Mendelian controversies: a botanical and historical review - PubMed

Affiliations

• PMID: 11353700

Free article

Mendelian controversies: a botanical and historical review

D J Fairbanks et al. Am J Bot. 2001 May.

Free article

Abstract

Gregor Mendel was a 19(th) century priest and botanist who developed the fundamental laws of inheritance. The year 2000 marked a century since the rediscovery of those laws and the beginning of genetics. Although Mendel is now recognized as the founder of genetics, significant controversy ensued about his work throughout the 20(th) century. In this paper, we review five of the most contentious issues by looking at the historical record through the lens of current botanical science: (1) Are Mendel's data too good to be true? (2) Is Mendel's description of his experiments fictitious? (3) Did Mendel articulate the laws of inheritance attributed to him? (4) Did Mendel detect but not mention linkage? (5) Did Mendel support or oppose Darwin?A synthesis of botanical and historical evidence supports our conclusions: Mendel did not fabricate his data, his description of his experiments is literal, he articulated the laws of inheritance attributed to him insofar as was possible given the information he had, he did not detect linkage, and he neither strongly supported nor opposed Darwin.

Similar articles

• Historical study: Johann Gregor Mendel 1822-1884.

  Weiling F. Weiling F. Am J Med Genet. 1991 Jul 1;40(1):1-25; discussion 26. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320400103. Am J Med Genet. 1991. PMID: 1887835

• How did Mendel arrive at his discoveries?

  van Dijk PJ, Jessop AP, Ellis THN. van Dijk PJ, et al. Nat Genet. 2022 Jul;54(7):926-933. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01109-9. Epub 2022 Jul 11. Nat Genet. 2022. PMID: 35817970 Review.

• Seeds of doubt: Mendel's choice of Hieracium to study inheritance, a case of right plant, wrong trait.

  Bicknell R, Catanach A, Hand M, Koltunow A. Bicknell R, et al. Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Dec;129(12):2253-2266. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2788-x. Epub 2016 Oct 1. Theor Appl Genet. 2016. PMID: 27695890 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

• Darwin's Influence on Mendel: Evidence from a New Translation of Mendel's Paper.

  Fairbanks DJ, Abbott S. Fairbanks DJ, et al. Genetics. 2016 Oct;204(2):401-405. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.194613. Genetics. 2016. PMID: 27729491 Free PMC article.

• Gregor Johann Mendel: From peasant to priest, pedagogue, and prelate.

  Hartl DL. Hartl DL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2121953119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2121953119. Epub 2022 Jul 18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022. PMID: 35858394 Free PMC article.

• Mendel's genes: toward a full molecular characterization.

  Reid JB, Ross JJ. Reid JB, et al. Genetics. 2011 Sep;189(1):3-10. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132118. Genetics. 2011. PMID: 21908742 Free PMC article. Review.

• Epigenetics as an answer to Darwin's "special difficulty," Part 2: natural selection of metastable epialleles in honeybee castes.

  Ruden DM, Cingolani PE, Sen A, Qu W, Wang L, Senut MC, Garfinkel MD, Sollars VE, Lu X. Ruden DM, et al. Front Genet. 2015 Feb 24;6:60. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00060. eCollection 2015. Front Genet. 2015. PMID: 25759717 Free PMC article. Review.

• Mendel's pea crosses: varieties, traits and statistics.

  Ellis THN, Hofer JMI, Swain MT, van Dijk PJ. Ellis THN, et al. Hereditas. 2019 Oct 31;156:33. doi: 10.1186/s41065-019-0111-y. eCollection 2019. Hereditas. 2019. PMID: 31695583 Free PMC article.

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Wiley