Comparative performance of Bayesian and AIC-based measures of phylogenetic model uncertainty - PubMed
Comparative Study
Comparative performance of Bayesian and AIC-based measures of phylogenetic model uncertainty
Michael E Alfaro et al. Syst Biol. 2006 Feb.
Abstract
Reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (RJ-MCMC) is a technique for simultaneously evaluating multiple related (but not necessarily nested) statistical models that has recently been applied to the problem of phylogenetic model selection. Here we use a simulation approach to assess the performance of this method and compare it to Akaike weights, a measure of model uncertainty that is based on the Akaike information criterion. Under conditions where the assumptions of the candidate models matched the generating conditions, both Bayesian and AIC-based methods perform well. The 95% credible interval contained the generating model close to 95% of the time. However, the size of the credible interval differed with the Bayesian credible set containing approximately 25% to 50% fewer models than an AIC-based credible interval. The posterior probability was a better indicator of the correct model than the Akaike weight when all assumptions were met but both measures performed similarly when some model assumptions were violated. Models in the Bayesian posterior distribution were also more similar to the generating model in their number of parameters and were less biased in their complexity. In contrast, Akaike-weighted models were more distant from the generating model and biased towards slightly greater complexity. The AIC-based credible interval appeared to be more robust to the violation of the rate homogeneity assumption. Both AIC and Bayesian approaches suggest that substantial uncertainty can accompany the choice of model for phylogenetic analyses, suggesting that alternative candidate models should be examined in analysis of phylogenetic data. [AIC; Akaike weights; Bayesian phylogenetics; model averaging; model selection; model uncertainty; posterior probability; reversible jump.].
Similar articles
-
Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo.
Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Alfaro ME. Huelsenbeck JP, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jun;21(6):1123-33. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh123. Epub 2004 Mar 19. Mol Biol Evol. 2004. PMID: 15034130
-
Park ES, Symanski E, Han D, Spiegelman C. Park ES, et al. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015 Jun;(183 Pt 1-2):51-113. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015. PMID: 26333239
-
Vrieze SI. Vrieze SI. Psychol Methods. 2012 Jun;17(2):228-43. doi: 10.1037/a0027127. Epub 2012 Feb 6. Psychol Methods. 2012. PMID: 22309957 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Xie J, Kim NK. Xie J, et al. J Comput Biol. 2005 Sep;12(7):952-70. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2005.12.952. J Comput Biol. 2005. PMID: 16201915 Review.
Cited by
-
Stuber EF, Verpeut J, Horvat-Gordon M, Ramachandran R, Bartell PA. Stuber EF, et al. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e59097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059097. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23785393 Free PMC article.
-
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. Tamura K, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. Epub 2011 May 4. Mol Biol Evol. 2011. PMID: 21546353 Free PMC article.
-
Eben A, Espinosa de Los Monteros A. Eben A, et al. Zookeys. 2013 Sep 19;(332):207-321. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.332.5220. eCollection 2013. Zookeys. 2013. PMID: 24163585 Free PMC article.
-
Licona-Vera Y, Ornelas JF. Licona-Vera Y, et al. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e101870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101870. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24992589 Free PMC article.
-
Visualizing phylogenetic tree landscapes.
Wilgenbusch JC, Huang W, Gallivan KA. Wilgenbusch JC, et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Feb 2;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1479-1. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017. PMID: 28153045 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous