Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects - PubMed
- ️Sun Jan 01 2006
Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects
Marianne Latinus et al. Brain Res. 2006.
Abstract
Cognitive models of face perception suggest parallel levels of processing yet there is little evidence of these levels in studies of brain function. Series of faces that engage different processes ((photographs, schematic and Mooney faces (incomplete two-tone faces)) were presented upright, inverted and scrambled; subjects performed a face/non-face discrimination while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Different patterns in N170 latency and amplitude provided evidence of multiple steps in face processing, which can be seen at the ERP level. We showed that first-order configural and holistic processing were evident at the N170. N170 latency indexed task difficulty for the upright faces, yet the face inversion effect was independent of difficulty. N170 amplitude inversion effect was unique to photographic faces. Separable ERP effects were found for the processing engaged by the three face types, although the P1 and N170 sources did not differ. Thus, it appears that common brain sources underlie the early processing stages for faces (reflected in the P1 and N170), whereas the P2 showed activation of primary visual areas for the non-photographic faces and reactivation of the same regions as the N170 for the photographic faces.
Similar articles
-
Holistic processing of faces: learning effects with Mooney faces.
Latinus M, Taylor MJ. Latinus M, et al. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1316-27. doi: 10.1162/0898929055002490. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16197686 Clinical Trial.
-
Itier RJ, Taylor MJ. Itier RJ, et al. Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1518-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.016. Neuroimage. 2004. PMID: 15050576
-
Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
Marzi T, Viggiano MP. Marzi T, et al. Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Sep;65(3):182-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 Apr 13. Int J Psychophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17512996
-
The faces of development: a review of early face processing over childhood.
Taylor MJ, Batty M, Itier RJ. Taylor MJ, et al. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Oct;16(8):1426-42. doi: 10.1162/0898929042304732. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15509388 Review.
-
[Neural mechanisms of face recognition: an event-related potential study].
Tobimatsu S. Tobimatsu S. Brain Nerve. 2012 Jul;64(7):717-26. Brain Nerve. 2012. PMID: 22764343 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Effects of Part- and Whole-Object Primes on Early MEG Responses to Mooney Faces and Houses.
Steinberg Lowe M, Lewis GA, Poeppel D. Steinberg Lowe M, et al. Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 16;7:147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00147. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26909056 Free PMC article.
-
Berchio C, Kumar S, Destro MF. Berchio C, et al. Brain Topogr. 2024 Oct 2;38(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10548-024-01083-x. Brain Topogr. 2024. PMID: 39358648 Review.
-
Herzmann G, Bird CW, Freeman M, Curran T. Herzmann G, et al. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Oct;38(10):2140-51. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 4. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013. PMID: 23648370 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cognitive tasks during expectation affect the congruency ERP effects to facial expressions.
Lin H, Schulz C, Straube T. Lin H, et al. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 28;9:596. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00596. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26578938 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus-Specific Individual Differences in Holistic Perception of Mooney Faces.
Canas-Bajo T, Whitney D. Canas-Bajo T, et al. Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 6;11:585921. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585921. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33240177 Free PMC article.