Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription - PubMed
- ️Thu Jan 01 2004
. 2004 Jul 29;430(6999):573-8.
doi: 10.1038/nature02742. Epub 2004 Jun 30.
Affiliations
- PMID: 15229615
- PMCID: PMC2610358
- DOI: 10.1038/nature02742
Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription
Armelle Lengronne et al. Nature. 2004.
Abstract
Sister chromatids, the products of eukaryotic DNA replication, are held together by the chromosomal cohesin complex after their synthesis. This allows the spindle in mitosis to recognize pairs of replication products for segregation into opposite directions. Cohesin forms large protein rings that may bind DNA strands by encircling them, but the characterization of cohesin binding to chromosomes in vivo has remained vague. We have performed high resolution analysis of cohesin association along budding yeast chromosomes III-VI. Cohesin localizes almost exclusively between genes that are transcribed in converging directions. We find that active transcription positions cohesin at these sites, not the underlying DNA sequence. Cohesin is initially loaded onto chromosomes at separate places, marked by the Scc2/Scc4 cohesin loading complex, from where it appears to slide to its more permanent locations. But even after sister chromatid cohesion is established, changes in transcription lead to repositioning of cohesin. Thus the sites of cohesin binding and therefore probably sister chromatid cohesion, a key architectural feature of mitotic chromosomes, display surprising flexibility. Cohesin localization to places of convergent transcription is conserved in fission yeast, suggesting that it is a common feature of eukaryotic chromosomes.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcee/2610358/c7677f22e009/ukmss-3402-f0001.gif)
Cohesin localises to convergent intergene regions along budding yeast chromosome VI. Cells containing Smc3-Flag3 or Scc1-HA6 were arrested in metaphase by nocodazole treatment and processed for ChIP against the epitope tagged subunits. Enrichment in the immunoprecipitated fraction relative to a whole genome DNA sample is shown along the length of the chromosome. Each bar represents the average of 16 oligonucleotide probes within adjacent 300 bp windows. The y-axis scale is log2. Dark grey signals represent significant binding, as detailed in the Supplementary MIAME Document. Blue bars above and below the midline are genes transcribed from left to right and opposite, respectively. The purple oval represents the centromere. Origins of replication are depicted in red, tRNA genes in yellow, and a Ty2 transposon in green.
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcee/2610358/20a0dbf998ad/ukmss-3402-f0002.gif)
Cohesin is moved towards 3′-ends of genes by their transcription. a, Localisation of Scc1-HA6 around STE2 on chromosome VI in a nocodazole-arrested wild-type strain (top), and after deletion of the STE2 promoter (bottom). b, Localisation of Scc1-HA6 around MSH4, close to centromere VI, in mitotic cells (top), and of Rec8-Flag3 in meiosis (bottom) when MSH4 is induced. c, Localisation of Scc1-HA6 in nocodazole-arrested cells before (top) and 15 min after heat-shock (bottom). Regions around HSP30 and SRO9 on chromosome III, induced and repressed after heat-shock respectively, are shown.
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcee/2610358/6809e54d84d6/ukmss-3402-f0003.gif)
Cohesin loading at, and movement away from sites of Scc2/Scc4 binding. a, Localisation of Scc4-HA6 and Scc2-HA6 along chromosome VI in hydroxyurea-arrested cells. See the legend to chromosomal features in Fig. 1. b, Transcriptional activity along chromosome VI in wild-type logarithmically growing cells. The signal intensity reflects the abundance of transcripts, as an approximation of transcriptional activity. Broken bars exceed 10,000, see Supplementary Figure S5 for full values c, Detail of the localisation on the left arm of chromosome VI, from top to bottom, of Scc2-HA6 in hydroxyurea-arrested cells, Scc1-HA6 in scc2-4 mutant cells released from G1 into hydroxyurea block at restrictive temperature, Scc1-HA6 in wild-type cells 10 min, and 30 min following release from G1 at 16°C, and Scc1-HA6 in hydroxyurea-arrested wild-type cells. The green and red dashed lines flank sites usually seen bound by Scc2 and Scc1, respectively.
![Figure 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcee/2610358/5209d02be057/ukmss-3402-f0004.gif)
Cohesin localisation to convergent intergenic regions is conserved in fission yeast. ChIP was performed against the cohesin subunit Rad21-HA3 from logarithmically growing cells. A 240 kb long stretch from the right arm of chromosome 2 is shown.
Comment in
-
Molecular biology: cohesins slip sliding away.
Ross KE, Cohen-Fix O. Ross KE, et al. Nature. 2004 Jul 29;430(6999):520-1. doi: 10.1038/430520b. Nature. 2004. PMID: 15282594 No abstract available.
-
New temptations in SMC research.
Sjögren C. Sjögren C. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012 Apr 4;13(5):282. doi: 10.1038/nrm3331. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012. PMID: 22473469 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evidence for cohesin sliding along budding yeast chromosomes.
Ocampo-Hafalla M, Muñoz S, Samora CP, Uhlmann F. Ocampo-Hafalla M, et al. Open Biol. 2016 Jun;6(6):150178. doi: 10.1098/rsob.150178. Open Biol. 2016. PMID: 27278645 Free PMC article.
-
Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins.
Ciosk R, Shirayama M, Shevchenko A, Tanaka T, Toth A, Shevchenko A, Nasmyth K. Ciosk R, et al. Mol Cell. 2000 Feb;5(2):243-54. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80420-7. Mol Cell. 2000. PMID: 10882066
-
Transcription alters chromosomal locations of cohesin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Bausch C, Noone S, Henry JM, Gaudenz K, Sanderson B, Seidel C, Gerton JL. Bausch C, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Dec;27(24):8522-32. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01007-07. Epub 2007 Oct 8. Mol Cell Biol. 2007. PMID: 17923700 Free PMC article.
-
The mechanism of sister chromatid cohesion.
Uhlmann F. Uhlmann F. Exp Cell Res. 2004 May 15;296(1):80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.03.005. Exp Cell Res. 2004. PMID: 15120997 Review.
-
Heterochromatin and the cohesion of sister chromatids.
Gartenberg M. Gartenberg M. Chromosome Res. 2009;17(2):229-38. doi: 10.1007/s10577-008-9012-z. Chromosome Res. 2009. PMID: 19308703 Review.
Cited by
-
The yeast 2-micron plasmid Rep2 protein has Rep1-independent partitioning function.
Mereshchuk A, Johnstone PS, Chew JSK, Dobson MJ. Mereshchuk A, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Oct 14;50(18):10571-10585. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac810. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022. PMID: 36156142 Free PMC article.
-
Kim KD, Tanizawa H, Iwasaki O, Noma K. Kim KD, et al. Nat Genet. 2016 Oct;48(10):1242-52. doi: 10.1038/ng.3647. Epub 2016 Aug 22. Nat Genet. 2016. PMID: 27548313 Free PMC article.
-
Hu B, Petela N, Kurze A, Chan KL, Chapard C, Nasmyth K. Hu B, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Nov 16;43(20):e132. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv670. Epub 2015 Jun 30. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015. PMID: 26130708 Free PMC article.
-
Peters JM, Nishiyama T. Peters JM, et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012 Nov 1;4(11):a011130. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011130. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012. PMID: 23043155 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pakchuen S, Ishibashi M, Takakusagi E, Shirahige K, Sutani T. Pakchuen S, et al. J Biol Chem. 2016 Aug 12;291(33):17228-46. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.727438. Epub 2016 Jun 20. J Biol Chem. 2016. PMID: 27325700 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K. Cohesins: Chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell. 1997;91:35–45. - PubMed
-
- Tanaka T, Fuchs J, Loidl J, Nasmyth K. Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:492–499. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials