Distinct regions of right temporo-parietal junction are selective for theory of mind and exogenous attention - PubMed
Distinct regions of right temporo-parietal junction are selective for theory of mind and exogenous attention
Jonathan Scholz et al. PLoS One. 2009.
Abstract
In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, a cortical region in the right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ) is recruited when participants read stories about people's thoughts ('Theory of Mind'). Both fMRI and lesion studies suggest that a region near the RTPJ is associated with attentional reorienting in response to an unexpected stimulus. Do Theory of Mind and attentional reorienting recruit a single population of neurons, or are there two neighboring but distinct neural populations in the RTPJ? One recent study compared these activations, and found evidence consistent with a single common region. However, the apparent overlap may have been due to the low resolution of the previous technique. We tested this hypothesis using a high-resolution protocol, within-subjects analyses, and more powerful statistical methods. Strict conjunction analyses revealed that the area of overlap was small and on the periphery of each activation. In addition, a bootstrap analysis identified a reliable 6-10 mm spatial displacement between the peak activations of the two tasks; the same magnitude and direction of displacement was observed in within-subjects comparisons. In all, these results suggest that there are neighboring but distinct regions within the RTPJ implicated in Theory of Mind and orienting attention.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ce4a/4ce4a2dcf68f01ed42ac16c47548b902d80f3ae9" alt="Figure 1"
(A) Sample stimuli for the Theory of Mind task. The key contrast compares the brain response while participants read ‘Belief’ vs ‘Photo’ stories. (B) Four trial types in the attentional reorienting task. The key contrast compared the brain response while participants detect the target on Invalid, vs Valid, trials.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4628/b46286a0fda3496bda1cbcd329eb823d956dcb33" alt="Figure 2"
(A) Group activations for Belief – Photo (Red) and Invalid – Valid (Green), both
p<0.001 uncorrected, k>5. (B) Group activations with approximately matching numbers of voxels: Belief – Photo (Red, 82 voxels, p<0.0001, k>10) and Invalid – Valid (Green, 72 voxels, p<0.005, k>10). (C) Interaction of the two contrasts, ((Belief-Photo)-(Invalid-Valid)), p<0.01, k>10. All activations were superimposed on the inflated T1 canonical brain in SPM using the SurfRend toolbox.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcc86/fcc8650b05e7abc69e71c61b1c2d9d0c66d02791" alt="Figure 3"
(A) Distance between the peaks estimated by the bootstrap: attention region – Theory of Mind region. Bars show 99.9% confidence intervals (3.36 standard errors of the bootstrap mean). There was no reliable difference in the X (medial to lateral) or Y (anterior to posterior) axes, but the attention region was reliably 6–10 mm superior to the theory of mind region. (B) Histogram of the observed distance, on the Z dimension, between the Theory of Mind and attention regions, in the 150 non-parametric bootstrap samples. Positive values indicate that the attention peak was superior to the Theory of Mind peak.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66978/66978e168a854f4f75ab8c0a2a47460cdde1abda" alt="Figure 4"
Bars represent standard error of the mean.
Similar articles
-
Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind.
Mitchell JP. Mitchell JP. Cereb Cortex. 2008 Feb;18(2):262-71. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm051. Epub 2007 Jun 5. Cereb Cortex. 2008. PMID: 17551089
-
Young L, Dodell-Feder D, Saxe R. Young L, et al. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 May 12. Neuropsychologia. 2010. PMID: 20470808
-
Functional Heterogeneity and Convergence in the Right Temporoparietal Junction.
Lee SM, McCarthy G. Lee SM, et al. Cereb Cortex. 2016 Mar;26(3):1108-1116. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu292. Epub 2014 Dec 4. Cereb Cortex. 2016. PMID: 25477367 Free PMC article.
-
Krall SC, Rottschy C, Oberwelland E, Bzdok D, Fox PT, Eickhoff SB, Fink GR, Konrad K. Krall SC, et al. Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Mar;220(2):587-604. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0803-z. Epub 2014 Jun 11. Brain Struct Funct. 2015. PMID: 24915964 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Schurz M, Tholen MG, Perner J, Mars RB, Sallet J. Schurz M, et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Sep;38(9):4788-4805. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23675. Epub 2017 Jun 13. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017. PMID: 28608647 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A nexus model of the temporal-parietal junction.
Carter RM, Huettel SA. Carter RM, et al. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;17(7):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 20. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013. PMID: 23790322 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Peake SJ, Dishion TJ, Stormshak EA, Moore WE, Pfeifer JH. Peake SJ, et al. Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 15;82:23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.061. Epub 2013 May 24. Neuroimage. 2013. PMID: 23707590 Free PMC article.
-
Testing effects of social rejection on aggressive and prosocial behavior: A meta-analysis.
Quarmley M, Feldman J, Grossman H, Clarkson T, Moyer A, Jarcho JM. Quarmley M, et al. Aggress Behav. 2022 Nov;48(6):529-545. doi: 10.1002/ab.22026. Epub 2022 Mar 29. Aggress Behav. 2022. PMID: 35349722 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Deming P, Philippi CL, Wolf RC, Dargis M, Kiehl KA, Koenigs M. Deming P, et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Feb 28;18:575-581. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.029. eCollection 2018. Neuroimage Clin. 2018. PMID: 29845005 Free PMC article.
-
Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex activity predicts the accuracy in estimating others' preferences.
Kang P, Lee J, Sul S, Kim H. Kang P, et al. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 26;7:686. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00686. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 24324419 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fletcher PC, Happé F, Frith U, Baker SC, Dolan RJ, et al. Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition. 1995;57:109–128. - PubMed
-
- Saxe R, Kanwisher N. People thinking about thinking people: the role of the temporo-parietal junction in theory of mind. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1835–1842. - PubMed
-
- Perner J, Aichhorn M, Kronbichler M, Staffen W, Ladurner G. Thinking of mental and other representations: The roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction. Social Neuroscience. 2006;1:245–258. - PubMed
-
- Gobbini MI, Koralek AC, Bryan RE, Montgomery KJ, Haxby JV. Two Takes on the Social Brain: A Comparison of Theory of Mind Tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2007;19:1803–1814. - PubMed
-
- Saxe R, Wexler A. Making sense of another mind. The role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43:1391–1399. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources