Auditory evoked responses are additive to brain oscillations - PubMed

Affiliations

• PMID: 16015712

Comparative Study

Auditory evoked responses are additive to brain oscillations

V T Mäkinen et al. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2004.

Abstract

The generation mechanism of stimulus-evoked electro- and magnetoencephalographic (EEG & MEG) responses has remained controversial. One view holds that evoked responses are independent components, additive to ongoing brain activity. The other view holds that evoked responses are generated via stimulus-induced phase reorganization of ongoing brain activity. This issue has been commonly addressed with signal processing techniques that assume a high level of stationarity (i.e., unchanging properties over time) of the measured signal. Here we used signal analysis methods suitable for analyzing non-stationary signals. We found that auditory stimulation leads to a large power increase of the poststimulus signal compared to prestimulus level. Linear superposition of the (time-domain) averaged response and the unaveraged prestimulus signal accounted for 90% of the power increase. Further, we found that auditory stimulation does not lead to a phase-coherent state of ongoing oscillations. Taken together our results show that auditory evoked responses are directly additive to ongoing oscillations and only 10% of the observed power increases are explained by non-phase-locked brain activity. When examining evoked brain activity with methods providing simultaneous frequency and time information, emphasizing temporal accuracy is likely to provide more accurate descriptions of non-stationary processes of the human brain.

Similar articles

• Auditory event-related responses are generated independently of ongoing brain activity.

  Mäkinen V, Tiitinen H, May P. Mäkinen V, et al. Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):961-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.020. Epub 2004 Dec 9. Neuroimage. 2005. PMID: 15670673 Clinical Trial.

• Spectral characterization of ongoing and auditory event-related brain processes.

  Mäkinen VT, May PJ, Tiitinen H. Mäkinen VT, et al. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov 30;2004:104. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2004. PMID: 16012610

• A novel mechanism for evoked responses in the human brain.

  Nikulin VV, Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Nolte G, Lemm S, Müller KR, Ilmoniemi RJ, Curio G. Nikulin VV, et al. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 May;25(10):3146-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05553.x. Eur J Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17561828

• Magnetoencephalography of the newborn brain.

  Huotilainen M. Huotilainen M. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Dec;11(6):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Sep 15. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006. PMID: 16979394 Review.

• Background and evoked activity and their interaction in the human brain.

  Nierhaus T, Schön T, Becker R, Ritter P, Villringer A. Nierhaus T, et al. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Oct;27(8):1140-50. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Jun 4. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009. PMID: 19497696 Review.

Publication types

MeSH terms