Culpable control and the psychology of blame - PubMed

Review

Culpable control and the psychology of blame

M D Alicke. Psychol Bull. 2000 Jul.

Abstract

A culpable control model is advanced to describe the conditions that encourage as well as mitigate blame and to assess the process by which blame and mitigation occur. The fundamental assumptions of the model are that evidence concerning harmful events is scrutinized for its contribution to personal control and spontaneously evaluated for its favorableness or unfavorableness. Spontaneous evaluations encourage a blame-validation mode of processing in which evidence concerning the event is reviewed in a manner that favors ascribing blame to the person or persons who evoke the most negative affect or whose behavior confirms unfavorable expectations. The author delineates the elements of perceived control and then discusses spontaneous evaluation influences on control and blame assessments. The blame-validation process is described next. Finally, the culpable control model is compared with extant theories of blame and responsibility and its basic tenets summarized.

Similar articles

• Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame.

  Alicke MD, Buckingham J, Zell E, Davis T. Alicke MD, et al. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Oct;34(10):1371-81. doi: 10.1177/0146167208321594. Epub 2008 Jul 21. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008. PMID: 18644856

• Defensive externality and blame projection following failure.

  Hochreich DJ. Hochreich DJ. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975 Sep;32(3):540-6. doi: 10.1037/h0077102. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975. PMID: 1177087

• Judgments of cause and blame: the effects of intentionality and foreseeability.

  Lagnado DA, Channon S. Lagnado DA, et al. Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):754-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Aug 15. Cognition. 2008. PMID: 18706537

• Finding "meaning" in psychology: a lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development.

  Molden DC, Dweck CS. Molden DC, et al. Am Psychol. 2006 Apr;61(3):192-203. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192. Am Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16594836 Review.

• Personality reflected in a coherent idiosyncratic interplay of intra- and interpersonal self-regulatory processes.

  Morf CC. Morf CC. J Pers. 2006 Dec;74(6):1527-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00419.x. J Pers. 2006. PMID: 17083657 Review.

Cited by

• Punishment and sympathy judgments: is the quality of mercy strained in Asperger's syndrome?

  Channon S, Fitzpatrick S, Drury H, Taylor I, Lagnado D. Channon S, et al. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Oct;40(10):1219-26. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-0980-4. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010. PMID: 20195738

• Renouncing the attempt versus perpetration distinction.

  Skoczeń I. Skoczeń I. Synthese. 2023;201(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-04000-6. Epub 2023 Jan 11. Synthese. 2023. PMID: 36643730 Free PMC article.

• Moral Judgments of Human vs. AI Agents in Moral Dilemmas.

  Zhang Y, Wu J, Yu F, Xu L. Zhang Y, et al. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 16;13(2):181. doi: 10.3390/bs13020181. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36829410 Free PMC article.

• Asymmetric morality: Blame is more differentiated and more extreme than praise.

  Guglielmo S, Malle BF. Guglielmo S, et al. PLoS One. 2019 Mar 12;14(3):e0213544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213544. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30861034 Free PMC article.

• Scaling up psychology via Scientific Regret Minimization.

  Agrawal M, Peterson JC, Griffiths TL. Agrawal M, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 21;117(16):8825-8835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915841117. Epub 2020 Apr 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020. PMID: 32241896 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • American Psychological Association
  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.

• Research Materials

  • NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program