pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Show me the data - PubMed

  • ️Mon Jan 01 2007

Editorial

Show me the data

Mike Rossner et al. J Cell Biol. 2007.

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None

©cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved.

Comment in

Similar articles

  • Show me the data.

    Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill E. Rossner M, et al. J Exp Med. 2007 Dec 24;204(13):3052-3. doi: 10.1084/jem.20072544. Epub 2007 Dec 17. J Exp Med. 2007. PMID: 18086866 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

  • Don Quixote, David and me.

    Freda MC. Freda MC. Nurs Outlook. 2006 Jan-Feb;54(1):58-9. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.11.008. Nurs Outlook. 2006. PMID: 16523575 No abstract available.

  • Desktop research--bibliographic databases and electronic journals.

    Kerwin D. Kerwin D. J Sports Sci. 2000 Oct;18(10):777-8. doi: 10.1080/026404100419829. J Sports Sci. 2000. PMID: 11201954 No abstract available.

  • Specialist Bibliographic Databases.

    Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Trukhachev VI, Kostyukova EI, Gerasimov AN, Kitas GD. Gasparyan AY, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2016 May;31(5):660-73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660. Epub 2016 Feb 23. J Korean Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27134485 Free PMC article. Review.

  • Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities.

    Wallin JA. Wallin JA. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005 Nov;97(5):261-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005. PMID: 16236137 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Monastersky, R. 2005. The number that's devouring science. The impact factor, once a simple way to rank scientific journals, has become an unyielding yardstick for hiring, tenure, and grants. Chron. High. Educ. 52:A12
    1. Wells, W.A. 2007. The returning tide: how China, the world's most populous country, is building a competitive research base. J. Cell Biol. 176:376–401 doi:10.1083/jcb.200701150 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Editorial. 2006. Cash-per-publication is an idea best avoided. Nature. 441:786 doi:10.1038/441786b - DOI - PubMed
    1. Editorial. 2005. Not-so-deep impact. Research assessment rests too heavily on the inflated status of the impact factor. Nature. 435:1003–1004 doi:10.1038/4351003b - DOI - PubMed
    1. The PLoS Medicine Editors. 2006. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med. 3:e291 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms