A randomised controlled trial comparing a dilating vaginal speculum with a conventional bivalve speculum - PubMed

Clinical Trial

A randomised controlled trial comparing a dilating vaginal speculum with a conventional bivalve speculum

A Thomas et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Nov.

Abstract

Cervical smears are traditionally taken with the aid of a metal or disposable plastic bivalve speculum. Many women complain of discomfort with these specula. This study compares the efficacy and women's experiences of a new 'dilating speculum' called the Veda-scope, with a conventional metal bivalve speculum (Pederson). The aims of this study were: to determine whether the Veda-scope provides adequate visualisation of the cervix and vaginal walls and an adequate cervical cytology specimen; and to compare user acceptability and women's levels of comfort between the Veda-scope and the bivalve speculum. Sixty-four women were randomised to be examined with the Veda-scope and 60 with the bivalve speculum, by one of two operators. Each woman completed a questionnaire that included subjective views of their previous cervical smear experiences, and acceptability of the examination at the study consultation. Cytologists were blinded as to which speculum was used for cervical sampling. Of women examined, 7-83% of women found Veda-scope examinations comfortable, compared to 38-62% of women who found examinations with the bivalve comfortable; 94% of the women preferred the 'comfort' of the Veda-scope. The Veda-scope was as good as the bivalve speculum in providing samples for cytological analysis following the initial learning curve, and also provided markedly superior magnified views of the cervix and vaginal fornices.

Similar articles

• Veda-scope: More comfortable than the bivalve speculum and cytologically equivalent.

  Longmore PG. Longmore PG. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Apr;44(2):140-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00180.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004. PMID: 15089838 Clinical Trial.

• Acceptability of non-speculum clinician sampling for cervical screening in older women: A qualitative study.

  Freeman M, Waller J, Sasieni P, Lim AW, Marlow LA. Freeman M, et al. J Med Screen. 2018 Dec;25(4):205-210. doi: 10.1177/0969141318756452. Epub 2018 Feb 13. J Med Screen. 2018. PMID: 29439604 Free PMC article.

• Speculum 'self-insertion': a pilot study.

  Wright D, Fenwick J, Stephenson P, Monterosso L. Wright D, et al. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Oct;14(9):1098-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01205.x. J Clin Nurs. 2005. PMID: 16164528

• Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.

  McGoogan E, Colgan TJ, Ramzy I, Cochand-Priollet B, Davey DD, Grohs HK, Gurley AM, Husain OA, Hutchinson ML, Knesel EA Jr, Linder J, Mango LJ, Mitchell H, Peebles A, Reith A, Robinowitz M, Sauer T, Shida S, Solomon D, Topalidis T, Wilbur DC, Yamauchi K. McGoogan E, et al. Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):25-32. doi: 10.1159/000331532. Acta Cytol. 1998. PMID: 9479321 Review.

• The effect of vaginal lubrication on unsatisfactory results of cervical smears.

  Pergialiotis V, Vlachos DG, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N, Christakis D, Vlachos GD. Pergialiotis V, et al. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2015 Jan;19(1):55-61. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000037. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2015. PMID: 24769651 Review.

Cited by

• A Novel Use of Laryngoscope for Difficult Papanicolaou Smear Collection.

  Boudova S, Thomas C, Wolfe J, Schilder JM. Boudova S, et al. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 23;2021:6986768. doi: 10.1155/2021/6986768. eCollection 2021. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34603808 Free PMC article.

• Innovative prototypes for cervical cancer prevention in low-income primary care settings: A human-centered design approach.

  Arrivillaga M, Bermúdez PC, García-Cifuentes JP, Botero J. Arrivillaga M, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 24;15(8):e0238099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238099. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32833974 Free PMC article.

• Improving visualization of the cervix during pelvic exams: A simulation using a physical model of the speculum and human vagina as a steppingstone to reducing disparities in gynecological cancers.

  Yerrabelli RS, Palsgaard PK, Hojati A, Johnson AJW. Yerrabelli RS, et al. PLoS One. 2023 Sep 26;18(9):e0283145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283145. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37751425 Free PMC article.

• Improving women's experience during speculum examinations at routine gynaecological visits: randomised clinical trial.

  Seehusen DA, Johnson DR, Earwood JS, Sethuraman SN, Cornali J, Gillespie K, Doria M, Farnell E 4th, Lanham J. Seehusen DA, et al. BMJ. 2006 Jul 22;333(7560):171. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38888.588519.55. Epub 2006 Jun 27. BMJ. 2006. PMID: 16803941 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

• Design and preliminary analysis of a vaginal inserter for speculum-free cervical cancer screening.

  Asiedu MN, Agudogo J, Krieger MS, Miros R, Proeschold-Bell RJ, Schmitt JW, Ramanujam N. Asiedu MN, et al. PLoS One. 2017 May 31;12(5):e0177782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177782. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28562669 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Wiley