Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting - PubMed
Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting
Robert S Van Howe. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006 Jan-Feb.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to prospectively document the incidence of meatal stenosis in boys. The study included a consecutive sample of boys whose visit with the physician included a genital examination in a private primary care pediatric practice in rural northern Wisconsin. Meatal stenosis was diagnosed in boys from 1.94 to 12.34 years of age. The diagnosis was made in 24 of 329 circumcised boys who were Tanner I development and older than 3 years of age (7.29%, 95%CI=4.48-10.10%). Nearly all required meatotomy to resolve their symptoms. All of the boys with meatal stenosis were circumcised neonatally (exact OR=3.54, 95%CI=0.62-infinity). The ratio of circumcised boys to noncircumcised boys in this study provided 80% power to demonstrate a 21.4% difference in the incidence of meatal stenosis between circumcised and noncircumcised Tanner I boys 3 years and older. Meatal stenosis may be the most common complication following neonatal circumcision. The frequency of this complication and the need for surgical correction need to be disclosed as part of the informed consent for neonatal circumcision. A careful meatal examination is indicted in any circumcised boy with abdominal or urinary complaints.
Comment in
-
Meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision.
Schoen EJ. Schoen EJ. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007 Jan;46(1):86. doi: 10.1177/0009922806289836. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007. PMID: 17164518 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Wedge urethral meatotomy in meatal stenosis secondary to web formation.
Edan OA. Edan OA. J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Jun;18(3):334.e1-334.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Mar 10. J Pediatr Urol. 2022. PMID: 35321834
-
Meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision.
Schoen EJ. Schoen EJ. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007 Jan;46(1):86. doi: 10.1177/0009922806289836. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007. PMID: 17164518 No abstract available.
-
Complication of newborn circumcision: Meatal stenosis or meatal web?
Özen MA, Gündoğdu G, Taşdemir M, Eroğlu E. Özen MA, et al. J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Dec;13(6):617.e1-617.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Jun 2. J Pediatr Urol. 2017. PMID: 28623142
-
Kunz HV. Kunz HV. Prim Care. 1986 Sep;13(3):513-25. Prim Care. 1986. PMID: 3538087 Review.
-
Does Circumcision Increase Meatal Stenosis Risk?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Morris BJ, Krieger JN. Morris BJ, et al. Urology. 2017 Dec;110:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Aug 4. Urology. 2017. PMID: 28826876 Review.
Cited by
-
Fendereski K, Horns JJ, Driggs N, Lau G, Schaeffer AJ. Fendereski K, et al. J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Nov;59(11):161614. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.022. Epub 2024 Jul 5. J Pediatr Surg. 2024. PMID: 39084960
-
Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.
Morris BJ, Moreton S, Krieger JN. Morris BJ, et al. J Evid Based Med. 2019 Nov;12(4):263-290. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12361. Epub 2019 Sep 8. J Evid Based Med. 2019. PMID: 31496128 Free PMC article.
-
Meatal stenosis posttraditional neonatal circumcision-cross-sectional study.
Abid AF, Hussein NS. Abid AF, et al. Urol Ann. 2021 Jan-Mar;13(1):62-66. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_30_20. Epub 2021 Jan 19. Urol Ann. 2021. PMID: 33897167 Free PMC article.
-
Shokri Varniab Z, Pourabhari Langroudi A, Neishabouri A, Torabinavid P, Arbab M, Heidari F, Milani SM, Eftekharzadeh S, Sabetkish S, Kajbafzadeh AM. Shokri Varniab Z, et al. Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Apr;192(2):707-711. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03040-8. Epub 2022 Jun 3. Ir J Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 35657540 Clinical Trial.
-
Chen MY, Skewes J, Daley R, Woodruff MA, Rukin NJ. Chen MY, et al. Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Jul 1;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00799-8. Biomed Eng Online. 2020. PMID: 32611431 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical