The good-subject effect: investigating participant demand characteristics - PubMed

The good-subject effect: investigating participant demand characteristics

Austin Lee Nichols et al. J Gen Psychol. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Although researchers are often concerned with the presence of participant demand, few have directly examined effects of demand on participant behavior. Before beginning the present study, a confederate informed participants (N = 100) of the study's purported hypothesis. Participants then performed a laboratory task designed to evaluate the extent to which they would respond in ways that may confirm or disconfirm the hypothesis of the study. The authors found that participants tended to respond in ways that confirmed the hypothesis, yet this tendency depended on attitudes toward the experiment or experimenter and other individual differences. In addition, results suggested that suspicion probes may be ineffective in measuring participants' previous knowledge and suspicion. Findings indicate the need for more research and consideration of demand in the design of studies and analysis of data.

Similar articles

• Ethical issues in the qualitative researcher--participant relationship.

  Eide P, Kahn D. Eide P, et al. Nurs Ethics. 2008 Mar;15(2):199-207. doi: 10.1177/0969733007086018. Nurs Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18272610 Review.

• Whatever happens in the laboratory stays in the laboratory: the prevalence and prevention of participant crosstalk.

  Edlund JE, Sagarin BJ, Skowronski JJ, Johnson SJ, Kutter J. Edlund JE, et al. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 May;35(5):635-42. doi: 10.1177/0146167208331255. Epub 2009 Feb 20. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009. PMID: 19234298

• Assuring ethical treatment of students as research participants.

  Ridley RT. Ridley RT. J Nurs Educ. 2009 Oct;48(10):537-41. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090610-08. Epub 2009 Oct 9. J Nurs Educ. 2009. PMID: 19645366

• The adolescent research participant: strategies for productive and ethical interviewing.

  Mack R, Giarelli E, Bernhardt BA. Mack R, et al. J Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Dec;24(6):448-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2008.07.009. Epub 2009 May 14. J Pediatr Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19931142

• Recruiting participants in end-of-life research.

  Kirchhoff KT, Kehl KA. Kirchhoff KT, et al. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007 Dec-2008 Jan;24(6):515-21. doi: 10.1177/1049909107300551. Epub 2007 Jun 29. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007. PMID: 17601835 Review.

Cited by

• A first online intervention to increase patients' perceived ability to act in situations of abuse in health care: reports of a Swedish pre-post study.

  Brüggemann AJ, Swahnberg K, Wijma B. Brüggemann AJ, et al. BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 24;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0027-7. BMC Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 26003674 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

• Aggression by omission: Redefining and measuring an understudied construct.

  Parton DM, Chester DS. Parton DM, et al. Aggress Behav. 2024 Jan;50(1):e22123. doi: 10.1002/ab.22123. Epub 2023 Nov 14. Aggress Behav. 2024. PMID: 37963213 Free PMC article.

• The effect of ingredient-specific calorie information on calories ordered.

  Gustafson CR, Zeballos E. Gustafson CR, et al. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Oct 3;12:186-190. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.09.013. eCollection 2018 Dec. Prev Med Rep. 2018. PMID: 30306016 Free PMC article.

• Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

  Rung JM, Madden GJ. Rung JM, et al. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Sep;147(9):1349-1381. doi: 10.1037/xge0000462. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018. PMID: 30148386 Free PMC article. Review.

• Neural signatures of different behavioral types in fairness norm compliance.

  Gianotti LRR, Nash K, Baumgartner T, Dahinden FM, Knoch D. Gianotti LRR, et al. Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 12;8(1):10513. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28853-5. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30002413 Free PMC article.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Atypon