Colloquium paper: where does biodiversity go from here? A grim business-as-usual forecast and a hopeful portfolio of partial solutions - PubMed
- ️Tue Jan 01 2008
. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):11579-86.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801911105. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
Affiliations
- PMID: 18695214
- PMCID: PMC2556413
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801911105
Colloquium paper: where does biodiversity go from here? A grim business-as-usual forecast and a hopeful portfolio of partial solutions
Paul R Ehrlich et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008.
Abstract
The threats to the future of biodiversity are many and well known. They include habitat conversion, environmental toxification, climate change, and direct exploitation of wildlife, among others. Moreover, the projected addition of 2.6 billion people by mid-century will almost certainly have a greater environmental impact than that of the last 2.6 billion. Collectively, these trends portend a grim future for biodiversity under a business-as-usual scenario. These threats and their interactions are formidable, but we review seven strategies that, if implemented soundly and scaled up dramatically, would preserve a substantial portion of global biodiversity. These are actions to stabilize the human population and reduce its material consumption, the deployment of endowment funds and other strategies to ensure the efficacy and permanence of conservation areas, steps to make human-dominated landscapes hospitable to biodiversity, measures to account for the economic costs of habitat degradation, the ecological reclamation of degraded lands and repatriation of extirpated species, the education and empowerment of people in the rural tropics, and the fundamental transformation of human attitudes about nature. Like the carbon "stabilization wedges" outlined by Pacala and Socolow [Pacala S, Socolow R (2004) Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968-972] (1), the science and technologies needed to effect this vision already exist. The remaining challenges are largely social, political, and economic. Although academic conservation biology still has an important role to play in developing technical tools and knowledge, success at this juncture hinges more on a massive mobilization of effort to do things that have traditionally been outside the scope of the discipline.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Predicting the impacts of future sea-level rise on an endangered lagomorph.
LaFever DH, Lopez RR, Feagin RA, Silvy NJ. LaFever DH, et al. Environ Manage. 2007 Sep;40(3):430-7. doi: 10.1007/s00267-006-0204-z. Epub 2007 Jun 4. Environ Manage. 2007. PMID: 17557173
-
Molotoks A, Stehfest E, Doelman J, Albanito F, Fitton N, Dawson TP, Smith P. Molotoks A, et al. Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Dec;24(12):5895-5908. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14459. Epub 2018 Oct 24. Glob Chang Biol. 2018. PMID: 30267559 Free PMC article.
-
Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention.
Tilman D, Clark M, Williams DR, Kimmel K, Polasky S, Packer C. Tilman D, et al. Nature. 2017 May 31;546(7656):73-81. doi: 10.1038/nature22900. Nature. 2017. PMID: 28569796 Review.
-
Future battlegrounds for conservation under global change.
Lee TM, Jetz W. Lee TM, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 7;275(1640):1261-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1732. Proc Biol Sci. 2008. PMID: 18302999 Free PMC article.
-
Synergies among extinction drivers under global change.
Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Bradshaw CJ. Brook BW, et al. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Aug;23(8):453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.011. Epub 2008 Jun 24. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008. PMID: 18582986 Review.
Cited by
-
Franzolin F, Garcia PS, Bizzo N. Franzolin F, et al. Sci Adv. 2020 Aug 26;6(35):eabb0110. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb0110. eCollection 2020 Aug. Sci Adv. 2020. PMID: 32923631 Free PMC article.
-
Liu S, Costanza R, Troy A, D'Aagostino J, Mates W. Liu S, et al. Environ Manage. 2010 Jun;45(6):1271-85. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9483-5. Epub 2010 Apr 16. Environ Manage. 2010. PMID: 20396885
-
Evaluating the relative environmental impact of countries.
Bradshaw CJ, Giam X, Sodhi NS. Bradshaw CJ, et al. PLoS One. 2010 May 3;5(5):e10440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010440. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20454670 Free PMC article.
-
Schaub M, Martinez N, Tagmann-Ioset A, Weisshaupt N, Maurer ML, Reichlin TS, Abadi F, Zbinden N, Jenni L, Arlettaz R. Schaub M, et al. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 6;5(10):e13115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013115. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20949083 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of disputes and easement violations on the cost-effectiveness of land conservation.
Schuster R, Arcese P. Schuster R, et al. PeerJ. 2015 Aug 13;3:e1185. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1185. eCollection 2015. PeerJ. 2015. PMID: 26413430 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pacala S, Socolow R. Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science. 2004;305:968–972. - PubMed
-
- Martin RD. Primate origins: Plugging the gaps. Nature. 1993;363:223–234. - PubMed
-
- Hughes TP. Catastrophes, phase-shifts, and large-scale degradation of a Caribbean coral reef. Science. 1994;265:1547–1551. - PubMed
-
- Asner GP, et al. Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science. 2005;310:480–482. - PubMed
-
- Oliveira PJC, et al. Land-use allocation protects the Peruvian Amazon. Science. 2007;317:1233–1236. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources