higher signal threshold.

62. A method as claimed in

claim 54

wherein said establishing activity comprises determining said status is an indeterminate status when a line signal derived from said URD cable has a line-signal amplitude greater than a lower signal threshold and less than a higher signal threshold.

63. A method as claimed in

claim 62

additionally comprising repeating said connecting, verifying, and establishing activities at a different location on said URD cable when said establishing activity establishes said status is said indeterminate status.

64. A method as claimed in

claim 54

additionally comprising:

executing said connecting, verifying, and establishing activities a plurality of times wherein, for each of said executing activities, said connecting activity is executed at a different contact location on said URD cable; and

adjudicating said status of said URD cable in response to a plurality of said establishing activities.

65. A method as claimed in

claim 54

wherein said URD cable is a jacketed URD cable, and wherein said method additionally comprises:

heating a melt unit of said probe; and

melting an insulating jacket of said jacketed URD cable with said melt unit to effect said connecting activity.

66. A method as claimed in

claim 65

additionally comprising attaching said melt unit to a body of said probe prior to said heating activity when said melt unit is configured to be detachably coupled to said body.

67. A method as claimed in

claim 54

wherein:

said URD cable is an unjacketed cable that comprises a plurality of neutral conductors surrounding a semiconductor sheath; and

said method additionally comprises, when said establishing activity fails to establish a “dead” status for said URD cable, clamping said neutral conductors to said semiconductor sheath proximate a position where said probe is connected to said URD cable.

68. A method as claimed in

claim 67

wherein said clamping activity clamps first and second clamps on opposing sides of said position.

69. A method for determining the status of a jacketed underground residential distribution (URD) cable in an electric power network, said method comprising:

heating a melt unit of a probe with heat from an external heat source;

melting an insulating jacket of said URD cable with said melt unit;

connecting said probe to said URD cable so as to establish an electrical connection through said melting activity;

verifying that said electrical connection established in said connecting activity is a valid connection; and

establishing said status of said URD cable when said verifying activity verifies that said electrical connection is a valid connection.

70. A method as claimed in

claim 69

additionally comprising attaching said melt unit to a body of said probe prior to said heating activity when said melt unit is configured to be detachably coupled to said body.

71. A method as claimed in

claim 69

additionally comprising configuring said melt unit to have a substantially cylindrical and conductive thermal reservoir, to have a thermally conductive insulator within said thermal reservoir, and to have an inner conductor within said thermally conductive insulator.

72. A method as claimed in

claim 71

wherein said conductive thermal reservoir, said thermally conductive insulator, and said inner conductor are mutually coaxial.

73. A method as claimed in

claim 69

wherein said establishing activity establishes said status while said verifying activity simultaneously verifies said electrical connection.

US10/778,288 2003-02-18 2004-02-11 Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable Abandoned US20040160227A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/778,288 US20040160227A1 (en) 2003-02-18 2004-02-11 Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable
US11/092,071 US7154281B2 (en) 2004-02-11 2005-03-29 Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US44816103P 2003-02-18 2003-02-18
US10/778,288 US20040160227A1 (en) 2003-02-18 2004-02-11 Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable
US55931404P 2004-04-02 2004-04-02

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/092,071 Continuation-In-Part US7154281B2 (en) 2004-02-11 2005-03-29 Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040160227A1 true US20040160227A1 (en) 2004-08-19

Family

ID=34830603

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/778,288 Abandoned US20040160227A1 (en) 2003-02-18 2004-02-11 Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable
US11/092,071 Expired - Fee Related US7154281B2 (en) 2004-02-11 2005-03-29 Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/092,071 Expired - Fee Related US7154281B2 (en) 2004-02-11 2005-03-29 Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20040160227A1 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070179721A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2007-08-02 Yaney David S System and method for detecting noise source in a power line communications system
US20080122642A1 (en) * 2006-11-02 2008-05-29 Radtke William O Power Line Communication and Power Distribution Parameter Measurement System and Method
US20090187358A1 (en) * 2008-01-21 2009-07-23 Deaver Sr Brian J System, Device and Method for Determining Power Line Equipment Degradation
US20090187285A1 (en) * 2008-01-20 2009-07-23 Yaney David S Method and Apparatus for Communicating Power Distribution Event and Location
US20090289637A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-11-26 Radtke William O System and Method for Determining the Impedance of a Medium Voltage Power Line
US7626497B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2009-12-01 Current Technologies, Llc Power line communication vegetation management system and method
US20100045447A1 (en) * 2002-12-10 2010-02-25 Mollenkopf James D Power Line Communications Device and Method
US7714592B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2010-05-11 Current Technologies, Llc System and method for determining the impedance of a medium voltage power line
US8533121B1 (en) * 2009-11-25 2013-09-10 Gregory Hubert Piesinger Method and apparatus for phase identification in a three-phase power distribution network
US11394183B2 (en) 2017-12-22 2022-07-19 Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Knife accessory for hot stick
CN115656719A (en) * 2022-10-26 2023-01-31 徐忠林 High-voltage cable sheath defect online diagnosis method based on sheath current abnormal motion

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070063664A1 (en) * 2005-09-22 2007-03-22 Avistar, Inc. Phase identification apparatus having automatic gain control to prevent detector saturation
US9489025B2 (en) * 2010-01-22 2016-11-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. I/O control systems and methods
US8597040B2 (en) 2010-03-03 2013-12-03 Thomas & Betts International, Inc. Device having an electrical connector and a sacrificial cap
US8172596B2 (en) * 2010-03-03 2012-05-08 Thomas & Betts International, Inc. Electrical connector with sacrificial appendage
US8616908B2 (en) 2010-03-03 2013-12-31 Thomas & Betts International, Inc. Electrical connector with a cap with a sacrificial conductor
US8872505B2 (en) * 2010-10-28 2014-10-28 Infineon Technologies Ag Accessory presence detection
US9472868B2 (en) 2013-09-25 2016-10-18 Thomas & Betts International Llc Permanent ground point for splicing connectors
US9337553B2 (en) 2013-10-30 2016-05-10 Thomas & Betts International Llc Grounding rod for sacrificial appendage
WO2016048954A1 (en) 2014-09-22 2016-03-31 Panduit Corp. A system for the verification of the absence of voltage
US11215646B2 (en) 2019-04-22 2022-01-04 Panduit Corp. Absence of voltage detection device

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3068409A (en) * 1959-01-29 1962-12-11 Du Pont Capacitive power line voltmeter
US3826981A (en) * 1968-05-03 1974-07-30 H Ross Solid-state high impedance meter system
US5101161A (en) * 1990-10-12 1992-03-31 Boston Edison Company Non-destructive status determination for electric power cables
US5672964A (en) * 1993-04-02 1997-09-30 Vinci; Peter Voltage probe testing device
US5867019A (en) * 1996-10-23 1999-02-02 Bmf Engineering Inc. Power cable voltage tester
US6337573B1 (en) * 1997-10-01 2002-01-08 International Business Machines Corporation Contact test circuit

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4760327A (en) 1986-11-10 1988-07-26 Boston Edison Company Cable status testing
US6531880B1 (en) 2000-07-03 2003-03-11 American Electric Power Company, Inc. Non-invasive cable tester

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3068409A (en) * 1959-01-29 1962-12-11 Du Pont Capacitive power line voltmeter
US3826981A (en) * 1968-05-03 1974-07-30 H Ross Solid-state high impedance meter system
US5101161A (en) * 1990-10-12 1992-03-31 Boston Edison Company Non-destructive status determination for electric power cables
US5672964A (en) * 1993-04-02 1997-09-30 Vinci; Peter Voltage probe testing device
US5867019A (en) * 1996-10-23 1999-02-02 Bmf Engineering Inc. Power cable voltage tester
US6337573B1 (en) * 1997-10-01 2002-01-08 International Business Machines Corporation Contact test circuit

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100176968A1 (en) * 2002-12-10 2010-07-15 White Ii Melvin Joseph Power Line Communication Apparatus and Method of Using the Same
US20100045447A1 (en) * 2002-12-10 2010-02-25 Mollenkopf James D Power Line Communications Device and Method
US7626497B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2009-12-01 Current Technologies, Llc Power line communication vegetation management system and method
US7468657B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2008-12-23 Current Technologies, Llc System and method for detecting noise source in a power line communications system
US20070179721A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2007-08-02 Yaney David S System and method for detecting noise source in a power line communications system
US20080122642A1 (en) * 2006-11-02 2008-05-29 Radtke William O Power Line Communication and Power Distribution Parameter Measurement System and Method
US7795877B2 (en) 2006-11-02 2010-09-14 Current Technologies, Llc Power line communication and power distribution parameter measurement system and method
US20090289637A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-11-26 Radtke William O System and Method for Determining the Impedance of a Medium Voltage Power Line
US7714592B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2010-05-11 Current Technologies, Llc System and method for determining the impedance of a medium voltage power line
US20090187285A1 (en) * 2008-01-20 2009-07-23 Yaney David S Method and Apparatus for Communicating Power Distribution Event and Location
US8077049B2 (en) 2008-01-20 2011-12-13 Current Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for communicating power distribution event and location
US8779931B2 (en) 2008-01-20 2014-07-15 Current Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for communicating power distribution event and location
US20090187358A1 (en) * 2008-01-21 2009-07-23 Deaver Sr Brian J System, Device and Method for Determining Power Line Equipment Degradation
US8566046B2 (en) 2008-01-21 2013-10-22 Current Technologies, Llc System, device and method for determining power line equipment degradation
US8533121B1 (en) * 2009-11-25 2013-09-10 Gregory Hubert Piesinger Method and apparatus for phase identification in a three-phase power distribution network
US11394183B2 (en) 2017-12-22 2022-07-19 Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Knife accessory for hot stick
CN115656719A (en) * 2022-10-26 2023-01-31 徐忠林 High-voltage cable sheath defect online diagnosis method based on sheath current abnormal motion

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7154281B2 (en) 2006-12-26
US20050174126A1 (en) 2005-08-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7154281B2 (en) 2006-12-26 Apparatus and method for determining the status of an electric power cable
US4721916A (en) 1988-01-26 Method for diagnosing an insulation deterioration of a power cable
US5481198A (en) 1996-01-02 Method and device for measuring corrosion on a portion of a metallic path carrying an undetermined load current
US9046558B2 (en) 2015-06-02 Apparatus and method for determining the status and phase of an electric power cable
Khan et al. 2012 A review of condition monitoring of underground power cables
MXPA97005838A (en) 1998-02-01 Cable tester of bridge of connection to earth protector better
CN102298104B (en) 2016-01-13 A kind of method for detecting ground fault of bridge cable
US4335348A (en) 1982-06-15 Cable conductor continuity tester with magnetically coupled drive means and sensor
KR100787488B1 (en) 2007-12-21 Concentric neutral wire live construction device having a function to check whether there is a disconnection from the ground floating or the neutral side of the power supply, and a ground floating checking method using the same
CN111711129B (en) 2021-08-17 Construction method for searching and repairing fault of outer sheath of single-core high-voltage cable
US4866391A (en) 1989-09-12 System and method of simultaneously measuring a multiplicity of grounds on utility poles
US6812712B2 (en) 2004-11-02 Wire test method and apparatus
US4839598A (en) 1989-06-13 Method for testing underground electric cables
US11408796B2 (en) 2022-08-09 Continuous monitoring device for detecting defects in a section of piping and a monitoring system fitted with at least two monitoring devices
EP0843823B1 (en) 2002-10-30 Detection and location of current leakage paths
US10288663B1 (en) 2019-05-14 Method and apparatus for injecting current over an electrical conductor
US3037161A (en) 1962-05-29 Method and apparatus for locating faults in transmission lines
CN209979776U (en) 2020-01-21 Device for positioning fault of underground cable
Selkirk et al. 2008 Why neutral-grounding resistors need continuous monitoring
GB2057147A (en) 1981-03-25 Detecting Faults in Buried Cables
CA1277705C (en) 1990-12-11 Apparatus for detecting faulty power line insulator
JP2662698B2 (en) 1997-10-15 Confirmation of cable breakage and method of detecting breakage
Woodhouse et al. 2015 Effective use of continuity testing to assess grounding system integrity
Yamashita et al. 2019 Study on Location Accuracy of Partial Discharge Locator
Crawford et al. 2006 Test before touch-easier said than done

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
2005-10-17 STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION