Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: what are the differences? - PubMed
- ️Thu Jan 01 2009
. 2009 Jan 30;28(2):221-39.
doi: 10.1002/sim.3478.
Affiliations
- PMID: 19012297
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.3478
Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: what are the differences?
Joseph C Gardiner et al. Stat Med. 2009.
Abstract
For analyses of longitudinal repeated-measures data, statistical methods include the random effects model, fixed effects model and the method of generalized estimating equations. We examine the assumptions that underlie these approaches to assessing covariate effects on the mean of a continuous, dichotomous or count outcome. Access to statistical software to implement these models has led to widespread application in numerous disciplines. However, careful consideration should be paid to their critical assumptions to ascertain which model might be appropriate in a given setting. To illustrate similarities and differences that might exist in empirical results, we use a study that assessed depressive symptoms in low-income pregnant women using a structured instrument with up to five assessments that spanned the pre-natal and post-natal periods. Understanding the conceptual differences between the methods is important in their proper application even though empirically they might not differ substantively. The choice of model in specific applications would depend on the relevant questions being addressed, which in turn informs the type of design and data collection that would be relevant.
Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Goodness-of-fit tests for GEE modeling with binary responses.
Barnhart HX, Williamson JM. Barnhart HX, et al. Biometrics. 1998 Jun;54(2):720-9. Biometrics. 1998. PMID: 9629652
-
Hubbard AE, Ahern J, Fleischer NL, Van der Laan M, Lippman SA, Jewell N, Bruckner T, Satariano WA. Hubbard AE, et al. Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21(4):467-74. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181caeb90. Epidemiology. 2010. PMID: 20220526
-
O'Connell AA, McCoach DB. O'Connell AA, et al. Eval Health Prof. 2004 Jun;27(2):119-51. doi: 10.1177/0163278704264049. Eval Health Prof. 2004. PMID: 15140291 Review.
-
Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
Peters JL, Mengersen KL. Peters JL, et al. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):941-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01010.x. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008. PMID: 19018929 Review.
Cited by
-
Rao HM, Yuditskaya S, Williamson JR, Vian TR, Lacirignola JJ, Shenk TE, Talavage TM, Heaton KJ, Quatieri TF. Rao HM, et al. Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 4;12:584684. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.584684. eCollection 2021. Front Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33746869 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement of oral chronic GVHD: results from the Chronic GVHD Consortium.
Treister N, Chai X, Kurland B, Pavletic S, Weisdorf D, Pidala J, Palmer J, Martin P, Inamoto Y, Arora M, Flowers M, Jacobsohn D, Jagasia M, Arai S, Lee SJ, Cutler C. Treister N, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Aug;48(8):1123-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.285. Epub 2013 Jan 28. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013. PMID: 23353804 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Intracranial Directed Connectivity Links Subregions of the Prefrontal Cortex to Major Depression.
Myers J, Xiao J, Mathura R, Shofty B, Pirtle V, Adkinson J, Allawala AB, Anand A, Gadot R, Najera R, Rey HG, Mathew SJ, Bijanki K, Banks G, Watrous A, Bartoli E, Heilbronner SR, Provenza N, Goodman WK, Pouratian N, Hayden BY, Sheth SA. Myers J, et al. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Aug 8:2024.08.07.24311546. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.07.24311546. medRxiv. 2024. PMID: 39148826 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Zhang D, Cui Y, Zhang X. Zhang D, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2019 Oct 3;10:1145. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01145. eCollection 2019. Front Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31636561 Free PMC article.
-
Zhang H, Sun Y, Zhang D, Zhang C, Chen G. Zhang H, et al. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Nov 23;12:72. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0251-x. eCollection 2018. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018. PMID: 30479658 Free PMC article.