Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesis - PubMed
Review
. 2007 Nov;11(11):458-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.015. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
Affiliations
- PMID: 17983834
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.015
Review
Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesis
Merav Ahissar. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov.
Abstract
The 'core deficit' of dyslexia has been characterized by different researchers in terms of either phonological impairments or of difficulties in processing basic visual and auditory stimuli. Recent findings suggest that a single type of impairment in the dynamics of perception, which affects the efficiency of short-term memory, might underlie the broad range of difficulties of dyslexics. Experimental findings show that the general population quickly and automatically tunes around incoming stimuli, 'anchors to them' and performs faster and more accurately when these stimuli are subsequently repeated. Dyslexic individuals fail to benefit from stimulus-specific repetitions. This deficit can account for phonological, working memory, visual and auditory difficulties, in addition to the greater sensitivity of dyslexics to external noise.
Comment in
-
Better to lose the anchor than the whole ship.
Ziegler JC. Ziegler JC. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):244-5; author reply 245-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.001. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008. PMID: 18515174 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Lallier M, Donnadieu S, Valdois S. Lallier M, et al. Ann Dyslexia. 2013 Jul;63(2):97-116. doi: 10.1007/s11881-012-0074-4. Epub 2012 Jul 25. Ann Dyslexia. 2013. PMID: 22829423
-
Poor anchoring limits dyslexics' perceptual, memory, and reading skills.
Oganian Y, Ahissar M. Oganian Y, et al. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1895-905. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.014. Epub 2012 Apr 26. Neuropsychologia. 2012. PMID: 22561890
-
Ram-Tsur R, Faust M, Zivotofsky AZ. Ram-Tsur R, et al. Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(22):3949-60. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Aug 24. Vision Res. 2006. PMID: 16934311
-
Valdois S, Bosse ML, Tainturier MJ. Valdois S, et al. Dyslexia. 2004 Nov;10(4):339-63. doi: 10.1002/dys.284. Dyslexia. 2004. PMID: 15573964 Review.
-
Phonological dyslexia and phonological impairment: an exception to the rule?
Tree JJ, Kay J. Tree JJ, et al. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(14):2861-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.006. Epub 2006 Aug 1. Neuropsychologia. 2006. PMID: 16879843 Review.
Cited by
-
Neurobiological underpinnings of math and reading learning disabilities.
Ashkenazi S, Black JM, Abrams DA, Hoeft F, Menon V. Ashkenazi S, et al. J Learn Disabil. 2013 Nov-Dec;46(6):549-69. doi: 10.1177/0022219413483174. Epub 2013 Apr 9. J Learn Disabil. 2013. PMID: 23572008 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Auditory Processing in Noise: A Preschool Biomarker for Literacy.
White-Schwoch T, Woodruff Carr K, Thompson EC, Anderson S, Nicol T, Bradlow AR, Zecker SG, Kraus N. White-Schwoch T, et al. PLoS Biol. 2015 Jul 14;13(7):e1002196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002196. eCollection 2015 Jul. PLoS Biol. 2015. PMID: 26172057 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory frequency discrimination in developmental dyslexia: A meta-analysis.
Witton C, Swoboda K, Shapiro LR, Talcott JB. Witton C, et al. Dyslexia. 2020 Feb;26(1):36-51. doi: 10.1002/dys.1645. Epub 2019 Dec 26. Dyslexia. 2020. PMID: 31877576 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impaired neural mechanism for online novel word acquisition in dyslexic children.
Kimppa L, Shtyrov Y, Partanen E, Kujala T. Kimppa L, et al. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 24;8(1):12779. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31211-0. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30143722 Free PMC article.
-
Singh S, Conway CM. Singh S, et al. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 22;15:734179. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.734179. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34744661 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources