Estimating individual contributions to population growth: evolutionary fitness in ecological time - PubMed
- ️Sun Jan 01 2006
Estimating individual contributions to population growth: evolutionary fitness in ecological time
T Coulson et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2006.
Abstract
Ecological and evolutionary change is generated by variation in individual performance. Biologists have consequently long been interested in decomposing change measured at the population level into contributions from individuals, the traits they express and the alleles they carry. We present a novel method of estimating individual contributions to population growth and changes in distributions of quantitative traits and alleles. An individual's contribution to population growth is an individual's realized annual fitness. We demonstrate how the quantities we develop can be used to address a range of empirical questions, and provide an application to a detailed dataset of Soay sheep. The approach provides results that are consistent with those obtained using lifetime estimates of individual performance, yet is substantially more powerful as it allows lifetime performance to be decomposed into annual survival and fecundity contributions.
Figures

Individual contributions to population growth summed across individuals in the same phenotypic states for the Soay sheep. (a) Age-specific values of pt(i) for the Soay sheep averaged across years 1986–2003, (b) time series of age-specific contributions to population growth. The solid lines represent lambs (negative values of pt(i), and four and five year olds (positive values). There is substantial inter-annual variation in the contribution of different age-classes to population growth and (c) the contribution of different cohorts to population growth. Note that the foot and mouth outbreak means data are not available for 2001.

Using pt(i) to estimate selection in the Soay sheep. (a) An example of a selection gradient calculated using birth weights and pt(i) values for all Soay sheep (males and females) living in the population in 1993. Each dot represents an individual. Males and females of known ages are included in the plot. Data are transformed to have a mean of zero and a standard deviation of unity prior to analyses. (b) A time series of fluctuations in selection pressure on birth weight calculated using pt(i). There is evidence that the strength of selection on birth weight has declined during the course of the study. The horizontal dotted line shows the estimate of selection calculated using lifetime reproductive success. This is close to the mean of the estimates of fluctuating selection calculated using pt(i) (solid circles) (c) scatter plot showing the lack of correlation between annual estimates of selection calculated using pt(i) and cohort based estimates calculated using LRS.
Similar articles
-
The evolutionary demography of ecological change: linking trait variation and population growth.
Pelletier F, Clutton-Brock T, Pemberton J, Tuljapurkar S, Coulson T. Pelletier F, et al. Science. 2007 Mar 16;315(5818):1571-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1139024. Science. 2007. PMID: 17363672
-
The population growth consequences of variation in individual heterozygosity.
Di Fonzo MM, Pelletier F, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Coulson T. Di Fonzo MM, et al. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019667. Epub 2011 May 18. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21611172 Free PMC article.
-
Childs DZ, Coulson TN, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Rees M. Childs DZ, et al. Ecol Lett. 2011 Oct;14(10):985-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01657.x. Epub 2011 Jul 26. Ecol Lett. 2011. PMID: 21790931
-
Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".
Kruuk LE. Kruuk LE. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 29;359(1446):873-90. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1437. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004. PMID: 15306404 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Plard F, Fay R, Kéry M, Cohas A, Schaub M. Plard F, et al. Ecology. 2019 Jun;100(6):e02715. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2715. Epub 2019 May 10. Ecology. 2019. PMID: 30927548 Review.
Cited by
-
Martínez-Padilla J, Estrada A, Early R, Garcia-Gonzalez F. Martínez-Padilla J, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jun 14;284(1856):20170516. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0516. Proc Biol Sci. 2017. PMID: 28615500 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial, temporal, and density-dependent components of habitat quality for a desert owl.
Flesch AD, Hutto RL, van Leeuwen WJ, Hartfield K, Jacobs S. Flesch AD, et al. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119986. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25786257 Free PMC article.
-
Rodriguez-Hidalgo P, Gortazar C, Tortosa FS, Rodriguez-Vigal C, Fierro Y, Vicente J. Rodriguez-Hidalgo P, et al. Oecologia. 2010 Oct;164(2):389-98. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1663-8. Epub 2010 May 28. Oecologia. 2010. PMID: 20508950
-
Cerwenka AF, Pagnotta A, Böker C, Brandner J, Geist J, Schliewen UK. Cerwenka AF, et al. Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr 26;7(12):4076-4085. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2942. eCollection 2017 Jun. Ecol Evol. 2017. PMID: 28649321 Free PMC article.
-
Evolutionary ecology of aging: time to reconcile field and laboratory research.
Reichard M. Reichard M. Ecol Evol. 2016 Mar 28;6(9):2988-3000. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2093. eCollection 2016 May. Ecol Evol. 2016. PMID: 27069592 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arnold S.J, Wade M.J. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution. 1984;38:709–719. - PubMed
-
- Benton T.G, Grant A. Evolutionary fitness in ecology: comparing measures of fitness in stochastic, density-dependent environments. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2000;2:769–789.
-
- Caswell H. Sinauer Associates Inc; Sunderland, MA: 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation.
-
- Catchpole E.A, Morgan B.J.T, Coulson T.N, Freeman S.N, Albon S.D. Factors influencing Soay sheep survival. Appl. Stat. 2000;49:453–472.
-
- Charlesworth B. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1994. Evolution in age structured populations.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources