Duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a closer look at efficacy and safety data across the approved dose range - PubMed
Meta-Analysis
Duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a closer look at efficacy and safety data across the approved dose range
Craig H Mallinckrodt et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Jun.
Abstract
Objective: This analysis focuses on efficacy and safety data obtained from studies of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) within the approved dose range of 40-60 mg/day.
Method: Efficacy and safety data were obtained from the acute phase portions of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD. In Studies 1 and 2, patients were randomized to duloxetine 60 mg once daily (QD) (n=123 [Study 1]; n=128 [Study 2]) or placebo (n=122 [Study 1]; n=139 [Study 2]) for 9 weeks. In Studies 3 and 4, patients were randomized to duloxetine 20 mg twice daily (BID) (n=91 [Study 3]; n=86 [Study 4]) or placebo (n=90 [Study 3]; n=89 [Study 4]) for 8 weeks. Efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD17) total score (primary outcome), HAMD17 subscales, the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scales, and Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for pain. Safety assessments included rates of discontinuation due to adverse events, spontaneously reported treatment-emergent adverse events, and changes in vital signs.
Results: In both studies of duloxetine 60 mg QD, mean change in HAMD17 total score was significantly greater in duloxetine-treated patients compared with placebo (Study 1, p<.001; Study 2, p=.024). At a dose of 20 mg BID, duloxetine demonstrated significant superiority over placebo on the HAMD17 total score in one of the two studies (Study 4, p=.034). Probabilities of remission among patients receiving duloxetine 60 mg QD were 44.2% in Study 1 (p<.001 vs. placebo) and 43.0% in Study 2 (NS), while for patients receiving duloxetine 20 mg BID the probabilities of remission were 27.2% in Study 3 (NS) and 36.1% in Study 4 (NS). Across the six assessed VAS measures of pain severity and interference, the main effect of treatment for duloxetine 60 mg QD was significantly superior to placebo on 7 of the 12 outcomes in Studies 1 and 2, while duloxetine 20 mg BID was not superior to placebo on any of the 12 outcomes in Studies 3 and 4. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was 13.1% among patients receiving duloxetine 60 mg QD, and 11.9% at a dose of 20 mg BID. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events at both doses included nausea, headache, dry mouth, dizziness, and insomnia. The incidence of treatment-emergent nausea among patients receiving duloxetine 60 mg QD was 37.8%, compared with 16.4% among patients receiving 20 mg BID.
Conclusion: Duloxetine provides safe and effective acute phase treatment of MDD at doses of 40-60 mg/day. Compared with placebo, the 60 mg QD dose was more consistently effective than the 20 mg BID dose. However, the incidence of certain treatment-emergent adverse events is likely to be lower at the 40 mg dose.
Similar articles
-
Detke MJ, Wiltse CG, Mallinckrodt CH, McNamara RK, Demitrack MA, Bitter I. Detke MJ, et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15589385 Clinical Trial.
-
Brannan SK, Mallinckrodt CH, Brown EB, Wohlreich MM, Watkin JG, Schatzberg AF. Brannan SK, et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2005 Jan;39(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.04.011. J Psychiatr Res. 2005. PMID: 15504423 Clinical Trial.
-
Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an open-label study.
Hudson JI, Perahia DG, Gilaberte I, Wang F, Watkin JG, Detke MJ. Hudson JI, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2007 Aug 28;7:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-43. BMC Psychiatry. 2007. PMID: 17725843 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Duloxetine: a review of its use in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.
Carter NJ, McCormack PL. Carter NJ, et al. CNS Drugs. 2009;23(6):523-41. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200923060-00006. CNS Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19480470 Review.
-
Hudson JI, Wohlreich MM, Kajdasz DK, Mallinckrodt CH, Watkin JG, Martynov OV. Hudson JI, et al. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2005 Jul;20(5):327-41. doi: 10.1002/hup.696. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2005. PMID: 15912562 Review.
Cited by
-
Leão Nunes Filho MJ, Barreto ESR, Antunes Júnior CR, Alencar VB, Falcão Lins-Kusterer LE, Azi LMTA, Kraychete DC. Leão Nunes Filho MJ, et al. Pain Manag. 2024;14(8):437-451. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2408215. Epub 2024 Oct 8. Pain Manag. 2024. PMID: 39377458 Review.
-
Gajula R, Maddela R, Babu Ravi V, Inamadugu JK, Pilli NR. Gajula R, et al. J Pharm Anal. 2013 Feb;3(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 7. J Pharm Anal. 2013. PMID: 29403794 Free PMC article.
-
Siddiqui F, Barbateskovic M, Juul S, Katakam KK, Munkholm K, Gluud C, Jakobsen JC. Siddiqui F, et al. Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 9;10(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01722-5. Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34108032 Free PMC article.
-
Choy EH, Mease PJ, Kajdasz DK, Wohlreich MM, Crits-Christoph P, Walker DJ, Chappell AS. Choy EH, et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Sep;28(9):1035-44. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1203-2. Epub 2009 Jun 18. Clin Rheumatol. 2009. PMID: 19533210 Free PMC article.
-
Gao W, Gao Y, Xu Y, Liang J, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Shan F, Ge J, Xia Q. Gao W, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05910-0. BMC Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38877455 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous