The revolution in psychiatric diagnosis: problems at the foundations - PubMed
. 2007 Spring;50(2):161-80.
doi: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0016.
Affiliations
- PMID: 17468537
- DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0016
The revolution in psychiatric diagnosis: problems at the foundations
Isaac R Galatzer-Levy et al. Perspect Biol Med. 2007 Spring.
Abstract
The third edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III; 1974) not only revolutionized psychiatric diagnosis, it transformed and dominated American psychiatry. The nosology of psychiatry had been conceptually confusing, difficult to apply, and bound to widely questioned theories. Psychiatry and clinical psychology had been struggling with their scientific status. DSM attempted to solve psychiatry's problems by making psychiatry more like its authors' perception of general medicine. It tried to avoid theory, especially psychoanalytic theories, by discussing only observable manifestations of disorders. But DSM is actually highly theory-bound. It implicitly and powerfully includes an exclusively "medical" model of psychological disturbance, while excluding other psychiatric ideas. Its authors tried to meet what they saw as "scientific standards." To a surprising extent, DSM reflects its creators' personal distaste for psychoanalysis. The result is that DSM rests on a narrow philosophical perspective. The consequences of its adoption are widespread: it has profoundly affected drug development and other therapeutic studies, psychiatric education, attitudes toward patients, the public perception of psychiatry, and administrative and legal decisions. This article explores how DSM's most problematic features arise from its history in psychiatric controversies of the 1960s and its underlying positivistic philosophy.
Comment in
-
A footnote to the revolution in psychiatric diagnosis.
Landau WM. Landau WM. Perspect Biol Med. 2009 Spring;52(2):338-41. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0078. Perspect Biol Med. 2009. PMID: 19395829 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness.
Mayes R, Horwitz AV. Mayes R, et al. J Hist Behav Sci. 2005 Summer;41(3):249-67. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.20103. J Hist Behav Sci. 2005. PMID: 15981242
-
Fischer BA. Fischer BA. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Dec;200(12):1022-30. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318275cf19. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012. PMID: 23197117 Review.
-
DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: a history.
Wilson M. Wilson M. Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;150(3):399-410. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.3.399. Am J Psychiatry. 1993. PMID: 8434655 Review.
Cited by
-
Editorial: ADHD: Science and society.
Batstra L, Whitely M, Timimi S. Batstra L, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 16;13:1129728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1129728. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 36727084 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Searle K, Blashki G, Kakuma R, Yang H, Minas H. Searle K, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2570. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052570. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35270263 Free PMC article.
-
Minding our Minds: Obsessive-Compulsiveness, Psychiatry, and Psychology.
Blum LD. Blum LD. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;47(2):543-554. doi: 10.1007/s11013-022-09767-4. Epub 2022 Jan 22. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 35066727 Free PMC article. Review.
-
DSM diagnosis and beyond: on the need for a hermeneutically-informed biopsychosocial framework.
Healy P. Healy P. Med Health Care Philos. 2011 May;14(2):163-75. doi: 10.1007/s11019-010-9284-x. Med Health Care Philos. 2011. PMID: 20852943
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical