Functional interactions between BRCA1 and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress - PubMed
- ️Sat Jan 01 2000
Functional interactions between BRCA1 and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress
R S Tibbetts et al. Genes Dev. 2000.
Abstract
The BRCA1 gene encodes a tumor suppressor that is mutated in 50% of familial breast cancers. The BRCA1 protein has been implicated in the DNA damage response, as DNA damage induces the phosphorylation of BRCA1 and causes its recruitment into nuclear foci that contain DNA repair proteins. The ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) gene product controls overall BRCA1 phosphorylation in response to gamma-irradiation (IR). In this study, we show that BRCA1 phosphorylation is only partially ATM dependent in response to IR and ATM independent in response to treatment with UV light, or the DNA replication inhibitors hydroxyurea (HU) and aphidicolin (APH). We provide evidence that the kinase responsible for this phosphorylation is the ATM-related kinase, ATR. ATR phosphorylates BRCA1 on six Ser/Thr residues, including Ser 1423, in vitro. Increased expression of ATR enhanced the phosphorylation of BRCA1 on Ser 1423 following cellular exposure to HU or UV light, whereas doxycycline-induced expression of a kinase-inactive ATR mutant protein inhibited HU- or UV light-induced Ser 1423 phosphorylation in GM847 fibroblasts, and partially suppressed the phosphorylation of this site in response to IR. Thus, ATR, like ATM, controls BRCA1 phosphorylation in vivo. Although ATR isolated from DNA-damaged cells does not show enhanced kinase activity in vitro, we found that ATR responds to DNA damage and replication blocks by forming distinct nuclear foci at the sites of stalled replication forks. Furthermore, ATR nuclear foci overlap with the nuclear foci formed by BRCA1. The dramatic relocalization of ATR in response to DNA damage points to a possible mechanism for its ability to enhance the phosphorylation of substrates in response to DNA damage. Together, these results demonstrate that ATR and BRCA1 are components of the same genotoxic stress-responsive pathway, and that ATR directly phosphorylates BRCA1 in response to damaged DNA or stalled DNA replication.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5a/317107/c4672d12b7a0/6f1_C1TT.gif)
DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of BRCA1 on Ser 1423. (A) Endogenous BRCA1 is phosphorylated at Ser 1423 in intact cells. HEK 293T cells were either left untreated or cultured for 1 h following cellular exposure to IR (25 Gy), UV light (50 J/m2) or HU (2 mM). Cellular lysates were prepared and analyzed by immunoblot analysis using α-BRCA1 and α-pS-1423 antibodies. Cell lysates were treated with λ phosphatase where indicated. The relative levels of Ser 1423 phosphorylation were determined by densitometric analysis of the α-pS-1423 immunoblot and are presented at bottom. Values were normalized to the total level of BRCA1 present in each lane. (B) Phosphorylation of BRCA1 on Ser 1423 in A-T cells. ATM-deficient AT22IJE-T cells that had been stably transfected with empty expression vector (ATM−) or wild-type ATM (ATM+) were left untreated or exposed to IR (10, 25, or 50 Gy), UV light (50 J/m2), or HU (2 mM) and harvested 1 h later. Cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with the α-pS-1423 antibody to detect Ser 1423-phosphorylated BRCA1. Total levels of BRCA1 were then determined by reblotting the stripped membrane with an α-BRCA1 mAb. Densitometry was performed on the α-pS-1423 and α-BRCA1 immunoblots and the α-pS-1423/α-BRCA1 density ratios were used to calculate normalized levels of Ser 1423 phosphorylation, which are plotted as histograms at bottom. (C) Comparison of the time courses of IR-induced Ser 1423 phosphorylation in ATM− and ATM+ AT22IJE-T cells. Cells were harvested at the indicated times following exposure to 25 Gy of IR and subjected to immunoblot analysis using α-pS-1423 and α-BRCA1 antibodies as described in B. Levels of normalized Ser 1423 phosphorylation are presented at bottom.
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5a/317107/9bea7580606d/6f2_C1TT_rev1.gif)
ATR phosphorylates BRCA1 in vitro. (A) Schematic depiction of the six GST–BRCA1 fusion proteins tested as ATR substrates in immune complex kinase assays. SCD designates the S-Q cluster domain. (B) Phosphorylation of GST–BRCA1 fusion proteins requires a functional ATR kinase domain. HEK 293T cells were transiently transfected with either pcDNA3 (−), or plasmid constructs encoding FLAG-tagged wild-type ATR (WT), or FLAG-tagged catalytically-inactive ATR (KI). Cellular extracts were immunoprecipitated with α-FLAG mAb, and immune complex kinase assays were performed with GST–BRCA1 (1005–1313) or GST–BRCA1 (1314–1863) as the substrates. The levels of phosphorylated fusion protein and FLAG–ATR expression are presented at top and bottom, respectively. The other four GST–BRCA1 substrates depicted in A, were not phosphorylated by ATR above background levels (not shown). (C) Identification of ATR phosphorylation sites in GST–BRCA1 (1005–1313). ATR immune complex kinase assays were performed using cell lysates prepared from HEK 293T cells that had been transfected with either pcDNA3 (−) or FLAG–ATRWT (+). Wild-type (WT) or mutant GST–BRCA1 (1005–1313) fusion proteins containing either single or combination Ala substitutions at the indicated residues were used as substrates. (D) Identification of ATR phosphorylation sites in GST–BRCA1 (1314–1863). Wild-type (WT) or mutant GST–BRCA1 (1314–1863) fusion proteins containing single Ala substitutions at the indicated residues, or a GST–BRCA1 (1314–1863) mutant protein (4A) containing Ala substitutions at Ser 1387, Thr 1394, Ser 1423, and Ser 1457, were used as substrates in ATR kinase assays. Each panel represents a single experiment that is representative of the results obtained in independent trials.
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5a/317107/c18166a285bf/6f3_C1TT.gif)
Overexpression of kinase-inactive ATR inhibits BRCA1 phosphorylation. (A) HEK 293T cells were cotransfected with expression constructs encoding BRCA1-HA and either pcDNA3, wild-type ATR (WT) or kinase-inactive (KI). Cells were then cultured in the absence or presence of 5 μg/ml APH for 24 h. BRCA1-HA was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with α-HA. Levels of ATR overexpression were determined by α-ATR immunoblot. (B) BRCA1 is modified at one or more ATR phosphorylation sites in intact cells. (top) HEK 293T cells were transfected with an expression construct encoding an amino-terminally-truncated BRCA1 construct (AU1-BRCA1–ΔN) spanning BRCA1 amino acids 1317–1863 (see Materials and Methods). Cells were left untreated or cultured for 4 h in the presence of 5 μg/ml APH. Cell extracts were prepared and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with α-AU1. Where indicated, cell lysates were treated with 400 units of λ phosphatase. The positions of α- β-, and γ-phosphorylated forms of AU1-BRCA1–ΔN are marked. (middle, bottom) HEK 293T cells were transfected with expression constructs encoding wild-type AU1-BRCA1–ΔN (WT), AU1-BRCA1–ΔN containing Ala substitutions at Ser 1387, Thr 1394, Ser 1423, and Ser 1457 (4A), or AU1-BRCA1–ΔN containing a single Ser 1423→Ala substitution (1423A). Transfected cells were then cultured for 4 h in the absence or presence of 5 μg/ml APH. Cell extracts were prepared and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with α-AU1 (middle) or α-pS-1423 (bottom).
![Figure 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5a/317107/0d75c813a9c6/6f4_C1TT_rev1.gif)
Overexpression of wild-type ATR potentiates the phosphorylation of BRCA1 at Ser 1423 in intact cells. (A) Overexpression of FLAG–ATRWT stimulates the HU-induced phosphorylation of Ser 1423 in HEK 293T cells. HEK 293T cells were transfected with an expression vector encoding AU1-BRCA1–ΔN together with empty expression vector (−) or plasmids encoding FLAG–ATRWT, or FLAG–ATRKI. After 24 h, the transfected cells were left untreated or exposed to 2 mM HU, and harvested 1 h later. Cellular extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblot analysis with the α-pS-1423 antibody to detect Ser 1423-phosphorylated BRCA1. Immunoblotting with α-FLAG or α-AU1 antibodies was performed to monitor expression levels of the FLAG–ATR and AU1-BRCA1–ΔN constructs, respectively. α-, β-, and γ-phosphorylated forms of AU1-BRCA1–ΔN are marked. (B) Overexpression of FLAG–ATRWT stimulates UV light-induced phosphorylation of Ser 1423 in HEK 293T cells. The experiment was performed as described in A, except that the transfected HEK 293T cells were exposed to 50 J/m2 UV light, and then harvested 1 h later. Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with the indicated antibodies. (C) Relative contributions of ATM and ATR to the IR-induced phosphorylation of BRCA1 on Ser 1423. HEK 293T cells were cotransfected with expression plasmids encoding FLAG-tagged BRCA1 (1351–1552) together with an empty expression vector (−), FLAG–ATR, or FLAG–ATM plasmids. The FLAG–ATR and FLAG–ATM expression constructs encoded either wild-type (WT) or catalytically inactive (KI) proteins. After 24 h, the cells were either left untreated, or exposed to 25 Gy of IR and harvested 1 h later. Cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with the α-pS-1423 antibody to detect Ser 1423-phosphorylated BRCA1. Expression levels of FLAG–ATR, FLAG–ATM, and FLAG–BRCA1 (1351–1552) were monitored by immunoblotting with α-FLAG, and are presented at top and bottom, respectively.
![Figure 5](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5a/317107/120465b7e208/6f5_C1TT.gif)
Overexpression of catalytically inactive ATR inhibits the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of BRCA1 on Ser 1423. (A) Inhibition of HU- and UV-induced Ser 1423 phosphorylation. GM847/ATRKI cells were cultured either in the absence (−) or presence (+) of Dox for 96 h to induce ATRKI. Cells were then either left untreated or exposed to 2 mM HU for 4 h, or harvested 1 h after exposure to 200 J/m2 UV light. Cell lysates were prepared and immunoblots were performed with the indicated antibodies. Autoradiograms were quantitated by densitometry and phospho-Ser 1423 levels were normalized to account for differences in total BRCA1 protein levels. (B) Time course of Ser 1423 phosphorylation in response to IR. GM847/ATRKI cells were cultured in the presence of Dox for 96 h and then left untreated or exposed to 20 Gy of IR and harvested at the indicated times. Analysis of Ser 1423-phosphorylated BRCA1 were determined as described in A.
![Figure 6](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5a/317107/9c0871ac80ee/6f6_C4TT.gif)
DNA damage-induced alterations in ATR subcellular localization. (A) Immunolocalization of endogenous ATR. Exponentially growing K562 cells were left untreated, treated for 24 h with 5 μg/ml APH, or cultured for 4 h after exposure to 20 Gy IR. Cells were then immunostained with α-ATR antibodies and counterstained with propidium iodide (PI). (B) Localization of recombinant GFP–ATR. HEK 293T cells were transfected with a GFP–ATR expression vector and cultured for 24 h. Samples were then either left untreated, treated for 24 h with 5 μg/ml APH, or cultured for 4 h after exposure to 20 Gy of IR. Arrows highlight typical ATR nuclear foci found in a minority subpopulation of untreated HEK 293T cells. (C) ATR migrates to BrdU-positive sites of DNA replication in APH-blocked cells. The experiment was performed as in A, except that the cells were cultured in the presence of APH for 3 h, released from the APH block, pulse-labeled for 30 min with 100 μM BrdU, and then immunostained with α-BrdU. Foci demonstrating coincident GFP–ATR-and α-BrdU staining appear yellow in the merged image.
![Figure 7](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5a/317107/30368f7c5393/6f7_C4TT.gif)
Colocalization of ATR and BRCA1 in APH-induced nuclear foci. HEK 293T cells were transfected with a GFP–ATR expression vector and then either left untreated (A), or cultured in the presence of APH for 24 h (B). Cells were then fixed, permeabilized, and immunostained with a BRCA1-specific monoclonal antibody. Foci that contain both ATR and BRCA1 appear yellow or orange in the merged image. (C) Colocalization of endogenous ATR and BRCA1 in K562 cells. K562 cells were treated with APH for 24 h, and then were fixed and immunostained with α-ATR and α-BRCA1 antibodies. Typical foci that demonstrate colocalization of ATR and BRCA1 are indicated by arrows.
Similar articles
-
Gatei M, Zhou BB, Hobson K, Scott S, Young D, Khanna KK. Gatei M, et al. J Biol Chem. 2001 May 18;276(20):17276-80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M011681200. Epub 2001 Feb 13. J Biol Chem. 2001. PMID: 11278964
-
Fabbro M, Savage K, Hobson K, Deans AJ, Powell SN, McArthur GA, Khanna KK. Fabbro M, et al. J Biol Chem. 2004 Jul 23;279(30):31251-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405372200. Epub 2004 May 24. J Biol Chem. 2004. PMID: 15159397
-
ATM and ATR: networking cellular responses to DNA damage.
Shiloh Y. Shiloh Y. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001 Feb;11(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00159-3. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001. PMID: 11163154 Review.
-
The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer.
Smith J, Tho LM, Xu N, Gillespie DA. Smith J, et al. Adv Cancer Res. 2010;108:73-112. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380888-2.00003-0. Adv Cancer Res. 2010. PMID: 21034966 Review.
Cited by
-
Herpes simplex virus type I disrupts the ATR-dependent DNA-damage response during lytic infection.
Wilkinson DE, Weller SK. Wilkinson DE, et al. J Cell Sci. 2006 Jul 1;119(Pt 13):2695-703. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02981. Epub 2006 Jun 6. J Cell Sci. 2006. PMID: 16757521 Free PMC article.
-
ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response.
Andreassen PR, D'Andrea AD, Taniguchi T. Andreassen PR, et al. Genes Dev. 2004 Aug 15;18(16):1958-63. doi: 10.1101/gad.1196104. Genes Dev. 2004. PMID: 15314022 Free PMC article.
-
Adams KE, Medhurst AL, Dart DA, Lakin ND. Adams KE, et al. Oncogene. 2006 Jun 29;25(28):3894-904. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209426. Epub 2006 Feb 13. Oncogene. 2006. PMID: 16474843 Free PMC article.
-
Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo.
Melo JA, Cohen J, Toczyski DP. Melo JA, et al. Genes Dev. 2001 Nov 1;15(21):2809-21. doi: 10.1101/gad.903501. Genes Dev. 2001. PMID: 11691833 Free PMC article.
-
Interaction between human MCM7 and Rad17 proteins is required for replication checkpoint signaling.
Tsao CC, Geisen C, Abraham RT. Tsao CC, et al. EMBO J. 2004 Nov 24;23(23):4660-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600463. Epub 2004 Nov 11. EMBO J. 2004. PMID: 15538388 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Banin S, Moyal L, Shieh SY, Taya Y, Anderson CW, Chessa L, Smorodinsky NI, Prives C, Reiss Y, Shiloh Y, Ziv Y. Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in response to DNA damage. Science. 1998;281:1674–1677. - PubMed
-
- Barlow C, Hirotsune S, Paylor R, Liyanage M, Eckhaus M, Collins F, Shiloh Y, Crawley JN, Ried T, Tagle D, Wynshaw-Boris A. Atm-deficient mice: A paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell. 1996;86:159–171. - PubMed
-
- Barlow C, Brown KD, Deng CX, Tagle DA, Wynshaw-Boris A. Atm selectively regulates distinct p53-dependent cell-cycle checkpoint and apoptotic pathways. Nat Genet. 1997;17:453–456. - PubMed
-
- Beamish H, Lavin MF. Radiosensitivity in ataxia-telangiectasia: Anomalies in radiation-induced cell cycle delay. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994;65:175–184. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous