Double-blind, randomized crossover study of the percutaneous efficacy and tolerability of a topical indomethacin spray versus placebo in the treatment of tendinitis - PubMed
Clinical Trial
. 1991 Mar-Apr;19(2):131-6.
doi: 10.1177/030006059101900206.
Affiliations
- PMID: 1864449
- DOI: 10.1177/030006059101900206
Clinical Trial
Double-blind, randomized crossover study of the percutaneous efficacy and tolerability of a topical indomethacin spray versus placebo in the treatment of tendinitis
F Ginsberg et al. J Int Med Res. 1991 Mar-Apr.
Abstract
Percutaneous efficacy and tolerability of a new topical indomethacin spray compared with a corresponding placebo product were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized crossover study in 30 patients with tendinitis, i.e. 28 patients with peri-arthritis of the shoulder and two with epicondylitis. Each patient was treated with 4% indomethacin spray or the corresponding placebo product three to five times daily for a period of 14 days and then received the other treatment for the same period of time. The indomethacin spray demonstrated a clear efficacy compared with the placebo based on both objective criteria (elevation, abduction and internal rotation) and subjective criteria (spontaneous pain, pain on movement, pressure-induced pain, functional disturbances and sleep disturbances). Tolerability was excellent: only two patients had minor local cutaneous irritation with the indomethacin spray, which did not require interruption of treatment. Treatment with indomethacin spray appeared to be effective in 80% and well-tolerated in 93% of the patients studied.
Similar articles
-
White RH, Paull DM, Fleming KW. White RH, et al. J Rheumatol. 1986 Jun;13(3):608-13. J Rheumatol. 1986. PMID: 3735283 Clinical Trial.
-
Kress HG, Orońska A, Kaczmarek Z, Kaasa S, Colberg T, Nolte T. Kress HG, et al. Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31(6):1177-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.022. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19695386 Clinical Trial.
-
Mazières B, Rouanet S, Guillon Y, Scarsi C, Reiner V. Mazières B, et al. J Rheumatol. 2005 Aug;32(8):1563-70. J Rheumatol. 2005. PMID: 16078335 Clinical Trial.
-
Boussina I, Günthner W, Martí Massó R. Boussina I, et al. Arzneimittelforschung. 1983;33(4A):649-52. Arzneimittelforschung. 1983. PMID: 6349650 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Topical NSAIDs for musculoskeletal conditions. A review of the literature.
Vaile JH, Davis P. Vaile JH, et al. Drugs. 1998 Nov;56(5):783-99. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856050-00004. Drugs. 1998. PMID: 9829153 Review.
-
Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.
Derry S, Conaghan P, Da Silva JA, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA. Derry S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 22;4(4):CD007400. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007400.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27103611 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oral versus topical NSAIDs in rheumatic diseases: a comparison.
Heyneman CA, Lawless-Liday C, Wall GC. Heyneman CA, et al. Drugs. 2000 Sep;60(3):555-74. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060030-00004. Drugs. 2000. PMID: 11030467 Review.
-
Ritchie LD. Ritchie LD. Clin Rheumatol. 1996 May;15(3):243-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02229701. Clin Rheumatol. 1996. PMID: 8793254 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of indomethacin for pain relief following scleral buckling surgery.
Sadiq SA, Stevenson L, Gorman C, Orr GM. Sadiq SA, et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr;82(4):429-31. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.4.429. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998. PMID: 9640195 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical