Introducing a new incontinence management system for nursing home residents - PubMed
- ️Tue Dec 31 2318
Randomized Controlled Trial
Introducing a new incontinence management system for nursing home residents
Nahla R Al-Samarrai et al. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 May.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe current practices of incontinence care in nursing homes (NHs) provided by certified nurse assistants (CNAs), and to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an integrated incontinence care product, the One Step Incontinence System (OSIS) in the NH setting. While the ultimate purpose of OSIS is to encourage more consistent skin cleansing and thus reduce perineal dermatitis and risk of pressure ulcers, this study reports an initial feasibility test of OSIS.
Design: Controlled trial at two NH sites, with one ward at each site assigned to intervention with OSIS and one ward at each site assigned to a control condition with a box of wipes placed at the bedside (BW).
Setting: Two NHs (one community and one Veterans Administration) in the Los Angeles area.
Participants: 24 incontinent NH residents and 61 CNAs.
Intervention: OSIS integrates an adult brief and two cleansing/protective wipes into a single item by way of a waterproof pouch that is removed at the time of incontinence care. The OSIS briefs were placed on the intervention wards in the same location(s) and adjacent to regular adult briefs.
Measurements: Structured observations of incontinence care episodes were performed by trained research staff at baseline on all wards, and at follow-up with either the intervention (OSIS) or control condition (BW) in place. Observations included resident location, thoroughness and duration of incontinence care, and materials used. In addition, CNAs' opinions of their preferred incontinence care materials and their experience using OSIS were obtained by self-administered survey.
Results: Use of OSIS resulted in significantly greater frequency of use of cleansing wipes (97% of episodes) compared to the baseline (77% of episodes) and BW conditions (41% of episodes). In 59% of the observed episodes in the BW condition, the box of wipes was actually missing from the bedside, or completely absent from the patient's room and had to be replaced. The two wipes that were incorporated with OSIS were used for perineal skin cleansing immediately when providing incontinence care. There was a significant reduction in the percentage use of and number of cloth towels used during incontinence care with OSIS (53% of episodes, 0.8 towels) compared to baseline (67%, 1.1 towels) and BW conditions (82%, 1.2 towels; p=.002 and p=.012, respectively). CNAs were significantly less often interrupted by the need to find supplies during OSIS condition (13%) compared to baseline (23%) and BW (36%; p= .005). There were no significant differences between conditions in the thoroughness of observed cleansing. The average observed time for incontinence care from putting on gloves to fastening the clean adult brief (T1) and between uncovering the resident to fastening a clean adult brief (T2) decreased significantly within both groups (OSIS and BW) at follow-up (all p-values <.05), but there were no significant differences in T1 and T2 between groups at follow-up. CNAs were more likely to report that they felt that OSIS facilitated skin cleansing compared to the BW.
Conclusion: We successfully implemented a trial of an innovative adult brief that encouraged skin cleansing during incontinence care. The system was easily and effectively incorporated into the nursing home, was used by CNAs whenever available (97% of the time), and was favored by CNAs. Patterns of incontinence care differed at follow-up with OSIS compared to BW, with fewer linens used, fewer wipes used, and less CNA interruption during care, which may result in greater privacy and comfort for residents.
Similar articles
-
Beeckman D, Verhaeghe S, Defloor T, Schoonhoven L, Vanderwee K. Beeckman D, et al. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):627-34. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e31822efe52. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21952346 Clinical Trial.
-
Bates-Jensen BM, Alessi CA, Al-Samarrai NR, Schnelle JF. Bates-Jensen BM, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Mar;51(3):348-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51108.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003. PMID: 12588578 Clinical Trial.
-
Palese A, Carniel G. Palese A, et al. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;38(2):177-83. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e31820af380. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21326114
-
A review of perineal skin care protocols and skin barrier product use.
Nix D, Ermer-Seltun J. Nix D, et al. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004 Dec;50(12):59-67. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004. PMID: 15632457 Review.
-
Ersser SJ, Getliffe K, Voegeli D, Regan S. Ersser SJ, et al. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Sep;42(7):823-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.12.003. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005. PMID: 16084927 Review.
Cited by
-
A systematic mapping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in care homes.
Gordon AL, Logan PA, Jones RG, Forrester-Paton C, Mamo JP, Gladman JR; Medical Crises in Older People Study Group. Gordon AL, et al. BMC Geriatr. 2012 Jun 25;12:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-31. BMC Geriatr. 2012. PMID: 22731652 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nursing home work environment and the risk of pressure ulcers and incontinence.
Temkin-Greener H, Cai S, Zheng NT, Zhao H, Mukamel DB. Temkin-Greener H, et al. Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):1179-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01353.x. Epub 2011 Nov 18. Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22098384 Free PMC article.
-
Urinary and fecal incontinence in nursing home residents.
Leung FW, Schnelle JF. Leung FW, et al. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;37(3):697-707, x. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2008.06.005. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008. PMID: 18794004 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventions for preventing and treating incontinence-associated dermatitis in adults.
Beeckman D, Van Damme N, Schoonhoven L, Van Lancker A, Kottner J, Beele H, Gray M, Woodward S, Fader M, Van den Bussche K, Van Hecke A, De Meyer D, Verhaeghe S. Beeckman D, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):CD011627. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011627.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27841440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Potential fecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Current evidence and implications for public health.
Amirian ES. Amirian ES. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;95:363-370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.057. Epub 2020 Apr 23. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32335340 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ouslander JG, Schnelle JF, Uman G, Fingold S, Gilater J, Nigam G, Tuico E, Bates-Jensen B. Predictors of successful prompted voiding among incontinent nursing home residents. JAMA. 1995;273:1366–1370. - PubMed
-
- Ouslander JG, Schnelle JF. Incontinence in Nursing Home. Internal Medicine. 1995;122(6) - PubMed
-
- Schnelle JF, Ouslander JG, Simmons SF. Predicting Nursing-home resident responsiveness to a urinary incontinence treatment protocol. International Urogynecology Journal. 1993;4:89–94.
-
- HCFA (Health Care Financing Administration) Long-term care facility resident assessment instrument (RAI) user’s manual: for use with version 2.0 of the HCFA minimum data set, resident assessment protocols, and utilization guidelines. Eliot Press; Natick, MA 01760: 1999.
-
- AHCPR. Clinical practice guideline: pressure ulcers in adults. Rockville, MD: AHCPR; 1994.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical