Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study - PubMed
- ️Sat Jan 01 2005
Comparative Study
. 2005 Apr 12;111(14):1777-83.
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000160923.04524.5B. Epub 2005 Apr 4.
Affiliations
- PMID: 15809377
- DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000160923.04524.5B
Comparative Study
Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study
Roberto Sega et al. Circulation. 2005.
Abstract
Background: Studies in hypertensive patients suggest that ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is prognostically superior to office BP. Much less information is available in the general population, however. Obtaining this information was the purpose of the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study.
Methods and results: Office, home, and 24-hour ambulatory BP values were obtained in 2051 subjects between 25 and 74 years of age who were representative of the general population of Monza (Milan, Italy). Subjects were followed up for an average of 131 months, during which time cardiovascular and noncardiovascular fatal events were recorded (n=186). Office, home, and ambulatory BP values showed a significant exponential direct relationship with risk of cardiovascular or all-cause death. The goodness of fit of the relationship was greater for systolic than for diastolic BP and for night than for day BP, but its overall value was not better for home or ambulatory than for office BP. The slope of the relationship, however, was progressively greater from office to home and ambulatory BP. Home and night BP modestly improved the goodness of fit of the risk model when added to office BP.
Conclusions: In the PAMELA population, risk of death increased more with a given increase in home or ambulatory than in office BP. The overall ability to predict death, however, was not greater for home and ambulatory than for office BP, although it was somewhat increased by the combination of office and outside-of-office values. Systolic BP was almost invariably superior to diastolic BP, and night BP was superior to day BP.
Comment in
-
Hansen TW, Jeppesen J, Ibsen H. Hansen TW, et al. Circulation. 2005 Sep 27;112(13):e244; author reply e245-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.560805. Circulation. 2005. PMID: 16186430 No abstract available.
-
Dolan E, O'Brien ET, Staessen JA. Dolan E, et al. Circulation. 2005 Sep 27;112(13):e244-5; author reply e245-6. Circulation. 2005. PMID: 16189849 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Bombelli M, Facchetti R, Carugo S, Madotto F, Arenare F, Quarti-Trevano F, Capra A, Giannattasio C, Dell'Oro R, Grassi G, Sega R, Mancia G. Bombelli M, et al. J Hypertens. 2009 Dec;27(12):2458-64. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328330b845. J Hypertens. 2009. PMID: 19654559
-
Fagard RH, Van Den Broeke C, De Cort P. Fagard RH, et al. J Hum Hypertens. 2005 Oct;19(10):801-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001903. J Hum Hypertens. 2005. PMID: 15959536
-
Mancia G, Facchetti R, Bombelli M, Grassi G, Sega R. Mancia G, et al. Hypertension. 2006 May;47(5):846-53. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000215363.69793.bb. Epub 2006 Mar 27. Hypertension. 2006. PMID: 16567588
-
[Cardiovascular risk stratification. Systolic, diastolic or pulse pressure?].
Pede S, Lombardo M. Pede S, et al. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2001 Apr;2(4):356-8. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2001. PMID: 19397006 Review. Italian.
-
Defining blood pressure goals: is it enough to manage total cardiovascular risk?
Mancia G. Mancia G. J Hypertens Suppl. 2009 Jul;27(5):S3-8. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000357902.93951.3a. J Hypertens Suppl. 2009. PMID: 19587552 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment strategies for osteoarthritis patients with pain and hypertension.
Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Mazzotta G, Martire P, Garofoli M, Gentile G, Reboldi G. Verdecchia P, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2010 Aug;2(4):229-40. doi: 10.1177/1759720X10376120. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2010. PMID: 22870450 Free PMC article.
-
Kario K, Saito I, Kushiro T, Teramukai S, Ishikawa Y, Hiramatsu K, Kobayashi F, Shimada K. Kario K, et al. J Hum Hypertens. 2013 Dec;27(12):721-8. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2013.68. Epub 2013 Jul 18. J Hum Hypertens. 2013. PMID: 23863805 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Blood pressure variability, cardiovascular risk, and risk for renal disease progression.
Parati G, Ochoa JE, Bilo G. Parati G, et al. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012 Oct;14(5):421-31. doi: 10.1007/s11906-012-0290-7. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012. PMID: 22903810 Review.
-
Mizuno H, Hoshide S, Fukutomi M, Kario K. Mizuno H, et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Jan;18(1):70-8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12618. Epub 2015 Jul 14. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016. PMID: 26176643 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Yoshida Y, Yoshimura S, Kinoshita M, Ozeki Y, Okamoto M, Gotoh K, Masaki T, Shibata H. Yoshida Y, et al. J Endocr Soc. 2020 Aug 24;4(10):bvaa116. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa116. eCollection 2020 Oct 1. J Endocr Soc. 2020. PMID: 32968702 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources