Fecal incontinence. Studies on physiology, pathophysiology and surgical treatment - PubMed
Affiliations
- PMID: 13677243
Review
Fecal incontinence. Studies on physiology, pathophysiology and surgical treatment
Ole Ø Rasmussen. Dan Med Bull. 2003 Aug.
Abstract
The thesis consists of ten previously published studies and a review. The physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms in fecal incontinence has been studied by anal manometry, both by standard static anal manometry and by a new method, dynamic anal manometry, where anal sphincter pressure can be measured during simultaneous opening and closing of the anal canal. Patients with fecal incontinence showed abnormal sphincter pressures more frequently when dynamic anal manometry was used compared to standard anal manometry. The physiology and pathophysiology of the rectum was studied using rectal compliance measurements. Patients with normal anorectal function had a large variation in rectal compliance. Patients with fecal incontinence had as a group, lower rectal compliance than continent patients. This may lead to increased frequency of incontinence episodes in patients with fecal incontinence. The relationship between idiopathic fecal incontinence and pudendal nerve terminal latency was studied in 178 patients. The far majority of patients had normal latencies, and there was no correlation between latency and anal manometry. In contrast to previous suggestions, idiopathic fecal incontinence does not seem to be caused by pudendal nerve damage. Reconstruction of the external anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence due to obstetric sphincter lesion showed a poorer functional result among patients older than forty years compared to younger. This indicates that the general muscular weakening with age contribute to the incontinence in these patients. The treatment of more complicated forms of fecal incontinence consists of, apart from conservative treatment or colostomi, mainly in muscle transpositions or artificial anal sphincter. Transposition of the distal part of the gluteus maximus muscle to encircle the anal canal, did not lead to acceptable continence in any of the patients studied. Transposition of the gracilis muscle lead to acceptable continence in half the patients. Patients where the transposed muscle were stimulated by a neurostimulator had satisfactory continence in most cases. However, with this method several re-operations were necessary in some patients. In addition, some patients developed severe evacuation difficulties. Implantation of an artificial sphincter resulted in long-term improvement of continence in that half of patients in whom the artificial sphincter remained implanted. The other half of the patients had the artificial sphincter explanted due to various reasons, most frequently due to infection around the device. In selected patients with more complicated fecal incontinence, stimulated gracilis transposition or implantation of an artificial anal sphincter may be offered as an alternative to colostomy. Sacral nerve stimulation is a new method which seems to provide the best results among the more advanced procedures. Its minimally invasive character also contribute to the increasing use of this method in the last few years. Evaluation and treatment of fecal incontinence is presently in a state of rapid change with focus on more elaborate investigative methods and more diversified treatment.
Similar articles
-
Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence related to obstetric anal sphincter damage.
Jarrett ME, Dudding TC, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA. Jarrett ME, et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):531-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9199-2. Epub 2008 Feb 27. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008. PMID: 18301948
-
The utility of pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies in idiopathic incontinence.
Ricciardi R, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD, Baxter NN, Karulf RE, Parker SC. Ricciardi R, et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jun;49(6):852-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0529-y. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006. PMID: 16598403
-
Manometric evaluation of defecation disorders: Part II. Fecal incontinence.
Rao SS. Rao SS. Gastroenterologist. 1997 Jun;5(2):99-111. Gastroenterologist. 1997. PMID: 9193928 Review.
-
Tjandra JJ, Lim JF, Hiscock R, Rajendra P. Tjandra JJ, et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2138-46. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0760-3. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004. PMID: 15657666 Clinical Trial.
-
Advances in the surgical management of anal incontinence.
Christiansen J. Christiansen J. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1992 Mar;6(1):43-57. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1992. PMID: 1586770 Review.
Cited by
-
A novel animal model for external anal sphincter insufficiency.
Brügger L, Inglin R, Candinas D, Sulser T, Eberli D. Brügger L, et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;29(11):1385-92. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2006-8. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014. PMID: 25185845
-
Okui N, Ikegami T, Erel CT. Okui N, et al. Cureus. 2024 Mar 5;16(3):e55542. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55542. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38449912 Free PMC article.
-
Walega P, Romaniszyn M, Siarkiewicz B, Zelazny D. Walega P, et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:698516. doi: 10.1155/2015/698516. Epub 2015 Mar 11. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015. PMID: 25861261 Free PMC article.
-
Reasons for non-disclosure of faecal incontinence: a comparison between two survey methods.
Bartlett L, Nowak M, Ho YH. Bartlett L, et al. Tech Coloproctol. 2007 Sep;11(3):251-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-007-0360-z. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Tech Coloproctol. 2007. PMID: 17676265
-
Raghavan S, Miyasaka EA, Gilmont RR, Somara S, Teitelbaum DH, Bitar KN. Raghavan S, et al. Surgery. 2014 Apr;155(4):668-74. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.023. Epub 2013 Dec 27. Surgery. 2014. PMID: 24582493 Free PMC article.