A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory - PubMed

Review

A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory

Thomas F Pettigrew et al. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May.

Abstract

The present article presents a meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. With 713 independent samples from 515 studies, the meta-analysis finds that intergroup contact typically reduces intergroup prejudice. Multiple tests indicate that this finding appears not to result from either participant selection or publication biases, and the more rigorous studies yield larger mean effects. These contact effects typically generalize to the entire outgroup, and they emerge across a broad range of outgroup targets and contact settings. Similar patterns also emerge for samples with racial or ethnic targets and samples with other targets. This result suggests that contact theory, devised originally for racial and ethnic encounters, can be extended to other groups. A global indicator of Allport's optimal contact conditions demonstrates that contact under these conditions typically leads to even greater reduction in prejudice. Closer examination demonstrates that these conditions are best conceptualized as an interrelated bundle rather than as independent factors. Further, the meta-analytic findings indicate that these conditions are not essential for prejudice reduction. Hence, future work should focus on negative factors that prevent intergroup contact from diminishing prejudice as well as the development of a more comprehensive theory of intergroup contact.

Similar articles

• Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups.

  Tropp LR, Pettigrew TF. Tropp LR, et al. Psychol Sci. 2005 Dec;16(12):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x. Psychol Sci. 2005. PMID: 16313659

• Role of perceived importance in intergroup contact.

  van Dick R, Wagner U, Pettigrew TF, Christ O, Wolf C, Petzel T, Castro VS, Jackson JS. van Dick R, et al. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):211-27. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.211. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004. PMID: 15301628

• Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice.

  Tropp LR, Pettigrew TF. Tropp LR, et al. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Aug;31(8):1145-58. doi: 10.1177/0146167205274854. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005. PMID: 16000274

• Intergroup contact as a tool for reducing, resolving, and preventing intergroup conflict: evidence, limitations, and potential.

  Al Ramiah A, Hewstone M. Al Ramiah A, et al. Am Psychol. 2013 Oct;68(7):527-42. doi: 10.1037/a0032603. Am Psychol. 2013. PMID: 24128316 Review.

• In Pursuit of Three Theories: Authoritarianism, Relative Deprivation, and Intergroup Contact.

  Pettigrew TF. Pettigrew TF. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033327. Epub 2015 Sep 10. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26361053 Review.

Cited by

• Can high quality listening predict lower speakers' prejudiced attitudes?

  Itzchakov G, Weinstein N, Legate N, Amar M. Itzchakov G, et al. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2020 Nov;91:104022. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104022. Epub 2020 Aug 6. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32834106 Free PMC article.

• Does the size of foreign population in a city affect the level of labour-market discrimination against job applicants of migrant origin?

  Ahmad A. Ahmad A. Can Rev Sociol. 2022 Oct;59(S1):134-150. doi: 10.1111/cars.12398. Epub 2022 Aug 29. Can Rev Sociol. 2022. PMID: 36039400 Free PMC article.

• Changing Attitudes Towards Voice Hearers: A Literature Review.

  Reddyhough C, Locke V, Badcock JC, Paulik G. Reddyhough C, et al. Community Ment Health J. 2021 Aug;57(6):1032-1044. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00727-z. Epub 2020 Oct 17. Community Ment Health J. 2021. PMID: 33068204 Review.

• Gene × environment interaction on intergroup bias: the role of 5-HTTLPR and perceived outgroup threat.

  Cheon BK, Livingston RW, Hong YY, Chiao JY. Cheon BK, et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Sep;9(9):1268-75. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst111. Epub 2013 Jul 24. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 23887814 Free PMC article.

• Distinguishing Intergroup and Long-Distance Relationships.

  Pisor AC, Ross CT. Pisor AC, et al. Hum Nat. 2022 Sep;33(3):280-303. doi: 10.1007/s12110-022-09431-1. Epub 2022 Oct 1. Hum Nat. 2022. PMID: 36181615 Free PMC article. Review.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • American Psychological Association
  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.

• Medical

  • MedlinePlus Health Information