Influences on venom yield in Australian tigersnakes (Notechis scutatus) and brownsnakes (Pseudonaja textilis: Elapidae, Serpentes) - PubMed
Influences on venom yield in Australian tigersnakes (Notechis scutatus) and brownsnakes (Pseudonaja textilis: Elapidae, Serpentes)
P J Mirtschin et al. Toxicon. 2002 Nov.
Abstract
The rates at which venomous animals produce venoms are of obvious biological and medical importance, but factors influencing those rates remain poorly understood. We gathered data on venom yield (wet mass of venom) and percentage solids (dry mass of the venom divided by wet mass) for 53 eastern brownsnakes (Pseudonaja textilis) and 36 mainland tigersnakes (Notechis scutatus) over a 4-year period at Venom Supplies Pty. Ltd, a commercial venom production facility in South Australia. Tigersnakes yielded about threefold more venom (by wet mass) than brownsnakes, but with slightly lower percentage solids. Both species showed significant geographic variation in percentage solids. Venom yields varied as a function of the snake's sex and geographic origin, but these effects were secondary consequences of geographic and sex-based differences in body size. Relative head size affected venom yield in brownsnakes but not tigersnakes. Overall, the amount of venom that a snake produced during milking was affected by its species, its geographic origin, its body size and relative head size, and by the time of year that it was milked, as well as by interactions among these factors. Body size was the most important effect on venom yield, with yields increasing more rapidly with size in brownsnakes than in tigersnakes. Research at the intersection of snake ecology and venom characteristics has great potential, but will require a genuinely interdisciplinary approach.
Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Neutralisation of the clotting activity of Australian snake venoms by snake plasma.
Smith A, Marshall LR, Mirtschin PJ, Jelinek GA. Smith A, et al. Toxicon. 2000 Dec;38(12):1855-8. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(99)00235-4. Toxicon. 2000. PMID: 10858522
-
Chaisakul J, Isbister GK, Kuruppu S, Konstantakopoulos N, Hodgson WC. Chaisakul J, et al. Toxicol Lett. 2013 Aug 29;221(3):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.06.235. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Toxicol Lett. 2013. PMID: 23830990
-
Molecular diversity in venom from the Australian Brown snake, Pseudonaja textilis.
Birrell GW, Earl S, Masci PP, de Jersey J, Wallis TP, Gorman JJ, Lavin MF. Birrell GW, et al. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006 Feb;5(2):379-89. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500270-MCP200. Epub 2005 Nov 10. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006. PMID: 16284125
-
Padula AM, Winkel KD. Padula AM, et al. Toxicon. 2016 Jul;117:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Apr 1. Toxicon. 2016. PMID: 27045362 Review.
-
Commercial monovalent antivenoms in Australia are polyvalent.
O'Leary MA, Isbister GK. O'Leary MA, et al. Toxicon. 2009 Aug;54(2):192-5. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Apr 16. Toxicon. 2009. PMID: 19375442 Review.
Cited by
-
Yee KT, Macrander J, Vasieva O, Rojnuckarin P. Yee KT, et al. Toxins (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;15(5):309. doi: 10.3390/toxins15050309. Toxins (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37235344 Free PMC article.
-
Snake bite in India: A few matters to note.
Abraham SV. Abraham SV. Toxicol Rep. 2018 Aug 17;5:839. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.08.010. eCollection 2018. Toxicol Rep. 2018. PMID: 30140616 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Flight S, Mirtschin P, Masci PP. Flight S, et al. Ecotoxicology. 2006 Mar;15(2):133-41. doi: 10.1007/s10646-005-0047-z. Epub 2005 Dec 23. Ecotoxicology. 2006. PMID: 16374664
-
Arbuckle K. Arbuckle K. Toxicon X. 2020 Apr 18;6:100034. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100034. eCollection 2020 Jun. Toxicon X. 2020. PMID: 32550589 Free PMC article.
-
Werner RM, Soffa AN. Werner RM, et al. Toxicon X. 2023 Aug 19;20:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2023.100169. eCollection 2023 Dec. Toxicon X. 2023. PMID: 37661997 Free PMC article.