US5523949A - Method and apparatus for an improved autopilot system providing for late runway change - Google Patents
- ️Tue Jun 04 1996
Info
-
Publication number
- US5523949A US5523949A US08/286,317 US28631794A US5523949A US 5523949 A US5523949 A US 5523949A US 28631794 A US28631794 A US 28631794A US 5523949 A US5523949 A US 5523949A Authority
- US
- United States Prior art keywords
- ils
- runway
- aircraft
- localizer
- glideslope Prior art date
- 1994-08-05 Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 19
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 67
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9,10-anthraquinone Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(=O)C3=CC=CC=C3C(=O)C2=C1 RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037452 priming Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/04—Control of altitude or depth
- G05D1/06—Rate of change of altitude or depth
- G05D1/0607—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft
- G05D1/0653—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing
- G05D1/0676—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing specially adapted for landing
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the aircraft autopilot art and, in particular, to an improved autopilot system which allows the flight crew to maintain autopilot engagement while making a late runway change during approach.
- a problem frequently encountered by commercial aircraft flight crews on approach to an airport is runway re-assignment.
- As the aircraft approaches an airport it is assigned a runway and an approach profile by air traffic control. Due to various conditions that can occur, an aircraft is often re-assigned from one runway to another and is expected to make a smooth transition thereto.
- Such re-assignment may happen after the flight crew has engaged the autopilot and after the aircraft's on board instrument landing system (ILS) has captured either the assigned runway's localizer signal (which defines lateral movement within the approach profile) and/or glideslope (which defines the desired flight path to the assigned runway).
- IVS instrument landing system
- an improvement allows the flight crew to select a new ILS runway without disengaging the autopilot.
- the improvement includes an actuator which is actuated by the flight crew to initiate a desired runway change.
- Provided logic control means responds to the actuation of the actuator to:
- the above described logic control means includes means responsive to actuation of the actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
- an improved method for allowing the flight crew to select a new ILS approach without disengaging the autopilot comprises the steps of:
- the provided logic control means further performs the step of responding to actuation of said actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an aircraft on approach to a runway and depicts prior art autopilot systems which do not allow tuning of the ILS to a new approach when the autopilot is engaged;
- FIG. 2A a depicts an autopilot flight director system mode control panel
- FIG. 2B depicts the pilot's control wheel with autopilot disarm switch
- FIG. 3 depicts an aircraft's primary flight display
- FIG. 4 depicts an aircraft on approach to a runway and illustrates, in accordance with the present invention, the zone over which the ILS can be returned to a new approach without autopilot disengagement;
- FIG. 5 is a logic flow diagram illustrating the steps performed by the control logic in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 6 illustrates mode changes as indicated by the primary flight display during a transition in which localizer, but not glideslope has been captured
- FIG. 7 illustrates mode changes as reflected by the primary flight display in an approach transition wherein glideslope, but not localizer, has been captured
- FIG. 8 illustrates mode changes, as depicted by the primary flight display, during an approach transition wherein both localizer and glideslope have been captured.
- FIG. 1 is a side profile of a commercial aircraft 10 on approach to a runway 12.
- the aircraft 10 in approaching an airport will be assigned clearance for an approach to a given runway by air traffic control.
- the flight crew of the aircraft 10 will commonly engage the autopilot and tune their onboard instrument landing system (ILS) to the guidance signal corresponding to the assigned runway.
- the guidance signal includes a localizer, which defines the lateral position of the aircraft on approach and a glideslope signal, defining the glideslope 14 to the assigned runway 12.
- Both localizer and glideslope signals are individually captured by the autopilot flight director system (AFDS) which is a part of the aircraft's autopilot. Once captured, localizer and glideslope signals are used to guide the aircraft 10 to the runway 12.
- AFDS autopilot flight director system
- FIG. 2A illustrates a conventional commercial aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS) mode control panel, indicated generally at 30.
- AFDS autopilot flight director system
- A/P autopilot
- F/D Flight Director
- A/T autothrottle
- A/T autothrottle right arm switch
- climb/continuous thrust switch 44 To the right of the autopilot switch 32 is an autothrottle (A/T) left arm switch 40 and an autothrottle right arm switch 42.
- A/T autothrottle left arm switch 40
- autothrottle right arm switch 42 Directly below the autothrottle arm switches 40, 42 is a climb/continuous thrust switch 44.
- IAS MACH reference switch 46 To the right of the autothrottle arm switches 40, 42 is an inertial airspeed (IAS) MACH reference switch 46 which allows the flight crew to enter a desired aircraft speed either as an airspeed value or a MACH number.
- the selected value is displayed in an IAS/MACH digital display 48 positioned directly below the switch 46.
- IAS/MACH selector switch 50 Below the digital display 48 is an IAS/MACH selector switch 50.
- To the right of the selector switch 50 are three vertical switches with indicator lights; 1) LNAV switch 52 with its corresponding indicator light 54, 2) VNAV switch 56 with its corresponding indicator light 58, and 3) a flight level change (FLCH) switch 60 with its corresponding indicator light 62.
- LNAV switch 52 With its corresponding indicator light 54
- VNAV switch 56 With its corresponding indicator light 58
- FLCH flight level change
- a heading/track hold switch 72 To the right of the autopilot disengage bar 70 is a heading/track hold switch 72 and it's corresponding indicator light 74. Above the heading/track hold switch 72 is a bank limit selector switch 76 which, as shown, allows selection from an "AUTO" position through 5° increments to a maximum bank limit, here indicated as "25".
- a digital display 78 which indicates the heading/track of the aircraft. Whether heading or track is displayed is determined by a heading/track reference switch 80 which is positioned directly above the heading/track display 78.
- a vertical speed/flight path angle reference switch 82 To the right of the heading/track reference switch 80 is a vertical speed/flight path angle reference switch 82. Directly below the vertical speed/flight path angle reference switch 82 is a digital display 84 which, as determined by switch 82, reads out the vertical speed or flight path angle value as input by the flight crew. Directly below the digital display 84 is a vertical speed/flight path angle selector 86.
- the selector 86 is a thumbwheel driven switch which allows the flight crew to input a "down" value by actuating the selector 86 in one direction or "up” value by actuation of selector 86 in the opposite direction, as indicated by an adjacent legend 88.
- the flight crew inputs a desired vertical speed or flight path angle via the vertical speed/flight path angle switch 90 with its corresponding indicator light 92, which is to the right of the selector 86.
- altitude hold switch 94 To the right of the vertical speed/flight path angle switch 90 is an altitude hold switch 94 with its corresponding indicator 96. Above the altitude hold switch 94 is an altitude selector 98.
- the altitude selector is controllable by the flight crew in an "auto"mode or increments of "1000" mode. In the increments of "1000" mode, turning the altitude selector 98 increments or decrements the altitude value displayed in the altitude window 100 by thousands of feet. With the "auto" mode selected, turning the altitude selector increments or decrements the altitude value displayed in the window at a variable rate, depending on the amount of altitude change commanded by the turning of the selector.
- an altitude window 100 which provides a digital display of the selected altitude.
- a localizer switch 102 With its corresponding indicator 104. Directly below the localizer switch 102 is an approach switch 106 with its indicator light 108.
- FIG. 2B Shown in FIG. 2B is a diagram of tile flight crews'control wheel 110 which, in the normal manner, is provided with an autopilot disengage switch 112.
- the automatic flight control system consists of an autopilot flight director system (AFDS) and an autothrottle system.
- AFDS autopilot flight director system
- FMC flight management computer
- the AFDS and autothrottle are controlled automatically by the FMC to perform climb, cruise, descent and initial approach flight path guidance.
- Final approach and landing guidance is provided by the AFDS with control inputs from an ILS system with the pilot controlling speed inputs to the autothrottle through the speed selector 50.
- the AFDS normally is comprised of three autopilot flight director computers and the mode control panel 30.
- the mode control panel 30 provides control of the autopilot, flight director, altitude alert, and autothrottle systems.
- the mode control panel 30 is used to select and activate AFDS modes and establish altitudes, speeds, and climb/descent profiles.
- the AFDS's provide control of the flight directors and autopilots. Flight director information is displayed on the priming/flight display (PFD), an example of which is illustrated in FIG. 3.
- the AFDS does not have direct control of the flight control surfaces.
- the autopilot controls the elevators, ailerons, flaperons, and spoilers through the flight control system. Autopilot rudder commands are added only during an autopilot approach and landing. The autopilot controls nose wheel steering during roll out after an automatic landing.
- the mode control panel 30 mode switches are used to select automatic control modes.
- the light in the lower half of each switch illuminates to indicate that the mode is selected.
- Mode engagement is indicated by the PFD (see FIG. 3) roll and pitch flight mode annunciation.
- flight control modes engage with a single push of a switch. These modes are: flight level change, via flight level change switch 60, heading hold, via heading/track hold switch 72 in conjunction with heading/track reference switch 80, track hold, via heading/track hold switch 72 in conjunction with heading/track reference switch 80, heading select, via heading/track selector 76, track select, via heading/track selector 76, vertical speed, via vertical speed flight path angle switch 90 in conjunction with vertical speed/flight path angle reference switch 82, flight path angle, via vertical speed/flight path angle switch 90 in conjunction with vertical speed/flight path angle reference switch 82, altitude hold, via altitude hold switch 94, climb thrust, via climb/continuous thrust switch 44 and continuous thrust, via climb/continuous thrust switch 44.
- modes arm or engage with a single push. These modes are: lateral navigation, via LNAV switch 52, vertical navigation, via VNAV switch 56, localizer, via localizer switch 102, and approach, via approach switch 106. All modes except localizer and approach can be disengaged by selecting another
- the flight crew can enter desired target values for mode. flight, via mode control panel 30 for: airspeed and MACH, as indicated in display 48, heading and track, via display 78, vertical speed and flight path angle, via display 84, and altitude, via display 100.
- mode control panel 30 for: airspeed and MACH, as indicated in display 48, heading and track, via display 78, vertical speed and flight path angle, via display 84, and altitude, via display 100.
- the autopilot is engaged by pushing either of the two autopilot engage switches 32, 34. Normal autopilot disengagement is through the control wheel 110 autopilot disengage switch 112.
- the airspeed indicator 152 is generally rectangular, indicating in a central window 154 the aircraft's current airspeed, here indicated as "300". From the bottom to the top of the airspeed indicator 52 are corresponding lower to higher airspeed values, here ranging from a value of "240" to a value of "360”. Opposite the indicated airspeed 154 is a selected speed bug 156, here indicating that the aircraft's actual airspeed corresponds to that selected by the flight crew. At the top of the airspeed indicator 152 is an indication of the selected speed, here indicated as MACH 0.82. At the bottom of the airspeed indicator 152 is an indication of the current MACH of the aircraft, here indicated as "820".
- attitude, steering and miscellaneous indication display 160 To the right of the airspeed indicator 152, and centrally located on the PFD 150 is the attitude, steering and miscellaneous indication display 160.
- This display includes a conventional representation of the position of the aircraft wings 162, 164 relative to a pitch up or down scale 166 with a relative roll scale 168. Displayed below display 160 is a semi-circular display of aircraft heading and track 170.
- an indicator 172 here displaying "A/P” indicating that the autopilot flight director systems have been activated.
- a flight mode annunciation display 174 which includes a portion identified as "SPD” to indicate the autothrottle thrust mode, a central display to indicate the aircraft's roll mode, here indicated as “LNAV”, and a right hand portion, indicating the aircraft's pitch mode, here indicated as "VNAV PTH”.
- air traffic control would issue clearance for an approach to a given runway.
- the flight crew would then, typically, engage the autopilot, via the autopilot engage switches 32 and/or 34 and, via the ILS system, tune to the guidance signals corresponding to the assigned runway.
- the ILS system would then proceed to capture either localizer, glideslope or both localizer and glideslope for the assigned approach.
- the improved autopilot (in particular, AFDS) according to the present invention, provides for ILS retuning without disengagement of the autopilot, as depicted generally in FIG. 4.
- FIG. 4 shown is an aircraft 200 approaching a runway 202.
- the flight crew has been assigned to a particular runway 202 and that the crew has engaged the autopilot and that the ILS system has captured either localizer and/or glideslope.
- the present invention allows for retuning of the ILS system without disengagement of the autopilot so long as the aircraft has not descended to a radio altitude of 1500 feet.
- the flight crew does not need to follow the elaborate procedure described above for ILS retuning and, during the transition to the new assigned runway, has reduced workload due to the autopilot remaining engaged.
- the improvement according to the present invention is inhibited and the flight crew must disengage the AFDS to discontinue the approach. This is necessary to allow sufficient time for AFDS internal checks to preserve automatic landing integrity.
- FIG. 5 is a logic flow diagram illustrating the sequential steps performed by the present autopilot improvement to provide the functionality described above.
- the system starts at block 250, indicating that the aircraft is on approach to an assigned runway with the autopilot engaged. If a transition to a new runway assigmnent is desired, the flight crew selects the approach switch 106. The system first checks at a block 260 to determine whether or not the aircraft is at a radio altitude greater than 1500 feet. If it is not, block 270 is entered and, as described herein above, the present improvement is inhibited and the flight crew must manually disengage the autopilot as in prior art designs.
- FIG. 6 illustrates the change in the flight mode annunciation portion 174 of the primary flight display, (shown in FIG. 3). Note that the roll indication transitions from localizer to the flight crew selected mode, here assumed to be heading hold. Also, note that the current pitch mode, here assumed to be VNAV PTH is retained.
- FIG. 7 illustrates the PFD flight mode annunciation display corresponding to this transition.
- the current roll mode, LNAV is retained.
- the pitch mode here assumed to be glideslope capture (G/S) is transitioned to the preselected pitch mode, here assumed to be vertical speed (V/S).
- G/S glideslope capture
- V/S vertical speed
- the sequence at block 330 is entered.
- the roll mode of the aircraft is transitioned to the preselected mode, here assumed to be either heading or track hold.
- the pitch mode of the aircraft is transitioned to the preselected mode, here assumed to be either vertical speed (V/S) or flight path angle (FPA).
- V/S vertical speed
- FPA flight path angle
- the PFD flight mode annunciation display corresponding to block 330 is shown in FIG. 8.
- the roll mode of the aircraft assumed to be localizer capture
- transitions to the preselected aircraft roll mode here assumed to be heading hold.
- the aircraft's pitch here assumed to be glideslope capture (G/S)
- transitions to the preselected pitch mode here assumed to be vertical speed (V/S).
- the sequence at block 340 is entered.
- the aircraft's current pitch mode and current roll mode are retained.
- the ILS localizer and glideslope capture is disarmed. ILS tuning remains enabled to allow tuning to the new assigned runway.
- an improved autopilot flight director system has been described which allows the flight crew to transition from one approach assignment to another without disengagement of the autopilot.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
An improvement to an autopilot flight director system allows the flight crew to make a late runway change without disengaging the autopilot. The improved system allows a transition to a new runway assignment if radio altitude is greater than 1500 feet. Control logic determines whether or not localizer and/or glideslope have been captured and enters predetermined modes as a function thereof to effect a transition to the new approach while enabling instrument landing system retuning while maintaining autopilot engagement. Flight crew workload during approach is significantly reduced as a result of implementation of the improved system.
Description
The present invention relates to the aircraft autopilot art and, in particular, to an improved autopilot system which allows the flight crew to maintain autopilot engagement while making a late runway change during approach.
A problem frequently encountered by commercial aircraft flight crews on approach to an airport is runway re-assignment. As the aircraft approaches an airport, it is assigned a runway and an approach profile by air traffic control. Due to various conditions that can occur, an aircraft is often re-assigned from one runway to another and is expected to make a smooth transition thereto. Such re-assignment may happen after the flight crew has engaged the autopilot and after the aircraft's on board instrument landing system (ILS) has captured either the assigned runway's localizer signal (which defines lateral movement within the approach profile) and/or glideslope (which defines the desired flight path to the assigned runway).
Conventional autopilot systems do not allow a change in ILS tuning with the autopilot engaged. Thus, in order to transition to a late runway change in a conventional autopilot system, the flight crew must go through a procedure to disengage the autopilot, manually fly the plane, re-tune to the new ILS approach, and then, if appropriate, re-engage the autopilot and select appropriate roll and pitch modes of the autopilot and, if desired, steer the airplane into a position for a manual landing, or into a position to recapture localizer and glideslope for the new runway assigmnent.
Approach is, however, one of the highest workload conditions a flight crew experiences. As such, it would be highly desirable if the autopilot could remain engaged during a transition to a late runway assigmnent and thereby alleviate flight crew workload.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONIt is an object of this invention, therefore, to provide an improved aircraft autopilot system which allows autopilot engagement during a transition from one runway assignment to another during approach.
It is a particular object in the invention to provide the above-improved autopilot system which allows autopilot engagement during approach transition, even if the localizer and/or glideslope from the first runway assignment has been captured.
Briefly, in an aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS) wherein, on approach, the flight crew selects an instrument landing system (ILS) signal for a particular runway and the AFDS captures a localizer and a glideslope signal to direct the aircraft to said runway, an improvement allows the flight crew to select a new ILS runway without disengaging the autopilot. The improvement includes an actuator which is actuated by the flight crew to initiate a desired runway change. Provided logic control means responds to the actuation of the actuator to:
in the event localizer but not glideslope of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) maintain the aircrafts current pitch mode,
ii) disarm glideslope capture,
iii) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway,
b) in the event glideslope but not Iocalizer of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) retain the current roll mode,
ii) disarm localizer capture,
iii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway, and
c) in the event both localizer and glideslope have been captured,
i) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode,
ii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iii) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway.
In the further aspect of the invention, the above described logic control means includes means responsive to actuation of the actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
In an aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS), on approach the flight crew selects an instrument landing system (ILS) signal for a particular runway and the AFDS captures a localizer and a glideslope signal to direct the aircraft to said runway, an improved method for allowing the flight crew to select a new ILS approach without disengaging the autopilot comprises the steps of:
a) providing an actuator for actuation by the flight crew to initiate the desired runway change; and
b) providing logic control means responsive to said actuation of said actuator for performing the steps of:
1) in the event localizer but not glideslope of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) maintain the aircraft's current pitch mode,
ii) disarm glideslope capture,
iii) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway,
2) in the event glideslope but not localizer of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) retain the current roll mode,
ii) disarm localizer capture,
iii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway,
3) in the event both localizer and glideslope have been captured,
i) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode,
ii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iii) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway.
In a further aspect of the improved method, the provided logic control means further performs the step of responding to actuation of said actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSFIG. 1 illustrates an aircraft on approach to a runway and depicts prior art autopilot systems which do not allow tuning of the ILS to a new approach when the autopilot is engaged;
FIG. 2A a depicts an autopilot flight director system mode control panel;
FIG. 2B depicts the pilot's control wheel with autopilot disarm switch;
FIG. 3 depicts an aircraft's primary flight display;
FIG. 4 depicts an aircraft on approach to a runway and illustrates, in accordance with the present invention, the zone over which the ILS can be returned to a new approach without autopilot disengagement;
FIG. 5 is a logic flow diagram illustrating the steps performed by the control logic in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 6 illustrates mode changes as indicated by the primary flight display during a transition in which localizer, but not glideslope has been captured;
FIG. 7 illustrates mode changes as reflected by the primary flight display in an approach transition wherein glideslope, but not localizer, has been captured; and
FIG. 8 illustrates mode changes, as depicted by the primary flight display, during an approach transition wherein both localizer and glideslope have been captured.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONFIG. 1 is a side profile of a
commercial aircraft10 on approach to a
runway12. In accordance with standard practice, the
aircraft10 in approaching an airport will be assigned clearance for an approach to a given runway by air traffic control. The flight crew of the
aircraft10 will commonly engage the autopilot and tune their onboard instrument landing system (ILS) to the guidance signal corresponding to the assigned runway. The guidance signal includes a localizer, which defines the lateral position of the aircraft on approach and a glideslope signal, defining the glideslope 14 to the assigned
runway12. Both localizer and glideslope signals are individually captured by the autopilot flight director system (AFDS) which is a part of the aircraft's autopilot. Once captured, localizer and glideslope signals are used to guide the
aircraft10 to the
runway12.
It is not uncommon for air traffic control to approve approach to a first runway but then require a transition to a second runway--this due to changing conditions and the need to most efficiently use the available runways. However, with the autopilot engaged and localizer and/or glideslope captured, the flight crew on conventional aircraft have been forced to go through a series of steps, including disengagement of the autopilot, to transition to the new approach. Since the approach phase is already demanding on the flight crew's time, it would be beneficial if the autopilot could remain engaged throughout the transition to a new runway assignment.
The burden on the flight crew to make a late runway change is better understood with respect to FIG. 2A, which illustrates a conventional commercial aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS) mode control panel, indicated generally at 30. In the upper left and right hand comers of the
panel30 are autopilot (A/P) engage switches 32, 34 with their corresponding engage
lights33, 35, respectively, In the lower left and right hand comers of the
mode control panel30 are the Flight Director (F/D) switches 36, 38, respectively.
To the right of the
autopilot switch32 is an autothrottle (A/T)
left arm switch40 and an autothrottle
right arm switch42. Directly below the autothrottle arm switches 40, 42 is a climb/
continuous thrust switch44.
To the right of the autothrottle arm switches 40, 42 is an inertial airspeed (IAS)
MACH reference switch46 which allows the flight crew to enter a desired aircraft speed either as an airspeed value or a MACH number. The selected value is displayed in an IAS/MACH
digital display48 positioned directly below the
switch46. Below the
digital display48 is an IAS/
MACH selector switch50. To the right of the
selector switch50 are three vertical switches with indicator lights; 1) LNAV switch 52 with its corresponding indicator light 54, 2)
VNAV switch56 with its
corresponding indicator light58, and 3) a flight level change (FLCH) switch 60 with its
corresponding indicator light62.
To the right of the
vertical switches52, 56 and 60 is an
autopilot disengage bar70.
To the right of the
autopilot disengage bar70 is a heading/
track hold switch72 and it's corresponding
indicator light74. Above the heading/
track hold switch72 is a bank
limit selector switch76 which, as shown, allows selection from an "AUTO" position through 5° increments to a maximum bank limit, here indicated as "25".
Directly above the
bank limit selector76 is a
digital display78 which indicates the heading/track of the aircraft. Whether heading or track is displayed is determined by a heading/
track reference switch80 which is positioned directly above the heading/
track display78.
To the right of the heading/
track reference switch80 is a vertical speed/flight path
angle reference switch82. Directly below the vertical speed/flight path
angle reference switch82 is a digital display 84 which, as determined by
switch82, reads out the vertical speed or flight path angle value as input by the flight crew. Directly below the digital display 84 is a vertical speed/flight
path angle selector86. The
selector86 is a thumbwheel driven switch which allows the flight crew to input a "down" value by actuating the
selector86 in one direction or "up" value by actuation of
selector86 in the opposite direction, as indicated by an
adjacent legend88.
The flight crew inputs a desired vertical speed or flight path angle via the vertical speed/flight
path angle switch90 with its
corresponding indicator light92, which is to the right of the
selector86.
To the right of the vertical speed/flight
path angle switch90 is an
altitude hold switch94 with its corresponding
indicator96. Above the
altitude hold switch94 is an
altitude selector98. The altitude selector is controllable by the flight crew in an "auto"mode or increments of "1000" mode. In the increments of "1000" mode, turning the
altitude selector98 increments or decrements the altitude value displayed in the
altitude window100 by thousands of feet. With the "auto" mode selected, turning the altitude selector increments or decrements the altitude value displayed in the window at a variable rate, depending on the amount of altitude change commanded by the turning of the selector.
Directly above the
altitude selector98 is an
altitude window100 which provides a digital display of the selected altitude.
To the right of the
altitude selector98 is a
localizer switch102 with its
corresponding indicator104. Directly below the
localizer switch102 is an
approach switch106 with its
indicator light108.
Shown in FIG. 2B is a diagram of tile
flight crews'control wheel110 which, in the normal manner, is provided with an
autopilot disengage switch112.
In modern commercial aircraft, the automatic flight control system consists of an autopilot flight director system (AFDS) and an autothrottle system. The AFDS is controlled using the
mode control panel30 and the aircraft's flight management computer (FMC) (not shown). The autothrottle is controlled through the
mode control panel30 and the FMC.
Normally, the AFDS and autothrottle are controlled automatically by the FMC to perform climb, cruise, descent and initial approach flight path guidance. Final approach and landing guidance is provided by the AFDS with control inputs from an ILS system with the pilot controlling speed inputs to the autothrottle through the
speed selector50.
The AFDS normally is comprised of three autopilot flight director computers and the
mode control panel30. The
mode control panel30 provides control of the autopilot, flight director, altitude alert, and autothrottle systems. The
mode control panel30 is used to select and activate AFDS modes and establish altitudes, speeds, and climb/descent profiles.
The AFDS's provide control of the flight directors and autopilots. Flight director information is displayed on the priming/flight display (PFD), an example of which is illustrated in FIG. 3. The AFDS does not have direct control of the flight control surfaces. The autopilot controls the elevators, ailerons, flaperons, and spoilers through the flight control system. Autopilot rudder commands are added only during an autopilot approach and landing. The autopilot controls nose wheel steering during roll out after an automatic landing.
The
mode control panel30 mode switches are used to select automatic control modes. The light in the lower half of each switch illuminates to indicate that the mode is selected. Mode engagement is indicated by the PFD (see FIG. 3) roll and pitch flight mode annunciation.
Most flight control modes engage with a single push of a switch. These modes are: flight level change, via flight
level change switch60, heading hold, via heading/
track hold switch72 in conjunction with heading/
track reference switch80, track hold, via heading/
track hold switch72 in conjunction with heading/
track reference switch80, heading select, via heading/
track selector76, track select, via heading/
track selector76, vertical speed, via vertical speed flight
path angle switch90 in conjunction with vertical speed/flight path
angle reference switch82, flight path angle, via vertical speed/flight
path angle switch90 in conjunction with vertical speed/flight path
angle reference switch82, altitude hold, via
altitude hold switch94, climb thrust, via climb/
continuous thrust switch44 and continuous thrust, via climb/
continuous thrust switch44.
Other modes arm or engage with a single push. These modes are: lateral navigation, via LNAV switch 52, vertical navigation, via
VNAV switch56, localizer, via
localizer switch102, and approach, via
approach switch106. All modes except localizer and approach can be disengaged by selecting another
As described above, the flight crew can enter desired target values for mode. flight, via
mode control panel30 for: airspeed and MACH, as indicated in
display48, heading and track, via
display78, vertical speed and flight path angle, via display 84, and altitude, via
display100.
The autopilot is engaged by pushing either of the two autopilot engage switches 32, 34. Normal autopilot disengagement is through the
control wheel110
autopilot disengage switch112.
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a conventional primary flight display (PFD), indicated generally at 150. The
PFD150 indicates both the actual and target values of aircraft speed, pitch, and roll as may be selected through the
mode control panel30 of FIG. 2A.
As shown in FIG. 3, on the left vertical side of the display is an airspeed/
MACH indicator152. The
airspeed indicator152 is generally rectangular, indicating in a
central window154 the aircraft's current airspeed, here indicated as "300". From the bottom to the top of the airspeed indicator 52 are corresponding lower to higher airspeed values, here ranging from a value of "240" to a value of "360". Opposite the
indicated airspeed154 is a selected
speed bug156, here indicating that the aircraft's actual airspeed corresponds to that selected by the flight crew. At the top of the
airspeed indicator152 is an indication of the selected speed, here indicated as MACH 0.82. At the bottom of the
airspeed indicator152 is an indication of the current MACH of the aircraft, here indicated as "820".
To the right of the
airspeed indicator152, and centrally located on the
PFD150 is the attitude, steering and
miscellaneous indication display160. This display includes a conventional representation of the position of the
aircraft wings162, 164 relative to a pitch up or down
scale166 with a
relative roll scale168. Displayed below
display160 is a semi-circular display of aircraft heading and
track170.
At the top of the
display150 is an
indicator172, here displaying "A/P" indicating that the autopilot flight director systems have been activated. Above the
display172 is a flight
mode annunciation display174 which includes a portion identified as "SPD" to indicate the autothrottle thrust mode, a central display to indicate the aircraft's roll mode, here indicated as "LNAV", and a right hand portion, indicating the aircraft's pitch mode, here indicated as "VNAV PTH".
Prior to the present invention, and returning to FIG. 2A, on approach to an airport, air traffic control would issue clearance for an approach to a given runway. The flight crew would then, typically, engage the autopilot, via the autopilot engage
switches32 and/or 34 and, via the ILS system, tune to the guidance signals corresponding to the assigned runway. The ILS system would then proceed to capture either localizer, glideslope or both localizer and glideslope for the assigned approach.
It is not uncommon, however, for air traffic control to direct an aircraft from one assigned runway to another. Thus, in accordance with prior art systems, in order for the flight crew, once localizer and/or glideslope had been captured to transition to the new assigned approach, the following procedure would be followed:
1) the autopilot would be disengaged by
disengage switch112 on the
control wheel110, thus requiring the aircraft to be flown by hand,
2) both flight director switches 36 and 38 would have to be turned off and then back on,
3) the ILS system would then have to be returned to the new approach frequency,
4) the autopilot would then be re-engaged via either of
switches32, 34 and
5) the
approach switch106 would then be reselected.
Without following tile above procedure, the ILS system could not be returned to the new approach.
The improved autopilot (in particular, AFDS) according to the present invention, provides for ILS retuning without disengagement of the autopilot, as depicted generally in FIG. 4. Here, shown is an
aircraft200 approaching a
runway202. As before, it is assumed that the flight crew has been assigned to a
particular runway202 and that the crew has engaged the autopilot and that the ILS system has captured either localizer and/or glideslope. As indicated in FIG. 4, over the
range204, the present invention allows for retuning of the ILS system without disengagement of the autopilot so long as the aircraft has not descended to a radio altitude of 1500 feet. Thus, the flight crew does not need to follow the elaborate procedure described above for ILS retuning and, during the transition to the new assigned runway, has reduced workload due to the autopilot remaining engaged.
Once the
aircraft200 has descended below 1500 feet radio altitude, the improvement according to the present invention is inhibited and the flight crew must disengage the AFDS to discontinue the approach. This is necessary to allow sufficient time for AFDS internal checks to preserve automatic landing integrity.
FIG. 5 is a logic flow diagram illustrating the sequential steps performed by the present autopilot improvement to provide the functionality described above.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the logical steps indicated in FIG. 5 are translated to code which controls the autopilot flight director system computer.
The system starts at
block250, indicating that the aircraft is on approach to an assigned runway with the autopilot engaged. If a transition to a new runway assigmnent is desired, the flight crew selects the
approach switch106. The system first checks at a
block260 to determine whether or not the aircraft is at a radio altitude greater than 1500 feet. If it is not, block 270 is entered and, as described herein above, the present improvement is inhibited and the flight crew must manually disengage the autopilot as in prior art designs.
However, if the aircraft is at a radio altitude greater than 1500 feet, a determination is made at
block280 as to whether or not the localizer for the first assigned approach has been captured. If localizer has been captured, a determination is then made at 290 as to whether the ILS system has captured glideslope. If localizer has been captured but glideslope has not been captured, the system enters block 300 and performs the steps set forth therein. First, the current pitch mode of the aircraft is retained. The ILS system glideslope capture is disarmed. The roll mode of the aircraft is transitioned to the predetermined mode set on the mode control panel (30 of FIG. 2) which here is assumed to be either the heading or track hold roll mode. ILS tuning is then enabled to allow the flight crew to tune to the new approach guidance signals.
FIG. 6 illustrates the change in the flight
mode annunciation portion174 of the primary flight display, (shown in FIG. 3). Note that the roll indication transitions from localizer to the flight crew selected mode, here assumed to be heading hold. Also, note that the current pitch mode, here assumed to be VNAV PTH is retained.
If it is determined at 280 that the localizer has not been captured, a determination is made at 310 as to whether or not glideslope has been captured. If localizer has not been captured but glideslope has, the sequence at 320 is entered. Specifically, the current roll mode of the aircraft is retained. The ILS localizer capture is disarmed. The aircraft is then transitioned to the predetermined aircraft pitch mode here indicated as being either vertical speed (V/S) or flight path angle (FPA). Finally, ILS tuning is enabled to allow tuning to the new approach guidance signal.
FIG. 7 illustrates the PFD flight mode annunciation display corresponding to this transition. Here, the current roll mode, LNAV is retained. However, the pitch mode, here assumed to be glideslope capture (G/S) is transitioned to the preselected pitch mode, here assumed to be vertical speed (V/S).
If localizer has been captured, via the determination at 280, and glideslope has been captured, via the determination at 290, the sequence at
block330 is entered. Here, the roll mode of the aircraft is transitioned to the preselected mode, here assumed to be either heading or track hold. The pitch mode of the aircraft is transitioned to the preselected mode, here assumed to be either vertical speed (V/S) or flight path angle (FPA). Finally, the ILS system is enabled to allow retuning to the new approach control signals.
The PFD flight mode annunciation display corresponding to block 330 is shown in FIG. 8. Here, the roll mode of the aircraft, assumed to be localizer capture, transitions to the preselected aircraft roll mode, here assumed to be heading hold. Also, the aircraft's pitch, here assumed to be glideslope capture (G/S), transitions to the preselected pitch mode, here assumed to be vertical speed (V/S).
Finally, if it is determined that the localizer has not been captured at 280 and that the glideslope has not been captured at 310, the sequence at
block340 is entered. Here, the aircraft's current pitch mode and current roll mode are retained. The ILS localizer and glideslope capture is disarmed. ILS tuning remains enabled to allow tuning to the new assigned runway.
In summary, an improved autopilot flight director system has been described which allows the flight crew to transition from one approach assignment to another without disengagement of the autopilot.
While a preferred embodiment of the invention has been described herein, it should be apparent that many modifications and variations thereto are possible, all of which fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (21)
1. In an aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS) wherein, on approach, the flight crew selects an instrument landing system (ILS) signal for a particular runway and the AFDS captures a localizer and a glideslope signal to direct the aircraft to said runway, an improvement allowing the flight crew to select a new ILS approach without disengaging the autopilot, comprising:
an actuator which is actuated by the flight crew to initiate a desired runway change; and
logic control means responsive to said actuation of said actuator to:
a) in the event localizer but not glideslope of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) maintain the aircraft's current pitch mode,
ii) disarm glideslope capture,
iii) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway,
b) in the event glideslope but not localizer of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) retain the current roll mode,
ii) disarm localizer capture,
iii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway,
c) in the event both localizer and glideslope have been captured,
i) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode,
ii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode and
iii) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway.
2. The improvement of claim 1 wherein said logic control means further includes means responsive to actuation of said actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
3. The improvement of either one of claims 1 or 2 wherein said logic control means includes means to inhibit selection of a new ILS runway with the autopilot engaged in the event the aircraft is below a predetermined altitude.
4. In an aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS) wherein, on approach, the flight crew selects an instrument landing system (ILS) signal for a particular runway and the AFDS captures a localizer and a glideslope signal to direct the aircraft to said runway, an improvement allowing the flight crew to select a new ILS runway without disengaging the autopilot, comprising:
an actuator which is actuated by tile flight crew to initiate a desired runway change; and
logic control means responsive to said actuation of said actuator to:
a) in the event localizer but not glideslope of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) maintain the aircraft's current pitch mode,
ii) disarm glideslope capture,
iii) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway.
5. The improvement of claim 4 wherein the logic control means is responsive to said actuation of said actuator to further:
b) in the event both localizer and glideslope have been captured,
i) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode,
ii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch, and
III) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway.
6. The improvement of claim 5 wherein said logic control means further includes means responsive to actuation of said actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
7. The improvement of any one of claims 4 through 6 wherein said logic control means includes means to inhibit selection of a new ILS runway with the autopilot engaged in the event the aircraft is below a predetermined altitude.
8. In an aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS) wherein, on approach, the flight crew selects an instrument landing system (ILS) signal for a particular runway and the AFDS captures a localizer and a glideslope signal to direct the aircraft to said runway, an improvement allowing the flight crew to select a new ILS approach without disengaging the autopilot, comprising:
an actuator which is actuated by the flight crew to initiate a desired runway change; and
logic control means responsive to said actuation of said actuator to:
a) in the event glideslope but not localizer of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) retain the current roll mode,
ii) disarm localizer capture,
iii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway.
9. The improvement of claim 8 wherein said logic control means is responsive to said actuation of said actuator to further:
b) in the event both localizer and glideslope have been captured,
i) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode, and
ii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iii) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway.
10. The improvement of claim 9 wherein said logic control means further includes means responsive to actuation of said actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
11. The improvement of any one of claims 8 through 10 wherein said logic control means includes means to inhibit selection of a new ILS runway with the autopilot engaged in the event the aircraft is below a predetermined altitude.
12. In an aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS) wherein, on approach, the flight crew selects an instrument landing system (ILS) signal for a particular runway and the AFDS captures a localizer and a glideslope signal to direct the aircraft to said runway, an improved method for allowing the flight crew to select a new ILS approach without disengaging the autopilot, the improved method comprising the steps of:
a) providing an actuator for actuation by the flight crew to initiate a desired runway change; and
b) providing logic control means responsive to said actuation of said actuator for performing the steps of:
1) in the event localizer but not glideslope of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) maintain the aircraft's current pitch mode,
ii) disarm glideslope capture,
iii) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway,
2) in the event glideslope but not localizer of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) retain the current roll mode,
ii) disarm localizer capture,
iii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iv) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway,
3) in the event both localizer and glideslope have been captured,
i) transition aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode,
ii) transition aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iii) enable ILS tuning to the desired runway.
13. The improved method of claim 12 wherein the logic control means further performs the step of:
responding to actuation of said actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
14. The improved method of either one of claims 12 or 13 wherein the logic control means performs the further step of inhibiting selection of a new ILS runway with the autopilot engaged in the event the aircraft is below a predetermined altitude.
15. In an aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS) wherein, on approach, the flight crew selects an instrument landing system (ILS) signal for a particular runway and the AFDS captures a localizer and a glideslope signal to direct the aircraft to said runway, an improved method for allowing the flight crew to select a new ILS approach without disengaging the autopilot comprising the steps of:
a) providing an actuator which is actuated by the flight crew to initiate a desired runway change; and
b) providing logic control means responsive to said actuation of said actuator for performing the steps of:
1) in the event localizer but not glideslope of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) maintaining the aircraft's current pitch mode,
ii) disarming glideslope capture,
iii) transitioning aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode, and
iv) enabling ILS tuning to the desired runway.
16. The improved method of claim 15 wherein the logic control means performs the further steps of:
a) in the event both localizer and glideslope have been captured,
i) transitioning aircraft roll to a predetermined roll mode,
ii) transitioning aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iii) enabling ILS tuning to the desired runway.
17. The improved method of claim 16 wherein said logic control means performs the further step of being responsive to actuation of said actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
18. The improved method of either one of claims 15 through 17 wherein the logic control means performs the further step of inhibiting selection of a new ILS runway with the autopilot engaged in the event the aircraft is below a predetermined altitude.
19. In an aircraft autopilot flight director system (AFDS) wherein, on approach, the flight crew selects an instrument landing system (ILS) signal for a particular runway and the AFDS captures a localizer and a glideslope signal to direct the aircraft to said runway, an improved method for allowing the flight crew to select a new ILS approach without disengaging the autopilot, said method comprising the steps of:
a) providing an actuator which is actuated by the flight crew to initiate a desired runway change; and
providing logic control means responsive to said actuation of said actuator to perform the steps of:
1) in the event glideslope but not localizer of the initial ILS has been captured,
i) retaining the current roll mode,
ii) disarming localizer capture,
iii) transitioning aircraft pitch to a predetermined pitch mode, and
iv) enabling ILS tuning to the desired runway.
20. The improved method of claim 19 wherein said logic control means further performs the step of being responsive to actuation of said actuator subsequent to retuning of the ILS to the new runway to rearm the localizer and glideslope for the new approach.
21. The improved method of either one of claims 19 or 20 wherein the logic control means performs the further step of inhibiting selection of a new ILS runway with the autopilot engaged in the event the aircraft is below a predetermined altitude.
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/286,317 US5523949A (en) | 1994-08-05 | 1994-08-05 | Method and apparatus for an improved autopilot system providing for late runway change |
AU32579/95A AU3257995A (en) | 1994-08-05 | 1995-08-07 | Method and apparatus for an improved autopilot system providing for late runway change |
DE69512423T DE69512423T2 (en) | 1994-08-05 | 1995-08-07 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AN IMPROVED AUTOPILOT SYSTEM FOR SPARE SLOPE CHANGE |
PCT/EP1995/003149 WO1996004597A1 (en) | 1994-08-05 | 1995-08-07 | Method and apparatus for an improved autopilot system providing for late runway change |
EP95929093A EP0775336B1 (en) | 1994-08-05 | 1995-08-07 | Method and apparatus for an improved autopilot system providing for late runway change |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/286,317 US5523949A (en) | 1994-08-05 | 1994-08-05 | Method and apparatus for an improved autopilot system providing for late runway change |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US5523949A true US5523949A (en) | 1996-06-04 |
Family
ID=23098057
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/286,317 Expired - Lifetime US5523949A (en) | 1994-08-05 | 1994-08-05 | Method and apparatus for an improved autopilot system providing for late runway change |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5523949A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0775336B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU3257995A (en) |
DE (1) | DE69512423T2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1996004597A1 (en) |
Cited By (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0990921A2 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2000-04-05 | Honeywell Inc. | Method and apparatus for annunciation of vehicle operational modes |
US6567728B1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2003-05-20 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Terrain awareness system having nuisance alarm filter for use during approach |
US6693559B1 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2004-02-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for flight mode annunciators |
US20040059474A1 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2004-03-25 | Boorman Daniel J. | Apparatuses and methods for displaying autoflight information |
US6870490B2 (en) | 2001-08-23 | 2005-03-22 | Honeywell International Inc. | Display of altitude and path capture trajectories |
US20050178903A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2005-08-18 | Boorman Daniel J. | Systems and methods for presenting and obtaining flight control information |
US20050192717A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | Tafs William D. | Methods and systems for automatically tracking information during flight |
US20050203675A1 (en) * | 2004-03-10 | 2005-09-15 | Griffin John C.Iii | Methods and systems for automatically displaying information, including air traffic control instructions |
US20050222721A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-06 | Chen Sherwin S | Systems and methods for handling the display and receipt of aircraft control information |
US20050228674A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-13 | Gunn Peter D | Methods and systems for displaying assistance messages to aircraft operators |
US20050231390A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-20 | Crane Jean M | Methods and systems for controlling the display of information at an aircraft flight deck |
FR2872316A1 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2005-12-30 | Thales Sa | METHOD OF CHANGING THE APPROACH PROCEDURE OF AN AIRCRAFT |
US20060005147A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-05 | Hammack Jason L | Methods and systems for controlling the display of maps aboard an aircraft |
US20060004498A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-05 | Gunn Peter D | Methods and systems for displaying the source of aircraft control instructions |
US20070164877A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2007-07-19 | Mumaw Randall J | Methods and systems for graphically displaying sources for and natures of aircraft flight control instructions |
US7302316B2 (en) | 2004-09-14 | 2007-11-27 | Brigham Young University | Programmable autopilot system for autonomous flight of unmanned aerial vehicles |
US20080004756A1 (en) * | 2006-06-02 | 2008-01-03 | Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. | Method and apparatus for display of current aircraft position and operating parameters on a graphically-imaged chart |
EP1322915B1 (en) * | 2000-10-05 | 2008-04-02 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for flight mode annunciators |
US20080140272A1 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2008-06-12 | Airbus France | Method and device for aiding the piloting of an airplane during an approach phase |
US20080172149A1 (en) * | 2005-07-13 | 2008-07-17 | Airbus France | Device For Assisting a Vertical Guidance Approach For Aircraft |
US7580235B2 (en) | 2004-10-12 | 2009-08-25 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling circuit breakers |
US20100017051A1 (en) * | 2008-07-15 | 2010-01-21 | Astrium Gmbh | Method of Automatically Determining a Landing Runway |
US20100076627A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2010-03-25 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US20100250033A1 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2010-09-30 | Avidyne Corporation | Flight Management System Vector Functions |
US20110320070A1 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2011-12-29 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for adjusting target approach speed |
US8180562B2 (en) | 2008-06-04 | 2012-05-15 | The Boeing Company | System and method for taxi route entry parsing |
US8386167B2 (en) | 2008-11-14 | 2013-02-26 | The Boeing Company | Display of taxi route control point information |
US20140091181A1 (en) * | 2011-05-12 | 2014-04-03 | Bombardier Inc. | Controller |
US20170053539A1 (en) * | 2015-08-20 | 2017-02-23 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for destination selection for vehicle indications and alerts |
US10089892B2 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2018-10-02 | The Boeing Company | Flight control system with low-frequency instrument landing system localizer anomaly detection and method of use |
US10175694B2 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2019-01-08 | The Boeing Company | Flight control system with synthetic inertial localizer deviation and method of use |
US10203693B2 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2019-02-12 | The Boeing Company | Flight control system with synthetic inertial glideslope deviation and method of use |
US20190096270A1 (en) * | 2017-09-26 | 2019-03-28 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and system for displaying an alignment symbol for indicating deviations between ownship runway course heading and tracking |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110488864B (en) * | 2019-08-15 | 2021-12-03 | 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 | Method and system for modifying a LOC signal in a flight control system of an aircraft |
Citations (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2960284A (en) * | 1957-01-11 | 1960-11-15 | Honeywell Regulator Co | Automatic control apparatus for aircraft |
US3265333A (en) * | 1964-02-03 | 1966-08-09 | North American Aviation Inc | Override control means for automatic landing system |
US3578270A (en) * | 1968-10-25 | 1971-05-11 | Elliott Brothers London Ltd | Aircraft manual control members |
US3686626A (en) * | 1970-06-03 | 1972-08-22 | United Control Corp | Aircraft instrument |
US3738594A (en) * | 1971-08-16 | 1973-06-12 | Mc Donnell Douglas Corp | Lift control mechanism |
US3776455A (en) * | 1972-03-06 | 1973-12-04 | Nasa | Terminal guidance system |
US3807666A (en) * | 1973-06-11 | 1974-04-30 | Sperry Rand Corp | Control wheel steering system for aircraft automatic pilots |
US4109886A (en) * | 1974-12-19 | 1978-08-29 | Sperry Rand Corporation | Semi-automatic flight control system utilizing limited authority stabilization system |
US4368517A (en) * | 1978-03-16 | 1983-01-11 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Aircraft landing display system |
US4373184A (en) * | 1979-12-26 | 1983-02-08 | The Boeing Company | Vertical flight path steering system for aircraft |
US4534000A (en) * | 1975-08-29 | 1985-08-06 | Bliss John H | Inertial flight director system |
US4866450A (en) * | 1986-05-15 | 1989-09-12 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Advanced instrument landing system |
US4956780A (en) * | 1988-12-08 | 1990-09-11 | The Boeing Company | Flight path angle command flight control system for landing flare |
US4999780A (en) * | 1989-03-03 | 1991-03-12 | The Boeing Company | Automatic reconfiguration of electronic landing display |
US5012423A (en) * | 1989-04-17 | 1991-04-30 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation | Back-up fly by wire control system |
US5017930A (en) * | 1990-01-25 | 1991-05-21 | John R. Stoltz | Precision landing system |
US5020747A (en) * | 1990-01-26 | 1991-06-04 | The Boeing Company | Method and apparatus for controlling flare engagement height in automatic landing systems |
US5047942A (en) * | 1987-08-06 | 1991-09-10 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Airplane takeoff and landing performance monitoring system |
US5060889A (en) * | 1989-05-01 | 1991-10-29 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and methods for maintaining aircraft track angle during an asymmetric flight condition |
US5343395A (en) * | 1992-08-26 | 1994-08-30 | Watts Alan B | Aircraft landing guidance system and method |
-
1994
- 1994-08-05 US US08/286,317 patent/US5523949A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1995
- 1995-08-07 DE DE69512423T patent/DE69512423T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-08-07 WO PCT/EP1995/003149 patent/WO1996004597A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1995-08-07 AU AU32579/95A patent/AU3257995A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1995-08-07 EP EP95929093A patent/EP0775336B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2960284A (en) * | 1957-01-11 | 1960-11-15 | Honeywell Regulator Co | Automatic control apparatus for aircraft |
US3265333A (en) * | 1964-02-03 | 1966-08-09 | North American Aviation Inc | Override control means for automatic landing system |
US3578270A (en) * | 1968-10-25 | 1971-05-11 | Elliott Brothers London Ltd | Aircraft manual control members |
US3686626A (en) * | 1970-06-03 | 1972-08-22 | United Control Corp | Aircraft instrument |
US3738594A (en) * | 1971-08-16 | 1973-06-12 | Mc Donnell Douglas Corp | Lift control mechanism |
US3776455A (en) * | 1972-03-06 | 1973-12-04 | Nasa | Terminal guidance system |
US3807666A (en) * | 1973-06-11 | 1974-04-30 | Sperry Rand Corp | Control wheel steering system for aircraft automatic pilots |
US4109886A (en) * | 1974-12-19 | 1978-08-29 | Sperry Rand Corporation | Semi-automatic flight control system utilizing limited authority stabilization system |
US4534000A (en) * | 1975-08-29 | 1985-08-06 | Bliss John H | Inertial flight director system |
US4368517A (en) * | 1978-03-16 | 1983-01-11 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Aircraft landing display system |
US4373184A (en) * | 1979-12-26 | 1983-02-08 | The Boeing Company | Vertical flight path steering system for aircraft |
US4866450A (en) * | 1986-05-15 | 1989-09-12 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Advanced instrument landing system |
US5047942A (en) * | 1987-08-06 | 1991-09-10 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Airplane takeoff and landing performance monitoring system |
US4956780A (en) * | 1988-12-08 | 1990-09-11 | The Boeing Company | Flight path angle command flight control system for landing flare |
US4999780A (en) * | 1989-03-03 | 1991-03-12 | The Boeing Company | Automatic reconfiguration of electronic landing display |
US5012423A (en) * | 1989-04-17 | 1991-04-30 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation | Back-up fly by wire control system |
US5060889A (en) * | 1989-05-01 | 1991-10-29 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and methods for maintaining aircraft track angle during an asymmetric flight condition |
US5017930A (en) * | 1990-01-25 | 1991-05-21 | John R. Stoltz | Precision landing system |
US5020747A (en) * | 1990-01-26 | 1991-06-04 | The Boeing Company | Method and apparatus for controlling flare engagement height in automatic landing systems |
US5343395A (en) * | 1992-08-26 | 1994-08-30 | Watts Alan B | Aircraft landing guidance system and method |
Cited By (71)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6188937B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2001-02-13 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and apparatus for annunciation of vehicle operational modes |
EP0990921A3 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2003-08-20 | Honeywell Inc. | Method and apparatus for annunciation of vehicle operational modes |
EP0990921A2 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2000-04-05 | Honeywell Inc. | Method and apparatus for annunciation of vehicle operational modes |
US6693559B1 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2004-02-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for flight mode annunciators |
EP1322915B1 (en) * | 2000-10-05 | 2008-04-02 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for flight mode annunciators |
US6567728B1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2003-05-20 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Terrain awareness system having nuisance alarm filter for use during approach |
US6870490B2 (en) | 2001-08-23 | 2005-03-22 | Honeywell International Inc. | Display of altitude and path capture trajectories |
US8494691B2 (en) | 2002-09-20 | 2013-07-23 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying autoflight information |
US20040059474A1 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2004-03-25 | Boorman Daniel J. | Apparatuses and methods for displaying autoflight information |
US7970502B2 (en) | 2002-09-20 | 2011-06-28 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and systems for controlling autoflight systems |
US8364329B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2013-01-29 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US7751948B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2010-07-06 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US7460029B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2008-12-02 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for presenting and obtaining flight control information |
US8135501B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2012-03-13 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US8121745B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2012-02-21 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US20110224848A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2011-09-15 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US8005582B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2011-08-23 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US20050178903A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2005-08-18 | Boorman Daniel J. | Systems and methods for presenting and obtaining flight control information |
US7945354B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2011-05-17 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US20100262358A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2010-10-14 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US8504223B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2013-08-06 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for presenting and obtaining flight control information |
US20100076627A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2010-03-25 | The Boeing Company | Apparatuses and methods for displaying and receiving tactical and strategic flight guidance information |
US20050192717A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | Tafs William D. | Methods and systems for automatically tracking information during flight |
US7577501B2 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2009-08-18 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for automatically tracking information during flight |
US20050203675A1 (en) * | 2004-03-10 | 2005-09-15 | Griffin John C.Iii | Methods and systems for automatically displaying information, including air traffic control instructions |
US7363119B2 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2008-04-22 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for automatically displaying information, including air traffic control instructions |
US7751947B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2010-07-06 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for displaying assistance messages to aircraft operators |
US20050231390A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-20 | Crane Jean M | Methods and systems for controlling the display of information at an aircraft flight deck |
US7418319B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2008-08-26 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for handling the display and receipt of aircraft control information |
US20050222721A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-06 | Chen Sherwin S | Systems and methods for handling the display and receipt of aircraft control information |
US20080316058A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2008-12-25 | The Boeing Company | Systems and Methods for Handling the Display and Receipt of Aircraft Control Information |
US7321318B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2008-01-22 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for controlling the display of information at an aircraft flight deck |
US20050228674A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-13 | Gunn Peter D | Methods and systems for displaying assistance messages to aircraft operators |
US8032270B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2011-10-04 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for handling the display and receipt of aircraft control information |
US8290643B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2012-10-16 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for handling the display and receipt of aircraft control information |
US20110060484A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2011-03-10 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for handling the display and receipt of aircraft control information |
US7844372B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2010-11-30 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for handling the display and receipt of aircraft control information |
US20100262319A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2010-10-14 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for displaying assistance messages to aircraft operators |
US8082070B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2011-12-20 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for displaying assistance messages to aircraft operators |
WO2006000590A1 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2006-01-05 | Thales | Method of changing the approach procedure of an aircraft |
US20070225876A1 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2007-09-27 | Thales | Method of Changing the Approach Procedure of an Aircraft |
FR2872316A1 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2005-12-30 | Thales Sa | METHOD OF CHANGING THE APPROACH PROCEDURE OF AN AIRCRAFT |
US7203577B2 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2007-04-10 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for displaying the source of aircraft control instructions |
US20070164877A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2007-07-19 | Mumaw Randall J | Methods and systems for graphically displaying sources for and natures of aircraft flight control instructions |
US20060004498A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-05 | Gunn Peter D | Methods and systems for displaying the source of aircraft control instructions |
US7256710B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2007-08-14 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for graphically displaying sources for and natures of aircraft flight control instructions |
US20060005147A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-05 | Hammack Jason L | Methods and systems for controlling the display of maps aboard an aircraft |
US7302316B2 (en) | 2004-09-14 | 2007-11-27 | Brigham Young University | Programmable autopilot system for autonomous flight of unmanned aerial vehicles |
US7580235B2 (en) | 2004-10-12 | 2009-08-25 | The Boeing Company | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling circuit breakers |
US20080172149A1 (en) * | 2005-07-13 | 2008-07-17 | Airbus France | Device For Assisting a Vertical Guidance Approach For Aircraft |
US20100250033A1 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2010-09-30 | Avidyne Corporation | Flight Management System Vector Functions |
US8255099B2 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2012-08-28 | Avidyne Corporation | Flight management system vector functions |
US20080004756A1 (en) * | 2006-06-02 | 2008-01-03 | Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. | Method and apparatus for display of current aircraft position and operating parameters on a graphically-imaged chart |
US8014912B2 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2011-09-06 | Airbus France | Method and device for aiding the piloting of an airplane during an approach phase |
US20080140272A1 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2008-06-12 | Airbus France | Method and device for aiding the piloting of an airplane during an approach phase |
US8180562B2 (en) | 2008-06-04 | 2012-05-15 | The Boeing Company | System and method for taxi route entry parsing |
US9460630B2 (en) * | 2008-07-15 | 2016-10-04 | Astrium Gmbh | Method of automatically determining a landing runway |
US20100017051A1 (en) * | 2008-07-15 | 2010-01-21 | Astrium Gmbh | Method of Automatically Determining a Landing Runway |
US8386167B2 (en) | 2008-11-14 | 2013-02-26 | The Boeing Company | Display of taxi route control point information |
US20110320070A1 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2011-12-29 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for adjusting target approach speed |
US8996204B2 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2015-03-31 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for adjusting target approach speed |
US20140091181A1 (en) * | 2011-05-12 | 2014-04-03 | Bombardier Inc. | Controller |
US9791886B2 (en) * | 2011-05-12 | 2017-10-17 | Bombardier Inc. | Controller |
US20170053539A1 (en) * | 2015-08-20 | 2017-02-23 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for destination selection for vehicle indications and alerts |
US9734728B2 (en) * | 2015-08-20 | 2017-08-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for destination selection for vehicle indications and alerts |
US10089892B2 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2018-10-02 | The Boeing Company | Flight control system with low-frequency instrument landing system localizer anomaly detection and method of use |
US10175694B2 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2019-01-08 | The Boeing Company | Flight control system with synthetic inertial localizer deviation and method of use |
US10203693B2 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2019-02-12 | The Boeing Company | Flight control system with synthetic inertial glideslope deviation and method of use |
US11176836B2 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2021-11-16 | The Boeing Company | Flight control system with low-frequency instrument landing system localizer anomaly detection and method of use |
US20190096270A1 (en) * | 2017-09-26 | 2019-03-28 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and system for displaying an alignment symbol for indicating deviations between ownship runway course heading and tracking |
US10460613B2 (en) * | 2017-09-26 | 2019-10-29 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and system for displaying an alignment symbol for indicating deviations between ownship runway course heading and tracking |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0775336A1 (en) | 1997-05-28 |
DE69512423D1 (en) | 1999-10-28 |
WO1996004597A1 (en) | 1996-02-15 |
EP0775336B1 (en) | 1999-09-22 |
AU3257995A (en) | 1996-03-04 |
DE69512423T2 (en) | 2000-01-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5523949A (en) | 1996-06-04 | Method and apparatus for an improved autopilot system providing for late runway change |
EP0256564B1 (en) | 1993-01-13 | Intervention flight management system |
US6438469B1 (en) | 2002-08-20 | Flight control system and method for an aircraft circle-to-land maneuver |
RU2343528C1 (en) | 2009-01-10 | Method and system for deviation from collisions for aircraft |
EP0929869B1 (en) | 2000-12-20 | Method and apparatus for avionics management |
US4019702A (en) | 1977-04-26 | Method and apparatus for guiding a jet aircraft in a noise-abated post-takeoff climb |
EP0999485B1 (en) | 2004-03-24 | Method of automated thrust-based roll guidance limiting |
US9043043B1 (en) | 2015-05-26 | Autonomous flight controls for providing safe mode navigation |
EP3299924B1 (en) | 2020-08-26 | Enhanced take-off system |
US8751070B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | Method and system for piloting an aircraft |
EP0030066B1 (en) | 1984-09-19 | Apparatus for aircraft pitch and thrust axes control |
US7512464B2 (en) | 2009-03-31 | System and method for controlling the speed of an aircraft |
US4862372A (en) | 1989-08-29 | Apparatus and methods for generating aircraft control commands using nonlinear feedback gain |
US20200090523A1 (en) | 2020-03-19 | Piloting assistance system and method for an aircraft |
US11164471B1 (en) | 2021-11-02 | System for previewing vertical speed guidance following an air traffic conflict alert |
Vakil et al. | 1995 | Mode awareness in advanced autoflight systems |
US6676088B1 (en) | 2004-01-13 | Flare control system |
Edwards | 1976 | Some aspects of automation in civil transport aircraft |
CN112595321B (en) | 2022-02-22 | Flight guidance system |
Leiden et al. | 2002 | Information to support the human performance modeling of a B757 flight crew during approach and landing |
Bellucci et al. | 1987 | Automatic flight control system developed for AB212'Combat SAR |
Last | 1989 | A320 and B757 on the Liner: A Line Pilot's Perspective |
Hinton | 1983 | A simulator evaluation of an automatic terminal approach system |
Keller et al. | 2002 | Information to support the human performance modeling of a B757 flight crew during approach and landing: RNAV |
Button | 0 | SECTION 6: AUTOMATIC FLIGHT CONTROL |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
1994-08-05 | AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BOEING COMPANY, THE, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AGATE, ROBERT M.;BLOOM, RONALD J.;CASHMAN, JOHN E.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:007106/0871;SIGNING DATES FROM 19940801 TO 19940802 |
1996-05-24 | STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
1998-12-07 | FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
1999-12-02 | FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
2003-12-04 | FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
2007-12-04 | FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
2007-12-10 | REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed |