pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees - PubMed

  • ️Tue Jan 01 2002

Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees

T C Marshall et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2002.

Abstract

A previous review of inbreeding in natural populations suggested that close inbreeding (inbreeding coefficient f = 0.25) is generally rare in wild birds and mammals. However, the review did not assess rates of moderate inbreeding (f = 0.125), which may make a rather larger contribution to overall inbreeding in a population. Furthermore, previous studies may have underestimated the prevalence of inbreeding in wild populations with incomplete pedigrees. By categorizing inbreeding events by the relationship of the parental pair, we suggest a simple method for estimating rates of close and moderate inbreeding from incomplete pedigree data. We applied this method to three wild populations of ruminants: red deer on Rum, Scotland, Soay sheep on Hirta, Scotland and reintroduced Arabian oryx on the Jiddat-al-Harasis, Oman. Although paternal half-sib pairs were the most common category of inbreeding in all three populations, there was considerable variation among populations in the frequencies of the various categories of inbreeding. This variation may be largely explained by differences in population size and dynamics, in maternal and paternal sibship size and in the overlap of reproductive lifespan of consecutive generations. Close and moderate inbreeding appear to be a routine part of breeding behaviour in these ruminant populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mol Ecol. 1999 Jul;8(7):1199-209 - PubMed
    1. J Theor Biol. 1978 Aug 8;73(3):439-44 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1979 Nov 30;206(4422):1101-3 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(7):2496-500 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1991 May 10;252(5007):789-94 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources