Mating preferences are not predictive of the direction of evolution in experimental populations of Drosophila - PubMed

Mating preferences are not predictive of the direction of evolution in experimental populations of Drosophila

T A Markow. Science. 1981.

Abstract

The general applicability of two models used in predicting evolutionary directions from asymmetry in reproductive isolation was tested in the laboratory. In mate preference tests with strains of Drosophila melanogaster whose ancestral and derived relationships were known, no correspondence was found between sexual isolation and direction of evolution.

Similar articles

• Mode of mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila.

  Singh BN. Singh BN. Indian J Exp Biol. 1997 Feb;35(2):111-9. Indian J Exp Biol. 1997. PMID: 9315217 Review.

• Variable assortative mating in replicate mating trials using Drosophila melanogaster populations derived from contrasting opposing slopes of 'Evolution Canyon', Israel.

  Drake A, Rashkovetsky E, Wong D, Rundle HD, Mooers AØ. Drake A, et al. J Evol Biol. 2005 Jul;18(4):1123-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00911.x. J Evol Biol. 2005. PMID: 16033586

• An evolutionary limit to male mating success.

  McGuigan K, Van Homrigh A, Blows MW. McGuigan K, et al. Evolution. 2008 Jun;62(6):1528-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00379.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18. Evolution. 2008. PMID: 18363864

• Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis.

  Jennings JH, Etges WJ. Jennings JH, et al. Evolution. 2010 Feb 1;64(2):587-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00834.x. Epub 2009 Sep 9. Evolution. 2010. PMID: 19744120

• Drosophila bipectinata species complex.

  Singh S, Singh BN. Singh S, et al. Indian J Exp Biol. 2001 Sep;39(9):835-44. Indian J Exp Biol. 2001. PMID: 11831362 Review.

Cited by

• Is premating isolation in Drosophila overestimated due to uncontrolled factors?

  Casares P, Piñeiro R, Carracedo MC. Casares P, et al. J Genet. 2005 Dec;84(3):259-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02715796. J Genet. 2005. PMID: 16385158

• Gut microbiomes and reproductive isolation in Drosophila.

  Leftwich PT, Clarke NVE, Hutchings MI, Chapman T. Leftwich PT, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12767-12772. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708345114. Epub 2017 Nov 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017. PMID: 29109277 Free PMC article.

• The effects of the sex chromosomes on the inheritance of species-specific traits of the copulatory organ shape in Drosophila virilis and Drosophila lummei.

  Kulikov AM, Sorokina SY, Melnikov AI, Gornostaev NG, Seleznev DG, Lazebny OE. Kulikov AM, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0244339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244339. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33373382 Free PMC article.

• Sexual and reproductive behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster from a microclimatically interslope differentiated population of "Evolution Canyon" (Mount Carmel, Israel).

  Iliadi K, Iliadi N, Rashkovetsky E, Minkov I, Nevo E, Korol A. Iliadi K, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 22;268(1483):2365-74. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1822. Proc Biol Sci. 2001. PMID: 11703877 Free PMC article.

• Behavioural reproductive isolation and speciation in Drosophila.

  Nanda P, Singh BN. Nanda P, et al. J Biosci. 2012 Jun;37(2):359-74. doi: 10.1007/s12038-012-9193-7. J Biosci. 2012. PMID: 22581340 Review.

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Atypon

• Molecular Biology Databases

  • FlyBase