History, objectivity, and the construction of molecular phylogenies - PubMed
History, objectivity, and the construction of molecular phylogenies
Edna Suárez-Díaz et al. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2008 Dec.
Abstract
Despite the promises made by molecular evolutionists since the early 1960s that phylogenies would be readily reconstructed using molecular data, the construction of molecular phylogenies has both retained many methodological problems of the past and brought up new ones of considerable epistemic relevance. The field is driven not only by changes in knowledge about the processes of molecular evolution, but also by an ever-present methodological anxiety manifested in the constant search for an increased objectivity-or in its converse, the avoidance of subjectivity. This paper offers an exhaustive account of the methodological and conceptual difficulties embedded in each of the steps required to elaborate molecular phytogenies. The authors adopt a historical perspective on the field in order to follow the development of practices that seek to increase the objectivity of their methods and representations. These include the adoption and development of explicit criteria for evaluation of evidence, and of procedures associated with methods of statistical inference, quantification and automation. All these are linked to an increasing use of computers in research since the mid 1960s. We will show that the practices of objectivity described are highly dependent on the problems and tools of molecular phylogenetics.
Similar articles
-
DRUIDS--detection of regions with unexpected internal deviation from stationarity.
Fedrigo O, Adams DC, Naylor GJ. Fedrigo O, et al. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2005 Mar 15;304(2):119-28. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21032. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2005. PMID: 15706597
-
Rooting the ribosomal tree of life.
Fournier GP, Gogarten JP. Fournier GP, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Aug;27(8):1792-801. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq057. Epub 2010 Mar 1. Mol Biol Evol. 2010. PMID: 20194428
-
Molecular evolution: concepts and the origin of disciplines.
Suárez-Díaz E. Suárez-Díaz E. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2009 Mar;40(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Feb 27. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2009. PMID: 19268873
-
Making room for new faces: evolution, genomics and the growth of bioinformatics.
Suárez-Díaz E. Suárez-Díaz E. Hist Philos Life Sci. 2010;32(1):65-89. Hist Philos Life Sci. 2010. PMID: 20848807 Review.
-
Fixed-parameter algorithms in phylogenetics.
Gramm J, Nickelsen A, Tantau T. Gramm J, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;452:507-35. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-159-2_24. Methods Mol Biol. 2008. PMID: 18566780 Review.
Cited by
-
Molecular Evolution in Historical Perspective.
Suárez-Díaz E. Suárez-Díaz E. J Mol Evol. 2016 Dec;83(5-6):204-213. doi: 10.1007/s00239-016-9772-6. Epub 2016 Dec 2. J Mol Evol. 2016. PMID: 27913843 Review.
-
How Phenograms and Cladograms Became Molecular Phylogenetic Trees.
Kranke N. Kranke N. J Hist Biol. 2024 Sep;57(3):423-443. doi: 10.1007/s10739-024-09782-8. Epub 2024 Aug 30. J Hist Biol. 2024. PMID: 39212876 Free PMC article.
-
Maxson Jones K, Ankeny RA, Cook-Deegan R. Maxson Jones K, et al. J Hist Biol. 2018 Dec;51(4):693-805. doi: 10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7. J Hist Biol. 2018. PMID: 30390178 Free PMC article.
-
The long and winding road of molecular data in phylogenetic analysis.
Suárez-Díaz E. Suárez-Díaz E. J Hist Biol. 2014 Fall;47(3):443-78. J Hist Biol. 2014. PMID: 25574534
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous