The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game - PubMed
- ️Wed Jan 01 2003
. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1755-8.
doi: 10.1126/science.1082976.
Affiliations
- PMID: 12805551
- DOI: 10.1126/science.1082976
The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game
Alan G Sanfey et al. Science. 2003.
Abstract
The nascent field of neuroeconomics seeks to ground economic decision making in the biological substrate of the brain. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging of Ultimatum Game players to investigate neural substrates of cognitive and emotional processes involved in economic decision-making. In this game, two players split a sum of money;one player proposes a division and the other can accept or reject this. We scanned players as they responded to fair and unfair proposals. Unfair offers elicited activity in brain areas related to both emotion (anterior insula) and cognition (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). Further, significantly heightened activity in anterior insula for rejected unfair offers suggests an important role for emotions in decision-making.
Comment in
-
Psychology and economics. Strategizing in the brain.
Camerer CF. Camerer CF. Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1673-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1086215. Science. 2003. PMID: 12805527 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Neural correlates of the rejection of unfair offers in the impunity game.
Takagishi H, Takahashi T, Toyomura A, Takashino N, Koizumi M, Yamagishi T. Takagishi H, et al. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2009;30(4):496-500. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2009. PMID: 20010492
-
Economic decision-making in the ultimatum game by smokers.
Takahashi T. Takahashi T. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007 Oct;28(5):659-61. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007. PMID: 17984946
-
Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex.
Knoch D, Pascual-Leone A, Meyer K, Treyer V, Fehr E. Knoch D, et al. Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):829-32. doi: 10.1126/science.1129156. Epub 2006 Oct 5. Science. 2006. PMID: 17023614
-
The neuronal basis of empathy and fairness.
Singer T. Singer T. Novartis Found Symp. 2007;278:20-30; discussion 30-40, 89-96, 216-21. Novartis Found Symp. 2007. PMID: 17214308 Review.
-
The neurobiology of social decision-making.
Rilling JK, King-Casas B, Sanfey AG. Rilling JK, et al. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Aug 7. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008. PMID: 18639633 Review.
Cited by
-
Decoding the influence of emotional and attentional states on self-control using facial analysis.
Aydogan G, Kretschmer J, Brewer G, McClure SM. Aydogan G, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):25465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73729-6. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39461963 Free PMC article.
-
Servaas MN, Aleman A, Marsman JB, Renken RJ, Riese H, Ormel J. Servaas MN, et al. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Sep;15(3):537-52. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0342-y. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25720857 Free PMC article.
-
McCall C, Steinbeis N, Ricard M, Singer T. McCall C, et al. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec 9;8:424. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00424. eCollection 2014. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25538589 Free PMC article.
-
Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game.
Alexopoulos J, Pfabigan DM, Lamm C, Bauer H, Fischmeister FP. Alexopoulos J, et al. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 28;6:59. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00059. eCollection 2012. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22470328 Free PMC article.
-
Framing the ultimatum game: the contribution of simulation.
Tomasino B, Lotto L, Sarlo M, Civai C, Rumiati R, Rumiati RI. Tomasino B, et al. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 9;7:337. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00337. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23847507 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources