An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols - PubMed
- ️Tue Jan 01 2008
Review
. 2008 Nov 13;366(1882):4007-37.
doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0131.
Affiliations
- PMID: 18757276
- DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0131
Review
An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols
Philip J Rasch et al. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008.
Abstract
We provide an overview of geoengineering by stratospheric sulphate aerosols. The state of understanding about this topic as of early 2008 is reviewed, summarizing the past 30 years of work in the area, highlighting some very recent studies using climate models, and discussing methods used to deliver sulphur species to the stratosphere. The studies reviewed here suggest that sulphate aerosols can counteract the globally averaged temperature increase associated with increasing greenhouse gases, and reduce changes to some other components of the Earth system. There are likely to be remaining regional climate changes after geoengineering, with some regions experiencing significant changes in temperature or precipitation. The aerosols also serve as surfaces for heterogeneous chemistry resulting in increased ozone depletion. The delivery of sulphur species to the stratosphere in a way that will produce particles of the right size is shown to be a complex and potentially very difficult task. Two simple delivery scenarios are explored, but similar exercises will be needed for other suggested delivery mechanisms. While the introduction of the geoengineering source of sulphate aerosol will perturb the sulphur cycle of the stratosphere signicantly, it is a small perturbation to the total (stratosphere and troposphere) sulphur cycle. The geoengineering source would thus be a small contributor to the total global source of 'acid rain' that could be compensated for through improved pollution control of anthropogenic tropospheric sources. Some areas of research remain unexplored. Although ozone may be depleted, with a consequent increase to solar ultraviolet-B (UVB) energy reaching the surface and a potential impact on health and biological populations, the aerosols will also scatter and attenuate this part of the energy spectrum, and this may compensate the UVB enhancement associated with ozone depletion. The aerosol will also change the ratio of diffuse to direct energy reaching the surface, and this may influence ecosystems. The impact of geoengineering on these components of the Earth system has not yet been studied. Representations for the formation, evolution and removal of aerosol and distribution of particle size are still very crude, and more work will be needed to gain confidence in our understanding of the deliberate production of this class of aerosols and their role in the climate system.
Similar articles
-
A risk-based framework for assessing the effectiveness of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering.
Ferraro AJ, Charlton-Perez AJ, Highwood EJ. Ferraro AJ, et al. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 12;9(2):e88849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088849. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24533155 Free PMC article.
-
Wilson SR, Solomon KR, Tang X. Wilson SR, et al. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2007 Mar;6(3):301-10. doi: 10.1039/b700022g. Epub 2007 Feb 6. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2007. PMID: 17344964
-
Tang X, Wilson SR, Solomon KR, Shao M, Madronich S. Tang X, et al. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2011 Feb;10(2):280-91. doi: 10.1039/c0pp90039g. Epub 2011 Jan 20. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2011. PMID: 21253665 Review.
-
Geoengineering: could we or should we make it work?
Schneider SH. Schneider SH. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Nov 13;366(1882):3843-62. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0145. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008. PMID: 18757279 Review.
-
A geophysiologist's thoughts on geoengineering.
Lovelock J. Lovelock J. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Nov 13;366(1882):3883-90. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0135. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008. PMID: 18757274 Review.
Cited by
-
Ecosystem impacts of geoengineering: a review for developing a science plan.
Russell LM, Rasch PJ, Mace GM, Jackson RB, Shepherd J, Liss P, Leinen M, Schimel D, Vaughan NE, Janetos AC, Boyd PW, Norby RJ, Caldeira K, Merikanto J, Artaxo P, Melillo J, Morgan MG. Russell LM, et al. Ambio. 2012 Jun;41(4):350-69. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0258-5. Epub 2012 Mar 20. Ambio. 2012. PMID: 22430307 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Smith KR, Jerrett M, Anderson HR, Burnett RT, Stone V, Derwent R, Atkinson RW, Cohen A, Shonkoff SB, Krewski D, Pope CA 3rd, Thun MJ, Thurston G. Smith KR, et al. Lancet. 2009 Dec 19;374(9707):2091-2103. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61716-5. Epub 2009 Nov 26. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19942276 Free PMC article.
-
A risk-based framework for assessing the effectiveness of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering.
Ferraro AJ, Charlton-Perez AJ, Highwood EJ. Ferraro AJ, et al. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 12;9(2):e88849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088849. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24533155 Free PMC article.
-
Dykema JA, Keith DW, Anderson JG, Weisenstein D. Dykema JA, et al. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014 Dec 28;372(2031):20140059. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0059. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014. PMID: 25404681 Free PMC article.
-
Baum CM, Fritz L, Low S, Sovacool BK. Baum CM, et al. Env Polit. 2024 Jan 11;33(5):868-895. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2023.2301262. eCollection 2024. Env Polit. 2024. PMID: 38868558 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous