Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry - PubMed
Review
Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry
Paul J Boersema et al. J Mass Spectrom. 2009 Jun.
Abstract
Reversible phosphorylation is a key event in many biological processes and is therefore a much studied phenomenon. The mass spectrometric (MS) analysis of phosphorylation is challenged by the substoichiometric levels of phosphorylation and the lability of the phosphate group in collision-induced dissociation (CID). Here, we review the fragmentation behaviour of phosphorylated peptides in MS and discuss several MS approaches that have been developed to improve and facilitate the analysis of phosphorylated peptides. CID of phosphopeptides typically results in spectra dominated by a neutral loss of the phosphate group. Several proposed mechanisms for this neutral loss and several factors affecting the extent at which this occurs are discussed. Approaches are described to interpret such neutral loss-dominated spectra to identify the phosphopeptide and localize the phosphorylation site. Methods using additional activation, such as MS(3) and multistage activation (MSA), have been designed to generate more sequence-informative fragments from the ion produced by the neutral loss. The characteristics and benefits of these methods are reviewed together with approaches using phosphopeptide derivatization or specific MS scan modes. Additionally, electron-driven dissociation methods by electron capture dissociation (ECD) or electron transfer dissociation (ETD) and their application in phosphopeptide analysis are evaluated. Finally, these techniques are put into perspective for their use in large-scale phosphoproteomics studies.
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Schroeder MJ, Shabanowitz J, Schwartz JC, Hunt DF, Coon JJ. Schroeder MJ, et al. Anal Chem. 2004 Jul 1;76(13):3590-8. doi: 10.1021/ac0497104. Anal Chem. 2004. PMID: 15228329
-
Advances in the analysis of protein phosphorylation.
Paradela A, Albar JP. Paradela A, et al. J Proteome Res. 2008 May;7(5):1809-18. doi: 10.1021/pr7006544. Epub 2008 Mar 8. J Proteome Res. 2008. PMID: 18327898 Review.
-
Wiesner J, Premsler T, Sickmann A. Wiesner J, et al. Proteomics. 2008 Nov;8(21):4466-83. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800329. Proteomics. 2008. PMID: 18972526 Review.
Cited by
-
Relevant phosphoproteomic and mass spectrometry: approaches useful in clinical research.
López E, Muñoz SR, Pascual JL, Madero L. López E, et al. Clin Transl Med. 2012 Mar 29;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2001-1326-1-2. Clin Transl Med. 2012. PMID: 23369602 Free PMC article.
-
Salih E, Siqueira WL, Helmerhorst EJ, Oppenheim FG. Salih E, et al. Anal Biochem. 2010 Dec 1;407(1):19-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Jul 24. Anal Biochem. 2010. PMID: 20659418 Free PMC article.
-
Phosphoproteomics for the masses.
Grimsrud PA, Swaney DL, Wenger CD, Beauchene NA, Coon JJ. Grimsrud PA, et al. ACS Chem Biol. 2010 Jan 15;5(1):105-19. doi: 10.1021/cb900277e. ACS Chem Biol. 2010. PMID: 20047291 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mischerikow N, Altelaar AF, Navarro JD, Mohammed S, Heck AJ. Mischerikow N, et al. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010 Oct;9(10):2140-8. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900619-MCP200. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010. PMID: 20233845 Free PMC article.
-
Large-scale phosphosite quantification in tissues by a spike-in SILAC method.
Monetti M, Nagaraj N, Sharma K, Mann M. Monetti M, et al. Nat Methods. 2011 Jul 10;8(8):655-8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1647. Nat Methods. 2011. PMID: 21743459
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources