Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Switzerland - PubMed
Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Switzerland
Gisela Kobelt et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Sep.
Abstract
This cost-of-illness analysis, based on information from 1101 patients in Switzerland, is part of a Europe-wide cost-of-illness study in multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective was to analyze the costs and quality of life (QOL) related to the level of disease severity and progression. Patients registered with the Swiss MS patient organization were asked to participate in a mail survey and 44% responded. The questionnaire asked for details on the disease (type of disease, relapses, level of functional disability), information on all medical and non-medical resource consumption, informal care and work capacity (sick leave and early retirement). In addition, patients were asked about their current QOL (measured as utility) and the level of fatigue. The mean age of respondents was 53 years, and 21% were 65 years or older. Almost one-quarter of patients in the sample (23%) had severe disease (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score > or =7), while 36% had moderate disease (EDSS score 4-6.5) and 38% had mild disease (EDSS score 0-3). The median EDSS score was 5.0, with a mean of 4.5. Mean utility was 0.53 (range, 0 = death to 1 = full health), while mean fatigue was rated as 5.4 (range, 1 = not tired to 10 = extremely tired). Utility and fatigue were worse for patients with a recent relapse. Costs and utility are highly correlated with disease severity. Workforce participation decreases from greater than 80% in early disease to less than 10% in the very late stages, while total costs increase more than fivefold between an EDSS score of 0-1 and an EDSS of 7, and by more than 40% from an EDSS score of 7 to worse states. Most cost types increase steadily until patients reach an EDSS score of 7, after which there is a sharp increase due to home care, home services and informal care. The mean annual cost per patient in the sample (65.000 Swiss francs, euro 42.000) corresponds to costs for a patient at the median EDSS score of 5. Utility decreases from 0.89 to 0.1 as the disease becomes severe, but the loss compared to the age- and gender-matched general population can be observed at all levels of the disease ( approximately 0.1 at an EDSS score of 2 to approximately 0.3 at an EDSS score of 5-6), leading to an estimated annual loss of 0.3 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) per patient in the sample. Relapses for patients with an EDSS score <5 were associated with a utility loss of 0.08 and an incremental cost of 5500 Swiss francs (euro 3.500) during the quarter in which they occurred. Health-care costs are to a large extent covered by insurance, and a substantial amount of services such as home care and home help are available to patients with severe disease. These services represent approximately 15% of total societal costs and are largely covered, resulting in almost 30% of total costs to different payers. Despite this, a large amount of costs falls on families providing care, in particular for patients with severe disease.
Similar articles
-
Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Italy.
Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P, Battaglia M, Lucioni C, Uccelli A. Kobelt G, et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;7 Suppl 2:S45-54. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0385-7. Eur J Health Econ. 2006. PMID: 17310336
-
Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Austria.
Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P, Plesnilla C, Baumhackl U, Berger T, Kolleger H, Vass K. Kobelt G, et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;7 Suppl 2:S14-23. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0382-x. Eur J Health Econ. 2006. PMID: 17310339
-
Costs and quality of life for patients with multiple sclerosis in Belgium.
Kobelt G. Kobelt G. Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;7 Suppl 2:S24-33. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0377-7. Eur J Health Econ. 2006. PMID: 17318662
-
Perspectives in multiple sclerosis health care: special focus on the costs of multiple sclerosis.
Rotstein Z, Hazan R, Barak Y, Achiron A. Rotstein Z, et al. Autoimmun Rev. 2006 Oct;5(8):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Mar 10. Autoimmun Rev. 2006. PMID: 17027884 Review.
-
Contribution of intangible costs to the economic burden of multiple sclerosis.
Wundes A, Brown T, Bienen EJ, Coleman CI. Wundes A, et al. J Med Econ. 2010;13(4):626-32. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2010.525989. Epub 2010 Oct 18. J Med Econ. 2010. PMID: 20950249 Review.
Cited by
-
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.
Sharac J, McCrone P, Sabes-Figuera R. Sharac J, et al. Drugs. 2010 Sep 10;70(13):1677-91. doi: 10.2165/11538000-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2010. PMID: 20731475 Review.
-
Imani A, Gharibi F, Khezri A, Joudyian N, Dalal K. Imani A, et al. BMC Neurol. 2020 May 23;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01790-5. BMC Neurol. 2020. PMID: 32446303 Free PMC article.
-
Alshubaili AF, Awadalla AW, Ohaeri JU, Mabrouk AA. Alshubaili AF, et al. BMC Neurol. 2007 Sep 18;7:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-7-31. BMC Neurol. 2007. PMID: 17877820 Free PMC article.
-
Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study in Iran.
Rezaee M, Keshavarz K, Izadi S, Jafari A, Ravangard R. Rezaee M, et al. Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jan 3;12(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00350-y. Health Econ Rev. 2022. PMID: 34981265 Free PMC article.
-
Vitturi BK, Rahmani A, Dini G, Montecucco A, Debarbieri N, Bandiera P, Battaglia MA, Manacorda T, Persechino B, Buresti G, Ponzio M, Inglese M, Durando P. Vitturi BK, et al. PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0272156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272156. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35901070 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical